Antireflux Versus Conventional Plastic Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Randomized Study

Efficacy and complications of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction treatment by metallic stents: fully covered or uncovered?

Obstructive jaundice caused by malignant distal biliary obstruction is a common clinical symptom in patients with inoperable biliary-pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided stent implantation is an effective treatment for obstructive jaundice. Internal stent drainage is more physiologic and associated with a better quality of life than external stent drainage methods such as percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage. Self-expanding metallic stents, which may be covered and uncovered, are commonly used. However, some uncertainties remain regarding the selection of metallic stents, including drainage patency time, clinical effect, stent migration, and post-operative complications such as pancreatitis, bleeding, and cholecystitis. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies surrounding the use of covered or uncovered metallic stents in inoperable common biliary obstruction via ERCP.

Enteral extended biliary stents versus conventional plastic biliary stents for the treatment of extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction: a single-center prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The main limitation of plastic stents is the relatively short stent patency due to occlusion. We designed enteral extended biliary stents with lengths of 26 cm (EEBS-26 cm) and 30 cm (EEBS-30 cm) to prolong stent patency. This study aimed to compare patency among EEBS-26 cm, EEBS-30 cm, and conventional plastic biliary stent (CPBS).

METHODS

A single-center prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. Eligible patients were randomized into the EEBS-26 cm, EEBS-30 cm, and CPBS groups, respectively. All patients were followed up every 3 months until stent occlusion, patient death, or at 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was stent patency. The secondary outcomes included stent occlusion rate, patient survival, mortality, the rate of technical success, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Totally 117 patients were randomized into the three groups. There were no significant differences among the three groups in technical success rate, hospital stay, mortality, patient survival, and adverse events (P = 1.000, 0.553, 0.965, 0.302, and 0.427, respectively). Median stent patency durations in the EEBS-26 cm, EEBS-30 cm, and CPBS groups were 156.0 (95% CI 81.6-230.4) days, 81.0 (95% CI 67.9-94.1) days, and 68.0 (95% CI 20.0-116.0) days, respectively (P = 0.002). The EEBS-26 cm group had longer stent patency compared with the CPBS (P = 0.007) and EEBS-30 cm (P < 0.001) groups. The EEBS-26 cm group had lower stent occlusion rates compared with the other groups at 6 months (48.1% vs. 90.5% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.001) and 9 months (75.0% vs. 100.0% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

EEBS-26 cm has prolonged stent patency and is safe and effective for the alleviation of unresectable extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction.

Design and Optimization of a New Anti-reflux Biliary Stent With Retractable Bionic Valve Based on Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis

Duodenal biliary reflux has been a challenging common problem which could cause dreadful complications after biliary stent implantation. A novel anti-reflux biliary stent with a retractable bionic valve was proposed according to the concertina motion characteristics of annelids. A 2D equivalent fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model based on the axial section was established to analyze and evaluate the mechanical performances of the anti-reflux biliary stent. Based on this model, four key parameters (initial shear modulus of material, thickness, pitch, and width) were selected to investigate the influence of design parameters on anti-reflux performance via an orthogonal design to optimize the stent. The results of FSI analysis showed that the retrograde closure ratio of the retractable valve primarily depended on initial shear modulus of material (p < 0.05) but not mainly depended on the thickness, pitch, and width of the valve (p > 0.05). The optimal structure of the valve was finally proposed with a high retrograde closing ratio of 95.89%. The finite element model revealed that the optimized anti-reflux stent possessed improved radial mechanical performance and nearly equal flexibility compared with the ordinary stent without a valve. Both the FSI model and experimental measurement indicated that the newly designed stent had superior anti-reflux performance, effectively preventing the duodenobiliary reflux while enabling the bile to pass smoothly. In addition, the developed 2D equivalent FSI model provides tremendous significance for resolving the fluid-structure coupled problem of evolution solid with large deformation and markedly shortens the calculation time.

Biosafety of a novel covered self-expandable metal stent coated with poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate) in vivo

Covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) are often used for palliative endoscopic biliary drainage; however, the unobstructed period is limited because of sludge occlusion. The present study aimed to evaluate the biosafety of a novel poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate)-coated CSEMS (PMEA-CSEMS) for sludge resistance and examine its biosafety in vivo. Using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, we placed the PMEA-CSEMS into six normal porcine bile ducts and conventional CSEMS into three normal porcine bile ducts. We performed serological examination and undecalcified histological analysis at 1, 3, and 6 months during follow-up. In the bile ducts with PMEA-CSEMS or conventional CSEMS, we observed no increase in liver enzyme or inflammatory marker levels in the serological investigations and mild fibrosis but no inflammatory response in the histopathological analyses. Thus, we demonstrated the biosafety of PMEA-CSEMS in vivo.

New anti-reflux plastic stent to reduce the risk of stent-related cholangitis in the treatment of biliary strictures

BACKGROUND

There is little data available on the role of new anti-reflux plastic stents (ARPSs).

AIM

To compare the use of ARPSs with that of traditional plastic stents (TPSs) for patients with biliary strictures.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with biliary strictures who underwent first endoscopic biliary stenting between February 2016 and May 2019 were included. The onset of stent-related cholangitis, stent patency, clinical success, and other adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients in the ARPS group and 66 patients in the TPS group were included in the final analyses. Fewer patients experienced stent-related cholangitis in the ARPS group than that in the TPS group (8 patients vs 18 patients; P = 0.030). The median time till the onset of first stent-related cholangitis was later in the ARPS group than that in the TPS group (128.5 d vs 76 d; P = 0.039). The cumulative median stent patency in the ARPS group was 185 d, which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (133 d; P = 0.001). The clinical success rates and other adverse events did not significantly differ between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Placement of new ARPS might be a safe and effective optional therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of stent-related cholangitis and prolong stent patency.

