Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is Associated with the Operative Time in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

Is the Mayo adhesive probability score predictive of post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication grade in laparoscopic adrenalectomy?

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) continues to be considered the optimum approach to the surgical treatment of small benign adrenal tumours. The present study explores the correlation between the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, derived from computed tomography images and delineating such perinephric fat characteristics as thickness and adhesiveness, and post-operative complications in patients undergoing LA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of patients who underwent LA between 2013 and 2023 were subjected to a retrospective analysis, and MAP scores were calculated for all patients. Intraoperative and post-operative surgical outcomes, as well as any complications, were categorised using Modified Clavien-Dindo grading, and the relationship between their MAP scores and outcomes was analysed.

RESULTS

The mean body mass index, rate of overweight patients, Clavien-Dindo scores of II, III or IV, surgical time, hospitalisation duration, transfusion requirement and post-operative blood loss of the group of patients with MAP scores of 2-3 were significantly higher than those in the group with MAP scores in the 0-1 range (P < 0.05). Each one-point increase in MAP score led to a 2.559-times greater probability of a Clavien-Dindo Grade > I (95% confidence interval: 1.391-4.708, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A high MAP score is associated with Grade II and higher Clavien-Dindo complications in LA.

Early readmission after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma (PHEO) presents a significant challenge due to the high incidence of early hospital readmission (ER). This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors of ER for PHEO within 30 days of adrenalectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 346 patients > 18 years with unilateral PHEO who underwent adrenalectomy between September 2012 and September 2024. The patients were categorised into ER (n = 49) and no ER (n = 297) groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to predict risk factors for ER.

RESULTS

The most common causes of ER were postoperative maintained hypotension (42.9%), bleeding (6.1%), ileus (24.5%), wound infection (4.1%), hyperkalemia (8.2%), pneumonia (2%), intra-abdominal abscess (2%), acute MI (4.1%), and colonic injury (6.1%). Most postoperative complications were Clavien-Dindo grade II (n = 40, 81.6%). Two perioperative deaths (4%) occurred in the ER group. Logistic regression showed that low body mass index (OR 0.849, 95% CI, 0.748-0.964; p = 0.012), tumor size < 5 cm (OR 0.096, 95% CI, 0.030-0.310; p < 0.001), and low ASA (OR 0.435, 95% CI, 0.249-0.761; p = 0.003) were associated with risk reduction for ER while malignancy (OR 5.302, 95% CI, 1.214-23.164; p = 0.027), open approach(OR 12.247, 95% CI, 5.227-28.694; p < 0.001), and intraoperative complications (OR 19.149, 95% CI, 7.091-51.710; p < 0.001) were associated with risk increase of ER.

CONCLUSION

Postoperatively maintained hypotension and ileus were the most common causes of ER. Low body mass index, tumour size < 5 cm, and low ASA were risk reductions for ER, while malignancy, open approach, and intraoperative complications were the independent risk increase factors.

Predicting post-surgical complications using renal scoring systems

Current surgical approaches for renal malignancies primarily rely on qualitative factors such as patient preferences, surgeon experience, and hospital capabilities. Applying a quantitative method for consistent and reliable assessment of renal lesions would significantly enhance surgical decision-making and facilitate data comparison. Nephrometry scoring (NS) systems systematically evaluate and describe renal tumors based on their anatomical features. These scoring systems, including R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, MAP scores, C-index, CSA, and T-index, aim to predict surgical complications by evaluating anatomical and patient-specific factors. In this review paper, we explore the components and methodologies of these scoring systems, compare their effectiveness and limitations, and discuss their application in advancing patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes.

