Single-center experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Percutaneous cholecystostomy: techniques and applications

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a critical condition requiring immediate medical attention and treatment and is one of the most frequently encountered acute abdomen emergencies in surgical practice, requiring hospitalization. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the favored treatment for patients with AC who are fit for surgery. However, in high-risk patients considered poor surgical candidates, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been suggested and employed as a safe and reliable alternative option. PC is a minimally invasive, nonsurgical, image-guided intervention that drains and decompresses the gallbladder, thereby preventing its perforation and sepsis. It can act as a bridge to surgery, but it may also serve as a definitive treatment for some patients. The goal of this review is to familiarize physicians with PC and, more importantly, its applications and techniques, pre- and post-procedural considerations, and adverse events.

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) is a safe bailout procedure in situations when dissection of "critical view of safety" is not possible. After the proposed classification of subtotal cholecystectomy into "fenestrating" and "reconstituting" techniques in 2016, a comparative review of the outcomes of both methods is timely.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database was conducted up to January 31, 2020 for studies that reported LSC. Studies reporting LSC only in patients with Mirizzi syndrome or xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis were excluded. Our analysis includes 39 studies with 1784 cases of LSC. We report a comparison of outcomes between reconstituting and fenestrating LSC on 1505 cases [935 reconstituting (62.1%) and 570 fenestrating (37.9%)].

RESULTS

Following LSC, the rate of open conversion is 7.7%, hemorrhage is 0.4%, bile duct injury is 0.3%, bile leak is 15.4%, retained stone is 4.6%, subhepatic or subphrenic collection is 2.9%, superficial surgical site infection is 2.0% and 30-day mortality is 0.2%. 8.8% of patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 1.1% required percutaneous intervention, and 2.2% required reoperation. Compared to reconstituting LSC, fenestrating LSC has a higher incidence of open conversion (n = 58, 10.2% vs. n = 43, 4.6%, p < 0.001), retained stones (n = 38, 6.7% vs. n = 38, 4.1%, p = 0.0253), subhepatic or subphrenic collections (n = 33, 5.8% vs. n = 13, 1.4%, p < 0.001), superficial surgical site infections (n = 18, 3.2% vs. n = 14, 1.5%, p = 0.0303), postoperative ERCP (n = 82, 14.4% vs. n = 62, 6.6%, p < 0.001), and need for reoperation (n = 20, 3.5% vs. n = 12, 1.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although reconstituting LSC has better outcomes, both techniques are complementary. Intraoperative findings and surgical expertise impact the choice.

Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

BDI is the most common serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To address this problem, a multi-society consensus conference was held to develop evidenced-based recommendations for safe cholecystectomy and prevention of BDI.

METHODS

Literature reviews were conducted for 18 key questions across 6 broad topics around cholecystectomy directed by a steering group and subject experts from 5 surgical societies (Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and European Association for Endoscopic Surgery). Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation methodology. When evidence-based recommendations could not be made, expert opinion was documented. A number of recommendations for future research were also documented. Recommendations were presented at a consensus meeting in October 2018 and were voted on by an international panel of 25 experts with greater than 80% agreement considered consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 17 of 18 questions by the guideline development group and expert panel with high concordance from audience participation. Most recommendations were conditional due to low certainty of evidence. Strong recommendations were made for (1) use of intraoperative biliary imaging for uncertainty of anatomy or suspicion of biliary injury; and (2) referral of patients with confirmed or suspected BDI to an experienced surgeon/multispecialty hepatobiliary team.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus recommendations should provide guidance to surgeons, training programs, hospitals, and professional societies for strategies that have the potential to reduce BDIs and positively impact patient outcomes. Development of clinical and educational research initiatives based on these recommendations may drive further improvement in the quality of surgical care for patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injury (BDI) is the most common serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To address this problem, a multi-society consensus conference was held to develop evidenced-based recommendations for safe cholecystectomy and prevention of BDI.

