Intra-abdominal adhesions after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an experimental model

Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions occurs after all types of abdominal surgery. It has been suggested that the laparoscopic technique should reduce the risk for adhesion formation and thus for postoperative bowel obstruction. This study was designed to compare the incidence of bowel obstruction in a randomized trial where laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer was compared.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed, collecting data of episodes of bowel obstruction with or without surgery. Only episodes treated in the hospital where the index surgery took place were included. Data for 786 patients were collected for the 5-year period after cancer surgery.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics for the evaluated laparoscopic (n = 383) and open (n = 403) groups were comparable. The cumulative obstruction percentages at 5 years for the open and laparoscopic groups were 6.5 and 5.1% respectively and did not significantly differ from each other. Tumor stage seemed to influence the risk for bowel obstruction: 2.8% in stage I, 6.6% in stage II, and 7% in stage III, but the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis does not support the hypothesis that laparoscopy leads to fewer episodes of bowel obstruction compared with open surgery.

Intra-abdominal adhesion formation: does surgical approach matter? Questionnaire survey of South Asian surgeons and literature review

AIM

The impact of postsurgical intra-abdominal adhesions, which represent a considerable burden for patients and health services, is often underestimated. Various factors influence adhesion formation, including the surgical approach. This study aimed to further understand the condition by investigating surgeons' perceptions of adhesion formation, particularly differences after laparoscopic and open surgery, and by performing a selective literature review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

South Asian surgeons attending endoscopy symposia in India and in Germany completed Likert-scale-based questionnaires on awareness of adhesion formation and associated consequences in gynecology. MEDLINE and PubMed were searched for articles published in 2000-2010 comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy in relation to adhesion formation. The results of the questionnaire study were then considered in view of findings from this review.

RESULTS

In total, 43.1% (97/225) of questionnaires were completed. Respondents considered that laparoscopy caused fewer adhesions than laparotomy for all gynecological procedures. Although they believed their knowledge of adhesion formation was satisfactory, they widely underestimated the risk, giving estimated rates of 12.5% after laparoscopy and 36.3% after laparotomy. Twenty-eight studies were identified in the review. Most concluded that laparoscopy was less likely to cause adhesions than laparotomy but further statistical analysis was precluded because so many different definitions and classifications of adhesions had been used.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of adhesion formation was widely underestimated in the study group. Both the questionnaire study and the review concluded that laparoscopy results in less adhesion than laparotomy but further statistical comparison necessitates the development of standard definitions and classifications of adhesions.

The peritoneal fibrinolytic response to conventional and laparoscopic colonic surgery

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery is considered to induce less peritoneal trauma than conventional surgery. The peritoneal plasmin system is important in the processes of peritoneal healing and adhesion formation. The present study assessed the peritoneal fibrinolytic response to laparoscopic and conventional colonic surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients scheduled for a right colonic resection were enrolled in the trial. Twelve underwent conventional surgery and 12 were operated laparoscopically. Biopsies of the parietal peritoneum were taken at standardized moments during the procedure. Tissue concentrations of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and its specific activity (tPA-activity), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) were measured, using commercial assays.

RESULTS

After mobilization of the colon, peritoneal levels of tPA antigen and activity were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.005) due to a decrease in the conventional group (p < 0.05). At the end of the procedure, the concentrations of tPA antigen and activity significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the laparoscopic group to levels comparable with the conventional group. Neither uPA antigen nor PAI-1 antigen changed throughout the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both conventional and laparoscopic surgery inflict a decrease in tPA antigen and its specific activity. Peritoneal hypofibrinolysis initiates more rapidly during conventional, compared to laparoscopic, surgery, but at the conclusion of the surgery, the effect was the same.