Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly: Does Size Matter?

Ten-year experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for patients with splenic benign lesions

BACKGROUND

The increasing comprehension of spleen function has led to the gradual endorsement of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) as a treatment option for benign spleen lesions. However, it is important to note that the LPS technique remains challenging. This study explores the standardized process and surgical techniques in LPS, aiming to promote the application of this technique.

METHODS

The clinical data of 20 patients with benign cystic or solid spleen lesions who underwent LPS at Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University were retrospectively collected. Data include age, gender, imaging data, surgical process, and postoperative complications. Additionally, the surgical techniques and standardization process were recorded in detail.

RESULTS

All 20 cases completed LPS without conversion to laparotomy or splenectomy. The surgical time was 162.25 ± 37.96 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 93.00 ± 58.40 mL, no blood products were transfused during the operations, and the removed volume of the spleen was about 34.75 ± 12.19 %. There were no postoperative complications such as intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, pancreatic fistula, and residual splenic infarction. Postoperative pleural effusion occurred in four cases, and symptoms improved after symptomatic treatment. The postoperative hospital stay was 7.0 ± 1.4 days. There were no perioperative deaths. The residual splenic vessels were normal during the follow-up period, and no vascular embolism occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

LPS is a safe, feasible, and effective surgical method for patients with benign cystic or solid spleen lesions. Subsequently, mastering related surgical techniques and standardized surgical procedures can control the surgical risks in suitable cases, making LPS the standard procedure for treating benign spleen diseases.

A Simple Technique of Tunnel Constructing for Occluding Splenic Vessels During Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients with Cirrhosis

Purpose: Dissecting and ligating the splenic artery is crucial for bleeding control during laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). However, for patients with portal hypertension from liver cirrhosis, it is difficult for identification and ligation because the splenic vessel is circuitous and dilated. The aim of this study was to describe a simple technique of constructing a tunnel behind the tail of the pancreas for occluding the splenic vessels during LS in patients with portal hypertension. Materials and Methods: The clinical data of 61 patients who underwent LS from April 2016 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. In 27 patients, the tunnel construction (TC) behind the tail of the pancreas approach was performed owning to difficulty in dissecting and ligating the splenic artery (TC group), including 17 patients who received the TC method directly and 10 patients who received the TC method after trying to dissect the splenic artery. The remaining 34 patients underwent traditional ligating of the splenic artery (LA group). The peri- and postoperative outcomes of operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative oral diet intake, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate of the two groups were analyzed. All the operations were completed by the same group of surgeons. Results: All 61 operations were successfully completed. Compared with patients in the LA group, patients in the TC group had less blood loss (120.37 ± 40.74 mL versus 162.65 ± 87.47 mL; t = -2.317, P = .024). There was no statistical difference of operative time, conversion rate, complication rate, postoperative hospital stays, and follow-up between the two groups. Conclusions: The technique of constructing a tunnel behind the tail of the pancreas for occluding the splenic vessels was effective and safe in those patients whose splenic artery was difficult to dissect and ligate.

Long-term Results of Splenectomy in Transfusion-dependent Thalassemia

Splenectomy is indicated in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) only in certain situations. This study aimed to present the effectiveness, complications, and long-term follow-up results of splenectomy in children with TDT. We performed a 30-year single-institution analysis of cases of splenectomy for TDT between 1987 and 2017 and their follow-up until 2021. A total of 39 children (female/male: 24/15) were included. The mean age at splenectomy was 11.2±3.2 years, and their mean follow-up duration after splenectomy was 21.5±6.4 years. Response was defined according to the patient's annual transfusion requirement in the first year postsplenectomy and on the last follow-up year. Complete response was not seen in any of the cases; partial response was observed in 32.3% and no response in 67.6%. Thrombocytosis was seen in 87% of the patients. The platelet counts of 7 (17.9%) patients were >1000 (10 9 /L), and aspirin prophylaxis was given to 22 (56.4%) patients. Complications were thrombosis in 2 (5.1%) patients, infections in 11 (28.2%) patients, and pulmonary hypertension in 4 (10.2%) patients. Our study showed that after splenectomy, the need for transfusion only partially decreased in a small number of TDT patients. We think splenectomy can be delayed with appropriate chelation therapy up to higher annual transfusion requirement values.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: the "splenic no-touch" technique for hilar control by anterior lienorenal approach

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic splenectomy is challenging in patients with massive splenomegaly. The paper describes a technique that overcomes the difficulties one faces while dealing with a massive spleen laparoscopically.

METHODS

We describe our splenic no-touch technique through the anterior lienorenal approach in patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly during a 10-year period from January 2010 to January 2020.

RESULTS

During the study period, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Of these, 13 patients had successful laparoscopic completion of the procedure. One patient required conversion for bleed. There were no pancreatic tail injuries during splenic hilar stapling in any patient. The median operative time was 170 minutes (140-225). The median blood loss was 50 mL (20-600). Two patients required blood transfusions. There was no other morbidity or mortality. The median postoperative stay was 2 days.

CONCLUSION

The splenic no-touch technique using the anterior lienorenal approach for laparoscopic splenectomy is safe and feasible in patients with massive splenomegaly. Preoperative imaging enables optimal port placement and procedure ergonomics.

Elective splenectomy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Does the size of the spleen affect surgical outcomes?

Backgrounds/Aims

Splenectomy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is performed to relieve abdominal symptoms, treat hypersplenism or confirm diagnosis. Excision of a very large spleen is technically challenging and data on outcomes of surgery in patients with NHL are scanty. The aim of study was to evaluate the impact of spleen size on the surgical outcome of splenectomy in patients with NHL.

