Bariatric Surgery and Gastroesophageal Reflux

Efficacy of combined sleeve gastrectomy and nissen fundoplication for weight loss and prevention of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The addition of a Nissen fundoplication to the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been recently proposed to reduce the incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic Nissen Sleeve (LNS). A systematic review using the Medline database was performed to identify original articles analyzing outcomes after LNS. Main outcomes included weight loss, improvement of GERD symptoms, esophagitis, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage, and pH monitoring. Postprocedural complications were included as secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis of proportions and paired preintervention and postintervention tests were used to assess the effect of the procedure on the different outcomes. A total of 5 studies comprising 246 patients undergoing LNS were included in the analysis. Mean age was 43.22 (40-46.2) years and 201 (85.12%) were females. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of patients was 38.10 (33.9-40.4) kg/m2. After a mean follow up of 27 (12-60) months, there was a significant reduction in mean BMI (pre: 38.10 versus post: 29.36, P < .007) and a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 59.10% (26%-82%). The proportion of patients with GERD symptoms (pre: 80.16% versus post: 11.22%, P = .001) were significantly reduced after the operation. The use of PPIs (pre: 69% versus post: 8.98%, P = .10) and presence of esophagitis (pre: 69.6% versus post: 18%, P = .05) also reduced after the procedure, but this was not statiscally significant. Overall morbidity rate was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-11%), with a weighted pooled proportion of 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%) for leaks, 2% (95% CI, 1%-5%) for strictures, 1% (95% CI, 1%-3%) for bleeding, and 3% (95% CI, 1%-5%) for perforation. LNS seems to be a safe and effective operation with apparently better GERD-related outcomes than SG alone. Further studies with longer follow-up and objective measurement of reflux are needed to confirm the successful outcomes of the procedure.

Normative high resolution esophageal manometry values in asymptomatic patients with obesity

BACKGROUND

Surgical bariatric interventions, while highly effective, can be associated with post-operative esophageal symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility. Whether pre-operative physiology impacts this risk is unknown, in part because expected values on esophageal manometry in patients with obesity are not well understood. This study seeks to establish normative values on esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) and the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in the asymptomatic patient with obesity.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg m-2 without esophageal symptoms undergoing preoperative bariatric surgical evaluation, including HRM, at a single tertiary care center between February, 2019 and February, 2020.

RESULTS

Of 104 asymptomatic patients with obesity, HRM identified normal esophageal motility in 94 (90.4%) with the remaining 10 having ineffective esophageal motility (3.8%), manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (3.8%), distal esophageal spasm (1.0%), and hypercontractile esophagus (1.0%). Mean of median lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (LES IRP) was 10.6 mmHg supine (95th percentile 21.5 mmHg) and 8.5 mmHg upright (95th percentile 21.3 mmHg). 86% of patients had intragastric pressure above 8 mmHg. Mean of mean distal contractile integral (DCI) was 2261.6 mmHg cm s-1 (95th percentile 5889.5 mmHg cm s-1).

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of asymptomatic patients with obesity had normal manometry. LES IRP and DCI were higher than that observed in non-obese cohorts. Additionally, BMI correlated to increased intragastric pressure. These data suggest that normative values in patients with obesity should be adjusted to prevent overdiagnosis of EGJOO or hypercontractile esophagus.

An Unusual Complication of Internal Hernia Post-laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Video Case Report

Internal hernia is a well-recognized complication after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass. Recently, it has been recognized after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Alteration of bowel anatomy was put as the cause of internal hernia after these procedures.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide; it was hypothesized that internal hernia could not occur after sleeve gastrectomy. We report in a video a case of internal hernia that occurred post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and its concomitant management. Data on the case of post-SG internal hernia were collected retrospectively and reported in a video with its intra-operative findings and concomitant management. The patient is a 35-year-old male. He underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which was complicated by a leak. It was managed conservatively with optimal clinical response. He presented seven years after his surgery to the emergency department with a history of multiple episodes of severe left upper abdominal pain. a CT scan was performed, showing suspicion of an internal hernia. The patient was taken for emergency laparoscopic exploration.  Intra-operatively, there was a band of adhesion from a previous leak site connecting a loop of proximal jejunum to the anterior abdominal wall, forming a 5 cm defect. Through it, a loop of bowel was found herniating with partial twisting of its mesentery and engorgement of its vessels. In addition, there were multiple adhesions between bowel loops. The herniated bowel loop was reduced with no evidence of ischemia. The adhesive band was resected using a laparoscopic linear stapler. The bowel was fully inspected from the ileocecal valve up to the duodenojejunal (DJ) flexure, and a full adhesiolysis was performed. The patient recovered well. He was discharged on day one postoperatively. He was followed up with a complete resolution of his symptoms and no complications. We conclude that an internal hernia could occur as a long-term complication of sleeve gastrectomy leaks. A high index of suspicion should be applied when dealing with vague abdominal pain post-bariatric surgery. The laparoscopic approach was safe and feasible.

