1
|
Al-gafari M, Jagadeesan SK, Kazmirchuk TDD, Takallou S, Wang J, Hajikarimlou M, Ramessur NB, Darwish W, Bradbury-Jost C, Moteshareie H, Said KB, Samanfar B, Golshani A. Investigating the Activities of CAF20 and ECM32 in the Regulation of PGM2 mRNA Translation. BIOLOGY 2024; 13:884. [PMID: 39596839 PMCID: PMC11592143 DOI: 10.3390/biology13110884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Translation is a fundamental process in biology, and understanding its mechanisms is crucial to comprehending cellular functions and diseases. The regulation of this process is closely linked to the structure of mRNA, as these regions prove vital to modulating translation efficiency and control. Thus, identifying and investigating these fundamental factors that influence the processing and unwinding of structured mRNAs would be of interest due to the widespread impact in various fields of biology. To this end, we employed a computational approach and identified genes that may be involved in the translation of structured mRNAs. The approach is based on the enrichment of interactions and co-expression of genes with those that are known to influence translation and helicase activity. The in silico prediction found CAF20 and ECM32 to be highly ranked candidates that may play a role in unwinding mRNA. The activities of neither CAF20 nor ECM32 have previously been linked to the translation of PGM2 mRNA or other structured mRNAs. Our follow-up investigations with these two genes provided evidence of their participation in the translation of PGM2 mRNA and several other synthetic structured mRNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Al-gafari
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Sasi Kumar Jagadeesan
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Thomas David Daniel Kazmirchuk
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Sarah Takallou
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Jiashu Wang
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Maryam Hajikarimlou
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Nishka Beersing Ramessur
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
| | - Waleed Darwish
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
| | - Calvin Bradbury-Jost
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Houman Moteshareie
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
- Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Kamaledin B. Said
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Hail P.O. Box 2240, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bahram Samanfar
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre (ORDC), Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
| | - Ashkan Golshani
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (M.A.-g.); (S.K.J.); (T.D.D.K.); (S.T.); (J.W.); (M.H.); (N.B.R.); (W.D.); (C.B.-J.); (K.B.S.)
- Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang Z, Xu Z, Liu X, Chen G, Hu C, Chen M, Liu Y. Exploring the Role of the Processing Body in Plant Abiotic Stress Response. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024; 46:9844-9855. [PMID: 39329937 PMCID: PMC11430669 DOI: 10.3390/cimb46090585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 08/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The processing body (P-Body) is a membrane-less organelle with stress-resistant functions. Under stress conditions, cells preferentially translate mRNA that favors the stress response, resulting in a large number of transcripts unfavorable to the stress response in the cytoplasm. These non-translating mRNAs aggregate with specific proteins to form P-Bodies, where they are either stored or degraded. The protein composition of P-Bodies varies depending on cell type, developmental stage, and external environmental conditions. This review primarily elucidates the protein composition in plants and the assembly of P-Bodies, and focuses on the mechanisms by which various proteins within the P-Bodies of plants regulate mRNA decapping, degradation, translational repression, and storage at the post-transcriptional level in response to ethylene signaling and abiotic stresses such as drought, high salinity, or extreme temperatures. This overview provides insights into the role of the P-Body in plant abiotic stress responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yun Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nahar A, Sokolova V, Sekaran S, Orth JD, Park S. Assembly checkpoint of the proteasome regulatory particle is activated by coordinated actions of proteasomal ATPase chaperones. Cell Rep 2022; 39:110918. [PMID: 35675778 PMCID: PMC9214829 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The proteasome holoenzyme regulates the cellular proteome via degrading most proteins. In its 19-subunit regulatory particle (RP), a heterohexameric ATPase enables protein degradation by injecting protein substrates into the core peptidase. RP assembly utilizes "checkpoints," where multiple dedicated chaperones bind to specific ATPase subunits and control the addition of other subunits. Here, we find that the RP assembly checkpoint relies on two common features of the chaperones. Individual chaperones can distinguish an RP, in which their cognate ATPase persists in the ATP-bound state. Chaperones then together modulate ATPase activity to facilitate RP subunit rearrangements for switching to an active, substrate-processing state in the resulting proteasome holoenzyme. Thus, chaperones may sense ATP binding and hydrolysis as a readout for the quality of the RP complex to generate a functional proteasome holoenzyme. Our findings provide a basis to potentially exploit the assembly checkpoints in situations with known deregulation of proteasomal ATPase chaperones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asrafun Nahar
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, 1945 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Vladyslava Sokolova
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, 1945 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Suganya Sekaran
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, 1945 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - James D Orth
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, 1945 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Soyeon Park
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, 1945 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nst1, Densely Associated to P-Body in the Post-Exponential Phases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Shows an Intrinsic Potential of Producing Liquid-Like Condensates of P-Body Components in Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23052501. [PMID: 35269643 PMCID: PMC8910029 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Membrane-less biomolecular compartmentalization is a core phenomenon involved in many physiological activities that occur ubiquitously in cells. Condensates, such as promyelocytic leukemia (PML) bodies, stress granules, and P-bodies (PBs), have been investigated to understand the process of membrane-less cellular compartmentalization. In budding yeast, PBs dispersed in the cytoplasm of exponentially growing cells rapidly accumulate in response to various stresses such as osmotic stress, glucose deficiency, and heat stress. In addition, cells start to accumulate PBs chronically in post-exponential phases. Specific protein-protein interactions are involved in accelerating PB accumulation in each circumstance, and discovering the regulatory mechanism for each is the key to understanding cellular condensation. Here, we demonstrate that Nst1 of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is far more densely associated with PBs in post-exponentially growing phases from the diauxic shift to the stationary phase than during glucose deprivation of exponentially growing cells, while the PB marker Dcp2 exhibits a similar degree of condensation under these conditions. Similar to Edc3, ectopic Nst1 overexpression induces self-condensation and the condensation of other PB components, such as Dcp2 and Dhh1, which exhibit liquid-like properties. Altogether, these results suggest that Nst1 has the intrinsic potential for self-condensation and the condensation of other PB components, specifically in post-exponential phases.
Collapse
|