Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain Demonstrate Increased Lumbopelvic Muscle Stiffness Compared to Asymptomatic Controls

Effectiveness of structured myofascial release in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of structured myofascial release techniques on symptoms in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on an expected effect size (d = 0.25), α = 0.05, β = 0.20, a minimum of 36 participants was calculated using G*Power for 80 % power. Although 52 were targeted considering 30 % attrition, 41 completed the study. We enrolled 41 participants with PD who were randomly classified into three groups: Structured myofascial release (MFG), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and training. All participants were evaluated 3 times: 1st measurement on the first day of the menstrual cycle (pre), 2nd measurement after treatment (post) and 3rd measurement 4 weeks after treatment (follow-up). Outcome measures; demographic information, McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form, Menstruation Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ), Functional and Emotional Measure of Dysmenorrhea (FEMD), and VAS questionnaire were applied. Pain threshold and muscle tension were measured.

RESULTS

While a significant difference was detected between the pre-post and pre-follow-up values in the pairwise comparisons of MC-1, MC-2, MC-3, and MC-4 values in the MFG group, a significant difference was detected between the pre-post and pre-follow-up MC-1, MC-2, and MC-4 values in the TENS and training groups (p < 0.05). Key outcome differences included a 30 % reduction in MPQ-SF scores in the MFG group (p < 0.001). In all groups, a significant difference was found between the three time-dependent measurements of the MSQ and FEMD values (Pre, Post, Follow-up) (p < 0.05). The mean Follow-up Myoton was 3.63 ± 0.33 in the MFG group, 4.49 ± 0.49 in the TENS group and 4.89 ± 0.57 in the Training group. A significant difference was found between the three time-dependent measurements of Myoton and VAS values (Pre, Post, and Follow-up of the individuals in the MFG group) (*F = 46.600; *χ2 = 25.739; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MFG group demonstrated superior efficacy to the TENS and training groups in alleviating dysmenorrheic pain, enhancing pain threshold, reducing dysmenorrhea symptoms, and decreasing lower abdominal tension. This effect persisted during the follow-up period, 4 weeks post-treatment.

Influence of High-Impact Physical Activity on Pelvic Floor and Lumbar Muscle Mechanical Properties in Asymptomatic Nulliparous Women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

High-impact physical activity is a known risk factor for the development of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in women, affecting the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). However, there is insufficient information to determine whether alterations in PFMs, or even in the lumbar muscles, can be detected before the onset of symptoms. The aim of the study was to identify whether high-impact physical activity influences the muscle mechanical properties (MMPs) of the lumbopelvic region in continent nulliparous women.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study with a nonprobabilistic sampling of consecutive cases was designed. Fifty women who had practiced high-impact physical activity at least three times per week for more than 2 years were included in the high-impact group, and 50 women who did not practice high-impact activity were included in the control group. Data collection for both groups included sociodemographic data and MMPs (frequency, characterizing muscle tone; stiffness; logarithmic decrement, characterizing the inverse of the elasticity; relaxation time of stress; creep, characterizing fluidity) of PFMs and lumbar muscles, externally assessed using a hand-held tonometer device. Between-group comparison of the MMPs were calculated, together with intragroup correlations between the outcomes.

RESULTS

The MMPs of PFMs showed statistically significant lower tone (0.76 Hz, 95% CI 0.04, 1.48) and stiffness (23.76 N/m, 95% CI 1.10, 46.42) and were more viscoelastic (relaxation: -1.04 ms, 95% CI -1.98, -0.11; creep: -0.04 De, 95% CI -0.07, -0.02) in women who practiced high-impact physical activity. No lumbar MMPs showed statistically significant between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS

High-impact physical activity alters the MMPs of PFMs in nulliparous women, although not lumbar spinal MMPs, even before the appearance of signs.

Central mechanisms of muscle tone regulation: implications for pain and performance

Muscle tone represents a foundational property of the motor system with the potential to impact musculoskeletal pain and motor performance. Muscle tone is involuntary, dynamically adaptive, interconnected across the body, sensitive to postural demands, and distinct from voluntary control. Research has historically focused on pathological tone, peripheral regulation, and contributions from passive tissues, without consideration of the neural regulation of active tone and its consequences, particularly for neurologically healthy individuals. Indeed, simplistic models based on the stretch reflex, which neglect the central regulation of tone, are still perpetuated today. Recent advances regarding tone are dispersed across different literatures, including animal physiology, pain science, motor control, neurology, and child development. This paper brings together diverse areas of research to construct a conceptual model of the neuroscience underlying active muscle tone. It highlights how multiple tonic drive networks tune the excitability of complex spinal feedback circuits in concert with various sources of sensory feedback and in relation to postural demands, gravity, and arousal levels. The paper also reveals how tonic muscle activity and excitability are disrupted in people with musculoskeletal pain and how tone disorders can lead to marked pain and motor impairment. The paper presents evidence that integrative somatic methods address the central regulation of tone and discusses potential mechanisms and implications for tone rehabilitation to improve pain and performance.

