Robotic Thymectomy: Learning Curve and Associated Perioperative Outcomes

Initial Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Thymectomy Through a Subxiphoid Incision

BACKGROUND

Sternotomy is the traditional approach for thymectomy. However, over the last 2 decades, minimally invasive surgical approaches (multiport thoracoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery) have proven feasible, offering similar survival, lower morbidity, and shorter length of stay. Single-port (SP) subxiphoid thymectomy potentially offers less pain and allows bilateral visualization of the mediastinum.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study was conducted to evaluate the performance and safety of the da Vinci SP surgical system (Intuitive) for thymectomy through a subxiphoid incision. Primary performance end points included ability to achieve R0 resection and completion of the procedure without conversion. The primary safety end point was all adverse events up to 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 13 individuals (benign, n = 6; malignant, n = 7) at 6 centers in the United States. All SP thymectomy procedures were completed through a small (mean, 3.8 cm) subxiphoid incision without conversion to other minimally invasive or open approaches. For malignant cases, the rate of complete resection was 100%. No study participants experienced any intraoperative or serious adverse events. No unanticipated adverse device effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Thymectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system through a subxiphoid approach is feasible, and there are no early indications of safety or procedural concerns. Larger clinical studies are warranted to further evaluate the relative benefits and limitations of the SP system compared with multiport robotic thymectomy.

Learning curve for full-port robot-assisted mediastinal mass resection: a single-centre retrospective study

The advent of da Vinci robotic technology has revolutionized the surgical management of mediastinal masses. However, research on the learning curve of full-port robot-assisted mediastinal mass resection remains limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 74 consecutive patients who underwent full-port robot-assisted mediastinal mass resection performed by a single surgeon at our center. We performed multiple linear regression analysis to evaluate and standardize the operative time (OT). Subsequently, the cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts were constructed to compare learning curve models derived from standardized versus nonstandardized OT data. Finally, a systematic evaluation was conducted to assess the perioperative parameters. Lesion size and intraoperative blood loss were identified via multiple linear regression as significant factors influencing the OT (P < 0.05), with the OT standardized using regression coefficients. A CUSUM chart based on the OT was then generated. The learning curve model based on nonstandardized operative time data demonstrated an earlier peak than that derived from standardized data. Further analysis of the standardized operative time revealed a peak in the learning curve at the 33rd case. Cases 1-33 were classified as the learning phase and cases 34-74 as the proficiency phase. The mean OT in the proficiency phase was significantly shorter, and intraoperative blood loss was notably lower than that in the learning phase (P < 0.05 for both). However, no significant differences were identified between the two phases for other perioperative outcomes (P > 0.05).

Ergonomic Assessment of Robotic versus Thoracoscopic Thymectomy

Introduction: Robotic and thoracoscopic surgery are being increasingly adopted as minimally invasive alternatives to open sternotomy for complete thymectomy. The superior maneuverability range and three-dimensional magnified vision are potential ergonomical advantages of robotic surgery. To compare the ergonomic characteristics of robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy, a previously developed scoring system based on impartial findings was employed. The relationship between ergonomic scores and perioperative endpoints was also analyzed. Methods: Perioperative data of patients undergoing robotic or thoracoscopic complete thymectomy between January 2014 and December 2022 at three institutions were retrospectively retrieved. Surgical procedures were divided into four standardized surgical steps: lower-horns, upper-horns, thymic veins and peri-thymic fat dissection. Three ergonomic domains including maneuverability, exposure and instrumentation were scored as excellent(score-3), satisfactory(score-2) and unsatisfactory(score-1) by three independent reviewers. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed, including anterior mediastinal tumors only. The primary endpoint was the total maneuverability score. Secondary endpoints included the other ergonomic domain scores, intraoperative adverse events, conversion to sternotomy, operative time, post-operative complications and residual disease. Results: A total of 68 robotic and 34 thoracoscopic thymectomies were included after propensity score matching. The robotic group had a higher total maneuverability score (p = 0.039), particularly in the peri-thymic fat dissection (p = 0.003) and peri-thymic fat exposure score (p = 0.027). Moreover, the robotic group had lower intraoperative adverse events (p = 0.02). No differences were found in residual disease. Conclusions: Robotic thymectomy has shown better ergonomic maneuverability compared to thoracoscopy, leading to fewer intraoperative adverse events and comparable early oncological results.

National learning curves among robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States: Quantifying the impact of procedural experience on efficiency and productivity gains

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to characterize the aggregate learning curves of US surgeons for robotic thoracic procedures and to quantify the impact on productivity.

