Laparoscopic repair of paracolostomy hernia

Other Surgeries in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will often require abdominal surgical intervention for indications not directly related to their IBD. Because these patients often have a history of multiple previous abdominal operations and/or ostomies, they are at increased risk for incisional and parastomal hernias. They may also have develop symptomatic cholelithiasis, chronic pain, or desmoid disease. All of these potentially surgical issues may require special consideration in the IBD population.

Single-port laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with modified sugarbaker technique

Single-port laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with a modified Sugarbaker technique is suggested to be feasible and safe and provides an alternative to multi-port surgery.

Introduction:

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with modified Sugarbaker technique has become increasingly the operation of choice because of its low recurrence rates. This study aimed to assess feasibility, safety, and efficiency of performing the same operation with single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Materials and Methods:

All patients referred from March 2010 to February 2013 were considered for single-port laparoscopic repair with modified Sugarbaker technique. A SILS port (Covidien, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA) was used together with conventional straight dissecting instruments and a 5.5- mm/52-cm/30° laparoscope. Important technical aspects include modified dissection techniques, namely, “inline” and “chopsticks” to overcome loss of triangulation, insertion of a urinary catheter into an ostomy for ostomy limb identification, safe adhesiolysis by avoiding electocautery, saline -jet dissection to demarcate tissue planes, dissection of an entire laparotomy scar to expose incidental incisional hernias, adequate mobilization of an ostomy limb for lateralization, and wide overlapping of defect with antiadhesive mesh.

Results:

Of 6 patients, 5 underwent single-port laparoscopic repair, and 1 (whose body mass index [BMI] of 39.4 kg/m² did not permit SILS port placement) underwent multiport repair. Mean defect size was 10 cm, and mean mesh size was 660 cm² with 4 patients having incidental incisional hernias repaired by the same mesh. Mean operation time was 270 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 4 days. Appliance malfunction ceased immediately, and pain associated with parastomal hernia disappeared. There was no recurrence with a follow-up of 2 to 36 months.

Conclusion:

Compared with multiport repair, single-port laparoscopic parastomal repair with modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and efficient, and it may eventually become the standard of care.

Laparoscopic repair of parastomal and incisional hernias with a modified Sugarbaker technique

A parastomal hernia is the most common surgical complication following stoma formation. As the field of laparoscopic surgery advances, different laparoscopic approaches to repair of parastomal hernias have been developed. Recently, the Sugarbaker technique has been reported to have lower recurrence rates compared to keyhole techniques. As far as we know, the Sugarbaker technique has not yet been performed in Korea. We herein present a case report of perhaps the first laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with a modified Sugarbaker technique to be successfully carried out in Korea. A 79-year-old woman, who underwent an abdominoperineal resection for an adenocarcinoma of the rectum 9 years ago, presented with a large parastomal and incisional hernias, and was treated with a laparoscopic repair with a modified Sugarbaker technique. Six months after surgery, follow-up with the patient has shown no evidence of recurrence.

Laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia repair: a retrospective case series at a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Paracolostomy hernias are one of the most common complications of stomas. Primary repair is associated with a high rate of recurrence. The choice is between mesh-reinforced repair of the defect and relocation of the stoma to another position. The laparoscopic approach seems attractive, as it is minimally invasive, requires shorter hospitalization, and the entry is through a noncontaminated part of the abdomen.

STUDY DESIGN

This study consists of a case series of 9 patients with paracolostomy hernia, of which 2 had recurrent hernias. All patients presenting with nonobstructed parastomal hernias at our clinic between October 2006 and October 2009 are included in this series. Two patients that presented with obstruction are not included. We describe our technique for this surgery using the laparoscopic approach and discuss the outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine patients with permanent colostomies in the left lumbar quadrant after abdominoperineal resection presented with parastomal hernias of varying durations and were subjected to laparoscopic repair. The average operating time was 112 minutes. All the patients were mobilized postoperatively and were discharged by 48 hours. None of the patients have reported any complication, including recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair of paracolostomy hernia using a technique involving intracorporeal suturing of defect followed by reinforcement by a tissue-separating mesh is safe and feasible.

Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using a bilayer mesh with a slit

BACKGROUND

Open surgery for parastomal hernia has been associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates exceeding 50%. Laparoscopic mesh repair is a promising alternative. Published series on laparoscopic mesh repair of parastomal hernia, however, are few with relative short follow-up.

METHODS

Seventy-two consecutive patients with 48 paracolostomy and 24 paraileostomy hernias were studied prospectively. Using a two-layer mesh with polypropylene on the parietal side and nonadhesive PTFE toward the viscera, a slit with a central keyhole was cut in the mesh modified after Hofstetter. Covering the fascial defect, the slit was closed laterally. Of the 70 patients discharged alive, 66 were followed for 6 months to 11 years (median=3 years). Four patients were lost for follow-up.