METHODS

Literature reviews were conducted for 18 key questions across six broad topics around cholecystectomy directed by a steering group and subject experts from five surgical societies (SAGES, AHPBA IHPBA, SSAT, and EAES). Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology. When evidence-based recommendations could not be made, expert opinion was documented. A number of recommendations for future research were also documented. Recommendations were presented at a consensus meeting in October 2018 and were voted on by an international panel of 25 experts with greater than 80% agreement considered consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 17 of 18 questions by the Guideline Development Group (GDG) and expert panel with high concordance from audience participation. Most recommendations were conditional due to low certainty of evidence. Strong recommendations were made for (1) use of intraoperative biliary imaging for uncertainty of anatomy or suspicion of biliary injury; and (2) referral of patients with confirmed or suspected BDI to an experienced surgeon/multispecialty hepatobiliary team.

CONCLUSION

These consensus recommendations should provide guidance to surgeons, training programs, hospitals, and professional societies for strategies that have the potential to reduce BDIs and positively impact patient outcomes. Development of clinical and educational research initiatives based on these recommendations may drive further improvement in the quality of surgical care for patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Two-Center Prospective Comparison of the Trocar and Seldinger Techniques for Percutaneous Cholecystostomy

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the bedside ultrasound (US)-guided trocar technique versus the US- and fluoroscopy-guided Seldinger technique for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective noninferiority study compared the bedside US-guided trocar technique for PC (the trocar group; 53 patients [28 men and 25 women]; mean [± SD] age, 74.31 ± 16.19 years) with the US- and fluoroscopy-guided Seldinger technique for PC (the Seldinger group; 52 patients [26 men and 26 women], mean age, 79.92 ± 13.38 years) in consecutive patients undergoing PC at two large tertiary university hospitals. The primary endpoints were technical success and procedure-related complication rates. Secondary endpoints included procedural duration, pain assessment, and clinical success after up to 3 months of follow-up. RESULTS. PC was successfully performed for all 105 patients. The clinical success rate was similar between the two study groups (86.8% in the trocar group vs 76.9% in the Seldinger group; p = 0.09). Mean procedural time was significantly lower in the trocar group than in the Seldinger group (1.77 ± 1.62 vs 4.88 ± 2.68 min; p < 0.0001). Significantly more procedure-related complications were noted in the Seldinger group than in the trocar group (11.5% vs 1.9%; p = 0.02). Among patients in the Seldinger group, bile leak occurred in 7.7%, abscess formation in 1.9%, and gallbladder rupture in 1.9%. No procedure-related death was noted. Minor bleeding occurred in one patient (1.9%) in the trocar group, but the bleeding resolved on its own. The mean pain score during the procedure was significantly lower in the Seldinger group than in the trocar group (3.2 ± 1.77 vs 4.76 ± 2.17; p = 0.01). At 12 hours after the procedure, the mean pain score was significantly lower for patients in the trocar group (0.78 ± 1.0 vs 3.12 ± 1.36; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Use of the bedside US-guided trocar technique for PC was equally effective as the Seldinger technique but was associated with fewer procedure-related complications, required less procedural time, and resulted in decreased postprocedural pain, compared with fluoroscopically guided PC using the Seldinger technique.

Initial Japanese Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a New Robot-Assisted System

The object of this paper is to clarify the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acute or chronic cholecystitis is the most common disease in patients, caused by cholecystolithiasis. Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery is often performed for treatment of cholelithiasis. We performed robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of 5 patients with cholecystolithiasis. The patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the ViKY Endo-Control System (ViKY, EndoControl, Grenoble, France). The robot-controlled laparoscopic holder was placed at the right axilla. The laparoscopic operation was performed via conventional 4-port access using the ViKY system with voice activation. All patients were treated successfully by this robot-assisted laparoscopic procedure, without any complications. Mean docking time using the ViKY was 16 minutes, mean resection time of the gallbladder was 62.2 minutes, operative time was 94.6 minutes, and the mean amount of the blood loss was minimal. Our initial experience demonstrated that robot-assisted laparoscopy was feasible and safe in patients with cholecystolithiasis, providing patient advantages. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for what benefit?

BACKGROUND

A single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) was developed to improve outcomes as compared with the four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Any potential benefits associated with a SILC have been suggested by previous studies reporting few patients with different surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to describe the experience with a standardized SILC as compared with CLC.

METHODS

From June 2010 to January 2012, 40 patients underwent a SILC [median age: 47.5 years (25-92)] and operative and peri-operative data were prospectively collected. Over the same period, 37 patients underwent a CLC. A 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for qualitative data. The costs of SILC and CLC were also compared.

