Laparoscopic Sigmoid and Rectal Resection Using an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealing Device

New Bipolar Electrosurgical Vessel Sealing Device Provides Improved Performance and Procedural Efficiency

Purpose

This study compared the performance of the new LigaSure™ XP Maryland Jaw Sealer/Divider (XP Maryland) to that of LigaSure Atlas™ (Atlas) and LigaSure™ Dolphin Tip (Dolphin Tip), two early LigaSure™ (LigaSure) devices characterized by consistent and reliable clinical performance.

Methods

Ex vivo bench testing on porcine renal arteries compared burst pressures, seal times, and rates of sticking, incomplete cuts, and charring between XP Maryland and Atlas and between XP Maryland and Dolphin Tip. In vivo acute testing on a porcine model compared thermal spread, seal times, and rates of hemostasis, sticking, and incomplete cuts between XP Maryland and the two early LigaSure devices.

Results

Ex vivo, XP Maryland showed a significantly faster mean seal time compared to Dolphin Tip (P < 0.0001) and Atlas (P < 0.0001). XP Maryland had fewer incomplete cuts than Dolphin Tip (P < 0.0001) and fewer sticking incidents than Atlas (P = 0.0019). Atlas had a statistically higher average burst pressure compared to XP Maryland (P < 0.0001). As with ex vivo results, XP Maryland had a significantly faster mean seal time in vivo compared to Dolphin Tip (P = 0.0168) and Atlas (P < 0.0001). Other in vivo results showed XP Maryland had fewer incomplete cuts compared to Dolphin Tip (P < 0.0001) and statistically less lateral thermal spread than Atlas (P = 0.0010). For all other ex vivo and in vivo performance characteristics, no statistically significant differences were found between XP Maryland and the other devices.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated the consistent and reliable performance of XP Maryland and the two early LigaSure devices. In addition, the studies showed XP Maryland has some improved performance characteristics when compared to Atlas and Dolphin Tip that may result in improved procedural efficiency and may reduce potential surgical risks.

Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

In locally advanced breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection remains a pivotal component of surgical therapy. Apart from this, it has been mostly replaced by sentinel node biopsy. Complications after axillary dissection include wound infection, neuropathy, lymphedema and-most frequently-seroma. In this retrospective multi-centre study, we compared the use of LigaSure^TM with monopolar electrocautery regarding perioperative outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis from female breast cancer patients who underwent axillary dissection at two breast centres in Austria that are using two different surgical techniques was performed for this study. We compared the rate of complications and re-operations, length of hospital stay, time to drain removal, total drain fluid, seroma formation after drain removal, number of seroma aspirations and total seroma fluid.

RESULTS

Seventy one female patients with a median age of 63 (30-83) were included in this study. In 35 patients LigaSure^TM and in 36 monopolar cautery was used for axillary dissection. There was no significant difference regarding intraoperative complications and rate of re-operations between the two groups (2.9 vs. 5.6%; p = 1 and 2.9 vs. 13.9%; p = 0.199). The time to drain removal and the length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. A significant difference in the occurence of postoperative wound infection could also not be shown. However, we found a significantly smaller total drain fluid in the LigaSure^TM-group compared to the cautery-group (364.6 ml vs. 643.4 ml; p = 0.004). Seroma formation after drain removal was more frequent in the LigaSure^TM-group (68.6 vs. 41.7%; p = 0.032) with a higher number of outpatient seroma aspirations (2.0 vs. 0.9; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

LigaSure^TM and monopolar cautery provide equivalent techniques in axillary lymph node dissection with comparable postoperative outcomes.

Evaluation of the LigaSure(™) Vessel Sealing System for bowel transection and intestinal anastomosis-an experimental study in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study is to assess the value of the LigaSure™ Vessel Sealing System (LVSS) as a means for bowel transection and intestinal anastomosis.

METHODS

We compared the LVSS for (1) transecting bowel and (2) creation of an intestinal anastomosis with standard methods such as stapler (S) and hand-sewn (HS) in a porcine model. For each study arm, i.e., bowel transection and anastomosis creation, both the small bowel and colon were examined. In total, ten transections and ten anastomoses were performed for each. Burst and anastomotic leak pressures were compared.

RESULTS

In the study arm 1, LVSS achieved lowest burst pressures in both small bowel (LVSS 39.8 ± 3.6 mmHg, S 81.9 ± 3.9, HS 111.9 ± 14.7 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and colon transections (LVSS 21.5 ± 2.6 mmHg, S 79.5 ± 4.9, HS 91.0 ± 5.2 mmHg, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in burst pressures between S and HS in both small bowel and colon transections. In the study arm 2, LVSS showed the lowest anastomotic leak pressures for small bowel (LVSS 26.4 ± 2.6 mmHg, S 52.1 ± 6.2, HS 87.4 ± 7.0 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and colonic anastomoses (LVSS 16.9 ± 1.3 mmHg, S 55.9 ± 4.3, HS 74.4 ± 4.4 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, small bowel and colonic anastomoses using S demonstrated significantly lower leak pressures than HS anastomosis p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LVSS achieves significantly lower burst pressures and anastomotic leak pressures for bowel transection and intestinal anastomosis than S and HS techniques. However, due to the achieved pressure levels of 39.8 ± 3.6 mmHg, LVSS appears to be a sufficient stand-alone method for bowel transection. Whether it can be used to perform intestinal anastomosis warrants further research in a survival model.

