Impaired pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine in severely obese volunteers

Comorbidities of hypothyroidism

Hypothyroidism is a relatively common condition that may affect as many as 10% of the population worldwide when its overt and subclinical presentations are considered. Important clinical comorbidities are highly prevalent in people with hypothyroidism and diminish quality of life and functional status in a manner that is proportional to the number of comorbidities present and their severity. This article reviews the common comorbidities of hypothyroidism, as reported in the literature. The comorbidities of hypothyroidism include clinical conditions commonly associated with hypothyroidism, such as dyslipidaemia, hypertension, fatigue or (possibly) cardiovascular disease, and can appear whether or not intervention with LT4 is applied appropriately to ensure biochemical euthyroidism. Other comorbidities may share some pathogenetic background with hypothyroidism, including depression or anxiety, or autoimmune conditions. Hypothyroidism may arise as a comorbidity of some other conditions, e.g. following the application of targeted cancer therapies or some disease-modfying treatments for multiple sclerosis. Other common treatments, including metformin, glucocorticoids or proton pump inhibitors, among others, may alter levels of thyrotropin, thus impacting on the monitoring of thyroid dysfunction and the diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction. Ensuring good control of hypothyroidism is a necessary first step in managing any patient with hypothyroidism. Then, physicians should be aware of the possibility of other comorbid conditions that must be addressed to achieve an optimal patient outcome.

Thyroid function status in patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement and associated factors: a retrospective cohort study in primary care

BACKGROUND

Long-term management of patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement requires thyroid function test (TFT) monitoring once every six-12 months as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. This study determined their thyroid function status during two-year follow-up visits in primary care, and the factors influencing their thyroid status, and assessed the optimal interval for TFTs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults with a clinical diagnosis code for hypothyroidism in their electronic health records taken from a group of polyclinics in Singapore between July 2017 and June 2020. The follow-up thyroid status was categorized as under-replacement (TSH ≥ 3.70mIU/L), over-replacement (TSH ≤ 0.65mIU/L) or euthyroid (TSH 0.65-3.70mIU/L). The patients' demographic, clinical and TFT data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests during the two-year follow-up. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the factors associated with suboptimal thyroid control. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare their thyroid function status in association with the interval between TFT monitoring.

RESULTS

Data from 5,749 eligible subjects (mean age 62.1 ± 13.29 years; 79% female; 79.7% Chinese) were analyzed. After a two-year follow-up, 61.9% (n = 3558) of all subjects were euthyroid, with 29.5% (n = 1694) being under-replaced and 8.6% (n = 497) over-replaced. However, thyroid status did not differ significantly with the various dose regimen (daily, segmented, or alternate days) (p = 0.193). Stepwise logistic regression showed that thyroxine under-replacement was significantly associated with the male gender (AOR = 1.25,95%CI = 1.03-1.51,p = 0.02) and obesity (AOR = 1.34,95%CI = 1.08-1.66,p = 0.008). Every unit (μg/kg body weight) increase in the mean daily thyroxine dose was associated with 2.72 times greater odds of over-replacement. When comparing thyroid function monitoring at intervals of 13-24 months, monitoring at shorter intervals (≤ 12 months) was less likely to detect thyroxine under-replacement (AOR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.44-0.74,p < 0.001) and over-replacement (AOR = 0.62,95%CI = 0.41-0.97,p = 0.033). Among the 3,312 adults who were euthyroid at baseline, 22.2%, 41.7% and 59.6% had suboptimal thyroid control at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively (Kaplan-Meier analysis).

CONCLUSION

Around six in ten patients were euthyroid with thyroxine replacement for hypothyroidism in primary care over two years. Thyroxine under-replacement was associated with male gender and obesity. The proportion of euthyroid patients developing abnormal thyroid function doubled with TFTs at six, 12 and 24-month intervals.

Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Patients with Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: A Narrative Review

The literature on the connection between obesity, metabolic syndrome, and subclinical hypothyroidism is critically analyzed in this narrative review. These conditions are frequently observed among adult populations and various studies and meta-analyses have assessed their association. The prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in obese individuals is higher than in non-obese subjects and this trend is more pronounced in unhealthy obesity phenotypes. However, the diagnosis and treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism can be difficult in obese patients. Exaggerated body fat is linked to thyroid hypoechogenicity as evident through ultrasonography and euthyroid obese people have greater TSH, FT3, and FT3/FT4 ratios than non-obese individuals in a euthyroid condition. Moreover, a reduced expression of the TSH receptor and altered function of deiodinases has been found in the adipose tissue of obese patients. Current data do not support the necessity of a pharmacological correction of the isolated hyperthyrotropinemia in euthyroid obese patients because treatment with thyroid hormone does not significantly improve weight loss and the increase in serum TSH can be reversible after hypocaloric diet or bariatric surgery. On the other hand, obesity is linked to elevated leptin levels. Inflammation can raise the risk of Hashimoto thyroiditis, which increases the likelihood that obese patients will experience overt or subclinical hypothyroidism. Both metabolic syndrome and subclinical hypothyroidism are associated with atherosclerosis, liver and kidney disease. Hence, the association of these two illnesses may potentiate the adverse effects noted in each of them. Subclinical hypothyroidism should be identified in patients with obesity and treated with appropriate doses of L-thyroxine according to the lean body mass and body weight. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to verify whether treatment of thyroid deficiency could counteract the expected risks.

Levothyroxine therapy, calculated deiodinases activity and basal metabolic rate in obese or nonobese patients after total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer, results of a retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Therapy for hypothyroid obese patients is still under definition since the thyrotropin-stimulating hormone (TSH) level is a less reliable marker of euthyroidism than nonobese patients. Indeed, TSH levels positively correlate with body mass index (BMI), and this increase may be a compensatory mechanism aimed at increasing energy expenditure in obese people. In contrast, the correlation of BMI with thyroid hormone levels is not completely clear, and conflicting results have been obtained by several studies. The L-T4 replacement dose is more variable in obese hypothyroid patients than in nonobese patients, and a recent study indicated that the L-T4 replacement dose is related to lean body mass in obese thyroidectomized patients. We aimed to study the correlations of L-T4-administered dose, thyroid hormone levels and TSH secretion with basal metabolic rate (BMR) and total calculated deiodinase activity (GD) in obese and nonobese athyreotic patients. We also looked for individualized L-T4 replacement dose set points to be used in clinical practice.

METHODS

We studied retrospectively 160 athyreotic patients, 120 nonobese and 40 obese. GD was calculated by SPINA Thyr 4.2, the responsiveness of the hypothalamic/pituitary thyrotrope by Jostel's thyrotropin (TSH) index and BMR by the Mifflin-St. Jeor formula, the interplay of GD and BMR with L-T4, thyroid hormones and TSH index (TSHI) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In our study, the L-T4 dose was an independent predictor of GD, and approximately 30% of athyreotic patients under L-T4 therapy had a reduced GD; FT4 levels were higher and negatively modulated by BMR in obese athyreotic patients respect to nonobese, in these patients a T4 to T3 shunt, in terms of TSHI suppression is observed suggesting a defective hypothalamic pituitary T4 to T3 conversion and a resistance to L-T4 replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

L-t4 dose is the most important predictor of GD, BMR modulates T4 levels in obese athyreotic patients that are resistant to L-T4 replacement therapy.

Thyroid Function Alteration in Obesity and the Effect of Bariatric Surgery

The most common endocrine disease in obesity is hypothyroidism and secondary endocrine alterations, including abnormal thyroid function, are frequent in obesity. It is unclear whether impaired thyroid function is the cause or the consequence of increased adiposity; furthermore, there are no clear data regarding the best way to dose levothyroxine for patients with both hypothyroidism and obesity, and the effect of bariatric surgery (BS). The aim of the present article is to review some controversial aspects of the relation between obesity and the thyroid: (1) Thyroid function in obesity and the effect of BS (2) Thyroid hormone treatment (THT) in obese patients with hypothyroidism and the effect of BS. In summary: In morbidly obese patients, TSH is moderately increased. Morbid obesity has a mild central resistance to the thyroid hormone, reversible with weight loss. In morbidly obese hypothyroid patients, following weight loss, the levothyroxine dose/kg of ideal weight did not change, albeit there was an increment in the levothyroxine dose/kg of actual weight. From a clinical practice perspective, in morbid obesity, diagnosing mild hypothyroidism is difficult, BS improves the altered thyroid function and THT can be adapted better if it is based on ideal weight.