Obesity-related cancer and bariatric surgery: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a silent pandemic affecting all ages and is a component of metabolic syndrome. Its treatment is conducted by lifestyle and behavioral changes, pharmacological therapy, and when correctly indicated, bariatric surgery. In recent years, the procedures for weight loss have been investigated due to their relationship with the development of many types of cancer. Although many studies have shown that bariatric surgery decreases cancer risk, other researchers observed an increase in this association. Carcinogenesis is affected by many factors, such as age, sex, type of cancer, and the bariatric surgery performed on each patient. This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol aims to clarify the association between the different modalities of bariatric surgery and the risk of cancer development in adult patients with metabolic syndrome.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis will be reported conforming to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) guidelines. This research will include observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) about patients who undergo bariatric surgery due to metabolic syndrome. Will be accepted in any language and any year. Publications without peer review will be excluded from this review. Data will be entered into the Review Manager software (RevMan5.2.3). We extracted or calculated the OR and 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes for each study. In case of heterogeneity (I2>50%), the random-effects model will combine the studies to calculate the OR and 95% CI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will review the published data; Thus, obtaining ethical approval is unnecessary. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023432079.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Lacks Intrasurgeon and Intersurgeon Agreement in Technical Key Points That May Affect Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After the Procedure

PURPOSE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be related to surgical technique. The fact that there is a lack of technical standardization may explain large differences in GERD incidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate auto- and hetero-agreement for SG technical key points based on recorded videos.

METHODS

Ten experienced (minimum of 5 years performing bariatric surgery, minimum of 30 SG per year) bariatric surgeons (9 (90%) males) were selected. Participants were invited to send an unedited video with a typical laparoscopic SG (first round of the Delphi process). Videos were cropped into small clips comprising 11 key points of the technique. All anonymized clips (including their own) were returned to all surgeons. Individuals were asked to agree or not with the technique demonstrated (second round). The percentage of agreement was presented to the entire group that was asked for a second vote (third round).

RESULTS

Agreement was poor/fair for all points except hiatal repair that had a very good agreement in the second round. For the third round, there was a slight increase in agreement for distance esophagogastric junction/proximal stapling and gastric mobilization for stapling and a slight decrease in agreement for gastric tube final shape. Only 1 (10%) surgeon recognized that he evaluated his own video. Five (50%) surgeons disagreed with themselves on 1 or more points.

CONCLUSION

SG lacks intrasurgeon and intersurgeon agreement in technical key points that may justify significant differences in GERD incidence after the procedure.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Pathophysiology and Management

Introduction: Patients with obesity are often affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the ideal operation for patients with severe obesity and GERD. Although the majority of patients improve their reflux with the operation, some might persist symptomatic and others can even develop de novo GERD. The aim of this study was to determine pathophysiologic factors involved in the development of GERD after RYGB surgery and define potential treatments for this condition. Materials and Methods: Studies including patients with GERD before and after RYGB and/or analyzing possible GERD therapies were analyzed by the authors. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Results: GERD can persist, worsen, or develop after RYGB. There are certain technical elements of the operation identified as potential risk factors for GERD. Medical therapy is effective in the majority of patients. Both endoscopic and surgical procedures can also help resolving GERD after RYGB. Conclusions: Although the majority of patients with GERD after RYGB can be effectively managed with medical therapy, some may require endoscopic or surgical treatment. Critical technical elements of RYGB should be considered to reduce the risk of postoperative GERD.

