The outer kinetochore protein KNL-1 contains a defined oligomerization domain in nematodes

Centromeres in cancer: Unraveling the link between chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis

Centromeres are critical structures involved in chromosome segregation, maintaining genomic stability, and facilitating the accurate transmission of genetic information. They are key in coordinating the assembly and help keep the correct structure, location, and function of the kinetochore, a proteinaceous structure vital for ensuring proper chromosome segregation during cell division. Abnormalities in centromere structure can lead to aneuploidy or chromosomal instability, which have been implicated in various diseases, including cancer. Accordingly, abnormalities in centromeres, such as structural rearrangements and dysregulation of centromere-associated proteins, disrupt gene function, leading to uncontrolled cell growth and tumor progression. For instance, altered expression of CENP-A, CENP-E, and others such as BUB1, BUBR1, MAD1, and INCENP, have been shown to ascribe to centromere over-amplification, chromosome missegregation, aneuploidy, and chromosomal instability; this, in turn, can culminate in tumor progression. These centromere abnormalities also promoted tumor heterogeneity by generating genetically diverse cell populations within tumors. Advanced techniques like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray analysis are crucial for detecting centromere abnormalities, enabling accurate cancer classification and tailored treatment strategies. Researchers are exploring strategies to disrupt centromere-associated proteins for targeted cancer therapies. Thus, this review explores centromere abnormalities in cancer, their molecular mechanisms, diagnostic implications, and therapeutic targeting. It aims to advance our understanding of centromeres' role in cancer and develop advanced diagnostic tools and targeted therapies for improved cancer management and treatment.

An intrinsically disordered kinetochore protein coordinates mechanical regulation of chromosome segregation by dynein

Kinetochores connect chromosomes and spindle microtubules to maintain genomic integrity through cell division. Crosstalk between the minus-end directed motor dynein and kinetochore-microtubule attachment factors promotes accurate chromosome segregation through a poorly understood pathway. Here we identify a physical linkage between the intrinsically disordered protein Spc105 (KNL1 orthologue) and dynein using an optogenetic oligomerization assay. Core pools of the checkpoint protein BubR1 and the adaptor complex RZZ mediate the connection of Spc105 to dynein. Furthermore, a minimal segment of Spc105 that contains regions with a propensity to multimerize and binding motifs for Bub1 and BubR1 is sufficient to functionally link Spc105 to RZZ and dynein. Deletion of the minimal region from Spc105 reduces recruitment of its binding partners to bioriented kinetochores and causes chromosome mis-segregation. Restoration of normal chromosome segregation and localization of BubR1 and RZZ requires both protein binding motifs and higher-order oligomerization of Spc105. Together, our results reveal that higher-order multimerization of Spc105 is required to recruit a core pool of RZZ that modulates microtubule attachment stability to promote accurate chromosome segregation.

BubR1 recruitment to the kinetochore via Bub1 enhances spindle assembly checkpoint signaling

During mitosis, unattached kinetochores in a dividing cell activate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and delay anaphase onset by generating the anaphase-inhibitory mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). These kinetochores generate the MCC by recruiting its constituent proteins, including BubR1. In principle, BubR1 recruitment to signaling kinetochores should increase its local concentration and promote MCC formation. However, in human cells BubR1 is mainly thought to sensitize the SAC to silencing. Whether BubR1 localization to signaling kinetochores by itself enhances SAC signaling remains unknown. Therefore, we used ectopic SAC activation (eSAC) systems to isolate two molecules that recruit BubR1 to the kinetochore, the checkpoint protein Bub1 and the KI and MELT motifs in the kinetochore protein KNL1, and observed their contribution to eSAC signaling. Our quantitative analyses and mathematical modeling show that Bub1-mediated BubR1 recruitment to the human kinetochore promotes SAC signaling and highlight BubR1's dual role of strengthening the SAC directly and silencing it indirectly.

MEL-28/ELYS and CENP-C coordinately control outer kinetochore assembly and meiotic chromosome-microtubule interactions

During mitosis and meiosis in the majority of eukaryotes, centromeric chromatin comprised of CENP-A nucleosomes and their reader CENP-C recruits components of the outer kinetochore to build an interface with spindle microtubules.^1,2 One exception is C. elegans oocyte meiosis, where outer kinetochore proteins form cup-like structures on chromosomes independently of centromeric chromatin.³ Here, we show that the nucleoporin MEL-28 (ortholog of human ELYS) and CENP-C^HCP-4 act in parallel to recruit outer kinetochore components to oocyte meiotic chromosomes. Unexpectedly, co-inhibition of MEL-28 and CENP-C^HCP-4 resulted in chromosomes being expelled from the meiotic spindle prior to anaphase onset, a more severe phenotype than what was observed following ablation of the outer kinetochore.^4,5 This observation suggested that MEL-28 and the outer kinetochore independently link chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Consistent with this, the chromosome expulsion defect was observed following co-inhibition of MEL-28 and the microtubule-coupling KNL-1/MIS-12/NDC-80 (KMN) network of the outer kinetochore. Use of engineered mutants showed that MEL-28 acts in conjunction with the microtubule-binding NDC-80 complex to keep chromosomes within the oocyte meiotic spindle and that this function likely involves the Y-complex of nucleoporins that associate with MEL-28; by contrast, the ability to dock protein phosphatase 1, shared by MEL-28 and KNL-1, is not involved. These results highlight nuclear pore-independent functions for a conserved nucleoporin and explain two unusual features of oocyte meiotic chromosome segregation in C. elegans: centromeric chromatin-independent outer kinetochore assembly, and dispensability of the outer kinetochore for constraining chromosomes in the acentrosomal meiotic spindle.