Evaluation of Thyroid Hormone Replacement Dosing in Morbidly Obese Hypothyroid Patients after Bariatric Surgery-Induced Weight Loss

The most frequent endocrine disease in obese patients is hypothyroidism. To date, there are no clear data regarding what happens to the dose of levothyroxine (LT4) after bariatric surgery (BS). The objective of the present study was to evaluate thyroid hormone replacement dose in morbidly obese hypothyroid patients after BS-induced weight loss. We explore the best type of measured or estimated body weight for LT4 dosing. We performed an observational study evaluating patients with morbid obesity and hypothyroidism who underwent BS. We included 48 patients (three men). In morbidly obese hypothyroid patients 12 months after BS-induced weight loss, the total LT4 dose or the LT4 dose/kg ideal body weight did not change, while there was a significant increase in LT4 dose/body surface area, LT4 dose/kg weight, LT4 dose/kg adjusted body weight, LT4 dose/kg body fat, and LT4 dose/kg lean body weight. There were no differences in LT4 dose and its variation between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The present study strongly suggests that LT4 dosing in obese hypothyroid patients can be individually adapted more precisely if it is based on ideal body weight.

Appropriate dose of levothyroxine replacement therapy for hypothyroid obese patients

Background

Athyreotic patients require a daily levothyroxine (LT4) doses of 1.6-1.8 mcg/kg of actual body weight (BW) to achieve normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. Lean body mass (LBM) calculation may be a more accurate determination of LT4 dose in obese patients. Previous studies were mainly investigated in Caucasians and LBM is markedly different between various ethnic groups. We aim to identify the optimal dose of LT4 replacement therapy in hypothyroid Thai patients including obese subjects.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of Thai adults with hypothyroidism at the thyroid clinic. Patients had been received LT4 (Brand: Euthyrox) at a stable dose ≥ 75 mcg/day for at least 1 year. Patients with thyroid cancer, pregnant, and lactating women were excluded. LBM was calculated by the Hume formula.

Results

Two hundred patients (80% females) with a mean age of 48.6 ± 14.8 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 ± 4.6 kg/m² were included. Daily LT4 dose/kg of actual BW according to BMI 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, and ≥ 30 kg/m² were 1.67 ± 0.27, 1.51 ± 0.28 and 1.39 ± 0.34 mcg/kg, respectively. In contrast, LT4 dose/kg of LBM were 2.31 ± 0.39, 2.35 ± 0.45 and 2.36 ± 0.51 mcg/kg, respectively.

Conclusions

LBM is considered a better indicator for calculating an appropriate LT4 replacement dose than actual BW in hypothyroid obese Thai patients. The recommended daily dose of LT4 is 2.3 mcg/kg of LBM that could be applied for all ranges of BMI.

Effect of obesity on gastrointestinal transit, pressure and pH using a wireless motility capsule

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing prevalence and medical burden of obesity, the understanding of gastrointestinal physiology in obesity is scarce, which hampers drug development.

AIM

To investigate the effect of obesity and food intake on gastrointestinal transit, pressure and pH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An exploratory cross-sectional study using a wireless motility capsule (SmartPill©) was performed in 11 participants with obesity and 11 age- and gender-matched participants with normal weight (group) in fasted and fed state (visit). During the first visit, the capsule was ingested after an overnight fast. During a second visit, the capsule was ingested after a nutritional drink to simulate fed state. Linear mixed models were constructed to compare segmental gastrointestinal transit, pressure and pH between groups (obesity or control) and within every group (fasted or fed).

RESULTS

Food intake slowed gastric emptying in both groups (both P < 0.0001), though food-induced gastric contractility was higher in participants with obesity compared to controls (P = 0.02). In the small intestine, a higher contractility (P = 0.001), shorter transit (P = 0.04) and lower median pH (P = 0.002) was observed in participants with obesity compared to controls. No differences were observed for colonic measurements.

CONCLUSION

Obesity has a profound impact on gastrointestinal physiology, which should be taken into account for drug development.