METHODS

National average console times relative to cumulative case number were extracted from the My Intuitive application (Version 1.7.0). Intuitive da Vinci robotic system data for 56,668 lung resections performed by 870 individual surgeons between 2021 and 2022 were reviewed. Console time and hourly productivity (work relative value units/hour) were analyzed using linear regression models.

RESULTS

Average console times improved for all robotic procedures with cumulative case experience (P = .003). Segmentectomy and thymectomy had the steepest initial learning curves with a 33% and 34% reduction of the average console time for proficient (51-100 cases) relative to novice surgeons (1-10 cases), respectively. The hourly productivity increase for proficient surgeons ranged from 11.4 work relative value units/hour (+26%) for lobectomy to 17.0 work relative value units/hour (+50%) for segmentectomy. At the expert level (101+ cases), average console times continued to decrease significantly for esophagectomy (-18%) and lobectomy (-23%), but only minimally for wedge resections (-1%) (P = .003). The work relative value units/hour increase at the expert level reached 50% for lobectomy and 40% for esophagectomy. Surgeon experience level, dual console use, system model, and robotic stapler use were factors independently associated with console time for robotic lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The aggregate learning curve for robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States varies significantly by procedure type and demonstrate continued improvements in efficiency beyond 100 cases for lobectomy and esophagectomy. Improvements in efficiency with growing experiences translate to substantial productivity gains.

Outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted mediastinal mass resection during the initial learning curve

To compare the learning curve of mediastinal mass resection between robot-assisted surgery and thoracoscopic surgery. Retrospective perioperative data were collected from 160 mediastinal mass resection cases. Data included 80 initial consecutive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resection cases performed from February 2018 to February 2020 and 80 initial consecutive robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) resection cases performed from March 2020 to March 2023. All cases were operated on by a thoracic surgeon. The clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. The operation time in both the RATS group and VATS group was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Based on this method, the learning curves of both groups were divided into a learning period and mastery period. The VATS group and the RATS group crossed the inflection point in the 27th and 21st case, respectively. Subsequently, we found that the learning period was longer than the mastery period with statistically significant differences in terms of the operating time, and postoperative hospital stay in the VATS group and the RATS group. A certain amount of VATS experience can shorten the learning curve for RATS.

Early Postoperative Results after Thymectomy for Thymic Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Surgery for thymic cancers is considered the key of curative treatment. Preoperative patients' characteristics and intraoperative features might influence postoperative outcome. We aim to verify short-term outcomes and possible risk factors for complications after thymectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients undergoing surgery for thymoma or thymic carcinoma in the period between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021, in our department. Preoperative features, surgical technique (open, bilateral VATS, RATS), intraoperative characteristics and incidence of postoperative complications (PC) were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included in the study 138 patients. Open surgery was performed in 76 patients (55.1%), in 36 VATS (26.1%) and in 26 RATS (36.1%). Resection of one or more adjacent organs due to neoplastic infiltration was required in 25 patients. PC appeared in 25 patients (52% Clavien-Dindo grade I, 12% grade IVa). Open surgery had a higher incidence of PC (p < 0.001), longer postoperative in-hospital stay (p = 0.045) and larger neoplasm (p = 0.006). PC were significant related to pulmonary resection (p = 0.006), phrenic nerve resection (p = 0.029), resection of more than one organ (p = 0.009) and open surgery (p = 0.001), but only extended surgery of more organs was confirmed as independent prognostic factor for PC (p = 0.0013). Patients with preoperative myasthenia symptoms have a trend toward stage IVa complications (p = 0.065). No differences were observed between outcomes of VATS and RATS.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended resections are related to a higher incidence of PC, while VATS and RATS guarantee a lower incidence of PC and shorter postoperative stay even in patients that require extended resections. Symptomatic myasthenia patients might have a higher risk toward more severe complications.

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Surgeons have widely regarded sternotomy (ST) as the standard surgical method for thymectomy. Minimally invasive methods for thymectomy, including video-assisted and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), have been explored. There are some studies have researched and compared the outcomes of patients after robotic and sternotomy procedure.

Methods

We searched the databases of Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and selected the studies on the efficacy and safety of RATS or ST for thymectomy. Meta-analysis was performed for operation time, operation blood loss, postoperative drainage time, operative complications and hospitalization time.