RESULTS

Lysis of adhesions to the anterior abdominal wall, necessary in 68 patients (94%), was frequently a cumbersome and time-consuming task. In nine patients it was the apparent cause of inadvertent full-thickness enterotomy and seromuscular lesion in three and six patients, respectively. Three procedures (4%) were converted to open surgery. Postoperative complications were observed in 16 patients (22%), nine of whom required repeat surgery (13%). Two patients (3%) died. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Late mesh-related complications were observed in five patients (7%) after 5-34 months. Three patients developed abscess that required mesh removal in two patients, including one patient with a small bowel fistula. In two patients the mesh was removed because of small-bowel obstruction and stenosis of the colon at the level of the mesh, respectively. Parastomal hernia recurred in two patients 1 month and 52 months after surgery (recurrence rate=3%, 95% confidence interval=1-10).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using bilayer mesh with a slit is associated with a risk of substantial postoperative morbidity, including late mesh-related complications, but a recurrence rate of less than 10%.

Parastomal hernia repair: laparoscopic ventral hernia meshplasty with stoma relocation. The current state and a clinical case presentation

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after performing an ostomy, and although different technical options have been described, it lacks an ideal intervention to resolve it. The use of meshes and the laparoscopic approach, has led to a significant advance in resolving this condition. However, the ideal technique should guarantee must ensure integral repair of the abdominal wall, taking into account the functionality of the stoma. In large parastomal eventrations the repairing of the ventral hernia with a mesh and relocating the stoma in another quadrant may be an intervention that fulfills both principles, and open approach being described.

METHODS

We review the current state of surgical management of this condition and analyze the different technical options. Present the first description for using a laparoscopic technique with meshplasty and stoma relocation in an obese patient with a complex parastomal hernia, with results in the 18 month follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical technique repair of the parastomal hernia is sometimes a complex issue, which possibly requires different solutions according to the characteristics of the hernia and patient. The technique described of meshplasty with stoma relocation by laparoscopic approach has been revealed as an affordable technique, with minor inconvenience to the patient, absence of complications and good functional results in the long term, benefiting from the advantages of minimally invasive surgery itself.

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique

BACKGROUND

The management of parastomal hernia is associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates (20-70%). This study investigated a novel laparoscopic approach and evaluated its outcomes.

METHODS

A consecutive multi-institutional series of patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair between 2001 and 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Laparoscopy was used with modification of the open Sugarbaker technique. A nonslit expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh was placed to provide 5-cm overlay coverage of the stoma and defect. Transfascial sutures secured the mesh, allowing the stoma to exit from the lateral edge. Five advanced laparoscopic surgeons performed all the procedures. The primary outcome measure was hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 60 years and a body mass index of 29 kg/m2 underwent surgery. Six of these patients had undergone previous mesh stoma revisions. The mean size of the hernia defect was 64 cm2, and the mean size of the mesh was 365 cm2. There were no conversions to open surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity was 23%, and the mean hospital length of stay was 3.3 days. One patient died of pulmonary complications; one patient had a trocar-site infection; and one patient had a mesh infection requiring mesh removal. During a median follow-up period of 19 months (range, 2-38 months), 4% (1/25) of the patients experienced recurrence.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this large case series, the laparoscopic nonslit mesh technique for the repair of parastomal hernias seems to be a promising approach for the reduction of hernia recurrence in experienced hands.

Laparoscopic repair of a paracolostomy hernia: secure reinforced closure of the defect prevents recurrence

High incidence rates have been reported for parastomal hernias after colostomies, particularly end colostomies. In addition to cosmetic disfigurement, parastomal hernias also cause several functional problems in stoma management, and their repair becomes essential. While a variety of open techniques have been described for their management, including the extreme step of stoma relocation, laparoscopic techniques offer a viable and possibly better option. We present a case of parastomal hernia and describe our technique of repair.

Parastomal hernia

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia following formation of an ileostomy or colostomy is common. This article reviews the incidence of hernia, the technical factors related to the construction of the stoma that may influence the incidence, and the success of the different methods of repair.

METHODS

A literature search using the Medline database was performed to locate English language articles on parastomal hernia. Further articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature initially reviewed.

RESULTS

Parastomal hernia affects 1.8-28.3 per cent of end ileostomies, and 0-6.2 per cent of loop ileostomies. Following colostomy formation, the rates are 4.0-48.1 and 0-30.8 per cent respectively. Site of stoma formation (through or lateral to rectus abdominis), trephine size, fascial fixation and closure of lateral space are not proven to affect the incidence of hernia. The role of extraperitoneal stoma construction is uncertain. Mesh repair gives a lower rate of recurrence (0-33.3 per cent) than direct tissue repair (46-100 per cent) or stoma relocation (0-76.2 per cent).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of parastomal hernia is between 0 and 48.1 per cent, depending on the type of stoma and length of follow-up. No technical factors related to the construction of the stoma have been shown to prevent herniation. If repair is required, a prosthetic mesh technique should be considered. Further randomized clinical trials (particularly of extraperitoneal stoma construction) are needed.

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair

Parastomal hernia is a common complication of ostomy construction. The morbidity and recurrence rates associated with repair can be quite high. Among the various approaches to repair, the lowest recurrence rates are associated with the use of mesh. We report a case in which a parastomal hernia was repaired laparoscopically. By employing this minimally invasive approach, our patient avoided the morbidity associated with laparotomy for intraperitoneal mesh placement.