Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes

Physical Activity Levels in Children with Esophageal Atresia and Congenital Heart Disease: A Comparative Multicenter Study

AIM OF THE STUDY

 Esophageal atresia (EA) is associated with impaired motor development, cardiopulmonary function, and physical activity (PA). Despite missing scientific evidence, this fact is often attributed to associated congenital heart disease (CHD). The aim of this study was to investigate PA in EA patients without CHD compared with CHD patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

 In this multicenter study, EA patients aged 6 through 17 years were included. Moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA, minutes per week) was assessed using the standardized and validated questionnaire Motorik-Modul Physical Activity Questionnaire. EA patients were randomly matched 1:4 for gender and age with patients with CHD (n = 1,262) and healthy controls (n = 6,233). Patients born with both EA and CHD were excluded. Means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. To identify associated factors, Spearman's correlation was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

 Overall, 69 EA patients were matched with 276 CHD patients and 276 controls (57% male, 43% female, mean age 10,3 years, 95% CI: 9.5-11.1). Mean MVPA was reduced in EA (492 minutes, 95% CI: 387-598) and CHD patients (463 minutes, 95% CI: 416-511) compared with controls (613 minutes, 95% CI: 548-679). In subgroup analysis, MVPA was reduced further in females and older age groups with EA and CHD. For EA patients, there was no statistical association between Gross type, current symptoms, surgical approaches, and MVPA.

CONCLUSION

 Isolated EA and CHD were associated with reduced PA, especially in females and teenagers. To avoid additional morbidity associated with sedentary behavior, PA should be promoted during follow-up.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracoscopic and Open Repair for Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes for thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF and compare with open repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EA/TEF repair during 2000-2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with delayed repair were excluded. Demographic, operative, outcome data was collected. Outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests for continuous, Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests for categorical data.

RESULTS

There were 104 patients with primary repair, 49 (47.1%) underwent thoracoscopic repair per surgeon's choice. Type C accounted for 101 (97.1%) of the cases. Gestational age and birth weight were higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.001). The rate of ≥3 VACTERL anomalies was higher in the OR group (p = 0.016). Operative time, rate of anastomotic leak, time to first oral feeding were similar (p > 0.05). Thoracoscopy group had decreased length of ventilation (p = 0.026) and length of stay (p = 0.029). The incidence of anastomotic stricture was higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.012). Recurrent TEF was one case in each group. Rates of tube feeding at discharge and in first year were similar (p > 0.05), rate in third year was decreased (p = 0.032) in the thoracoscopy group. Rates of anti-reflux medication in first and third years, and fundoplication rate were similar (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the short- and long-term outcomes are comparable between thoracoscopic and open repair of EA/TEF. Length of ventilation, length of stay are decreased in the thoracoscopy group. Anastomotic stricture is higher, the need for long-term tube feeding is lower after thoracoscopic repair. Although these results could be affected by selection bias, they are still promising for advancing thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF safely and efficiently.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Development and validation of a realistic type III esophageal atresia simulator for the training of pediatric surgeons

BACKGROUND

The technical complexity and limited casuistry of neonatal surgical pathology limit the possibilities of developing the necessary technical competencies by specialists in training. Esophageal atresia constitutes the paradigm of this problem. The use of synthetic 3D models for training is a promising line of research, although the literature is limited.

METHODS

We conceptualized, designed, and produced an anatomically realistic model for the open correction of type III oesophageal atresia. We validated it with two groups of participants (experts and non-experts) through face, construct, and content-validity questionnaires.

RESULTS

The model was validated by nine experts and nine non-experts. The mean procedure time for the experts and non-experts groups was 34.0 and 38.4 min, respectively. Two non-experts did not complete the procedure at the designed time (45 min). Regarding the face validity questionnaire, the mean rating of the model was 3.2 out of 4. Regarding the construct validity, we found statistically significant differences between groups for the equidistance between sutures, 100% correct in the expert group vs. 42.9% correct in the non-expert group (p = 0.02), and for the item "Confirms that tracheoesophageal fistula closure is watertight before continuing the procedure", correctly assessed by 66.7% of the experts vs. by 11.1% of non-experts (p = 0.05). Concerning content validity, the mean score was 3.3 out of 4 for the experts and 3.4 out of 4 for the non-experts.

CONCLUSIONS

The present model is a cost-effective, simple-to-produce, and validated option for training open correction of type III esophageal atresia. However, future studies with larger sample sizes and blinded validators are needed before drawing definitive conclusions.