RESULTS

For those patients undergoing a SILC the median operating time was 70 min (24-110). There were no conversions. An additional trocar was necessary in 16 patients. Four patients developed post-operative complications. The median immediate post-operative pain score was 5 (0-10). The median quality of life and cosmetic satisfaction at the initial post-operative visit were 10 (6-10) and 10 (5-10), respectively (VAS). Although the surgical results of both groups were similar, post-operative complications were exclusively reported in the SILC group (two incisional hernias).

CONCLUSION

Standardization of SILC is possible but associated with an important rate of additional trocar placement and a disturbing rate of incisional hernias.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for cholecystectomy. Recently, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been suggested as an alternative technique.

METHODS

Six databases were searched and reference lists of retrieved articles were checked to identify eligible studies. Data from randomized clinical trials related to the safety and effectiveness of SILC versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Odds ratio and mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals based on intention-to-treat analyses whenever possible.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies with 1113 patients met the eligibility criteria. Methodologic quality was unclear in most trails. Operating time was significantly longer in the single-incision laparoscopic surgery group compared with the CLC group (P<0.00001). Cosmesis was improved in single-incision laparoscopic patients at 1 month (P<0.00001). The pooled mean difference in pain scores at 24 hours was -0.75 in favor of the SILC technique (P=0.04). There was no significant difference in the conversion rates, adverse events, analgesia requirements, or the length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence shows that patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis or polypoid lesions of the gallbladder who prefer a better cosmetic outcome, SILC offers a safe alternative to CLC. Further high-powered randomized trials are need to determine whether SILC truly offer any advantages, especially be focused on failure of technique, adverse events, cosmesis, and quality of life.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult patients with sickle cell disease

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A gallstone is a common disease in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients, and cholecystectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in patients with SCD. We conducted this study to determine the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as the standard surgical treatment for gallstones in adult patients with sickle cell anemia over a long period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of all the SCD patients who were operated between April 1994 and December 2008 were collected retrospectively. We analyzed data including age, sex, mode of admission (elective or emergency), indication for LC (chronic or acute cholecystitis), operation time, length of hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

: During 1994 to 2008, there were 6014 patients who underwent LC; of those, 496 (8.25%) patients were SCD patients. The results showed significant differences in the outcome, operative time, hospital stay, and complication rate between 1994 and 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

LC is a safe procedure in sickle cell patients with a low morbidity rate.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy: the radiologist's role in treating acute cholecystitis

Acute cholecystitis is a common condition, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy considered the gold-standard for surgical management. However, surgical options are often unfavourable in patients who are very unwell, or have numerous medical co-morbidities, in which the mortality rates are significant. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an image-guided intervention, used to decompress the gallbladder, reducing patient's symptoms and the systemic inflammatory response. PC has been shown to be beneficial in high-risk patient groups, predominantly as a bridging therapy; allowing safer elective cholecystectomy once the patient has recovered from the acute illness; or, in the minority, as a definitive treatment in patients deemed unfit for surgery. This review aims to develop a broader understanding of PC, discussing its specific indications, patient management, technical factors, imaging guidance, and outcomes following the procedure.

Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has emerged as a technique that uses a natural scar, the umbilicus, within which a multiple-entry portal is placed into a 3.0-4.0-cm single incision to perform operations. The objective of this study was to compare incision size, wound complications, and postoperative pain of LESS compared with those of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between January and June 2011 at two university hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Fifty-seven patients were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic or LESS cholecystectomy. Skin and aponeurosis wound sizes were recorded. A 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain at postoperative hours 3 and 24. Healing and wound complications were assessed at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients, 53 women and 4 men with a mean age of 48.7 years, were randomly assigned to undergo LESS (n = 28) or LC (n = 29). The mean length of the umbilical skin incision was 4.0 cm (range = 2.1-5.8) in LESS and 2.7 cm (1.5-5.1) in LC (p < .0001). The mean internal aponeurosis diameter was 3.5 cm (2.0-5.5) in LESS and 2.3 cm (1.2-3.5) in LC (p < .0001). The mean operative time was 60.3 min (32-128) for LESS and 51.3 min (25-120) for LC (p = 0.11). Gallbladder perforation at detachment occurred in 15.69 % of the LESS cases and in 5.88 % of the LC cases (p = 0.028). The mean VAS score for pain at hour 3 was 2.0 points (0-7) for the LESS group and 4.0 (0-10) for the LC group (p = 0.07), and at postoperative hour 24 it was 0.3 points (0-6) for LESS and 2.3 (0-10) for LC (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in wound complications. Incisional hernias were not found in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The LESS single-port (SP) operations demand a bigger incision than LC surgery. However, there were no differences in healing, wound infections, and hernia development. We found a tendency of less postoperative pain associated with LESS/SP than with LC.

Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In the setting of difficult dissection of Calot's triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, conversion is commonly advocated. An alternative approach aimed at preventing bile duct injury is laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC). The safety and efficacy of this procedure are unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed independently by three researchers. The outcomes were conversion rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), bile duct injury, bile leak, symptomatic gallstones in the remnant gallbladder, need for reoperation, postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), percutaneous intervention, and mortality.

RESULTS

The review included 15 publications, which reported on 625 patients. Four different operative techniques could be distinguished. Conversion to open (partial) cholecystectomy was performed in 10.4 % of the cases. The median LOS was 4.5 days (range, 0-48 days). The most common complication was postoperative bile leak, which occurred in 66 patients (10.6 %). One case of bile duct injury occurred. During the follow-up period, 2.2 % of the patients experienced recurrent symptoms of gallstones. Eight patients (2.7 %) underwent reoperation. Postoperative ERCP was performed for 26 (7.5 %) of 349 patients. A percutaneous intervention was performed for 5 (1.4 %) of 353 patients. Three deaths were described in the reviewed series (1 of pulmonary sepsis and 2 of myocardial infarctions). A rough comparison showed that fewer bile leaks, less need for ERCP, and less recurrent symptoms of gallstones seemed to occur when the cystic duct and gallbladder remnant were closed.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature concerning LPC is scarce. Four different LPC techniques can be distinguished. When a difficult gallbladder is encountered during LC, LPC seems to be a safe and feasible alternative to conversion. Closing of the cystic duct, gallbladder remnant, or both seems to be preferable.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single, non-teaching hospital: an analysis of 1557 patients

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may lead to serious complications, although it is the gold standard treatment for gallstones. In this article, the aim was to review our experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed in a single, non-teaching hospital between January 2000 and October 2010 and were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the effect of preoperative risk factors on outcome and the associated major complications.

RESULTS

This study included 1557 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and the mean age of the patients was 54.1±12.3 years. The mean duration of the operation and the mean length of stay were 43.4 minutes and 1.2 days, respectively. Conversion to an open cholecystectomy was necessary in 39 patients, and thus the conversion rate was 2.5%. In total, 57 (3.7%) complications occurred in 51 patients. Serious common bile duct injury was seen in 4 (0.27%) cases. The other common complications included bile leakage in 10 (0.64%) and postoperative bleeding in 7 (0.45%) patients. The mortality rate was 0.13%. Risk factors for conversion to open surgery were male gender, age >55 years, emergency admission due to acute cholecystitis, and a history of previous acute cholecystitis attacks. Factors that increased the morbidity rate were male gender, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III, emergency admission due to acute cholecystitis, and a history of previous acute cholecystitis attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may serve as a baseline for comparison with future studies done at single, non-teaching hospitals where surgical teams perform laparoscopic cholecystectomies over a long period of time.

Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term surgical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) between single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) and classic 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

BACKGROUND

There is significant interest in further reducing the trauma associated with surgical procedures. Although a number of observational studies have suggested that SPLC is a feasible alternative to CLC, there is a lack of data from randomized studies validating any benefit over CLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized to receive SPLC or CLC. Operative and perioperative outcomes, including cosmesis and QOL were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were randomized to SPLC (n = 21) or CLC (n = 22). There were no significant differences between groups for most preoperative demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology score, gallstone characteristics, local inflammation, blood loss, or length of stay. Patients undergoing SPLC were older than those receiving CLC (57.3 years vs. 45.8 years, P < 0.05). Operative times for SPLC were greater than CLC (88.5 minutes vs. 44.8 minutes, P < 0.05). Overall and cosmetic satisfaction, QOL as determined by the SF-36 survey, postoperative complications, and post-operative pain scores between discharge and 2-week postoperative visit were not significantly different between groups. Wound infection rates were similar in both groups. The SPLC group contained 1 retained bile duct stone, 1-port site hernia, and 1 postoperative port site hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

SPLC procedure time was longer and incurred more complications than CLC without significant benefits in patient satisfaction, postoperative pain and QOL. SPLC may be offered in carefully selected patients. Larger randomized trials performed later in the learning curve with SPLC may identify more subtle advantages of one method over another.