The impact of Mayo Adhesion probability score on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones

Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition in urology, with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) serving as a common treatment for kidney stones under 2 cm. The Mayo Adhesion Probability (MAP) score, calculated from perinephric fat characteristics, is traditionally used to assess surgical outcomes but has not been explored in the context of ESWL. This study aims to evaluate the effect of MAP score on the success rate of ESWL. This retrospective study included patients who underwent ESWL for kidney stones between January 2018 and June 2024 at a tertiary care center. Demographic data, stone characteristics, and MAP scores were obtained through CT imaging. ESWL success was defined as either complete stone clearance or a residual fragment less than 4 mm at three months post-procedure. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were employed to identify predictors of treatment success and to determine the optimal MAP score cutoff. A total of 260 patients were analyzed, divided into two groups: MAP score < 3 (n = 154) and MAP score ≥ 3 (n = 106). Patients with a MAP score ≥ 3 had a significantly lower ESWL success rate (49.1%) compared to those with a MAP score < 3 (71.4%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified MAP score, BMI, and stone size as significant predictors of ESWL success. ROC analysis established a MAP score cutoff of 2, with 76.5% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity. The MAP score is an independent predictor of ESWL success in kidney stone treatment. Preoperative MAP evaluation may improve patient selection and optimize ESWL outcomes.

Modified versus three-level technique of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for all patients with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm: a retrospective, case-controlled study

Objectives

The modified three-level technique for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) has proven beneficial in the treatment of adrenal lesions in patients with BMI≥25 Kg/m2. This paper aims to summarize our institution's seven-year experience using this technique for all patients with Adrenal Lesions ≤ 6cm.

Patients and methods

Between January 2016 and December 2022. The patients underwent laparoscopic adrenal surgery were categorized into Zhang's technique (ZT) (Three-level Technique) group and modified technique (MT) group. The fundamental characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Results

In total, 731 patients were stratified into two groups: ZT (n=448) and MT (n=283). Statistically significant distinctions were not detected between the two groups regarding sex, BMI, tumor location, tumor size, tumor type, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p>0.05). The MT group demonstrated superior outcomes compared to the ZT group in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, drainage volume, diet recovery time, complication rates, and postoperative hospitalization duration (p<0.05). 17 (4.34%) in the ZT group required unplanned adrenalectomy, while there was none in MT group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

MT retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy has demonstrated its benefits in the treatment of adrenal lesions across all patients with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm, serving as a valuable point of reference for the surgical management of adrenal diseases.

Patient summary

We have made modifications to the classic retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy and achieved superior surgical outcomes, resulting in a procedure known as modified retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This technique is suitable for both obese individuals and the general population with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm.

Can the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Predict Perioperative Outcomes in Laparoscopic Total and Partial Adrenalectomy?

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score could predict perioperative outcomes in transperitoneal laparoscopic total adrenalectomy (LTA) and laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy (LPA). Materials and Methods: The clinical data of 139 patients who underwent transperitoneal LTA (n = 116) or LPA (n = 23) between March 2013 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the images obtained from preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, the patients were divided into two groups: the low MAP score group (0-1 points) and the high MAP score group (2-5 points). General clinical features and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: In patients with a high MAP score, the mean body mass index (BMI) (p: 0.005), tumor size (p: 0.005), operative time (p: 0.002), estimated blood loss (EBL) (p: 0.001), and complication rate (p: 0.013) were significantly higher compared with those with a low MAP score. The comparison of the patients between the LTA and LPA subgroups revealed that operative time and EBL were significantly higher in both subgroups among the patients with a high MAP score. Moreover, the complication rate in the LTA subgroup was significantly higher in the high MAP score group compared with the other group. The Multivariate analyses revealed that a high MAP score was a risk factor for prolonged operative time (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.081, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.284-7.398, p: 0.012), increased EBL (OR: 2.495, 95% CI: 1.114-5.588, p: 0.026), and complications (OR: 6.085, 95% CI: 1.532-24.171, p: 0.01) Conclusions: Patients with a high MAP score had a prolonged operative time, increased EBL, and a higher complication rate compared with those with a low MAP score. In addition, we found that a high MAP score was an independent risk factor for perioperative parameters and complications in patients who underwent LTA and LPA.

