Neurogenic Potential of Isolated Precursor Cells from Early Post-Gastrula Somitic Tissue

Melatonin disturbs SUMOylation-mediated crosstalk between c-Myc and nestin via MT1 activation and promotes the sensitivity of paclitaxel in brain cancer stem cells

Here the underlying antitumor mechanism of melatonin and its potency as a sensitizer of paclitaxel was investigated in X02 cancer stem cells. Melatonin suppressed sphere formation and induced G2/M arrest in X02 cells expressing nestin, CD133, CXCR4, and SOX-2 as biomarkers of stemness. Furthermore, melatonin reduced the expression of CDK2, CDK4, cyclin D1, cyclin E, and c-Myc and upregulated cyclin B1 in X02 cells. Notably, genes of c-Myc related mRNAs were differentially expressed in melatonin-treated X02 cells by microarray analysis. Consistently, melatonin reduced the expression of c-Myc at mRNA and protein levels, which was blocked by MG132. Of note, overexpression of c-Myc increased the expression of nestin, while overexpression of nestin enhanced c-Myc through crosstalk despite different locations, nucleus, and cytoplasm. Interestingly, melatonin attenuated small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) more than SUMO-2 or SUMO-3 and disturbed nuclear translocation of nestin for direct binding to c-Myc by SUMOylation of SUMO-1 protein by immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation. Also, melatonin reduced trimethylated histone H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 more than dimethylation in X02 cells by Western blotting and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Notably, melatonin upregulated MT1, not MT2, in X02 cells and melatonin receptor inhibitor luzindole blocked the ability of melatonin to decrease the expression of nestin, p-c-Myc(S62), and c-Myc. Furthermore, melatonin promoted cytotoxicity, sub-G1 accumulation, and apoptotic body formation by Paclitaxcel in X02 cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that melatonin inhibits stemness via suppression of c-Myc, nestin, and histone methylation via MT1 activation and promotes anticancer effect of Paclitaxcel in brain cancer stem cells.

Nestin and cluster of differentiation 146 expression in breast cancer: Predicting early recurrence by targeting metastasis?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the expression of stem-cell markers nestin and cluster of differentiation 146 with clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer and to determine whether a prognostic impact of nestin and CD146 expression exists regarding occurrence of disease relapse in breast cancer. A total of 141 patients who were histologically diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent radical operations from November 2006 to October 2013 in Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, were enrolled in the study. CD146 and nestin protein expression were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Nestin expression was observed in 18.4% (26/141) of the cases, while CD146 expression was observed in 35.5% (50/141) of the cases. Nestin expression is significantly higher in younger patients with breast cancer. Nestin and CD146 expression were not correlated with the tumor size and the presence of lymph node metastasis. On the contrary, a significantly higher expression of nestin and CD146 was observed with triple-negative cancers (p < 0.0001 for both markers), low differentiated tumors (p = 0.021 for nestin and p = 0.008 for CD146), and increased Ki-67 expression (p = 0.007 for nestin and p < 0.0001 for CD146). The nestin-positive group of patients and the CD146-positive group of patients presented significantly higher rates of disease recurrence (log-rank test, p = 0.022 for nestin and p = 0.003 for CD146) with a distant metastasis, 30 months after the primary treatment. CD146 but not nestin, however, predicted independently (p = 0.047) disease recurrence. Nestin and CD146 are expressed in breast cancer cells with highly aggressive potency. They might contribute to disease relapse in breast cancer by activating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway and assist tumor neovascularization.

Wnt5a and Wnt11 inhibit the canonical Wnt pathway and promote cardiac progenitor development via the Caspase-dependent degradation of AKT

Wnt proteins regulate cell behavior via a canonical signaling pathway that induces β-catenin dependent transcription. It is now appreciated that Wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes the expansion of the second heart field (SHF) progenitor cells that ultimately give-rise to the majority of cardiomyocytes. However, activating β-catenin can also cause the loss of SHF progenitors, highlighting the necessity of precise control over β-catenin signaling during heart development. We recently reported that two non-canonical Wnt ligands, Wnt5a and Wnt11, act cooperatively to attenuate canonical Wnt signaling that would otherwise disrupt the SHF. While these data reveal the essential role of this anti-canonical Wnt5a/Wnt11 signaling in SHF development, the mechanisms by which these ligands inhibit the canonical Wnt pathway are unclear. Wnt11 was previously shown to inhibit β-catenin and promote cardiomyocyte maturation by activating a novel apoptosis-independent function of Caspases. Consistent with these data, we now show that Wnt5a and Wnt11 are capable of inducing Caspase activity in differentiating embryonic stem (ES) cells and that hearts from Wnt5a(-/-); Wnt11(-/-) embryos have diminished Caspase 3 (Casp3) activity. Furthermore, SHF markers are reduced in Casp3 mutant ES cells while the treatment of wild type ES cells with Caspase inhibitors blocked the ability of Wnt5a and Wnt11 to promote SHF gene expression. This finding was in agreement with our in vivo studies in which injecting pregnant mice with Caspase inhibitors reduced SHF marker expression in their gestating embryos. Caspase inhibition also blocked other Wnt5a/Wnt11 induced effects, including the suppression of β-catenin protein expression and activity. Interestingly, Wnt5a/Wnt11 treatment of differentiating ES cells reduced both phosphorylated and total Akt through a Caspase-dependent mechanism and phosphorylated Akt levels were increased in the hearts Caspase inhibitor treated. Surprisingly, inhibition of either Akt or PI3K in ES cells was an equally effective means of increasing SHF markers compared to treatment with Wnt5a/Wnt11. Moreover, Akt inhibition restored SHF gene expression in Casp3 mutant ES cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that Wnt5a/Wnt11 inhibit β-catenin to promote SHF development through Caspase-dependent Akt degradation.

