Population-Based Linked Longitudinal Surveillance of Pregnant People and Their Infants: A Critical Resource for Emerging, Re-Emerging, and Persistent Threats

A statewide system for maternal-infant linked longitudinal surveillance: Indiana's model for improving maternal and child health

Indiana, located in the Midwest region of the United States, faces significant challenges with respect to health, especially maternal and child health (MCH). These challenges include high rates of stillbirth, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and congenital syphilis (CS). Not only are these often-fatal conditions underreported, but it can also be difficult to track them longitudinally, as mothers and infants are not routinely linked through electronic health records (EHRs). This paper describes the process, structure and planned outcomes of a partnership between Indiana University, Regenstrief Institute and public health partners in support of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pregnant People-Infant Linked Longitudinal Surveillance (PILLARS) program. Together, academic, clinical and public health organisations are collaboratively developing an infrastructure and deploying novel methods to surveil stillbirth, CS and NAS longitudinally. The infrastructure includes: (a) deploying deterministic and probabilistic algorithms to link mothers and their infants using multiple, linked data sources; (b) creating and maintaining a registry of maternal-infant dyads; (c) using the registry to perform longitudinal surveillance in collaboration with Indiana public health authorities on stillbirth, NAS and CS and (d) translating information from surveillance activities into action by collaborating with public health and community-based organisations to improve and implement prevention activities in vulnerable Indiana communities. Our long-term goal is to improve outcomes for these conditions and other priority MCH outcomes by expanding our work to additional MCH use cases.

Planning for the future of maternal immunization: Building on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

As the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, the clinical and public health community raced to understand SARS-CoV-2 infection and develop life-saving vaccines. Pregnant persons were disproportionately impacted, experiencing more severe illness and adverse pregnancy outcomes. And yet, when COVID-19 vaccines became available in late 2020, safety and efficacy data were not available to inform their use during pregnancy because pregnant persons were excluded from pre-authorization clinical trials. Concerns about vaccine safety during pregnancy and misinformation linking vaccination and infertility circulated widely, creating a lack of vaccine confidence. Many pregnant people initially chose not to get vaccinated, and while vaccination rates rose after safety and effectiveness data became available, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was suboptimal and varied across racial and ethnic distribution of the pregnant population. The COVID-19 pandemic experience provided valuable insights that can inform current and future approaches to maternal vaccination against.

Neonatal-perinatal collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic required perinatal clinicians to address the individual medical needs of the pregnant person and the fetus as well as the interdependent considerations of the maternal/newborn dyad. Regional, national and international collaborative groups utilized existing structures and in some cases, formed new partnerships to rapidly collect perinatal information. The urgent need to care for at-risk and infected pregnant persons required these groups to develop practical approaches to collect the data needed to safely inform practice. Here we will summarize the findings of five collaborative studies that leveraged differing methods to inform perinatal pandemic care.