Pelvic floor muscle electrical coupling in chronic pelvic pain: Insights into pathophysiology and botulinum toxin treatment effects

This study aimed to assess the electrical coupling between both pelvic floor muscle (PFM) sides (two-sided coupling) and within individual PFM sides (one-sided coupling) in chronic pelvic pain (CPP) before and after botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) treatment. Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals were recorded from the left and right PFM of 24 patients (P) with CPP before and after being treated with BoNT/A (Weeks 0,8,12,24). Recordings were also made in 24 healthy women (H). PFM two-sided and one-sided coupling was evaluated during contractions by the cross-correlation (CC) and the imaginary part of coherency (iCOH) of their sEMG signals. Significant differences between their values were assessed comparing P(0) vs. P(8,12,24) and H vs. P(0,8,12,24). This study showed that PFM two-sided coupling is similar across groups before treatment, while PFM one-sided coupling on the patients' most painful side is deranged before and also after BoNT/A treatment: amplitude coupling is lower (iCOH) than healthy women's. This could be justified by altered neuromotor control strategies developed as an adaptation to muscle pain, structural and electrical changes in PFM, and alterations in their innervation pattern, which may influence the onset, perpetuation, or recurrence of CPP after treatment.

Is musculoskeletal pain associated with increased muscle stiffness? Evidence map and critical appraisal of muscle measurements using shear wave elastography

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Approximately 21% of the world's population suffers from musculoskeletal conditions, often associated with sensations of stiff muscles. Targeted therapy requires knowing whether typically involved muscles are objectively stiffer compared to asymptomatic individuals. Muscle stiffness is quantified using ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE). Publications on SWE-based comparisons of muscle stiffness between individuals with and without musculoskeletal pain are increasing rapidly. This work reviewed and mapped the existing evidence regarding objectively measured muscle stiffness in musculoskeletal pain conditions and surveyed current methods of applying SWE to measure muscle stiffness.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL using the keywords "muscle stiffness", "shear wave elastography", "pain", "asymptomatic controls" and synonyms. The search was supplemented by a hand search using Google Scholar. Included articles were critically appraised with the AXIS tool, supplemented by items related to SWE methods. Results were visually mapped and narratively described.

RESULTS

Thirty of 137 identified articles were included. High-quality evidence was missing. The results comprise studies reporting lower stiffness in symptomatic participants, no differences between groups and higher stiffness in symptomatic individuals. Results differed between pain conditions and muscles, and also between studies that examined the same muscle(s) and pathology. The methods of the application of SWE were inconsistent and the reporting was often incomplete.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing evidence regarding the objective stiffness of muscles in musculoskeletal pain conditions is conflicting. Methodological differences may explain most of the inconsistencies between findings. Methodological standards for SWE measurements of muscles are urgently required.

Investigating the lumbar proprioception and core muscles recruitment pattern while getting up from a chair with weight lifting in patients with chronic functional constipation: cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Patients with chronic functional constipation have some problems such as weakness of pelvic floor muscles, and a lack of coordination of pelvic floor and abdominal muscles has been seen. The goal of this study was to investigate the lumbar proprioception and the core muscle recruitment pattern.

METHODS

The study type is a cross-sectional case-control study. There were 30 participants (case, n = 15, and control, n = 15). Electromyography of the core muscles was recorded while the subjects were getting up from the chair accompanied by lifting a weight, to check the pattern of muscle recruitment. Moreover, the lumbar proprioception was evaluated by an isokinetic device in both groups. The study was analyzed using independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test, and a nonparametric Friedman test was performed followed by Bonferroni pairwise comparison.

RESULTS

The comparison of muscle activity delay between the two groups showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the abdominal muscles, anal sphincter, and erector spinae (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the rectus femoris and gluteal muscles between the two groups (p > 0.05). Moreover, the proprioception of the lumbar region showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that the lumbar proprioception sense was reduced in the case group. This result can be justified, based on the problems in constipation (lack of coordination of muscles, weakness of pelvic floor muscles). The coordination of core muscles changed in patients with chronic functional constipation during a functional task.

Between-sexes differences in lumbopelvic muscle mechanical properties of non-climacteric adults: a cross-sectional design

The lumbopelvic muscle mechanical properties (MMPs) are clinically relevant, but their dependence on sex remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to identify if lumbopelvic MMPs depend on the sex in a young adult population. Thirty-five healthy nulliparous women and 35 healthy men were analyzed (age range: 18-50). Lumbopelvic MMPs, that is, tone, stiffness, elasticity, relaxation and creep, assessed with MyotonPRO®, and pelvic floor (PF) health questionnaires were compared between-sexes. Intra-group correlations between sociodemographic and clinical data, and MMPs were also determined. The MMPs of PF were different between healthy non-climacteric adults of both sexes, with women showing higher values of tone and stiffness and lower values of elasticity and viscoelastic properties than men (in all cases, p < 0.03). At lumbar level, tone and stiffness were higher for men at both sides (in all cases, p < 0.04), and relaxation was lower at left side (p = 0.02). The MMPs showed few correlations with sociodemographic data within women. However, within males, there were positive correlations for PF stiffness and viscoelastic parameters with age, BMI and function (0.334 < r < 0.591) and, at lumbar level, negative correlations for tone and stiffness ( - 0.385 < r < -0.590) and positive correlations for viscoelastic properties (0.564 < r < 0.719), with BMI. This indicated that between-sexes differences of lumbopelvic MMPs depend on the specific location of assessment in healthy non-obese young individuals. Women show higher tone and stiffness and lower elasticity and viscoelasticity than men, at PF level.