Hypothyroidism and levothyroxine therapy following bariatric surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Many health benefits of bariatric surgery are known and well-studied, but there is scarce data on the benefits of bariatric surgery on the thyroid function.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to make a meta-analysis regarding the impact of bariatric surgery on thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, levothyroxine dose, and the status of subclinical hypothyroidism.

SETTING

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2020 for relevant clinical studies. Random-effects model was used to pool results. Network meta-analysis was performed, incorporating direct and indirect comparisons among different types of bariatric surgery. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of moderator variables on TSH levels and required levothyroxine dose after surgery. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for data selection and extraction. PROSPERO registry number: CRD42018105739.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies involving 1284 patients were included. There was a statistically significant decrease in TSH levels after bariatric surgery (mean difference = -1.66 mU/L, 95%CI [-2.29, -1.03], P < .0001). In meta-regression analysis, we found that the following moderator variables: length of follow-up, mean age, baseline TSH, and preoperative thyroid function, could explain 1%, 43%, 68%, and 88% of the between-study variance, respectively. Furthermore, subclinical hypothyroidism was completely resolved in 87% of patients following bariatric surgery. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease of levothyroxine dose in frank hypothyroid patients following bariatric surgery (mean difference = -13.20 mcg/d, 95%CI [-19.69, -6.71]). In network meta-analysis, we found that discontinuing or decreasing levothyroxine dose was significant following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 1 anastomosis gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy, (OR = 31.02, 95%CI [10.34, 93.08]), (OR = 41.73, 95%CI [2.04, 854.69]), (OR = 104.03, 95%CI [35.79, 302.38]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analysis, bariatric surgery is associated with the resolution of subclinical hypothyroidism, a decrease in TSH levels, and a decrease in levothyroxine dose.

New Formulations of Levothyroxine in the Treatment of Hypothyroidism: Trick or Treat?

Background: Levothyroxine (LT4) as a medication is used by up to 5.3% of the adult population. For optimal efficacy, the traditional tablet formulation (LT4tab) requires that patients avoid concomitant ingestion with food, drinks, and certain medications, as well as excellent patient compliance. Some comorbidities influence bioavailability of LT4 and may mandate repeated dose adjustments. Summary: New LT4 formulations (soft gel [LT4soft] and liquid [LT4liq]) containing predissolved LT4 are claimed to improve bioavailability, presumably by facilitating absorption. Thus, these formulations may well be more suitable than LT4tab for patients whose daily requirements are subjected to variations in bioavailability. Here, we review the evidence and indications for use of new LT4 formulations and highlight areas of uncertainty that are worthy of further investigation. While bioequivalence is established for LT4soft and LT4liq administered to healthy volunteers compared with LT4tab in pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, therapeutic equivalence of the new formulations seems to be different in several clinical settings. Some evidence suggests that new formulations of LT4 may mitigate against the strict requirements relating to concomitant ingestion with food, drinks, and certain medications, which apply to traditional LT4 tablets. The principal indication is in selected patients with disease fluctuations and intermittent therapies with interfering medications, where the need for frequent dose adjustments and office visits may be diminished. Whether the use of LT4soft or LT4liq in patients with impaired gastric acid secretion results in better control of hypothyroidism than LT4tab remains unclear. Conclusions: The evidence in favor of using LT4soft and LT4liq in clinical practice over LT4tab is weak, and the underlying putative PK mechanisms unclear. Additional studies to investigate these potential benefits, define the cost-effectiveness, and understand the PK mechanisms involved with new LT4 formulations are needed.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Drugs in Obese Pediatric Patients: How to Map Uncharted Clinical Territories

Clinicians are increasingly faced with challenges regarding the pharmacological treatment of obese pediatric patients. To provide guidance for these treatments, a better understanding of the impact of obesity on pharmacological processes in children is needed. Results on pharmacological studies in adults show however ambiguous patterns regarding the impact of obesity on ADME processes or on drug pharmacodynamics. Additionally, based on the limited research performed in obese pediatric patients, it becomes clear that findings from obese adults cannot be expected to always translate directly to similar findings in obese children. To improve knowledge on drug pharmacology in obese pediatric patients, studies should focus on quantifying the impact of maturation, obesity, and other relevant variables on primary pharmacological parameters and on disentangling systemic (renal and/or hepatic) and presystemic (gut and/or first-pass hepatic) clearance. For this, data is required from well-designed clinical trials that include patients with not only a wide range in age but also a range in excess body weight, upon oral and intravenous dosing. Population modelling approaches are ideally suitable for this purpose and can also be used to link the pharmacokinetics to pharmacodynamics and to derive drug dosing regimens. Generalizability of research findings can be achieved by including mechanistic aspects in the data analysis, for instance, using either extrapolation approaches in population modelling or by applying physiologically based modelling principles. It is imperative that more and smarter studies are performed in obese pediatric patients to provide safe and effective treatment for this special patient population.

