Huang L, Yu Q, Peng H, Zhen Z. LigaSure technique for splenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore) 2023;
102:e34719. [PMID:
37657000 PMCID:
PMC10476714 DOI:
10.1097/md.0000000000034719]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to clarify the optimal management of the LigaSure technique and conventional techniques during splenectomy.
METHODS
All databases, including CBM, CNKI, WFPD, Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023, were searched for relevant studies comparing the LigaSure technique with conventional techniques. Six studies, extracted by 2 independent reviewers, were evaluated for blood loss, operative time, conversion, mortality, hospital stay, and transfusion.
RESULTS
The blood loss was significantly higher in the convention group than in the LigaSure group (WMD = -48.98, 95% CI: -62.41 to -35.55, P < .00001). Meanwhile, the mean operative time was significantly shorter in LigaSure group than in convention group (WMD = -10.57; 95% CI: -12.35 to -8.78), P < .00001). No significant differences were found regarding the conversion rate, hospital stay, morbidity, and transfusion.
CONCLUSIONS
The LigaSure technique has comparable effects to conventional techniques, but to some extent reduces blood loss and operative time.
Collapse