Comparison of two different transection techniques in liver surgery-an experimental study in a porcine model

AIMS

Postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection is closely related to the degree of intraoperative blood loss; the majority of which occurs during transection of the liver parenchyma. Many approaches and devices have therefore been developed to limit bleeding, but none has yet achieved perfect results up to now. The aim of this standardized chronic animal study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the LigaSure™ Vessel Sealing System (LVSS) with the stapler technique, which is one of the modern techniques for transecting the parenchyma in liver surgery.

METHODS

Sixteen pigs underwent a left liver resection (LLR). Eight pigs received a LLR by means of an Endo GIA, whereas the other eight pigs underwent liver parenchymal transection followed by simultaneous sealing by the LVSS. The operating time, transection time, blood loss during transection, and time of hemostasis were measured on the day of LLR (postoperative day 0/POD 0). Animals were re-explored on postoperative day 7 (POD 7) and the transection surface of remnant liver was observed for fluid collection (hematoma, biloma, and abscess), necrosis, and other pathologies. A biopsy was taken from the area of transection for histopathological examination.

RESULTS

All animals survived until POD 7. Operating time and transection time of the liver parenchyma on POD 0 was significantly shorter in the stapler group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss during transection, time of hemostasis and number of sutures for hemostasis on POD 0, morbidity rate, as well as the histopathological examination on POD 7. Furthermore, the material costs were significantly higher in the stapler group than in the LVSS group.

CONCLUSION

In this standardized chronic animal study concerning transection of the parenchyma in liver surgery, LVSS seems not only to be safe, but also comparable with the stapler technique in terms of morbidity and mortality. Additionally, LVSS significantly reduces material costs. However, the transection time is significantly longer for LVSS than for the stapler resection technique.

Harmonic scalpel versus conventional dissection technique in pylorus-preserving partial duodenopancreatectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Pancreatic head resection is performed with low mortality, but morbidity remains high. Extensive preparation, long operating times, intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions are risk factors for postoperative morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the ultrasonic dissection device in pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy (PPPD).

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent PPPD with an ultrasonic dissection device (group 1) were compared with a match-controlled group of 50 consecutive patients who underwent PPPD with conventional dissection techniques (group 2). Duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, blood units, complications, mortality and duration of hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, gender or BMI between groups. In group 1, mean blood loss (446 ± 281.8 ml, p = 0.008) and number of blood units (0.32 ± 0.86, p = 0.001) were significantly lower than in group 2 (819 ± 915.4 ml; 1.36 ± 2.83 units). Duration of surgery was shorter in group 1 (345.6 vs. 373 min, p = 0.28). The rate of postoperative complications, mortality and hospital stay were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an ultrasonic dissection device in PPPD might significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions. These results should be verified in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Safety and effectiveness of 5-mm and 10-mm electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers (LigaSure) in laparoscopic resections for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers

BACKGROUND

LigaSure™ (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) has been used in cases undergoing laparoscopic colon and rectal resections. This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of the 5-mm and 10-mm devices.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients who received a laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic operation for a tumor located in the sigmoid colon or rectum since 2006 were abstracted from a prospectively designed database, and findings were analyzed in two groups based on size of the device used during the procedure. The videotapes of the procedures were watched, and operation reports were read to obtain further information on specific intra- and postoperative complications. Demographics, tumor and operation-related information, and postoperative data were compared.

RESULTS

Among 215 (128 [59.5%] males; median age, 59.5±13.8 years) patients, data obtained from the 5-mm (n=32) and 10-mm (n=183) groups were identical regarding demographics and data related to tumor (localization and stage) and operation (number of harvested lymph nodes, conversion rates, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, transfusion requirement, reoperation rates, complications, 30-day mortality, and length of hospital stay). However, more patients underwent an anterior resection in the 10-mm group than in the 5-mm group (31.7% versus 15.6%, P<.05). Further analyses found device-related bleeding in 8 (3.7%) cases (2 [6.3%] versus 6 [3.3%] in the 5-mm versus 10-mm group, respectively, P>.05), requiring further attempts for hemorrhage control (n=6), conversion to open surgery (n=1), or relaparotomy (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-mm and 10-mm LigaSure devices are similarly effective and safe during laparoscopic sigmoid colon and rectal resections. Severe bleeding from larger vessels may be observed, requiring conversion to open surgery or relaparotomy.

Hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery: a systematic review

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify and synthesize the hospital discharge criteria that have been used in the colorectal surgery literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using eight bibliographic databases. Searches were limited to English language journal articles published between January 1996 and October 2009. Primary research applying hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery was included. Study selection was made independently by two reviewers. Discharge criteria were extracted from each included study.

RESULTS

The 156 studies identified by the search strategy described 70 different sets of criteria to indicate readiness for discharge. The majority of studies applied a combination of three or four criteria; those most frequently cited were tolerance of oral intake (80%), return of bowel function (70%), adequate pain control (44%) and adequate mobility (35%). End-points employed to determine the achievement of criteria were generally poorly defined.

CONCLUSION

A variety of hospital discharge criteria were applied in the colorectal surgery literature. Development of standardized criteria will allow more accurate comparison of results between studies assessing hospital length of stay or other discharge-related outcome measures.

LigaSure versus conventional dissection technique in pancreatoduodenectomy: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic surgery requires extensive preparation and tissue dissection. Therefore, LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) provides an alternative to conventional dissection techniques. The aim of the present study was to describe the feasibility, safety, and cost efficiency of LigaSure in pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Seven patients underwent surgery with the Ligasure and 7 patients underwent surgery with conventional dissection techniques. The patients were investigated for surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, mortality, duration of hospital stay, and surgery-related costs.

RESULTS

Surgical time was 207 minutes in the LigaSure group and 255 minutes in the conventional group (P = .020). Intraoperative blood loss was 271 and 771 mL, respectively (P = .010). Other perioperative outcomes were comparable. The respective surgery-related costs averaged €4,125 and €4,931 (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LigaSure in pancreatoduodenectomy seems to be feasible and safe. In addition, it might lead to a reduction in the surgery-related costs.

Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer in endoscope-assisted latissumus dorsi flap harvesting

LigaSure™ is a new bipolar vascular sealing system commonly used in various fields of surgery. However, no reports have been published about its use in plastic surgery, particularly for endoscopic flap harvesting. In this study, we present the use of LigaSure in endoscope-assisted latissimus dorsi (LD) flap harvesting for breast reconstruction. Between 2006 and 2008, 11 female patients with the mean age of 33.4 (range, 20-49 years) who had previously undergone mastectomy operations were included in the study. First stage of reconstruction was performed with the ipsilateral LD harvested by the help of LigaSure and a tissue expander placed beneath the LD and pectoralis major muscles. Secondary reconstruction was done by a definitive silicon gel-filled implant placed after an average of 6.6 months of expansion (range, 6-9 months). Data concerning the hospitalization and operation times, drainage amounts, complications, etc., were recorded. Mean follow-up was 13 months (range, 8-18 months). Mean flap harvesting time was recorded as 74.2 minutes (range, 50-125 minutes), which shortened as the surgeon got used to the procedure. Patients were hospitalized for 3-7 days, with a mean hospitalization period of 5.5 days. The total mean drainage amount postoperatively was found to be 950 mL (range, 725-975 mL), which is relatively lower than the previously reported values. LigaSure use in endoscope-assisted LD harvesting is easy, safe, and time sparing with almost no complications observed in this small initial series. Although more controlled studies with larger number of patients need to be done to verify its effectiveness in terms of hospitalization, drainage amounts, etc., it holds promise for a wide spectrum of operations in the field of plastic surgery.

Energy-based hemostatic devices in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

PURPOSE

In literature, few papers compare different hemostatic devices in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This sequential cohort study analyzes the outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed by different hemostatic instruments, to evaluate if any of them has any advantage over the other and as secondary endpoints, the impact of body mass index (BMI) and tumor size on the indication, and the outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

METHODS

Forty-six patients, aged 54.6 +/- 46 years, underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy over 5 years. Mean BMI was 27 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2). Twenty-four patients had a left tumor, and 22 had a right one. Patients were divided into two groups according to the hemostatic device: Ultracision was used in 26 patients, and Ligasure was used in 20. Groups were well matched for histology, tumor size and site, BMI, gender, and age.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 126.5 +/- 52 min, blood losses were 101 +/- 169 mm, conversion rate was 6.5%, morbidity was 26%, and hospitalization was 5.3 +/- 2.5 days. Groups did not differ for surgical time, blood losses, complications, and conversion rate; BMI and length of surgery were not related. Tumor side and size did not affect surgical time, regardless of the hemostatic tool. Patients submitted to left adrenalectomy bled more (p = 0.007) and had more complications (p = 0.016) than those undergone operation on the right side.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity (BMI > 30) and large masses do not contraindicate laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Left adrenalectomies bleed more and have a higher morbidity. Hemostatic device choice is up to surgeon's preference.