Reach of a Fully Digital Diabetes Prevention Program in Health Professional Shortage Areas

Adapting the Diabetes Prevention Program for Older Adults: Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Prediabetes affects 26.4 million people aged 65 years or older (48.8%) in the United States. Although older adults respond well to the evidence-based Diabetes Prevention Program, they are a heterogeneous group with differing physiological, biomedical, and psychosocial needs who can benefit from additional support to accommodate age-related changes in sensory and motor function.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to describe adaptations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Diabetes Prevention Program aimed at preventing diabetes among older adults (ages ≥65 years) and findings from a pilot of 2 virtual sessions of the adapted program that evaluated the acceptability of the content.

METHODS

The research team adapted the program by incorporating additional resources necessary for older adults. A certified lifestyle coach delivered 2 sessions of the adapted content via videoconference to 189 older adults.

RESULTS

The first session had a 34.9% (38/109) response rate to the survey, and the second had a 34% (30/88) response rate. Over three-quarters (50/59, 85%) of respondents agreed that they liked the virtual program, with 82% (45/55) agreeing that they would recommend it to a family member or a friend.

CONCLUSIONS

This data will be used to inform intervention delivery in a randomized controlled trial comparing in-person versus virtual delivery of the adapted program.

Predictors of program interest in a digital health pilot study for heart health

Digital health programs can play a key role in supporting lifestyle changes to prevent and reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A key concern for new programs is understanding who is interested in participating. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to utilize electronic health records (EHR) to predict interest in a digital health app called Lark Heart Health. Because prior studies indicate that males are less likely to utilize prevention-focused digital health programs, secondary analyses assessed sex differences in recruitment and enrollment. Data were drawn from an ongoing pilot study of the Heart Health program, which provides digital health behavior coaching and surveys for CVD prevention. EHR data were used to predict whether potential program participants who received a study recruitment email showed interest in the program by "clicking through" on the email to learn more. Primary objective analyses used backward elimination regression and eXtreme Gradient Boost modeling. Recruitment emails were sent to 8,649 patients with available EHR data; 1,092 showed interest (i.e., clicked through) and 345 chose to participate in the study. EHR variables that predicted higher odds of showing interest were higher body mass index (BMI), fewer elevated lab values, lower HbA1c, non-smoking status, and identifying as White. Secondary objective analyses showed that, males and females showed similar program interest and were equally represented throughout recruitment and enrollment. In summary, BMI, elevated lab values, HbA1c, smoking status, and race emerged as key predictors of program interest; conversely, sex, age, CVD history, history of chronic health issues, and medication use did not predict program interest. We also found no sex differences in the recruitment and enrollment process for this program. These insights can aid in refining digital health tools to best serve those interested, as well as highlight groups who may benefit from behavioral intervention tools promoted by additional recruitment efforts tailored to their interest.

Weight Loss in a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program for People in Health Professional Shortage and Rural Areas

Individuals with prediabetes living in hard-to-reach and underserved areas experience barriers to accessing traditional in-person preventive health services. The National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a preventive health care program designed to reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Although there have been increasing numbers of remote DPPs accessible, there are little data on the clinical outcomes of digital DPPs for members living in hard-to-reach and underserved areas. This study assessed whether living in a designated Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) and a rural versus urban area impacted the weight loss of N = 7266 members of a fully digital program called Lark DPP. Secondary analyses included between-group comparisons of program retention and member characteristics, demographics, and socioeconomics. Percent weight loss did not differ by HPSA (P = 0.16) or rural/urban status (P = 0.15), despite greater potential barriers for members residing in HPSAs (eg, highest starting body mass index, lowest income, lowest education). Mean percent weight loss for members residing in an HPSA and rural area was mean (M) = 4.75%, standard error (SE) = 0.09; for members in a non-HPSA, rural area M = 4.96%, SE = 0.16; for members in an HPSA, urban area M = 4.55%, SE = 0.13; and for members in a non-HPSA, urban area M = 4.77%, SE = 0.13. Members of a fully digital DPP achieved weight loss that did not differ by HPSA or urban/rural designation. Fully digital programs offer a solution to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in areas where residents may not otherwise have access to diabetes prevention services.

Feasibility and Comparative Effectiveness for the Delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program through Cooperative Extension in Rural Communities

The U.S. Cooperative Extension Service (CE) has potential to deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) to rural residents with prediabetes. However, the CE remains underutilized for the delivery of NDPP. We compared the feasibility/effectiveness of the NDPP (0-6 mos.) delivered by CE personnel to rural residents with prediabetes using Zoom® (CE-Zoom®) or by our research staff using Facebook® (FB). Adults (n = 31, age ~55 years) were enrolled (CE-Zoom® n = 16, FB n = 15). Attendance did not differ significantly between groups (CE Zoom® = 69%, FB = 83%, p = 0.15). Participant retention was similar in the CE Zoom® (88%) and FB groups (87%). CE-Zoom® and FB® groups provided weekly, self-monitoring data for 83% and 84% of the 24 potential weeks, respectively. Six-month weight loss was not different between groups (CE-Zoom® = -5.99 ± 8.0 kg, -5.4%, FB = -1.68 ± 3.3 kg, -1.6% p = 0.13). Participants achieving ≥5% weight loss was greater in the CE-Zoom® (44%) compared with the FB group (7%, p = 0.04). Participants achieving the NDPP program goal for physical activity (≥150 min/week) did not differ (CE-Zoom® = 75%, FB = 67%, p = 0.91). This pilot trial demonstrated the potential feasibility and effectiveness of the NDPP delivered by CE personnel in a group remote format (Zoom®) to adults with prediabetes living in rural areas.