Clinical predictors and significance of adherent periadrenal fat in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Adrenalectomy requires the anatomic preparation of the adrenal gland in the fat-rich retroperitoneal space. In the literature, it was shown that the retroperitoneal fat area affects surgical outcomes in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). Besides the quantity of retroperitoneal fat, its qualitative properties play hypothetically a significant role in the safety profile and perioperative parameters of LA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with adherent periadrenal fat.

METHODS

The prospectively obtained demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of 44 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our clinic were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as adherent periadrenal fat (APAF) and non-APAF group. Periadrenal fat tissue was defined as adherent or non-adherent by the attending surgeon according to the difficulty in dissection of the adrenal gland from the surrounding fat tissue during the operation.

RESULTS

The rate of female gender and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was higher in the APAF group (respectively, p = 0.038 and p = 0.001). A ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off point was - 97 HU for APAF. On multivariable analysis using a stepwise regression model, we identified the presence of DM (OR = 5.073; 95% Cl = 2.192-12.387; p = 0.006) and ARFD > -97 HU (OR = 3.727; 95% Cl = 1.898-11.454; p = 0.008) as an independent predictor of APAF.

CONCLUSION

APAF seems to affect the perioperative outcomes of LA in terms of operation duration but not perioperative complications.

Mayo adhesive probability score is associated with perioperative outcomes in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to determine whether the Mayo adhesive probability score (MAP), which evaluated adherent perinephric fat (APF), is useful in evaluating the difficulty of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA), and to analyse the correlation between MAP and perioperative parameters.

METHODS

Clinical data of 104 patients with adrenal adenoma who underwent RLA were collected for retrospective analysis. According to the CT images obtained before surgery, patients were divided into two groups: High MAP group (2-5 points) and Low MAP group (0-1 points). Comparison of the general clinical characteristics and the perioperative data between the two groups was made.

RESULTS

There were more male patients (73.7% versus 34.3%), more patients with a smoking history (24.3% versus 7.5%), higher BMI (25.7 versus 23.2, kg/m² ), and bigger (23.8 versus 18.5, mm) neoplasm in the high MAP group (P < 0.05). Significant difference was observed in operative time (128.8 versus 102.3, min), estimated blood loss (47.2 versus 25.2, ml) and drainage tube removal time (4.0 versus 3.2, d) between the two groups (P < 0.05). A high MAP score (P < 0.001) and the size of tumour (P = 0.024) were independent risk factors for extended operative time. A higher BMI (OR = 1.525, P < 0.001) and larger tumour size (OR = 2.862, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for a high MAP score.

CONCLUSIONS

MAP score was associated with the perioperative outcomes of RLA. BMI and tumour size were better indicators of MAP score, which can influence the difficulty of RLA.

A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression

BACKGROUND

While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiological-clinical prediction model for evaluating the surgical difficulty of RPLA.

METHOD

Data from 398 patients with adrenal tumors treated by RPLA in a single center from August 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into sets. The influencing factors were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model (LASSO). Additionally, the nomogram was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the prediction efficiency of the nomogram. The C-index and bootstrap self-sampling methods were used to verify the discrimination and consistency of the nomogram.

RESULT

The following 11 independent influencing factors were selected by LASSO: body mass index, diabetes mellitus, scoliosis, hyperlipidemia, history of operation, tumor diameter, distance from adrenal tumor to upper pole of kidney, retro renal fat area, hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, and myelolipoma. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training set was 0.787, and 0.844 in the internal validation set. Decision curve analyses indicated the model to be useful. An additional 117 patients were recruited for prospective validation, and AUC was 0.848.

CONCLUSION

This study developed a radiological-clinical prediction model proposed for predicting the difficulty of RPLA procedures. This model was suitable, accessible, and helpful for individualized surgical preparation and reduced operational risk. Thus, this model could contribute to more patients' benefit in circumventing surgical difficulties because of accurate predictive abilities.