Mechanisms that ensure monogamous mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

TOR signaling regulates GPCR levels on the plasma membrane and suppresses the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pathway

Saccharomyces cerevisiae respond to mating pheromone through the GPCRs Ste2 and Ste3, which promote growth of a mating projection in response to ligand binding. This commitment to mating is nutritionally and energetically taxing, and so we hypothesized that the cell may suppress mating signaling during starvation. We set out to investigate negative regulators of the mating pathway in nutritionally depleted environments. Here, we report that nutrient deprivation led to loss of Ste2 from the plasma membrane. Recapitulating this effect with nitrogen starvation led us to hypothesize that it was due to TORC1 signaling. Rapamycin inhibition of TORC1 impacted membrane levels of all yeast GPCRs. Inhibition of TORC1 also dampened mating pathway output. Deletion analysis revealed that TORC1 repression leads to α-arrestin-directed CME through TORC2-Ypk1 signaling. We then set out to determine whether major downstream effectors of the TOR complexes also downregulate pathway output during mating. We found that autophagy contributes to pathway downregulation through analysis of strains lacking ATG8 . We also show that Ypk1 significantly reduced pathway output. Thus, both autophagy machinery and TORC2-Ypk1 signaling serve as attenuators of pheromone signaling during mating. Altogether, we demonstrate that the stress-responsive TOR complexes coordinate GPCR endocytosis and reduce the magnitude of pheromone signaling, in ligand-independent and ligand-dependent contexts.

One Sentence Summary

TOR signaling regulates the localization of all Saccharomyces cerevisiae GPCRs during starvation and suppress the mating pathway in the presence and absence of ligand.

A focus on yeast mating: From pheromone signaling to cell-cell fusion

Cells live in a chemical environment and are able to orient towards chemical cues. Unicellular haploid fungal cells communicate by secreting pheromones to reproduce sexually. In the yeast models Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, pheromonal communication activates similar pathways composed of cognate G-protein-coupled receptors and downstream small GTPase Cdc42 and MAP kinase cascades. Local pheromone release and sensing, at a mobile surface polarity patch, underlie spatial gradient interpretation to form pairs between two cells of distinct mating types. Concentration of secretion at the point of cell-cell contact then leads to local cell wall digestion for cell fusion, forming a diploid zygote that prevents further fusion attempts. A number of asymmetries between mating types may promote efficiency of the system. In this review, we present our current knowledge of pheromone signaling in the two model yeasts, with an emphasis on how cells decode the pheromone signal spatially and ultimately fuse together. Though overall pathway architectures are similar in the two species, their large evolutionary distance allows to explore how conceptually similar solutions to a general biological problem can arise from divergent molecular components.

Limits to transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mating-type switching in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae relies on the Sir protein complex to silence HML and HMR, the two loci containing copies of the alleles of the mating type locus, MAT. Sir-based transcriptional silencing has been considered locus-specific, but the recent discovery of rare and transient escapes from silencing at HMLα2 with a sensitive assay called to question if these events extend to the whole locus. Adapting the same assay, we measured that transient silencing failures at HML were more frequent for the α2 gene than α1, similarly to their expression level in unsilenced cells. By coupling a mating assay, at HML we found that one of the two genes at that locus can be transiently expressed while the other gene is maintained silent. Thus, transient silencing loss can be a property of the gene rather than the locus. Cells lacking the SIR1 gene experience epigenetic bistability at HML and HMR. Our previous result led us to ask if HML could allow for two independent epigenetic states within the locus in a sir1Δ mutant. A simple construct using a double fluorescent reporter at HMLα1 and HMLα2 ruled out this possibility. Each HML locus displayed a single epigenetic state. We revisited the question of the correlation between the states of two HML loci in diploid cells, and showed they were independent. Finally, we determined the relative strength of gene repression achieved by Sir-based silencing with that achieved by the a1-α2 repressor.

Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Many cells detect and follow gradients of chemical signals to perform their functions. Yeast cells use gradients of extracellular pheromones to locate mating partners, providing a tractable model to understand how cells decode the spatial information in gradients. To mate, yeast cells must orient polarity toward the mating partner. Polarity sites are mobile, exploring the cell cortex until they reach the proper position, where they stop moving and "commit" to the partner. A simple model to explain commitment posits that a high concentration of pheromone is only detected upon alignment of partner cells' polarity sites, and causes polarity site movement to stop. Here we explore how yeast cells respond to partners that make different amounts of pheromone. Commitment was surprisingly robust to varying pheromone levels, ruling out the simple model. We also tested whether adaptive pathways were responsible for the robustness of commitment, but our results show that cells lacking those pathways were still able to accommodate changes in pheromone. To explain this robustness, we suggest that the steep pheromone gradients near each mating partner's polarity site trap the polarity site in place.

Chemotropism and Cell-Cell Fusion in Fungi

Fungi exhibit an enormous variety of morphologies, including yeast colonies, hyphal mycelia, and elaborate fruiting bodies. This diversity arises through a combination of polar growth, cell division, and cell fusion. Because fungal cells are nonmotile and surrounded by a protective cell wall that is essential for cell integrity, potential fusion partners must grow toward each other until they touch and then degrade the intervening cell walls without impacting cell integrity. Here, we review recent progress on understanding how fungi overcome these challenges. Extracellular chemoattractants, including small peptide pheromones, mediate communication between potential fusion partners, promoting the local activation of core cell polarity regulators to orient polar growth and cell wall degradation. However, in crowded environments, pheromone gradients can be complex and potentially confusing, raising the question of how cells can effectively find their partners. Recent findings suggest that the cell polarity circuit exhibits searching behavior that can respond to pheromone cues through a remarkably flexible and effective strategy called exploratory polarization.

Post-Transcriptional Control of Mating-Type Gene Expression during Gametogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Gametogenesis in diploid cells of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces four haploid meiotic products called spores. Spores are dormant until nutrients trigger germination, when they bud asexually or mate to return to the diploid state. Each sporulating diploid produces a mix of spores of two haploid mating types, a and α. In asexually dividing haploids, the mating types result from distinct, mutually exclusive gene expression programs responsible for production of mating pheromones and the receptors to sense them, all of which are silent in diploids. It was assumed that spores only transcribe haploid- and mating-type-specific genes upon germination. We find that dormant spores of each mating type harbor transcripts representing all these genes, with the exception of Mata1, which we found to be enriched in a spores. Mata1 transcripts, from a rare yeast gene with two introns, were mostly unspliced. If the retained introns reflect tethering to the MATa locus, this could provide a mechanism for biased inheritance. Translation of pheromones and receptors were repressed at least until germination. We find antisense transcripts to many mating genes that may be responsible. These findings add to the growing number of examples of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression during gametogenesis.

Exploratory polarization facilitates mating partner selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast decode pheromone gradients to locate mating partners, providing a model for chemotropism. How yeast polarize toward a single partner in crowded environments is unclear. Initially, cells often polarize in unproductive directions, but then they relocate the polarity site until two partners’ polarity sites align, whereupon the cells “commit” to each other by stabilizing polarity to promote fusion. Here we address the role of the early mobile polarity sites. We found that commitment by either partner failed if just one partner was defective in generating, orienting, or stabilizing its mobile polarity sites. Mobile polarity sites were enriched for pheromone receptors and G proteins, and we suggest that such sites engage in an exploratory search of the local pheromone landscape, stabilizing only when they detect elevated pheromone levels. Mobile polarity sites were also enriched for pheromone secretion factors, and simulations suggest that only focal secretion at polarity sites would produce high pheromone concentrations at the partner’s polarity site, triggering commitment.