Results

A total of 16 cohort studies with 1,089 patients were included. Compared to ST, RATS is an appropriate alternative for thymectomy which reduced operation blood loss [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): (-2.64, -0.99), p = 0.000], postoperative drainage time [SMD = -2.47, 95% Cl: (-3.45, -1.48), p = 0.000], operative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.31, 95% Cl: (0.18, 0.51), p = 0.000] and hospitalization time [SMD = -1.62, 95% Cl: (-2.16, -1.07), p = 0.000].

Conclusions

This meta-analysis based on cohort studies shows that RATS has more advantages over ST. Therefore, RATS is a more advanced and suitable surgical method for thymectomy.

A universal incision for robot-assisted thoracic surgery

Objective

This paper aimed to design and explore the versatility of the incision for the robot-assisted thoracic surgery.

Methods

The concept of universal incision was designed and put forward. The clinical data of 342 cases of robot-assisted thoracic surgery were summarized, including sex, age, clinical diagnosis, operative method, operative time, conversion to thoracotomy, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissections, postoperative hospital stays, postoperative pathology, and postoperative complications of the patients.

Results

The 342 cases of robot-assisted surgery included 178 pulmonary surgery cases (94 lobectomy cases, 75 segmentectomy cases, 6 wedge resection cases, and 3 sleeve lobectomy cases), 112 esophageal surgery cases (107 McKeown approach cases and 5 esophageal leiomyoma resection cases), and 52 mediastinal tumor cases (42 anterior mediastinum cases and 10 posterior mediastinum cases). Among these, two cases were converted to thoracotomy (both esophageal cases), and the rest were successful with no massive intraoperative bleeding and no perioperative death.

Conclusion

The universal incision of robot-assisted thoracic surgery is safe and feasible and is suitable for most cases of thoracic surgery.

Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Thymectomy: Single Surgeon's 7-Year Experience

Background

Robot-assisted thymectomy (RAT) has rapidly emerged as the preferred approach over open trans-sternal or video-assisted thoracoscopy for the surgical treatment of thymomas and non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG). The aim of this study was to describe and discuss the learning curve (LC) of a single surgeon performing 113 consecutive RATs.

Methods

A single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data was performed on all patients who had been operated on by the same surgeon in an RAT setting between October 2013 and February 2020. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of the operative time was used to define the completion of the learning curve (CLC) in RAT. The CLC was separately calculated for myasthenic patients, non-myasthenic patients, and docking time.

Results

In myasthenic patients, the CLC cut-off was found in 19 patients. Considering the CLC cut-off of 19 patients, the mean operative time in phase 1 (first 19 cases) was 229.79 ± 93.40 min, while it was 167.35 ± 41.63 min in phase 2 (last 51 cases), p≪0.001. In non-myasthenic patients, the CLC cut-off was found in 16 cases. The mean operative time in phase 1 (first 16 cases) was 277.44 ± 90.50 min, while it was 169.63 ± 61.10 min in phase 2 (last 27 cases), p = 0.016. The LC for docking time was reached at 46 cases, recording a significant reduction of time after the first phase (28.09 ± 5.37 min vs. 19.75 ± 5.51 min, p≪0.001). The intraoperative and 30-day mortality were null in all phases of the LC in both myasthenic and non-myasthenic patients. There were no differences between the two phases of the LC in terms of blood loss, duration of postoperative drainage, and postoperative stay in both myasthenic and non-myasthenic groups. However, significantly higher hospital readmission at 30 days post surgery was recorded for myasthenic patients operated on during the first phase of the LC (2 cases vs. 0, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

According to our data, LC in RAT seems to be steep, and RAT confirms to be safe even before reaching CLC.

Maximal Thymectomy via Mini Sternotomy with Pleural Preservation

Gaurav PatelBackground  There are different surgical techniques used for maximal thymectomy. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. We propose a mini sternotomy with pleural preservation approach for complete maximal thymectomy. Methods  Over time range of 5 years, 32 patients with diagnosis of thymoma with or without myasthenia gravis (MG) underwent maximal thymectomy by mini sternotomy in our institute. Patient records were examined for the following parameters: age, sex, preoperative medication, symptoms of MG as per Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America grading system, operating time, duration of postoperative ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, overall length of hospitalization, and postoperative complications. Results  The mean age of patients in our study was 43.66. Sex ratio in this study was almost equal. Sixty-nine percent of patients were stage I thymoma according to Masaoka staging. Size of the tumor ranged from 3 to 8 cm with mean size being 4.54 cm. Complete resection with negative tumor margins was possible in all the cases. Four patients had intraoperative pleural injury out of which two patients required intercostal tube insertion. We did not have any serious postoperative complications with no perioperative mortality. Conclusions  Mini sternotomy allows maximal removal of thymus through a less invasive approach and is associated with a significantly smoother postoperative course, less overall complications, and good clinical outcome. It is a simple technique that can be performed by any thoracic and surgical oncologists especially in Indian subcontinent where facilities of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery are not available in all areas and are expensive.

