Safety and Efficacy of a Mobiderm Compression Bandage During Intensive Phase of Decongestive Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Guidelines on Compression Therapy in Venous Diseases

BACKGROUND

In recent years, compression therapy has attracted gradually increasing clinical attention in lower extremity venous diseases. However, basic concepts and clear nomenclature, standard treatment methods, and consistent product standards for pressure equipment are lacking. Therefore, developing clinical guidelines for compression therapy is essential to improving the treatment of venous diseases.

METHODS

Our panel generated strong (grade I), moderate (grade IIa and IIb), and weak (grade III) recommendations based on high-quality (class A), moderate-quality (class B), and low-quality (class C) evidence, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) grading system.

RESULTS

The panels made 30 recommendations from current evidence, focusing on 7 fields of lower extremity venous disease (venous thromboembolism, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), varicose veins, hemangioma and vascular malformations, lymphedema, and venous ulcers) and 18 topics.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the 30 recommendations made across the 18 topics, 7 were strong (grade I) and 17 were based on high-quality (class A) evidence, highlighting the need for further research of the use of compression therapy.

The effect of compression therapies and therapeutic modalities on lymphedema secondary to cancer: a rapid review and evidence map

The identification of effective therapeutic modalities to manage lymphedema secondary to cancer is a high priority among patients and clinicians. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) remains a fundamental intervention for individuals with lymphedema; however, interventions involving modalities such as low level laser therapy, specially designed compression systems, and compression pumps may be helpful to improve outcomes and reduce costs of care. We conducted a rapid review of the literature examining compression therapies and therapeutic modalities in the treatment of lymphedema secondary to cancer. A search of the electronic databases from June 2018 to October 2023 was performed including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. The electronic search yielded 438 potentially relevant citations with 40 randomized controlled trials included in the review, and 30 in the mapping process. Ninety-three percent (n = 37) of the trials included participants with a diagnosis of breast cancer. Across all categories and domains, all but two trials were rated as having 'some concerns' or a 'high risk of bias'. Intervention effects ranged from clinically insignificant to large effects on lymphedema volume. Evidence mapping suggests potential for benefit from (1) compression garments for the prevention of lymphedema, (2) interventions added to CDT in the intensive reduction phase, and (3) nighttime compression and compression pump treatments in the maintenance phase. A multi-centre collaborative research approach is needed to support the conduct of high-quality large-scale trials to inform the optimal type, timing, and combination of compression therapies and therapeutic modalities in the treatment of lymphedema secondary to cancer.

Effectiveness of Mobiderm Autofit in the Intensive Phase of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Treatment: A Case Series

Background: The objective of this case series was to evaluate the effectiveness of wearing Mobiderm® Autofit compressive garment as part of the complete decongestive therapy (CDT) of upper limb lymphedema. Materials and Methods: Ten women and men with stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema underwent a CDT intensive phase for 12 days, combining Mobiderm Autofit compression garment with manual lymphatic drainage. Arm volume was calculated with the truncated cone formula using circumferential measurements taken at each appointment. The pressure under the garment and the overall satisfaction of patients and physicians were also assessed. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the patients was 60.50 (11.70) years. The mean (SD) lymphedema excess volume decrease was 343.11 (266.14) mL, which represents a 36.68% decrease between day 1 and day 12, whereas the mean (SD) absolute volume difference was 420.03 (251.27) mL corresponding to a 10.12% decrease during this same period. The mean (SD) device pressure by using the PicoPress® was 30.01 (0.45) mmHg. The majority of patients were satisfied with the ease of use and the comfort of wearing Mobiderm Autofit. Such positive assessment was confirmed by the physicians. During this case series, no adverse event was reported. Conclusion: A lymphedema volume decrease of the upper limb was reported after 12 days of treatment with Mobiderm Autofit during the CDT intensive phase. Moreover, the device was well tolerated, and its use was appreciated by the patients and the physicians.