Building the Evidence Base for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Single-Center Comparison of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Evacuation Outcomes Under Local Versus General Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a neurosurgical pathology of an aged populace. Pathogenetic risk factors include traumatic brain injury, prolonged use of antiplatelet drugs, hypertension, and some inflammatory processes. The incidence increases as patients age. Burr-hole evacuation is the most common approach in management of symptomatic cases. We compared evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas with general or local anesthesia (GA and LA, respectively) and evaluated the safety, economic benefits, effects of comorbidity, benefits, and shortcomings of both techniques.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 67 consecutive patients who had 74 procedures for CSDH in a single neurosurgical center, the Regional Clinic, Centre of Neurosurgery and Neurology, over a 3-year period. They were grouped into the GA group (n = 44) and LA group (n = 23). Mean duration of procedure, length of hospital stay, complications, and preoperative and postoperative neurologic statuses were compared. The distribution of nominal variables between groups was compared using the Fisher exact test. The average duration of operation and length of hospital stay were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test due to violation of the normality assumption.

RESULTS

LA proved to be as effective as GA in CSDH evacuation. Seventy-four surgical procedures were performed on 67 patients due to recurrence in less than 30 days in 7 patients. Fifteen patients had tension pneumocephalus managed with fluid therapy to full recovery. LA was economical and required shorter hospital stays and surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

In our studies, LA proved to be noninferior to GA, time conserving, and less prone to some of the adverse effects of GA on elderly patients with comorbidity, although some patients who are hyperactive or contraindicated to LA will require GA.

Solve the post-operative subdural pneumatosis of chronic subdural hematoma: A novel active bone hole drainage system

Background

Post-operative subdural pneumatosis (PSP) is commonly encountered after the chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) surgery which currently lacks effective methods to avoid the condition. This study invented an active bone hole drainage system to change the venting technique with the aim of comparing post-operative efficacy and prognosis to traditional drilling and drainage.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial between January 2020 and January 2021. A total of 86 patients undergoing surgery were assessed for eligibility, with 50 patients randomly assigned to the control group (received drilling and drainage) and 36 patients to the test group (received modified surgery). The 6-month follow-up was done after surgery. CSDH recurrence and post-operative hematoma re-increasement were the primary endpoints. The data from the two groups were compared and analyzed. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Register (ChiCTR2200057158), and had ethics committee approval and patient consent.

Results

The incidence of PSP in the test group (0%, 0/30)was lower than the control group (93.88%, 46/49) (P < 0.001). The brain non-expansion rates 3 days/weeks/months after surgery of the test group were 59.25 [49.62, 76.97], 52.10 [42.88, 72.45], and 29.45 [23.40, 36.95] respectively, which were lower than the control group which were 78.60 [69.50, 94.70], 73.10 [60.70, 87.40], and 61.70 [51.50, 78.30], respectively (P < 0.001). The ADL scores a week/month/3/6 months after surgery of the test group were 100.00 [60.00, 100.00], 100.00 [85.00, 100.00], 100.00 [100.00, 100.00], 100.00 [100.00, 100.00], which were better than the control group's 60.00 [60.00, 80.00], 75.00 [60.00, 100.00], 100.00 [60.00, 100.00], 100.00 [60.00, 100.00] (P < 0.05). The incidence of primary endpoints in the test group (10%, 3/30) was lower than the control group (34.69%, 17/49) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared to drilling and drainage, the modified surgery with the active bone hole drainage system significantly reduced the incidence of PSP and primary endpoints and improved the post-operative efficacy and prognosis.

Clinical trial registration

Identifier: ChiCTR2200057158.