Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis Using a Combination of Laparoscopic Lithotomy and Pyeloscopy

Is laparoscopic pyelolithotomy an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients?

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of renal pelvis stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Our study consisted of two groups. Group 1 included 33 patients who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) between January 2013 and March 2022, and group 2 included 39 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The basic clinical parameters of the patients were recorded. Mean operation time, stone size, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hospital stay, stone-free rate, postoperative analgesia requirements, intraoperative complications, and early and late postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In our study, the mean age of the patients in groups 1 and 2 was 8.89 ± 1.58 years and 9.1 ± 1.85 years, respectively (p = 0.657). The mean stone size was 2.37 ± 0.38 cm in group 1 and 2.55 ± 0.45 cm in group 2 (p = 0.64). The mean operation time was 85.65 ± 20.55 min in group 1, while it was 76.11 ± 13.12 min in group 2 (p = 0.08). The stone-free rate was 100% in both groups. Intraoperative mean blood loss, need for postoperative analgesia, blood transfusion and intraoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the PCNL group (p < 0.01, p = 0.02, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective method for pediatric patients with large kidney stones.

Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of ureteroscopy and retrolaparoscopy on urinary calculi and infection.

METHOD

A total of 64 patients with urinary calculi and infection who received treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to January 2018 were selected. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups: a control group and a study group. The study group was treated with laparoscopic ureteroscopy, and the control group was treated with ureteroscopy. The surgical results, complications, renal function, stress response, and inflammatory reaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the study group stone clearance rate was higher, the surgical time was shorter (P < 0.05); the incidence of complications in the study group (23.3%) was lower than that in the control group (5.9%) (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in kidney function indicators before treatment (P > 0.05); after treatment, the SCR, BUN, NGAL, and Cys-C indicators of the two groups were significantly increased. Compared with the control group, the study group change was more obvious, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); after treatment, the two sets of stress response indicators were significantly increased, but relative to the control group, the study group stress response indicator was lower (P < 0.05); before treatment, there was no significant difference in inflammatory factors (P > 0.05); after treatment, the two sets of inflammatory factor levels were significantly increased, but relative to the control group, the study group was lower (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the clinical treatment of urinary stones, ureteroscopy technology and the laparoscopic technique have played an important role. But the laparoscopic technique is shorter, the stone clearance is higher, and the patient's renal function can be improved, and the patient is postoperative. The stress reaction should be small. Therefore, in the clinical treatment of urinary stones and infection, laparoscopic technical treatment is worth promoting.

Surgical treatment of pediatric urolithiasis

Introduction: Surgical treatment of urolithiasis in children is quite complex and specific due to certain anatomical and functional features of childhood. Methods of surgical treatment at this age are: extracorporeal lithotripsy (ESWL), intracorporeal (endoscopic) lithotripsy - pneumatic and laser, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) and open surgery. Aim: The aim of this study was evaluation of the effects of ureterorenoscopy and endoscopic lithotripsy in children, as methods of minimally invasive surgical treatment. Material and methods: The retrospective study was conducted at the Institute for Mother and Child Health Care of Serbia "Dr Vukan Cupic" in Belgrade from 2010 to 2020. The study included 112 patients (50 boys and 62 girls) aged 1-18 years with urolithiasis, treated by endoscopic (laser or pneumatic) lithotripsy. The retrospective study was conducted at the Institute for Mother and Child Health Care of Serbia "Dr Vukan Cupic" in Belgrade from 2010 to 2020. The study included 112 patients (50 boys and 62 girls) aged 1-18 years with urolithiasis, treated by endoscopic (laser or pneumatic) lithotripsy. Results: After one ureterorenoscopy, the calculus was successfully disintegrated in 87 (78%) patients: in the renal pelvis in 22 (79%), in the upper pole calices of the kidney in 14 (100%), in the lower pole calices in 10 (50%), in the proximal segment of the ureter in 10 (83%), in the distal segment of the ureter in 27 (79%), in the bladder in 4 (100%) cases. In 19 (17%) patients the second intervention was necessary: in the renal pelvis in 28 (100%), in the upper pole calices in 14 (100%), in the lower pole calices in 14 (70%), in the proximal segment of the ureter in 12 (100%), in the distal segment of the ureter in 34 (100%) and in the bladder in 4 (100%) patients. Conclusion: The primary treatment of pediatric urolithiasis is ureterorenoscopy in combination with pneumatic or laser lithotripsy. It is successfully used in all segments of the urinary tract. The procedure is partially limited in the lower pole calices of the kidney, due to anatomical circumstances and mechanical limitations of the instruments.

Laparoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Upper Tract Urolithiasis: An Alternate Modality

Introduction

Incidence of pediatric urolithiasis has increased over the last few decades. Procedures such as extracorporeal short wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, and ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy are not widely available for pediatric age group in many developing countries. It is desirable that advantages of minimally invasive surgery be offered to selected cases with urolithiasis.

Materials and Methods

All patients with pediatric upper tract urolithiasis managed laparoscopically from January 2015 to April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 38 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 8 ± 2.85 years. Thirty-four patients (renal and upper ureteric) were managed through retroperitoneal approach, while those with lower ureteric calculi (n = 4) were approached transperitoneally. A total of eight patients required conversion to open technique. The stone clearance rate was 79% by laparoscopic approach alone. There were no procedure-related complications.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that laparoscopic management for pediatric upper tract urolithiasis is a radiation-free, single-time curative treatment and is feasible in centers where facilities for other endoscopic procedures are unavailable.

Applications of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Surgery of the Pediatric Urinary Tract

Application of laparoscopy in pediatric urology has evolved over more than 30 years coming from a merely diagnostic use for non-palpable testes to "interventional" laparoscopy to extirpative surgery and finally to the era of reconstructive pediatric laparoscopic urology, when in 1995 Peters described the first laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a child. Laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology became implemented increasingly in the twenty-first century with now present-day applications including the complete variety of all kind of indications for surgery for pediatric urological pathology. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current indications, techniques, and outcomes of laparoscopic transperitoneal surgery of the upper as well as of the lower urinary tract for urological pathology in the pediatric patient population.