Levothyroxine Replacement in Obese Adults: The Role of Metabolic Variables and Aging on Thyroid Testing Abnormalities

CONTEXT

General rates of over- and underreplacement in levothyroxine (LT4) users with primary hypothyroidism are variably high. No information on LT4 adequacy exists in obesity.

OBJECTIVE

We explored rates and factors relating to LT4 adequacy in obese patients with primary hypothyroidism.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

DESIGN

Among 4954 consecutive obese patients admitted between 2011 and 2014, 691 hypothyroid patients receiving LT4 therapy and 691 body mass index (BMI)-, age-, and sex-matched euthyroid controls underwent analysis of thyroid function, glucolipid profile, body composition, and indirect calorimetry. LT4 users were classified into low TSH (<0.27 mU/L), euthyroid (0.27 to 4.2 mU/L), and high TSH (>4.2 mU/L).

RESULTS

LT4 users constituted 13.9% of the incident population. TSH was low in 7.5%, high in 17.2%, and normal in 75.2% of LT4 users. Overtreatment decreased with aging and more LT4 users ≥65 years of age had normal TSH than those <65 years of age (P < 0.05). Compared with the euthyroid obese group, LT4 users showed higher adiposity, similar insulin resistance, but a healthier lipid profile. In multivariable analyses, LT4 dose was predicted by fat-free mass, hypothyroidism cause, and sex (P < 0.0001 to < 0.05). Risk of LT4 overreplacement increased with younger age (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), higher LT4 dose (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.44 to 6.14), and lower BMI (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99). Male sex increased the likelihood of LT4 underreplacement (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.10 to 5.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is associated with milder rates of inadequate LT4 treatment compared with nonobese populations. LT4 adequacy increases with aging. Age, body composition, and sex are main determinants of LT4 requirements in obesity.

The Effect of the Bariatric Surgery Type on the Levothyroxine Dose of Morbidly Obese Hypothyroid Patients

BACKGROUND

Doubts exist about the effect of different bariatric surgery (BS) types on levothyroxine (Lt4) absorption. We compared Lt4 doses and their variation (ΔLt4) in patients with hypothyroidism that underwent malabsorptive (MS) or restrictive (RS) surgery and studied predictors of Lt4 dose change.

METHODS

Retrospective study of morbidly obese hypothyroid patients submitted to BS. We compared RS ("sleeve" gastrectomy or adjustable gastric banding) with MS (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) patients. We built a multivariable logistic regression and a linear regression model to study predictors of Lt4 dose changes and ΔLt4, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients: 35 MS and 22 RS. Mean age 47 years; 7% men. Patients submitted to MS had lower BMI at 1 year than those submitted to RS. Lt4 dose remained unchanged in 61.4%, increased in 12.3%, and decreased in 26.3% of patients. Initial and 1-year Lt4 dose were not different between surgical groups. Relative Lt4 dose, but not absolute (p = 0.07), increased at 1 year (p < 0.001). Neither BS nor BMI variation were predictors of Lt4 dose variation. BMI variation was associated with relative Lt4 dose change independently of initial BMI and BS type: β (95%CI) - 0.03 (- 0.05; 0.00); p = 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in Lt4 dose and its variation between restrictive and malabsorptive techniques 1 year after surgery. Malabsorptive procedures may not affect Lt4 absorption differently from restrictive ones. Bariatric surgery type was not predictive of Lt4 dose changes. BMI variation is associated with relative Lt4 dose (dose per weight) variation and its association was independent of bariatric surgery type.

