Chief resident experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Critical View of Safety Dissection and Rouviere's Sulcus for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Descriptive Study

Objective: To determine the importance of a critical view of safety (CVS) techniques and Rouviere's sulcus (RS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and its relation to biliary duct injuries (BDIs) and to determine the frequency and the type of RS. Design, Setting, and Participants: A descriptive study was carried out among 76 patients presenting to the surgery department of a tertiary care center in Nepal. The study population included all patients in the age group 16-80 years undergoing LC. Outcome Measures: The main outcome of interest was to calculate the percentage of BDIs along with the frequency and the type of RS. Results: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study, out of which 57(75%) were female patients with a male-to-female ratio of 1:3 and a mean age of 45.87 ± 15.33 years. Seventy-one (93.4%) patients were diagnosed with symptomatic gallstone disease. The CVS was achieved in 75 (98.7%) of the cases, whereas in 1 case, the CVS could not be achieved, and in the same patient routine LC was converted into open cholecystectomy owing to the difficult laparoscopic procedure. In 56 (73.7%) cases, RS was first visible to the operating surgeons after port installation, alignment, and adequate traction of the gallbladder; in 20 (26.3%) cases, RS was not originally apparent. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study and the literature's critical assessment of safety, this method will soon become a gold standard for dissecting gall bladder components. The technique needs to be extended further, especially for training purposes. Major difficulties can be avoided by identifying RS before cutting the cystic artery or duct during LC.

Is laparoscopy a risk factor for bile duct injury during cholecystectomy?

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, obesity, insurance status, and hospital volume were not associated with an increased risk of bile duct injury.

Background and Objectives:

Previously, risk factors for bile duct injury have been identified as acute cholecystitis, male gender, older age, aberrant biliary anatomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2006 was performed with an inclusion criterion of cholecystectomy performed on hospital day 0 or 1. Patient- and hospital-level factors potentially associated with bile duct injury were examined by logistic regression.

Results:

A total of 377,424 cholecystectomy patients were identified. There were 1124 bile duct injuries (0.30%), with 177 (0.06%) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 947 (1.46%) in the open cholecystectomy group (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for bile duct injury were male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–1.38; P = .006), age >60 years (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.61–3.09; P < .001), and academic hospital status (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05–1.79; P = .02). Acute cholecystitis was associated with a lower risk of bile duct injury (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46–0.99; P = .044).

Conclusion:

Independent risk factors for bile duct injury included male gender, age >60 years, and academic hospital status. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, obesity, insurance status, or hospital volume was not associated with an increased risk of bile duct injury.

Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries

BACKGROUND

Little is known about surgeon characteristics associated with common bile duct injury (CBDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Risk-taking preferences can influence physician behavior and practice. We evaluated self-reported differences in characteristics and risk-taking preference among surgeons with and without a reported history of CBDI.

STUDY DESIGN

A mailed survey was sent to 4,100 general surgeons randomly selected from the mailing list of the American College of Surgeons. Surveys with a valid exclusion (retired, no LC experience) were considered responsive, but were excluded from data analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent responded (1,412 surveys analyzed), 37.7% reported being the primary surgeon when a CBDI occurred, and 12.9% had more than one injury. Surgeons reporting an injury were slightly older (52.8 +/- 9.0 years versus 51.3 +/- 9.8 years; p < 0.004) and in practice longer (20.8 +/- 9.7 years versus 18.9 +/- 10.5 years; p < 0.001). Surgeons not reporting a CBDI were more likely trained in LC during residency (63.3% versus 55.4% injuring) as compared with surgeons reporting a CBDI, who were more likely trained at an LC course (29.8% versus 38.2%). Surgeons in academic practice or who work with residents had lower reported rates of CBDI (7.9% versus 14.5% [academics]; 18.7% versus 25.0% [residents]). Mean risk score was 12.4 +/- 4.4 (range 6 to 30 [30 = highest]) with a similar average between those who did (12.2 +/- 4.5) and did not (11.9 +/- 4.4) report a CBDI (p < 0.23). Compared with surgeons in the lowest three deciles of risk score, relative risk for CBDI among surgeons in the upper three deciles was 17% greater (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

More years performing LC and certain practice characteristics were associated with an increased rate of CBDI. The impact of extremes of risk-taking preference on surgical decision making can be an important part of decreasing adverse events during LC and should be evaluated.