Complications of robot-assisted thymectomy: A single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recently, thymectomy using minimally invasive approaches has been increasing with the development of robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (R-VATS). Although multimodal approach is effective for robot assisted thymectomy, it is necessary to determine the approach (left, right or subxiphoid) associated with the least complications.

METHODS

An electronic retrieval from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, GreyNet International and The Cochrane Library. The single-arm meta-analysis was performed to compare the rate of complications of right- and left-side approaches by R-VATS.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies including 930 patients were identified. The pooled incidence of total complications was 12.2% (confidence interval: 10.0%-14.8%) for all studies. The overall complication rate was 17.3% for the right-side compared with 7.4% for the left side (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 2.484, 1.601-3.852). The pooled incidence of air leak was significantly higher for the right versus left side (5.1% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher for the right-side compared with the left-side approach (4% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). The open conversion rate was significantly higher for the right versus the left-side (6.5% vs. 2.9%, respectively; p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in the pooled incidence of pleural effusion and thoracic duct fistula when comparing the right- and left-side approaches. In subgroup analysis, in the left approach, the incidence of overall complications (28.6% vs. 5.5%, respectively; p = 0.002) and pleural effusion (14.3% vs. 1%, respectively; p = 0.002) was higher for the 'Old Age' group compared with the 'Youth' group; However, In the subgroup analysis of gender, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications after thymectomy.

CONCLUSION

Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be performed on the left- and right-sides; however, complications are minimal with the left-side approach. These data demonstrate that the incidence of overall complications, atrial fibrillation, open conversion ratios, and air leak rate of left-side R-VATS thymectomy are lower than those of right-side. Further subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of postoperative complications was higher in the older group.

Difficult Decisions in Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Thymus

A minimally invasive resection of thymomas has been accepted as standard of care in the last decade for early stage thymomas. This is somewhat controversial in terms of higher-staged thymomas and myasthenia gravis patients due to the prognostic importance of complete resections and the indolent characteristics of the disease process. Despite concerted efforts to standardize minimally invasive approaches, there is still controversy as to the extent of excision, approach of surgery, and the platform utilized. In this article, we aim to provide our surgical perspective of thymic resection and a review of the existing literature.

Robotic vs. Transsternal Thymectomy: A Single Center Experience over 10 Years

Introduction: Thymomas are the most common tumors of the mediastinum. Traditionally, thymectomies have been performed through a transsternal (TS) approach. With the development of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), a promising, minimally invasive, alternative surgical technique for performing a thymectomy has been developed. In the current paper, the oncological and surgical outcomes of the TS vs. RATS thymectomies are discussed. Methods: For the RATS thymectomy, two 8 mm working ports and one 12 mm camera port were used. In the transsternal approach, we performed a median sternotomy and resected the thymic tissue completely, in some cases en bloc with part of the lung and/or, more frequently, a partial pericardiectomy with consequent reconstruction using a bovine pericardial patch. The decisions for using the TS vs. RATS methods were mainly based on the suspected tumor invasion of the surrounding structures on the preoperative CT scan and tumor size. Results: Between January 2010 and November 2020, 149 patients were submitted for an anterior mediastinal tumor resection at our institution. A total of 104 patients met the inclusion criteria. One procedure was performed through a hemi-clamshell incision. A total of 81 (78%) patients underwent RATS procedures, and 22 (21.1%) patients were treated using a transsternal (TS) tumor resection. Thymoma was diagnosed in 53 (51%) cases. In the RATS group, the median LOS was 3.2 ± 2.8 days and the median tumor size was 4.4 ± 2.37 cm compared to the TS group, which had a median LOS of 9 ± 7.3 days and a median tumor size of 10.4 ± 5.3 cm. Both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Complete resection was achieved in all patients. Conclusion: While larger and infiltrating tumors (i.e., thymic carcinomas) were usually resected via a sternotomy, the RATS procedure is a good alternative for the resection of thymomas of up to 9.5 cm, and the thymectomy is a strong approach for myasthenia gravis. The oncological outcomes and survival rates were not influenced by the chosen approach.

Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted and Transsternal Thymectomy

Objective: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is a minimally invasive technique that has been used in thymectomy operations in recent years. Minimally invasive surgical techniques offer less postoperative pain, a shorter length of hospital stay, and faster recovery compared to conventional surgical techniques. In our study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of robotic and transsternal thymectomies by analyzing the operative and postoperative data of these two approaches. Methods: Twelve robotic thymectomy patients and 16 transsternal thymectomy patients who were operated on in our clinic in 2018 were included in the study. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time (p=0.231). The median chest tube duration was 1.5 [range, 1-2] days in robotic thymectomy and 2.5 [range, 1-3.75] days in transsternal thymectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.082). The amount of chest tube drainage was significantly lower in the robotic thymectomy group (p=0.006). The length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in robotic thymectomy patients (p<0.001). Conclusion: The amount of chest tube drainage was lower and the length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic surgery compared to the transsternal approach. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of operative time. Within today's minimally invasive surgical techniques, robotic thymectomy can be considered a practical, comfortable, and safe technique with better early postoperative outcomes. Keywords: Robot-Assisted Thymectomy, Thymectomy, Transsternal Thymectomy

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal masses: a single-institution experience

Background

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) using the da Vinci robotic system for mediastinal mass resection and to describe the surgical approach for masses in different mediastinal regions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from 84 patients who underwent RATS for resection of a mediastinal mass from June 2015 to April 2019. The results were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

The mediastinal mass was resected successfully in all patients, with one patient requiring conversion to conventional open surgery. There were no intraoperative complications. The most common diagnoses were thymoma (n=17), bronchogenic cyst (n=16), and schwannoma (n=12). The surgical approach was determined by the location of the lesion and the planned extent of surgical resection. Resection was performed in the lateral decubitus position in 29 patients with posterior mediastinal tumor, semi-lateral decubitus position in 42 patients who only need resection of anterior mediastinal mass, and reverse Trendelenburg position in 13 patients undergoing thymectomy. The mean (± standard deviation) operation time was 91.86±56.42 min, duration of chest tube use was 1.83±0.93 days, and postoperative hospital stay was 3.62±7.52 days. Three patients (3.5%) developed postoperative complications: one chylous fistula, which required reoperation, and one case each of atrial fibrillation and pulmonary infection, which were treated conservatively.

Conclusions

Our experience demonstrated that different surgical approaches of RATS are safe and feasible for mediastinal mass resection. An appropriate approach can be selected based on the mediastinal region in which the tumor is located.

Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery

Background

Increased uptake of robotic surgery has led to interest in learning curves for robot‐assisted procedures. Learning curves, however, are often poorly defined. This systematic review was conducted to identify the available evidence investigating surgeon learning curves in robot‐assisted surgery.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched in February 2018, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, alongside hand searches of key congresses and existing reviews. Eligible articles were those assessing learning curves associated with robot‐assisted surgery in patients.

Results

Searches identified 2316 records, of which 68 met the eligibility criteria, reporting on 68 unique studies. Of these, 49 assessed learning curves based on patient data across ten surgical specialties. All 49 were observational, largely single‐arm (35 of 49, 71 per cent) and included few surgeons. Learning curves exhibited substantial heterogeneity, varying between procedures, studies and metrics. Standards of reporting were generally poor, with only 17 of 49 (35 per cent) quantifying previous experience. Methods used to assess the learning curve were heterogeneous, often lacking statistical validation and using ambiguous terminology.

Conclusion

Learning curve estimates were subject to considerable uncertainty. Robust evidence was lacking, owing to limitations in study design, frequent reporting gaps and substantial heterogeneity in the methods used to assess learning curves. The opportunity remains for the establishment of optimal quantitative methods for the assessment of learning curves, to inform surgical training programmes and improve patient outcomes.

Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists as to what constitutes a learning curve to achieve competency, and how the initial learning period of robotic thoracic surgery should be approached.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature published prior to December 2018 using PubMed/MEDLINE for studies of surgeons adopting the robotic approach for anatomic lung resection or thymectomy. Changes in operating room time and outcomes based on number of cases performed, type of procedure, and existing proficiency with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were examined.

RESULTS

Twelve observational studies were analyzed, including nine studies on robotic lung resection and three studies on thymectomy. All studies showed a reduction in operative time with an increasing number of cases performed. A steep learning curve was described for thymectomy, with a decrease in operating room time in the first 15 cases and a plateau after 15-20 cases. For anatomic lung resection, the number of cases to achieve a plateau in operative time ranged between 15-20 cases and 40-60 cases. All but two studies had at least some VATS experience. Six studies reported on experience of over one hundred cases and showed continued gradual improvements in operating room time.