Levothyroxine Dose Adjustment to Optimise Therapy Throughout a Patient's Lifetime

Levothyroxine is the standard therapy for patients with hypothyroidism, a condition that affects up to 5% of people worldwide. While levothyroxine therapy has substantially improved the lives of millions of hypothyroid patients since its introduction in 1949, the complexity of maintaining biochemical and clinical euthyroidism in patients undergoing treatment with levothyroxine cannot be underestimated. Initial dosing of levothyroxine can vary greatly and may be based on the amount of residual thyroid function retained by the patient, the body weight or lean body mass of the patient, and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. As levothyroxine is usually administered over a patient's lifetime, physiological changes throughout life will affect the dose of levothyroxine required to maintain euthyroidism. Furthermore, dose adjustments may need to be made in patients with concomitant medical conditions, in patients taking certain medications, as well as in elderly patients. Patients who have undergone any weight or hormonal changes may require dose adjustments, and the majority of pregnant women require increased doses of levothyroxine. Optimal treatment of hypothyroidism requires a partnership between patient and physician. The physician is tasked with vigilant appraisal of the patient's status based on a thorough clinical and laboratory assessment and appropriate adjustment of their levothyroxine therapy. The patient in turn is tasked with medication adherence and reporting of symptomatology and any changes in their medical situation. The goal is consistent maintenance of euthyroidism, without the patient experiencing the adverse events and negative health consequences of under- or overtreatment.Funding Merck.Plain Language Summary Plain language summary available for this article.

Obesity and drug pharmacology: a review of the influence of obesity on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters

INTRODUCTION

The rising prevalence of obesity confronts clinicians with dosing problems in the (extreme) overweight population. Obesity has a great impact on key organs that play a role in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of drugs, however the ultimate impact of these changes on how to adapt the dose may not always be known. Areas covered: In this review, physiological changes associated with obesity are discussed. An overview is provided on the alterations in absorption, distribution, drug metabolism and clearance in (morbid) obesity focusing on general principles that can be extracted from pharmacokinetic studies. Also, relevant pharmacodynamic considerations in obesity are discussed. Expert opinion: Over the last two decades, increased knowledge is generated on PK and PD in obesity. Future research should focus on filling in the knowledge gaps that remain, especially in connecting obesity-related physiological changes with changes in PK and/or PD and vice versa. Ultimately, this knowledge can be used to develop physiologically based PK and PD models on the basis of quantitative systems pharmacology principles. Moreover, efforts should focus on thorough prospective evaluation of developed model-based doses with subsequent implementation of these dosing recommendations in clinical practice.

Levothyroxine Dosing Following Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Based on the mechanisms of drug absorption, increased levothyroxine requirements are expected after bariatric surgery. However, there are conflicting data on this topic. This review evaluates the effects of bariatric surgery on levothyroxine dosing.

METHODS

Data were obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and review of published bibliographies.

RESULTS

Six of 10 studies demonstrated decreased postoperative requirements. Most demonstrated correlations between weight loss and dose. Only 3 case reports and 1 case series demonstrated increased levothyroxine requirements, attributed to malabsorption.

CONCLUSIONS

The loss of both fat and lean body mass may counteract malabsorptive effects from surgery, resulting in decreased postoperative levothyroxine requirements. In addition, the reversal of impaired levothyroxine pharmacokinetics and an altered set point of thyroid hormone homeostasis may also contribute to postoperative levothyroxine reductions.

Weight Loss and Variation of Levothyroxine Requirements in Hypothyroid Obese Patients After Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Obesity and hypothyroidism are both common disorders within the general population. Obese hypothyroid subjects require higher doses of levothyroxine (LT4) compared with normal weight individuals. Previous studies on the effects of bariatric surgery on LT4 dose requirements in hypothyroid subjects have provided conflicting results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the LT4 requirements in a group of obese subjects with acquired hypothyroidism, before and after weight loss achieved by bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Ninety-three obese hypothyroid subjects (mean age = 48 ± 9 years; mean body mass index = 45.9 ± 5.6 kg/m(2)), were evaluated before and 28 ± 8 months after bariatric surgery. Changes in the LT4 dose, anthropometric measures, and hormone values were evaluated. In 20 patients, data of body composition, assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