GORD and Barrett's oesophagus after bariatric procedures: multicentre prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) after bariatric surgery is a debated topic. This study investigated the prevalence of GORD and associated oesophageal complications following bariatric procedures-namely, adjustable gastric banding (AGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

METHODS

This was a prospective multicentre study designed to evaluate the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on GORD. Patients were studied at baseline, at >10 years following AGB, SG, and RYGB, and at >3 years following OAGB (due to the more recent recognition of OAGB as a standard bariatric procedure). Patients were assessed by endoscopy and GORD symptom evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were enrolled. A minimum follow-up of 10 years was completed by 193 patients following AGB (57 patients), SG (95 patients), and RYGB (41 patients), and of >3 years by 48 subjects following OAGB. GORD symptoms increased following AGB and SG (from 14 to 31.6 per cent and from 26.3 to 58.9 per cent, respectively; P < 0.0001), improved following RYGB (from 36.6 to 14.6 per cent; P < 0.0001), and were unchanged following OAGB. The overall prevalence of erosive oesophagitis was greater in the SG group (74.7 per cent) than in the AGB (42.1 per cent), RYGB (22 per cent), and OAGB (22.9 per cent) groups (P < 0.0001). Barrett's oesophagus was found only in patients who had SG (16.8 per cent). Biliary-like gastric stagnation was found in a greater proportion of SG and OAGB patients (79.7 and 69.4 per cent, respectively) than in other treatment groups (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of biliary-type reflux into the oesophagus was higher in patients who underwent SG (74.7 per cent), compared with other treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery leads to gastro-oesophageal complications of variable severity, particularly SG, which can result in a large proportion of patients developing Barrett's oesophagus.

Preoperative high-resolution esophageal manometry and postoperative symptoms in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of obesity has led to a rise in bariatric surgeries. Obesity can be associated with various gastrointestinal symptoms as well as abnormal findings on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). Bariatric procedures have variable effects on esophageal function and may contribute to postoperative symptoms. Preoperative HRM is not performed routinely on patients undergoing bariatric surgery but may identify patients likely to experience postoperative esophageal symptoms via delineation of structural or functional abnormalities.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether prebariatric surgery HRM could predict persistent or de novo postoperative esophageal symptoms.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care hospital, United States.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected for 20 patients undergoing HRM and 100 controls 18 years and older from May 2012 to May 2015. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 groups. Preoperative and postoperative esophageal symptoms (reflux, dysphagia, nausea/vomiting, bloating, fullness, early satiety, pain, and intolerance) were compared between HRM and control patients, and associations among HRM findings, Chicago Classification, and symptoms were analyzed. All included patients had follow-up beyond 3 months postoperatively. Data were analyzed with 2-tailed Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and odds ratio.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, patients undergoing preoperative HRM had a higher rate of postoperative chronic intolerance (25% versus 8%, P = .041). This difference was not observed in propensity score matching analysis. Identification of elevated integrated relaxation pressure and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction predicted chronic intolerance (odds ratio = 21.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.40-314; P = .027 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative HRM abnormalities were associated with postoperative symptoms in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. HRM can identify patients who are more likely to experience postoperative esophageal symptoms and may aid in discussion of suitability for surgery and selection of bariatric intervention.

The Impact of Bariatric Procedures on Esophageal Motility

Bariatric operations may cause or cure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The comprehension of esophageal motility following different types of bariatric procedures may help understand the relationship between GERD and bariatric surgery. This review focused on the impact of bariatric procedures on esophageal motility. We found that lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure is increased after adjustable gastric banding; is unaltered or decreased after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; and is decreased after sleeve gastrectomy. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation may be abnormal after all these procedures. Esophageal body contractility is worsened after sleeve gastrectomy.

