The Risk of Infertility After Surgery for Benign Ovarian Cysts

The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents

The majority of abdominal masses in female children derive from the ovaries. Ovarian masses in pediatric populations can vary from simple functional cysts to malignant neoplasms. Their incidence, clinical presentation, and histological distribution vary across age groups. In the assessment of ovarian masses in children, the primary aim is to determine the probability of malignancy, as the treatment approaches for benign and malignant lesions are significantly distinct. The primary imaging tool for evaluating ovarian cysts and masses is ultrasound, which can assess the size, location, and characteristics of masses. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) may be used for further evaluation if ultrasound findings are inconclusive or if malignancy is suspected, especially in older adolescents. Serum markers may be considered in older adolescents to help assess the risk of malignancy, though it is less useful in younger populations due to normal developmental variations. Many functional ovarian cysts, especially those detected in fetuses or infants, often resolve spontaneously without intervention. Surgical intervention is indicated in cases of large cysts that cause symptoms, or if there are concerns for malignancy. Common procedures include primarily ovarian sparing laparoscopy or laparotomy. Complications like torsion, rupture, or hemorrhage may require urgent surgical intervention. Treatment should be performed in specialized centers to avoid unnecessary oophorectomies and ensure the best possible outcome for the patient. This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian masses in the pediatric population. Emphasis is placed on the particularities of the lesions and their management in relation to age subgroups.

Surgical Technique and Fertility Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Open and Laparoscopic Cystectomy in Women of Reproductive Age

Cystectomy, the surgical removal of ovarian tissue, is commonly performed in women of reproductive age to address conditions such as ovarian cysts, endometriosis, and tumors. The choice of surgical technique, open versus laparoscopic, has significant implications for postoperative recovery and long-term fertility outcomes. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the current literature on the effects of these two surgical approaches on fertility in women of reproductive age. Open cystectomy, while effective, is associated with larger incisions, increased trauma to surrounding reproductive structures, and a higher incidence of postoperative complications, which may negatively impact future fertility. In contrast, laparoscopic cystectomy offers a minimally invasive option that generally results in less postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and potentially improved fertility outcomes due to reduced damage to surrounding tissues. However, the literature reveals a complex interplay between surgical technique, underlying medical conditions, and individual patient factors that can influence reproductive potential. This review synthesizes key studies comparing the fertility outcomes of both surgical methods, highlighting the need for individualized surgical planning based on each patient's unique circumstances and reproductive goals. Additionally, it discusses the importance of preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approaches to optimize patient outcomes. Future research is essential to further clarify the long-term fertility implications of open and laparoscopic cystectomy and to refine surgical techniques to enhance reproductive health. This review contributes to the growing body of evidence guiding clinicians in making informed decisions that prioritize the effective treatment of ovarian pathology and fertility preservation.

MRI Evaluation and Characterization of Ovarian Lesions Based on Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI

Background Managing ovarian lesions requires differentiating between benign and malignant cases. The development of a multiparametric MRI approach combining anatomical and functional criteria has led to the creation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI scoring system, which enhances diagnostic accuracy. Objectives To study ovarian lesions and their characteristics, along with their risk stratification based on MRI O-RADS. Methods  A prospective study used the O-RADS MRI criteria to categorize ovarian lesions. Clinical findings and MRI results were compared with histopathological outcomes to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results We identified abdominal pain as the most prevalent clinical finding among our cases (64, 91.43%), followed by a lump in the abdomen (33, 47.5%), dysmenorrhea (33, 47.5%), bleeding per vaginal (15, 21.43%), and weight loss (11, 15.71%). A total of 80 ovarian lesions were examined and characterized on the basis of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system. Among the 80 ovarian lesions, 54 were histopathologically confirmed ovarian lesions (39 (72.22%) were benign, and 15 (27.77%) were malignant). The most common benign lesions were ovarian serous cystadenoma (28.20%) and ovarian mucinous cystadenoma (20.51%), while the most common malignant lesions were serous carcinoma (33.33%) and mucinous carcinoma (20%). Using the O-RADS MRI scoring system, we categorized six lesions (7.5%) as O-RADS 1 (all benign), 34 lesions (42.50%) as O-RADS 2 (32 benign and 2 malignant), 24 lesions (30%) as O-RADS 3 (23 benign and 1 malignant), seven lesions (8.75%) as O-RADS 4 (four benign and three malignant), and nine lesions (11.25%) as O-RADS 5 (all malignant). Our findings revealed significant differences in the size of lesions, the presence of thick septa, high T2-weighted signal intensity within solid tissue, and patterns of solid component enhancement and wall irregularity between malignant and benign lesions. The MRI cut-off score of ≥4 for malignancy demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.59%, a specificity of 97.5%, an accuracy of 97.62%, a positive predictive value of 94.5%, and a negative predictive value of 97.5%. The positive likelihood ratio was 32.7, while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.025. These results affirm the high diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS MRI scoring system in distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Conclusion The O-RADS MRI score is a highly accurate tool for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Its application can significantly enhance the management and treatment outcomes for patients with adnexal masses. The study confirms the scoring system's high sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy.