On average, after weight loss, a significant reduction of the total dose of LT4 was documented (from 130.6 ± 48.5 to 116.2 ± 38.6 μg/day; p < 0.001). The LT4 dose had to be reduced in 47 patients, was unchanged in 34, and had to be increased in 12 patients affected by autoimmune thyroiditis. Reduction of the LT4 dose was proportional to reduction of the lean body mass.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight loss achieved with modern surgical bariatric procedures is associated with a reduction of LT4 requirements in most hypothyroid subjects, which appears to be related to a decrease of the lean body mass. Occasionally, a concurrent decline of residual thyroid function, as it occurs in autoimmune thyroiditis, can counteract this phenomenon and eventually produce an increase of LT4 needs. It is believed that during the weight loss phase that follows bariatric surgery, there is no need for preventive adjustments of the LT4 dose, but serum thyroid hormones and thyrotropin should be periodically monitored in order to detect possible variations of LT4 requirements and to allow proper corrections of the therapy.

Sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and efficient procedure in HIV patients with morbid obesity: a case series with results in weight loss, comorbidity evolution, CD4 count, and viral load

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery have been poorly studied in patients affected with HIV. Although sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most widely used procedure in many countries, most of the published literature reported results with the gastric bypass (GBP) procedure on morbidly obese HIV patients.

METHODS

We have evaluated retrospectively, in eight consecutive patients who underwent a SG, its effect in weight loss and its impact on the treatment and on the markers of HIV infection.

RESULTS

Seven out of eight patients were females. The mean age was 46 years, with a median preoperative BMI of 42 kg/m(2). The mean duration of HIV infection and CD4 cell count were 13.4 years and 457 cells/mm(3), respectively. The mean weight loss was 37 kg in 20 months, the excess BMI loss was 80.8 ± 30.9 %, and the excess weight loss is 81.5 ± 28.9 % with one minor complication. CD4 counts were unchanged. Three patients had therapy modifications that were unrelated to bariatric surgery. Two patients had a therapeutic drug monitoring before and after the intervention. Plasma concentrations remained in therapeutic levels after the SG. Most comorbidities disappeared postoperatively, decreasing the cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The sleeve gastrectomy was safe and effective with no consequences on CD4 counts and viral load in HIV-affected obese patients. It should be considered as a part of the treatment in morbidly obese HIV patients.

Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the american thyroid association task force on thyroid hormone replacement

BACKGROUND

A number of recent advances in our understanding of thyroid physiology may shed light on why some patients feel unwell while taking levothyroxine monotherapy. The purpose of this task force was to review the goals of levothyroxine therapy, the optimal prescription of conventional levothyroxine therapy, the sources of dissatisfaction with levothyroxine therapy, the evidence on treatment alternatives, and the relevant knowledge gaps. We wished to determine whether there are sufficient new data generated by well-designed studies to provide reason to pursue such therapies and change the current standard of care. This document is intended to inform clinical decision-making on thyroid hormone replacement therapy; it is not a replacement for individualized clinical judgment.

METHODS

Task force members identified 24 questions relevant to the treatment of hypothyroidism. The clinical literature relating to each question was then reviewed. Clinical reviews were supplemented, when relevant, with related mechanistic and bench research literature reviews, performed by our team of translational scientists. Ethics reviews were provided, when relevant, by a bioethicist. The responses to questions were formatted, when possible, in the form of a formal clinical recommendation statement. When responses were not suitable for a formal clinical recommendation, a summary response statement without a formal clinical recommendation was developed. For clinical recommendations, the supporting evidence was appraised, and the strength of each clinical recommendation was assessed, using the American College of Physicians system. The final document was organized so that each topic is introduced with a question, followed by a formal clinical recommendation. Stakeholder input was received at a national meeting, with some subsequent refinement of the clinical questions addressed in the document. Consensus was achieved for all recommendations by the task force.

RESULTS

We reviewed the following therapeutic categories: (i) levothyroxine therapy, (ii) non-levothyroxine-based thyroid hormone therapies, and (iii) use of thyroid hormone analogs. The second category included thyroid extracts, synthetic combination therapy, triiodothyronine therapy, and compounded thyroid hormones.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that levothyroxine should remain the standard of care for treating hypothyroidism. We found no consistently strong evidence for the superiority of alternative preparations (e.g., levothyroxine-liothyronine combination therapy, or thyroid extract therapy, or others) over monotherapy with levothyroxine, in improving health outcomes. Some examples of future research needs include the development of superior biomarkers of euthyroidism to supplement thyrotropin measurements, mechanistic research on serum triiodothyronine levels (including effects of age and disease status, relationship with tissue concentrations, as well as potential therapeutic targeting), and long-term outcome clinical trials testing combination therapy or thyroid extracts (including subgroup effects). Additional research is also needed to develop thyroid hormone analogs with a favorable benefit to risk profile.