CONCLUSION

The learning curve for robotic thoracic surgery appears to be rapid with most studies indicating the steepest improvement in operating time occurring in the initial 15-20 cases for thymectomy and 20-40 cases for anatomic lung resection. Existing data can guide a standardized robotic curriculum for rapid adaptation, and aid credentialing and quality monitoring for robotic thoracic surgery programs.

Third distant recurrence of benign thymoma in a patient with myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease where antibodies attack the presynaptic terminals at the neuromuscular junction causing progressive weakness. Associated with thymomas, resection can improve symptoms. A 29-year-old woman with MG who underwent two previous thymectomies, at ages 11 and 15 presented 14 years later with recurrent MG symptoms and an anterior mediastinal mass. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic excision of the mediastinal mass was performed without complications. She recovered well and had improvement of her MG symptoms. Thymectomy can significantly improve symptoms in MG even for patients who do not have a thymoma. Reports of distant benign thymoma recurrence are rare. MG patients require continued monitoring and vigilance, even after thymectomy. Benign thymomas can recur even after significant time intervals, and utilisation of the robotic platform for recurrent thymoma excision is safe, even following two sternotomies. Patient symptoms improve with redo thymectomy.

A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy

Background

Median sternotomy has been the most commonly used approach for thymectomy to date. Recent advances in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic access with CO₂ insufflation techniques have allowed more minimally invasive approaches. However, prior reviews have not compared robotic to both open and VATS thymectomy.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. Original research articles comparing robotic to VATS or to open thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, anterior mediastinal masses, or thymomas were included. Meta-analyses were performed for mortality, operative time, blood loss, transfusions, length of stay, conversion to open, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, and positive/negative margin rates.

Results

Robotic thymectomy is a valid alternative to the open approach; advantages include: reduced blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD): -173.03, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -305.90, -40.17, P=0.01], fewer postoperative complications (odds ratio: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.60, P<0.00001), a shorter hospital stay (WMD: -2.78, 95% CI: -3.22, -2.33, P<0.00001), and a lower positive margin rate (relative difference: -0.04, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01, P=0.01), with comparable operative times (WMD: 6.73, 95% CI: -21.20, 34.66, P=0.64). Robotic thymectomy was comparable with the VATS approach; both have the advantage of avoiding median sternotomy.

Conclusions

While randomized controlled studies are required to make definitive conclusions, current data suggests that robotic thymectomy is superior to open surgery and comparable to a VATS approach. Long-term follow-up is required to further delineate oncological outcomes.

Robotic Thymectomy Is Feasible for Large Thymomas: A Propensity-Matched Comparison

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted thymectomy (RAT) is increasingly performed for resection of thymomas. Its application for large tumors remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of RAT for large thymomas in comparison with transsternal thymectomy (ST).

METHODS

A single institution database was reviewed for patients who underwent RAT for thymoma of 4 cm or larger between 2004 and 2016. Propensity scores were applied to match RAT with ST patients, based on age, sex, tumor size, and Masaoka stage. Perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (15 women and 5 men, median age 59 years) underwent RAT for a large thymoma (median size 6.0 cm). A right-sided approach was used in 14 patients (70%). A control group of 34 ST patients (median size 6.7 cm) had similar Masaoka staging (p = 0.64). Combined resection of adjacent structures, including pericardium, lung, and phrenic nerve, were frequently performed in both groups (50% RAT versus 47% ST, p = 0.83). RAT patients had lower blood loss (25 mL versus 150 mL, p = 0.001), were more frequently managed with a single chest tube (85% versus 56%, p = 0.027), and had a shorter median length of stay (3 days versus 4 days, p = 0.034). There were no perioperative deaths and no major vascular injuries. Three RAT patients (15%) were converted to open approach. Overall complication rates were similar between RAT and ST patients (15% versus 24%, p = 0.45). No difference was seen in R0 resection rates (90% versus 85%, p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

RAT can be performed safely and effectively in a radical fashion for large thymomas. Future studies are necessary to determine long-term oncologic outcomes.

Robotic thymectomy-a new approach for thymus

Advancements in modern technology bring many evolutions in minimally invasive surgery such as robot assisted approaches. Because of complete resection is so important in thymectomy operations, they became a new era for robotic surgery as a result of its superiorities (intuitive movements, tremor filtration, more degrees of manipulative freedom, motion scaling, and high-definition stereoscopic vision).