Does Abrupt Weight Loss Caused by Bariatric Surgery Compromise the Voice in Women?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate vocal symptoms, voice characteristics and videolaryngoscopy in obese women before and after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Obese patients (18 to 59 years old), candidates for bariatric surgery were recruited. Evaluation times: T1 (preoperative), T2 (after six months), T3 (after 12 months). Evaluated parameters: weight, height, body mass index, abdominal and neck circumference, vocal self-assessment, perceptual and acoustic vocal assessment, and videolaryngoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 37 obese women were included, average age 40.8 years. There was a decrease in anthropometric measurements between the preoperative assessment and after 12 months: weight (121.18 ± 15.4 kg; 77.1 ± 11.6 kg), BMI (46.6 ± 6.95 kg/m²; 30 ± kg/m²), abdominal circumference (128 ± 16.1; 99.1 ± 12.1), and neck circumference (41.1 ± 5.85; 36.6 ± 3.02). Gastroesophageal (21.6%) and vocal symptoms (27%) prevailed. No difference was identified in vocal self-assessment between the evaluations. In the acoustic analysis, f0 increased and the soft phonation index decreased. The perceptual analysis registered lower scores for the degree of dysphonia (G) and voice instability (I). The maximum phonation time values increased without changing the s/z ratio. Videolaryngoscopies showed a posterior middle cleft and improvement in the signs of reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery led to an important and gradual decrease in anthropometric parameters. The voice became less hoarse, with higher pitch and more stable, with an improvement in maximum phonation time, however with slight breathiness. Such changes were not noticed by the patients.

Obesity and esophageal cancer: GERD, Barrett´s esophagus, and molecular carcinogenic pathways

INTRODUCTION

Increases in the rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) have paralleled rises in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Despite not being fully understood, obesity-related EAC seems to have different carcinogenic pathways.

AREAS COVERED

This comprehensive review will thoroughly evaluate the current literature, describing the underlying mechanisms that help understanding the strong association between obesity and esophageal cancer.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The risk of esophageal cancer among obese individuals could be partially explained by several factors: high prevalence of GERD; linear association between central adiposity and Barrett´s esophagus development; low levels of adiponectin and high levels of leptin that alter cell proliferation processes; insulin-resistant state that creates a tumorigenesis environment; and changes in the esophageal microbiota due to unhealthy dietary habits that promote carcinogenesis. In addition, a large proportion of obese patients are undergoing sleeve gastrectomy which can worsen GERD or cause de novo reflux, esophagitis, and Barrett´s metaplasia.

Follow-up after bariatric surgery: A review

Bariatric surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of severely obese patients who failed to lose weight with the help of non-surgical interventions. Such patients are at increased risk for premature death, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, gallstones, coronary heart disease, dyslipidemia, some cancers, anxiety, depression, and degenerative joint disorders. Although bariatric surgery appears to be the most effective and durable treatment option for obesity, it is associated with a number of surgical and medical complications. These include a range of conditions, of which dumping syndrome and malnutrition due to malabsorption of vitamins and minerals are the most common. To achieve better surgery outcomes, a number of postsurgical strategies must be considered. The aim of this review was to describe possible complications, ailments, and important moments in the follow-up after bariatric surgery. Adequate lifelong monitoring is crucial for the achievement of long-lasting goals and reduction of post-bariatric complications.

Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by means of esophageal manometry and pH-metry, before and after surgery

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux is a major problem after sleeve gastrectomy. There is still insufficient understanding of how it occurs and whether it is due to the sphincter length, relaxation, or pressure differences.

AIM

This study evaluates the effect on the lower esophageal sphincter of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) technique applied in surgery in cases of morbid obesity using ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring (APM) and esophageal manometry (EM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective examination was carried out on the APM and EM tests performed preoperatively and postoperatively in cases of LSG. The parameters examined were the body mass index (BMI), amplitude pressure of the esophagus (AP), total length of the lower esophageal segment (LESL), resting pressure of the LES (LESP), residual pressure of the LES (LESR), relaxation time of the LES, intragastric pressure, and the DeMeester score.

RESULTS

A total of 62 cases with available data were evaluated. A statistically significant difference was determined between the preoperative values and the 3-month postoperative values of BMI, LESP, and relaxation time of the LES. A statistically significant increase was determined in the DeMeester score, and the increase in the total number of reflux episodes longer than 5 min was found to be the most responsible for this increase. No significant difference was determined in the other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The LSG was found to cause a reduction in LESP, and an increase in acid reflux causing an extended relaxation time of the LES. This was confirmed by the increase seen in the DeMeester score.