Treatment with thyroid hormone

Thyroid hormone deficiency can have important repercussions. Treatment with thyroid hormone in replacement doses is essential in patients with hypothyroidism. In this review, we critically discuss the thyroid hormone formulations that are available and approaches to correct replacement therapy with thyroid hormone in primary and central hypothyroidism in different periods of life such as pregnancy, birth, infancy, childhood, and adolescence as well as in adult patients, the elderly, and in patients with comorbidities. Despite the frequent and long term use of l-T4, several studies have documented frequent under- and overtreatment during replacement therapy in hypothyroid patients. We assess the factors determining l-T4 requirements (sex, age, gender, menstrual status, body weight, and lean body mass), the major causes of failure to achieve optimal serum TSH levels in undertreated patients (poor patient compliance, timing of l-T4 administration, interferences with absorption, gastrointestinal diseases, and drugs), and the adverse consequences of unintentional TSH suppression in overtreated patients. Opinions differ regarding the treatment of mild thyroid hormone deficiency, and we examine the recent evidence favoring treatment of this condition. New data suggesting that combined therapy with T3 and T4 could be indicated in some patients with hypothyroidism are assessed, and the indications for TSH suppression with l-T4 in patients with euthyroid multinodular goiter and in those with differentiated thyroid cancer are reviewed. Lastly, we address the potential use of thyroid hormones or their analogs in obese patients and in severe cardiac diseases, dyslipidemia, and nonthyroidal illnesses.

Improved levothyroxine pharmacokinetics after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The absorption of levothyroxine (LT4) is affected by many factors. Bariatric surgery is recommended in severely obese patients. The aim of this study was to determine the consequences of bariatric surgery on LT4 pharmacokinetic parameters, and to identify the regions of the gastrointestinal tract where LT4 is absorbed in patients with severe obesity before and after surgery.

METHODS

We studied 32 severely obese nonhypothyroid patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG; n=10), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP; n=7), or biliopancreatic diversion with long limbs (BPD-LL; n=15). Before surgery, from 8:00 a.m., blood samples were collected before and every 30 minutes after the oral administration of a solution of 600 μg of LT4. The same procedure was repeated 35 days after surgery. We estimated the pharmacokinetic parameters of LT4 before and after surgery, including the area under the curve (AUC), the peak thyroxine concentration (Cmax), and the time to peak thyroxine concentration (Tmax).

RESULTS

Following surgery, in the SG group, the mean AUC was higher than it was before surgery (18.97±6.01 vs. 25.048±6.47 [μg/dL]·h; p<0.01), whereas the values of Cmax and Tmax were similar to those before surgery. In the RYGBP group, mean AUC, Cmax, and Tmax were similar before and after surgery. In the BPD-LL group, mean AUC and Cmax were higher after surgery than before (14.18±5.64 vs. 25.51±9.1 [μg/dL]·h, p<0.001; 5.62±1.34 vs. 8.16±2.57 μg/dL, p<0.001, respectively), whereas Tmax was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of LT4 absorption are improved following SG and BPD-LL types of bariatric procedures. We conclude that the stomach, the duodenum, and the upper part of the jejunum are not sites for LT4 absorption, because in the above-mentioned bariatric procedures these are bypassed or removed.

A Review of the Pharmacokinetics of Levothyroxine for the Treatment of Hypothyroidism

Thyroxine hormone has been recognised since the early part of the nineteenth century and levothyroxine has been available since the mid-nineteenth century as a replacement for deficient thyroid hormones. While levothyroxine remains the staple treatment for hypothyroidism even to this day, its optimal use can be challenging. As is often the case with older drugs, the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine is often under-appreciated or misunderstood and many factors influence the optimal dosing of levothyroxine. This article will review the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine in the treatment of hypothyroidism and highlight major concepts that should aid both clinicians and researchers.