Nestin positively regulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and the proliferation, survival and invasiveness of breast cancer stem cells

INTRODUCTION

We investigated Nestin expression in triple-negative breast cancer and examined how the modulation of Nestin expression affects cell cycle progression, survival, invasion and regulatory signaling in breast cancer stem cells (CSC) in vitro.

METHODS

Nestin expression in 150 triple-negative breast cancer specimens were examined by immunohistochemistry. The role of Nestin expression in tumorigenesis was examined by assaying naturally occurring Nestinhigh/Nestinlow CSC from 12 breast cancer tissues, as well as CSC from 26 clinical specimens, where Nestin overexpression and silencing was achieved by genetic manipulation, for their ability to form mammospheres and induce solid tumors. Cell cycle progression, spontaneous apoptosis and invasiveness of Nestin-silenced breast CSC were investigated by flow cytometry and transwell assays. The relative levels of expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and Wnt/β-catenin pathway-related molecules were determined by western blotting.

RESULTS

Nestin expression was significantly associated with poor survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.01). Nestinhigh breast CSC rapidly formed typical mammospheres in vitro. Nestinhigh, but not Nestinlow CSC, efficiently formed solid tumors in vivo. Nestin silencing induced cell cycle arrest at G2/M (52.03% versus 19.99% in controls) and promoted apoptosis (36.45% versus 8.29% in controls). Nestin silencing also inhibited breast CSC invasiveness, and was associated with significantly upregulated E-cadherin, while N-cadherin, vimentin, a-smooth muscle actin (a-SMA), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), MMP-9 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression was downregulated (P <0.05 for all). Nestin silencing also upregulated Axin, glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3β), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARa), and downregulated β-catenin, c-Myc, cyclin D and MMP-7 expression in CSC. Inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway mitigated mammosphere formation in Nestinhigh CSC, while inhibition of GSK-3β promoted the mammosphere formation in Nestinlow CSC (P <0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicates that Nestin positively regulates the proliferation, survival and invasiveness of breast CSC by enhancing Wnt/β-catenin activation.

Nestin: predicting specific survival factors for breast cancer

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between nestin expression and clinicopathological characteristics, immunohistochemical markers and to determine the prognostic impact of nestin expression in breast cancer so as to lay a foundation for the treatment of breast cancer. A total of 109 patients who were histologically diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent radical operations from January 2006 to September 2007 in China Medical University were enrolled in the study. Nestin protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between nestin and other parameters was analyzed by using chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Nestin expression was observed in 37.6% (41/109) of cases. There were no significant differences between the age of >40 and ≤40 years group in terms of nestin expression (39.8 vs 18.2%; P = 0.161). The rate of nestin expression between those with and without lymph node metastasis was not significantly different (X (2) = 0.086; P = 0.769). The 5-year survival rates of the patients with nestin expression and those without were 34.1% (14/41) and 55.9% (38/68), respectively (P = 0.028). Overall, triple-negative breast cancers had higher expression rates than other cancers (54.1 vs 29.2%; P = 0.011). Nestin expression rate in ER- and PR-negative tumors was found to be significantly higher than cases that were ER- and PR-positive (P = 0.011 and P = 0.036, respectively). However, it was not found that HER2 expression was related to nestin expression (P = 0.120). These results suggest that the expression of nestin might play an important role in the prognosis of breast carcinoma, especially in the triple-negative subgroups.

Clinical implications of stem cell gene Oct-4 expression in breast cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the expression of stem cell genes in breast cancer and the relationship between stem cell gene expression and clinical and pathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND

By now, stem cell differentiation-related genes and the relationship between the genes and clinic-pathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer are still unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were selected by Flow cytometry. The differential expression of genes between CD44+/CD24- tumor cells and non-CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were detected by RT(2) Profiler™ PCR Array. The expression of stem cell gene Octamer-4 (Oct-4) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry staining and the relationship between Oct-4 and clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer was determined.

RESULTS

Seven different genes including stem cell differentiation-related factors (CD44, Oct-4, and nestin), cell cycle regulators (APC and CDC2), and growth factors (HGF and TGF) were detected as significantly differently expressed between CD44+/CD24- tumor cells and non-CD44+/CD24- tumor cells. Oct-4 protein expressed significantly higher in cancerous tissues than adjacent-tumor tissues (P = 0.001). Moreover, we observed that the expression of Oct-4 protein was related to histological type, lymph node status and molecular type of breast cancer (P = 0.001, 0.006, and 0.001, respectively). After survival analysis, the cases with highly expressed Oct-4 protein attained a significantly poorer postoperative disease-specific survival than those with none/low expressed Oct-4 protein (P = 0.001). In the Cox regression test, tumor size, histological type, disease stage, lymph node metastasis, Her-2 and Oct-4 were detected as the independent prognostic factors (P = 0.031, 0.012, 0.001, 0.002, 0.030, and 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Oct-4 was highly expressed in CD44+/CD24- tumor cells, and may be a potential biomarker for the initiation, progression, and differentiation of breast cancer.