The microtubule- and PP1-binding activities of Drosophila melanogaster Spc105 control the kinetics of SAC satisfaction

KNL1 is a large intrinsically disordered kinetochore (KT) protein that recruits spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) components to mediate SAC signaling. The N-terminal region (NTR) of KNL1 possesses two activities that have been implicated in SAC silencing: microtubule (MT) binding and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) recruitment. The NTR of Drosophila melanogaster KNL1 (Spc105) has never been shown to bind MTs or to recruit PP1. Furthermore, the phosphoregulatory mechanisms known to control SAC protein binding to KNL1 orthologues is absent in D. melanogaster. Here, these apparent discrepancies are resolved using in vitro and cell-based assays. A phosphoregulatory circuit that utilizes Aurora B kinase promotes SAC protein binding to the central disordered region of Spc105 while the NTR binds directly to MTs in vitro and recruits PP1-87B to KTs in vivo. Live-cell assays employing an optogenetic oligomerization tag and deletion/chimera mutants are used to define the interplay of MT and PP1 binding by Spc105 and the relative contributions of both activities to the kinetics of SAC satisfaction.

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: at the intersection of order, disorder, and kinetochore function

The kinetochore (KT) field has matured tremendously since Earnshaw first identified CENP-A, CENP-B, and CENP-C [1,2]. In the past 35 years, the accumulation of knowledge has included: defining the parts list, identifying epistatic networks of interdependence within the parts list, understanding the spatial organization of subcomplexes into a massive structure - hundreds of megadaltons in size, and dissecting the functions of the KT in its entirety as well as of its individual parts. Like nearly all cell and molecular biology fields, the structure-function paradigm has been foundational to advances in the KT field. A point nicely highlighted by the fact that we are at the precipice of the in vitro reconstitution of a functional KT holo complex. Yet conventional notions of structure cannot provide a complete picture of the KT especially since it contains an abundance of unstructured or intrinsically disordered constituents. The combination of structured and disordered proteins within the KT results in an assembled system that is functionally greater than the sum of its parts.

Biochemical Approaches to Studying Caenorhabditis elegans ESCRT Functions In Vitro

Our fundamental understanding of the roles played by the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery in cells comes from interdisciplinary approaches that combine numerous in vivo and in vitro techniques. Here, we focus on methods used to biochemically characterize Caenorhabditis elegans ESCRT components in vitro, including the production and characterization of recombinant ESCRT complexes and their use in membrane interaction studies. Key methodologies used include gel filtration chromatography, glycerol density gradient analysis, multi-angle light scattering, liposome co-flotation, and single-liposome fluorescence microscopy. Collectively, these studies have enabled us to define subunit stoichiometry of soluble C. elegans ESCRT complexes and to demonstrate that the late-acting ESCRT-III complex facilitates membrane bending and remodeling, at least in part by virtue of its ability to sense the curvature of lipid bilayers.

Kinetochore function is controlled by a phospho-dependent coexpansion of inner and outer components

It is widely accepted that the kinetochore is built on CENP-A-marked centromeric chromatin in a hierarchical order from inner to outer kinetochore. Recruitment of many kinetochore proteins depends on microtubule attachment status, but it remains unclear how their assembly/disassembly is orchestrated. Applying 3D structured illumination microscopy to Xenopus laevis egg extracts, here we reveal that in the absence of microtubule attachment, proteins responsible for lateral attachment and spindle checkpoint signaling expand to form micrometer-scale fibrous structures over CENP-A-free chromatin, whereas a core module responsible for end-on attachment (CENP-A, CENP-T, and Ndc80) does not. Both outer kinetochore proteins (Bub1, BubR1, Mad1, and CENP-E) and the inner kinetochore component CENP-C are integral components of the expandable module, whose assembly depends on multiple mitotic kinases (Aurora B, Mps1, and Plx1) and is suppressed by protein phosphatase 1. We propose that phospho-dependent coexpansion of CENP-C and outer kinetochore proteins promotes checkpoint signal amplification and lateral attachment, whereas their selective disassembly enables the transition to end-on attachment.

Natural Loss of Mps1 Kinase in Nematodes Uncovers a Role for Polo-like Kinase 1 in Spindle Checkpoint Initiation

The spindle checkpoint safeguards against chromosome loss during cell division by preventing anaphase onset until all chromosomes are attached to spindle microtubules. Checkpoint signal is generated at kinetochores, the primary attachment site on chromosomes for spindle microtubules. Mps1 kinase initiates checkpoint signaling by phosphorylating the kinetochore-localized scaffold protein Knl1 to create phospho-docking sites for Bub1/Bub3. Mps1 is widely conserved but is surprisingly absent in many nematode species. Here, we show that PLK-1, which targets a substrate motif similar to that of Mps1, functionally substitutes for Mps1 in C. elegans by phosphorylating KNL-1 to direct BUB-1/BUB-3 kinetochore recruitment. This finding led us to re-examine checkpoint initiation in human cells, where we found that Plk1 co-inhibition significantly reduced Knl1 phosphorylation and Bub1 kinetochore recruitment relative to Mps1 inhibition alone. Thus, the finding that PLK-1 functionally substitutes for Mps1 in checkpoint initiation in C. elegans uncovered a role for Plk1 in species that have Mps1.