Perioperative outcomes and complications related to teaching residents and fellows in scoliosis surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Single-surgeon retrospective case series of 303 consecutive operative patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for IS as a function of the experience level of the surgical assistant.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The experience level of the surgical assistant, who is often a resident or fellow, has never before been evaluated as an independent factor in predicting perioperative outcomes and morbidity in scoliosis surgery. We hypothesize that there is no difference in perioperative outcomes with varying experience level of the surgical assistant.

METHODS

We evaluated the clinical, radiographic, and operative records from 303 consecutive operative patients from consecutive patients with IS. Group I was comprised of residents or spine fellows as assistants (teaching service, n = 175), and Group II consisted of junior or senior attendings as assistants (private practice service, n = 128). Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between experience level of the assistant and curve correction, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, transfusions, and length of stay.

RESULTS

In the posterior spinal fusion group (PSF, n = 164), there were no statistically significant differences in operative times between Groups I and II. Group I operative time was significantly increased, however, in patients undergoing anterior spinal surgery (ASF, P = 0.01), video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (P = 0.0004), and combined anterior/posterior surgeries (ASF/PSF, P = 0.0063). There were no differences in EBL in ASF, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or PSF surgeries, however, Group I had significantly higher EBL in the ASF/PSF group (P = 0.0016). No group differences were detected with respect to curve correction, transfusion rates, length of stay, or early complication rates.

CONCLUSION

The experience level of surgical assistant had little bearing on perioperative morbidity or radiographic outcomes in scoliosis surgery. Marginally increased operative times and EBL, without an increase in transfusions or complications, is an acceptably safe tradeoff for educating orthopedic residents and fellows.

Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Resident participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is important for education but increases the time of operation. This time cost in training programs is not well-defined, and available data show no decrease in operative time as residents progress in training. We undertook this study to determine the effect of the resident and attending surgeon seniority on the operative performance of LC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of LCs performed for all indications over two academic years in our training program. Operations were performed by junior (PGY 1-3) or senior (PGY 4-5) residents, assisted by junior (trained after 1994) or senior attending surgeons, none of whom had fellowship training in advanced laparoscopy. Demographics, surgeon, assistant, operative time, and operative complications were recorded. Operative diagnoses were defined as noninflammatory (biliary colic, dyskinesia, or polyps) or inflammatory (cholecystitis, pancreatitis). The primary outcome was time in minutes from skin incision to closure; secondary outcomes were complications and conversions to laparotomy. ANOVA, Student's t-test, and chi2 tests were used as appropriate with statistical significance attributed to P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifteen LCs were performed. Two hundred seventy were without conversion to laparotomy or intraoperative cholangiography and were included in time and complication analysis. Junior attendings averaged 4 and senior attendings averaged 21 postresidency years. No differences were found on univariate analysis between groups in demographics or diagnosis category. Operative times were longer for junior residents irrespective of attending seniority: Jr Res/Jr Staff (n = 65): 86 +/- 32 min; Jr/Sr (n = 78): 88 +/- 38 min; Sr/Jr (n = 52): 73 +/- 27 min; Sr/Sr (n = 75): 67 +/- 24 min (P < 0.05). The overall rate of operative complications was higher in junior than senior resident cases (5.6% versus 0.78%, P < 0.05). The most common complication was cystic duct leak, of which 4/5 occurred in junior resident cases. Senior attendings had a trend toward increased conversions (8.4% versus 3.7%, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Resident, but not attending surgeon, seniority influences operative time and complication rate in LC. This information may help surgical educators maximize both resident learning and operative efficiency and safety.

Spine infections: variations in incidence during the academic year

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective analysis of variations in monthly spinal infection rates at a spinal cord injury center with resident and fellow involvement in surgical care.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between resident and fellow participation in spinal surgery and the incidence of perioperative wound infection over the academic year.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It has been hypothesized that resident and fellow participation in surgical procedures may account for increased wound complications. Previous spinal infection studies have not addressed variations in the incidence of perioperative wound infections over the academic year.

METHODS

All cases of postoperative spinal infections at a spinal cord injury center from January 1994 through December 1997 were analyzed to determine whether monthly variations reflect the changes in surgical house officer experience through the academic year.