O-RADS MRI scoring system: key points for correct application in inexperienced hands

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of the O-RADS MRI criteria in the stratification of risk of malignancy of solid or sonographically indeterminate ovarian masses and assess the interobserver agreement of this classification between experienced and inexperienced radiologists.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included patients from 2019 to 2022 with sonographically indeterminate or solid ovarian masses who underwent MRI with a specific protocol for characterisation according to O-RADS MRI specifications. Each study was evaluated using O-RADS lexicon by two radiologists, one with 17 years of experience in gynaecological radiology and another with 4 years of experience in general radiology. Findings were classified as benign, borderline, or malignant according to histology or stability over time. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with US indeterminate or solid adnexal masses were included. Fifty-seven (31%) did not have ovarian masses, classified as O-RADS 1. The diagnostic performance for scores 2-5 was excellent with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 97.4%, 100%, 96.2%, and 100%, respectively by the experienced radiologist and 96.1%, 92.0%, 93.9%, and 94.8% by the inexperienced radiologist. Interobserver concordance was very high (Kappa index 0.92). Almost all the misclassified cases were due to misinterpretation of the classification similar to reports in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI determined by either experienced or inexperienced radiologists is excellent, facilitating decision-making with high diagnostic accuracy and high reproducibility. Knowledge of this classification and use of assessment tools could avoid frequent errors due to misinterpretation.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Up to 31% of ovarian masses are considered indeterminate by transvaginal US and 32% of solid lesions considered malignant by transvaginal US are benign. The O-RADs MRI accurately classifies these masses, even when used by inexperienced radiologists, thereby avoiding incorrect surgical approaches.

KEY POINTS

• O-RADS MRI accurately classifies indeterminate and solid ovarian masses by ultrasound. • There is excellent interobserver agreement between experienced and non-experienced radiologists. • O-RADS MRI is a helpful tool to assess clinical decision-making in ovarian tumours.

O-RADS MRI SCORE: An Essential First-Step Tool for the Characterization of Adnexal Masses

The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system on magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score is now a well-established tool to characterize pelvic gynecological masses based on their likelihood of malignancy. The main added value of O-RADS MRI over O-RADS US is to correctly reclassify lesions that were considered suspicious on US as benign on MRI. The crucial issue when characterizing an adnexal mass is to determine the presence/absence of solid tissue and thus need to perform gadolinium injection. O-RADS MR score was built on a multivariate analysis and must be applied as a step-by-step analysis: 1) Is the mass an adnexal mass? 2) Is there an associated peritoneal carcinomatosis? 3) Is there any significant amount of fatty content? 4) Is there any wall enhancement? 5) Is there any internal enhancement? 6) When an internal enhancement is detected, does the internal enhancement correspond to solid tissue or not? 7) Is the solid tissue malignant? With its high value to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses and its high reproducibility, the O-RADS MRI score could be a valuable tool for timely referral of a patient to an expert center for the treatment of ovarian cancers. Finally, to make a precise diagnosis allowing optimal personalized treatment, the radiologist in gynecological imaging will combine the O-RADS MRI score with many other clinical, biological, and other MR criteria to suggest a pathological hypothesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.