Methods

Patients with NHL who underwent splenectomy, between 2006 and 2017, were included and divided into two groups: group 1, spleen ≤ 20 cm; group 2, spleen > 20 cm. Surgical approach, operative time, postoperative morbidity, mortality, hospital stay and re-admission rates were retrospectively compared between groups. Non-parametric data were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in frequencies were analyzed with Fisher's exact test.

Results

Sixteen patients were included (group 1, 6; group 2, 10). Laparoscopy was successful in three patients of group 1, none of group 2 (p = 0.035), the intraoperative time did not differ significantly between groups. One patient in each group developed postoperative complications. The patient in group 1 died of pneumonia. Median length of stay was 8 days (range, 3-16 days) for group 1, 5.5 days (range, 3-10 days) for group 2, showing no significant difference between the two groups. No patient was readmitted to hospital.

Conclusions

Spleen size does not affect the outcome of splenectomy in patients with NHL. If a mini-invasive approach is to be chosen, laparoscopy may not be feasible when the spleen size is > 20 cm.

Application of Real-Time Augmented Reality Laparoscopic Navigation in Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical impact and technical feasibility of augmented reality laparoscopic navigation (ARLN) system in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.

METHODS

The clinical data of 17 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy using ARLN (ARLN group) and 26 patients without ARLN guidance (Non-ARLN group) between January 2018 and April 2020 were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed between the patients with and without ARLN guidance at a ratio of 1:1.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the ARLN-group than in the Non-ARLN group (306.6 ml vs. 462.6 ml, p = 0.047). All the patients in the ARLN-group achieved successful splenic artery dissection, while surgical success was achieved in 12 patients in the Non-ARLN group (p = 0.044). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the Non-ARLN group (3.8 days vs. 4.5 days, p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

ARLN can provide feasible and accurate intraoperative image guidance, and it could be helpful in the performance of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Treatment of Splenomegaly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence regarding the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques in cases of splenomegaly.

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic approaches such as laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and robotic surgery are commonly used for splenectomy, but the advantages in cases of splenomegaly are controversial.

REVIEW METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to February 2020.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included for meta-analysis. In relation to laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) versus open splenectomy (OS), 12 studies revealed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) of 3.3 days (p = <0.01) in the LS subgroup. Operative time was higher by 44.4 min (p < 0.01) in the LS group. Blood loss was higher in OS 146.2 cc (p = <0.01). No differences were found regarding morbimortality. The global conversion rate was 19.56%. Five studies compared LS and hand-assisted laparosocpic splenectomy (HALS), but no differences were observed in LOS, blood loss, or complications. HALS had a significantly reduced conversion rate (p < 0.01). In two studies that compared HALS and OS (n = 66), HALS showed a decrease in LOS of 4.5 days (p < 0.01) and increase of 44 min in operative time (p < 0.01), while OS had a significantly higher blood loss of 448 cc (p = 0.01). No differences were found in the complication rate.

CONCLUSION

LS is a safe approach for splenomegaly, with clear clinical benefits. HALS has a lower conversion rate. Higher-quality confirmatory trials with standardized splenomegaly grading are needed before definitive recommendations can be provided. Prospero registration number: CRD42019125251.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy Versus Open Splenectomy In Massive and Giant Spleens: Should we Update the 2008 EAES Guidelines?

The objective of this study was to derive some useful parameters to define the feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in massive [spleen longitudinal diameter (SLD)>20 cm] and giant spleens (SLD>25 cm). Between December 1996 and May 2017, 175 patients underwent an elective splenectomy. A laparoscopic approach was used in 133 (76%) patients. Massive spleens were treated in 65 (37.1%) patients, of which 24 were treated laparoscopically. In this subset of massive spleens, the results of laparoscopic splenectomy in massive spleens (LSM) and open splenectomy in massive spleens (OSM) were compared. The clinical outcome of a subgroup of patients with giant spleens was also analyzed. The LSM group resulted in significant longer operative times (143±31 vs. 112±40 min; P=0.001), less blood loss (278±302 vs. 575±583 mL; P=0.007), and shorter hospital stay (6±3 vs. 9±4 d; P=0.004). No conversions were experienced in the LSM group, and the morbidity rate was similar in both the LSM and OSM groups (16.6% vs. 20%; P=0.75). When considering the subset of 9 LSM patients and 26 OSM patients with giant spleens, the same favorable tendency of the laparoscopic group as regards surgical conversion, blood loss, and hospital stay was maintained. The laparoscopic approach can be successfully proposed in the presence of massive splenomegaly also after a careful preoperative evaluation of the expected abdominal "working space." In experienced hands, LS is safe, feasible, and associated with better outcomes than open splenectomy for the treatment of massive and giant spleen, with a maximum SLD limit of 31 cm.

Predictive Factors for Platelet Count Variation After Splenectomy in Non-Traumatic Diseases

BACKGROUND

The spleen plays a central role in a range of diseases. As such, great emphasis has been placed on the procedure of spleen removal, the benefits and the numerous associated complications. Given the immediate risk of the thrombotic complications, the aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and laboratory patient characteristics in non-traumatic diseases of the spleen, and to investigate possible predictive factors for platelet count variation following the procedure.

METHODS

A total of 72 patients who underwent splenectomy were included in this retrospective study. Correlation coefficients as well as multiple linear regressions were used to assess the relationship between post-splenectomy platelet count and various preoperative clinical and laboratory patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Following multiple linear regression analysis, we determined that 54.93% of post-splenectomy platelet count variation was explained by admission platelet count (p = 0.00), lymphocyte count (p = 0.04), WBC count (p = 0.00), LOS (p = 0.00), patient gender (p = 0.00), spleen accessibility on admission (p = 0.02) and PT (p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet count variation following splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases can be predicted by assessing preoperative patient characteristics. The implications of this study suggest that by means of a prediction model, patient care could benefit from assessing and addressing various preoperative factors that lead to these complications.