RESULTS

A statistically significant (P < 0.027) increase in the incidence of spinal infection was demonstrated for the month of January. No other significant variations in the monthly incidence of spinal infection existed. No significant differences were found when the data were analyzed: year-to-year (P < 0.727), season-to-season (P < 0.204), 4-month resident rotation (P < 0.061), and 6-month fellow rotation (P < 0.075).

CONCLUSION

A significantly higher incidence of spinal infection (10.5%) was observed for the month of January. Because January does not represent the start of a new resident or fellow rotation, there appears to be no association between the incidence of perioperative spinal wound infections and the level of experience of the surgical house officers in a regional spinal cord injury center.

Postgraduate year does not influence operating time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical resident education may contribute to increased operating time, thus increasing costs at teaching institutions. It is possible that junior residents, in particular, with less experience could contribute to longer operating times for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that all general surgery residents, regardless of level of training and with proper supervision, could complete a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a safe and timely fashion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed using data collected from laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed under the supervision of one attending surgeon over a 2-year period. Operating times were recorded, the operating surgeon was identified, and cases were assigned an acuity level based on pathologic findings. Operative times were compared after dividing surgeons into three groups (junior residents, senior residents, and staff).

RESULTS

Seventy-one cases were entered into the study. There were no differences when comparing mean operating times among the three groups (P = 0.2, analysis of variance). The pathologic acuity in each group was similar (P = 0.8, Fisher's exact test). There was a difference when evaluating the operating times for the pathologic level of acuity (P = 0.002, Kruskal-Wallis test).

CONCLUSIONS

Resident level does not affect the operating time in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The pathologic acuity of the gallbladders was distributed similarly for all three groups. There was a difference in mean operating time based on pathologic acuity. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed in a safe and efficient manner at a teaching institution.

Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether surgical residency training has influenced the occurrence of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and to asses the anatomic and technical details of bile duct injuries from the practices of surgeons trained in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after residency versus surgeons trained in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Shortly after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the rate of injury to the common bile duct increased to 0.5%, and injuries were more commonly reported early in each surgeon's experience. It is not known whether learning laparoscopic cholecystectomy during surgery residency influences this pattern.

METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to 3,657 surgeons across the United States who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency between 1980 and 1990 (group A) or 1992 and 1998 (group B). All surgeons in group A learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy after residency, and all those in group B learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency. Information obtained included practice description, number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency, postgraduate training in laparoscopy, and annual volume of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the surgeon's hospital. In addition, technical details queried included the completion of a cholangiogram, the interval between injury and identification, the method of repair, and the site of definitive treatment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (bile leaks without a major bile duct injury were not tabulated).

RESULTS

Forty-five percent (n = 1,661) of the questionnaires were completed and returned. Mean practice experience was 13.6 years for group A and 5.4 years for group B. At least one injury occurrence was reported by 422 surgeons (37.6%) in group A and 143 surgeons (26.5%) in group B. Forty percent of the injuries in group A occurred during the first 50 cases compared with 22% in group B. Thirty percent of bile duct injuries in group A and 32.9% of all injuries in group B occurred after a surgeon had performed more than 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Independent of the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency, group A surgeons were 39% more likely to report one or more biliary injuries and 58% more likely to report two or more injuries than their counterparts in group B. Bile duct injuries were more likely to be discovered during surgery if a cholangiogram was completed than if cholangiography was omitted (80.9% vs. 45.1%). Sixty-four percent of all major bile duct injuries required biliary reconstruction, and most injuries were definitively treated at the hospital where the injury occurred. Only 14.7% of injuries were referred to another center for repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Accepting that the survey bias underestimates the true frequency of bile duct injuries, residency training decreases the likelihood of injuring a bile duct, but only by decreasing the frequency of early "learning curve" injuries. If one accepts a liberal definition of the learning curve (200 cases), it appears that at least one third of injuries are not related to inexperience but may reflect fundamental errors in the technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as practiced by a broad population of surgeons in the United States. Intraoperative cholangiography is helpful for intraoperative discovery of injuries when they occur. Most injuries are repaired in the hospital where they occur and are not universally referred to tertiary care centers.