Antireflux metal stent for biliary obstruction: Any benefits?

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stent placement has been utilized as standard palliative management of distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Compared to plastic stents, metal stents can provide longer-term relief of symptoms. When a large-bore metal stent is placed across the ampulla, patients are predisposed to the risk of cholangitis or stent dysfunction due to reflux of duodenal contents. To mitigate the risk of adverse events associated with the duodenobiliary reflux, efforts have been directed to development of antireflux metal stents (ARMSs). The antireflux property has been introduced through adding of an antireflux valve to the duodenal stent end. Evidence from clinical studies indicates that ARMSs may not only reduce the risk of ascending cholangitis during follow-up but also prolong stent patency time. However, the results of clinical studies testing ARMSs are inconsistent owing to heterogeneous designs of antireflux valves and stent bodies. Metal stents are increasingly indicated for benign biliary strictures and MBO in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and therefore, research is warranted to evaluate ARMSs for those indications. Given that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural biliary drainage has gained popularity, the optimal timing of placing an ARMS in relation to EUS-guided and percutaneous drainage should be investigated. Development and evaluation of ARMSs require an integrative approach utilizing phantom and animal models, measurements of stent mechanical properties, and in vivo functional study after stent placement. In this review article, we summarize updated evidence on ARMSs for MBO and discuss issues that should be addressed in future studies.

Design and evaluation of a novel anti-reflux biliary stent with cone spiral valve

Endoscopic placement of biliary stent is a well-established palliative treatment for biliary obstruction. However, duodenobiliary reflux after stent placement has been a common problem which may lead to dreadful complications. This paper designed a novel anti-reflux biliary stent with a cone spiral valve. Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) simulations were established to evaluate the efficiency of the anti-reflux stent comparing with a clinically applied standard stent. According to the stress distribution of the valve, the fatigue performance in the stress concentration area was analyzed. The results show that when the antegrade flow through the valve, the cone spiral valve could stretch and open to realize adequate drainage under the normal physiological pressure of biliary tract; When the duodenal reflux through the valve, the valve would be compressed and close with a result of nearly zero at the outlet flow rate. Furthermore, the anti-reflux stent achieved improved radial mechanical performance with 2.7 times higher radial stiffness than standard stent. Finite element analysis (FEA) also indicates that compared with the standard stent, the addition of the anti-reflux valve had little negative effect on flexibility of the stent. Fatigue analysis results showed that the valve was reliable. This research provides the new stent with a cone spiral valve and proves that it is technically feasible and effective for preventing the duodenobiliary reflux while ensuring the antegrade bile flow without compromising the other biomechanical performances.

New antireflux plastic stent for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the main problem with stent placement is the relatively short duration of stent patency. Although self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have a longer patency period than plastic stents (PSs), the higher costs limit the wide use of SEMSs. A PS with an antireflux valve is an attractive idea to prolong stent patency, but no ideal design for an antireflux PS (ARPS) has been proposed. We developed a new ARPS with a “duckbilled” valve attached to the duodenal end of the stent.

AIM

To compare the patency of ARPSs with that of traditional PSs (TPSs) in patients with unresectable distal MBO.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. This study was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with extrahepatic MBO were enrolled prospectively. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ARPS or a TPS. Patients were followed by clinic visits or telephone interviews every 1-2 mo until stent exchange, death, or the final study follow-up in October 2018. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency. Secondary outcomes included the rate of technical success, the rate of clinical success, adverse events, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Between February 2016 and December 2017, 38 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, with 19 patients in each group, to receive ARPSs or TPSs. Stent insertion was technically successful in all patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of clinical success or the rates of early or late adverse events (P = 0.660, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively). The median duration of stent patency in the ARPS group was 285 d [interquartile range (IQR), 170], which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (median, 130 d; IQR, 90, P = 0.005). No significant difference in patient survival was noted between the two groups (P = 0.900).

CONCLUSION

The new ARPS is safe and effective for the palliation of unresectable distal MBO, and has a significantly longer stent patency than a TPS.

Suspended over length biliary stents versus conventional plastic biliary stents for the treatment of biliary stricture: A retrospective single-center study

To compare patency between suspended over length biliary stents (SOBSs; made from nasobiliary tube) and conventional plastic biliary stents (CPBSs).We retrospectively analyzed 61 patients with extrahepatic biliary stricture who underwent SOBS placement (intrahepatic bile duct) and 74 patients who underwent CPBS placement. Stent patency and complications were compared.The SOBS group was slightly older and contained more females than the CPBS group but other baseline characteristics were similar. Malignant biliary obstruction accounted for 57.4% (SOBS group) and 45.9% (CPBS group) of cases. Technical success rate, hospital stay and post-procedure complications were similar between groups. Median patency in the CPBS and SOBS group was 116 (2-360) days and 175 (3-480) days, respectively (P <.001). The SOBS group had lower stent occlusion rates than the CPBS group at 3 months (9.8% vs 36.5%), 4 months (22.0% vs 55.4%), 5 months (35.6% vs 67.6%), and 6 months (39.3% vs 77.0%) (all P <.01). In Cox regression analysis, stent type (SOBS vs CPBS) was the only factor associated with patency (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.449; 95% CI: 1.973-6.028; P <.001).SOBS may have better medium-term patency than CPBS for benign/malignant biliary stricture.