Robotic Adrenalectomy: Are We Expanding the Indications of Minimally Invasive Surgery?

Exploring the Benefits of a Reduced-Port Approach in Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparative Study of the Two-Port and Three-Port Techniques

Background: Robotic adrenalectomy has become a surgical treatment option for benign and selected malignant adrenal diseases. We aimed to evaluate the eligibility of two-port robotic posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) as an alternative to the conventional three-port technique by comparing their surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes among 197 patients who underwent two-port or three-port robotic adrenalectomy between 2016 and 2020 in a single tertiary center. For further evaluation, propensity score matching was performed to reduce the selection bias in population characteristics. Results: Patients were categorized by the number of ports (two-port group, 87; and three-port group, 110). The two-port group compared with the three-port group was significantly older (P = .006) and had a smaller mean tumor size (P = .003) and shorter mean operation time (P = .001). Upon comparing clinicopathologic characteristics according to adrenal disorders, for pheochromocytoma, the three-port group had a larger tumor size and a longer operation time. For Cushing's syndrome, the operation time was short and numeric rating scale pain score was significantly low in the two-port group. After propensity score matching, the two-port group had a short operation time and a significantly low postoperative pain score (P < .05). Predictive factors associated with prolonged operation time included male gender, an increased number of ports, and large tumor size. Conclusions: The two-port technique resulted in a shorter operation time and lower pain score compared with the three-port technique. The two-port technique may be a safe alternative to the conventional three-port technique for robotic PRA.

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art

Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is worldwide considered the gold standard technique. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches have proved their efficacy with excellent outcomes. Since the introduction of da Vinci System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), robotic surgery has made many steps forward gaining progressively more diffusion in the field of general and endocrine surgery. The robotic technique offers advantages to overcome some laparoscopic shortcomings (rigid instruments, loss of 3D vision, unstable camera). Indeed, the robotic system is provided of stereoscopic 3D-magnified vision, additional degree of freedom, tremor-filtering technology and a stable camera. Recently, several case series have demonstrated the feasibility and the safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy in high-volume centers with outcomes comparable to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Notwithstanding, the technical advantages of the robotic system have not yet demonstrated significant improvements in terms of outcomes to undermine laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Moreover, robotic adrenalectomy harbor inherits drawbacks, such as longer operative time and elevated costs, that limit its use. In particular, the high cost associated with the use of the robotic system is primarily related to the purchase and the maintenance of the unit, the high instruments cost and the longer operative time. Notably, these aspects make robotic adrenalectomy up to 2.3 times more costly than laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This literature review summarizes the current available studies and provides an overview about the robotic scenario including applicability, technical details and surgical outcomes.

Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Does Size Matter?

Objective: Open adrenalectomy (OA) is considered to be the standard care for large adrenal tumors. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) using laparoscopic technique is considered for many patients in the modern era. Robot assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RALA) can be an extremely useful tool which will negate the disadvantage of laparoscopic method. The aim of the present study is to determine whether adrenal tumor size and laterality have an impact on patients undergoing RALA with respect to perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

 Methods: During the study period, 38 patients who underwent RALA in a tertiary care center were considered for retrospectively analysis. The study populations were subdivided into distinctive groups based on the tumor size (<5 cm and ≥5 cm, <8 cm and ≥8 cm), and side (right and left side). For all the subgroups, perioperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed between patient groups, group a) <5 cm and ≥5 cm tumor, group b) <8 cm and ≥8 cm, and group c) laterality (right vs left).

Results: None of the patients showed any differences. In the current study, the conversion rate, readmission, and mortality were not observed. No major complications were noted.

Conclusion: RALA appears to be an extremely viable alternative to MIS using laparoscopic technique. The operative time, console time, blood loss, complication rates, and stay were extremely minimal irrespective of the size or laterality of the adrenal tumor.

Robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy from inception to ingenuity: the perspective on two high volume endocrine surgery centers

Background

With increased utilization of robotic technology, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) became popular in certain high-volume centers as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes of RA in two high-volume centers in Turkey.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in two referral centers for surgical endocrine diseases in Turkey were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 111 patients were analyzed. Mean diameter of the tumor in preoperative imaging was 38.6±2.0 mm. Total operation time was 135.4±47.9 min. The analysis of the learning curve period and the post-learning curve period in both centers demonstrated that the total surgery time decreased from 152.68±48.6 to 118.8±37.1 min, and the console time decreased from 113.2±38.9 to 81.6±35.1 min (P<0.0001). In 8 patients, complications arose during the surgery and postoperative complications were observed in 10 patients. Intraoperative complication rate was 28% in patients with a tumor diameter of greater than 50 mm (P<0.0001). There was no mortality.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that RA is a safe and effective procedure with low-morbidity and without mortality in high number of cases.

Risk factors for complications after robotic adrenalectomy: a review

The application of adrenal surgery has been spreading steadily in recent years. With the increased use of robotics in surgery, robotic adrenalectomy (RA), especially for the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach, has been taken on by many high-volume institutions as a good option over the standard laparoscopic approach (LA). This paper reviews the recent literature from May 2010 up to November 2019 with the aim of analyzing RA complications in order to identify risk factors for complications after RA. We analyzed 7 principal risk factors for complication: body mass index (BMI), age, tumor size, tumor side, pathology, previous surgery, and surgeon experience. In the review, some studies identified tumor size, malignancy type, completion of learning curve and, and less clearly, previous ipsilateral upper mesocolic or retroperitoneal surgery, as risk factors for postoperative complications and failure of robotic surgery. Whether RA is meaningfully superior to the standard minimally invasive approach is still a subject of discussion. RA appears safer by virtue of its reduction in hospital stay, lower blood loss, and equivalent complication rates, and surgeons should prefer adrenalectomy over the LA. Despite these advantages, the operative time and the overall cost of the robotic procedure are higher than the LA. Further high-quality trials, especially those analyzing the specific risk factors for complications in robotic surgery, should be conducted in order to optimize the stratification of patients eligible for robotic surgery.