Transareola single-site laparoendoscopic bilateral thyroidectomy

Advances in the assessment of cosmetic outcomes, sensory alteration in surgical areas, and health-related quality of life of endoscopic thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic thyroidectomy has been preliminarily proven effective and safe for thyroid diseases. The cosmetic outcomes and life quality are critical contents of postoperative assessment. This review will primarily focus on the assessment methods and results related to cosmetic outcomes, sensory alteration of surgical area, and quality of life following endoscopic thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of published articles within the last decade was conducted using the terms "endoscopic/robotic thyroidectomy," "patient satisfaction scores," "questionnaire," "quality of life," and "cosmetic" in PubMed.

RESULTS

Assessment methods for postoperative cosmetic satisfaction and sensory alterations encompassed verbal/visual analog scales, scar evaluations, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament tests, and more. The evaluation of postoperative quality of life in endoscopic thyroidectomy involved tools such as SF-36, SF-12, thyroid-specific questionnaires, thyroid cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires (THYCA-QOL), as well as assessments related to voice and swallow function. The cosmetic results of endoscopic thyroidectomy generally surpassed those of open thyroidectomy, while the quality of life in endoscopic procedures was either superior or equivalent to that in open thyroidectomy, especially with respect to general health, role emotion, and vitality.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessments of cosmetic outcomes and sensory alterations following endoscopic thyroidectomy predominantly relied on patients' subjective feelings. The objective and subjective perspectives of scar assessments remain underutilized. In addition, postoperative laryngoscopy and voice function assessments in endoscopic thyroidectomy procedures require more attention.

Novel robot-assisted thyroidectomy by a transaxillary gas-insufflation approach (TAGA): a preliminary report

Background

Robot-assisted transaxillary approaches to thyroidectomy have been well described. They have an advantage over the breast approach in that a circumareolar incision is avoided. However, they require a single long axillary incision to accommodate all 3 robotic arms and provide adequate visualization of the area around the thyroid. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of the robot-assisted transaxillary gas-insufflation approach (TAGA) and to attempt reducing the size of the scar.

Methods

We evaluated 47 patients who underwent robot-assisted thyroid lobectomy via TAGA from July 2015 to Aug 2017. The following variables were studied: patients' demographics, operative time according to each operation step, volume of drainage, duration of hospitalization, and perioperative complications.

Results

The mean age of all patients was 42.4±9.1 years. The mean total volume of drainage was 195.4±70.9 mL, and the duration of postoperative stay was 3.0±1.1 days. Two cases (4.3%) of transient vocal cord palsy and 2 cases (4.3%) of seroma were identified postoperatively. There was no post-operative cosmetic problem at the skin incisions made in the axilla.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted thyroid lobectomy via TAGA is technically feasible while achieving good cosmetic results. TAGA can be an alternative robot-assisted method for thyroidectomy.

The Learning Curve of Transareola Single-site Laparoendoscopic Thyroidectomy: CUSUM Analysis of a Single Surgeon's Experience

Transareola single-site laparoendoscopic thyroidectomy (TASSET) is a rapidly advancing minimally invasive procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the learning curve for TASSET.

Subcutaneous dissection area contributes less to endoscopic thyroidectomy-related invasiveness

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the contribution of the subcutaneous area during breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy (BAET), with regard to invasiveness-related outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients were randomly assigned to two groups: standard dissection and limited dissection. Postoperative pain and inflammatory response were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The groups were well matched except for subcutaneous dissection area (137.11 ± 21.10 vs. 83.69 ± 12.10 cm(2), p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found with regard to VAS score and postoperative inflammatory response.

CONCLUSION

Our RCT indicated that the subcutaneous area plays a less important role with regard to BAET-related postoperative pain.