Prediction and management of a low-lying costal arch which restricts the operative working space during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is difficult to perform in patients with a low-lying costal arch that entirely covers the liver. We conducted this study to clarify the factors related to a low-lying costal arch and establish countermeasures to circumvent this characteristic.

METHODS

The study included 103 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The possible clinical factors associated with a low-lying costal arch restricting the operative working space were analyzed. The position of the liver against the costal arch and the presumed surgical visual angle for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comprising the hepatic porta, umbilicus, and costal arch, were estimated with abdominal multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

RESULTS

Seven (7%) patients had a low-lying costal arch presenting an inadequate exposure of Calot's triangle and restricted instrument mobility during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and three patients required conversion to a laparotomy. A low-lying costal arch was significantly associated with advanced age, shorter stature, lighter body weight, coexisting kyphoscoliosis, gallbladder pathology, laparotomy conversion, and most of all, the liver edge lying above the costal arch and a narrow surgical visual angle upon MDCT. Of the seven patients with a critical low-lying costal arch, four underwent a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy, this being done by lifting the right costal arch to create a workable surgical field; the rib-lifting procedure was planned as part of the scheduled procedure in the other three patients because the preoperative MDCT examination indicated a poor working space for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A low-lying costal arch is a substantial risk factor for conversion to a laparotomy when performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the operative difficulty related to a low-lying costal arch can be predicted by using preoperative MDCT images and can be managed with proper planning and the appropriate use of the rib-lifting technique.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 619 consecutive cases in a Caribbean setting

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard in the definitive treatment of symptomatic gall bladder disease. It boasts superior morbidity and mortality and lower complication rates than open approaches.

AIM

This study outlines the experiences associated with 619 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in Trinidad.

METHODS

The records of 619 consecutive patients who underwent the procedure were reviewed. All cases were either performed or supervised by the senior author. The population comprised 511 females and 108 males. The average age was 48.5 years.

RESULTS

The commonest indications for surgery were symptomatic cholelithiasis (380 cases) and acute cholecystitis (111 cases). The mean operating time was 34 minutes. The mean length of stay on the ward was 17.45 hours. Mortality was zero. Only 4 cases were converted to open procedures. The commonest postoperative complication was wound-infection.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this study demonstrates that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in a Third World setting with results comparable to those internationally.

Modified Subtotal Cholecystectomy: Results of a Laparotomy Procedure During the Laparoscopic Era

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now indisputably the gold standard for managing most gallbladder diseases. However, subversion of the Calot triangle anatomy cannot always be managed by laparoscopy and often requires a laparotomy conversion. This report discusses our patients treated with our personal technique.

Methods

Patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy performed by the same surgeon with a personal technique from January 1999 to December 2007 were considered for the present study. Sex, age, symptoms, co‐morbidities, diagnostic modality, time between hospitalization and surgery, length of postsurgical hospitalization, morbidity and mortality, and follow‐up were assessed.

Results

Four men and six women, aged 23 to 88 years, were included. Every patient had symptoms of acute cholecystitis. Four patients had had symptoms for an average of 2.5 days and six for an average of 5.1 h. All patients were studied by ultrasonography, and seven underwent computed tomography. The operation was performed within 48 h in all patients. The average hospital stay from surgery to discharge was different for patients who underwent primary open cholecystectomy (10 days, range 5–16 days) and those having a conversion after a laparoscopic attempt (7.8 days, range 4–16 days). During the postoperative period only one patient presented a self‐limiting biliary leak. No postoperative mortality occurred. At follow‐up, any recurrences of stone in the biliary tract or newly formed pouch were recorded.

Conclusions

The results suggest that this new approach can be considered effective in every instance of subversion of the normal anatomy of Calot’s triangle.