Assessment of the clinical value of urinary trypsin inhibitory activity in elderly people

Pathophysiology and diagnostic value of urinary trypsin inhibitors

Inflammation is an important indicator of tissue injury. In the acute form, there is usually accumulation of fluids and plasma components in the affected tissues. Platelet activation and the appearance in blood of abnormally increased numbers of polymorphonucleocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages usually occur. Infectious disorders such as sepsis, meningitis, respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, viral infection, and bacterial infection usually induce an inflammatory response. Chronic inflammation is often associated with diabetes mellitus, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, kidney diseases, and certain auto-immune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, organ failures and other disorders with an inflammatory component or etiology. The disorder may occur before inflammation is apparent. Markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and urinary trypsin inhibitors have changed our appraisal of acute events such as myocardial infarction; the infarct may be a response to acute infection and (or) inflammation. We describe here the pathophysiology of an anti-inflammatory agent termed urinary trypsin inhibitor (uTi). It is an important anti-inflammatory substance that is present in urine, blood and all organs. We also describe the anti-inflammatory agent bikunin, a selective inhibitor of serine proteases. The latter are important in modulating inflammatory events and even shutting them down.

Sensitive noninvasive marker for the diagnosis of probable bacterial or viral infection

Urinary trypsin inhibitor (uTi) is a product of elastase-mediated degradation of interleukin-alpha-inhibitor (I-alpha-I). Its activity increases in the urine of patients with a malignancy, inflammation, or infection, or in late pregnancy. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of uTi in urine with that of serum quantitative C-reactive protein (CRP) for diagnosing infection, as indicated by white cell response and clinical assessment. Ninety controls and 171 patients with various systemic infections were enrolled. We measured uTi enzymatically on a Cobas Fara (Roche Diagnostics). Patients were separated into bacterial, probable bacterial, viral, or probable viral groups based on the results of a complete blood count with differential (CBC), urinalysis (UA), and clinical assessment. In the bacterial (n=70) and control (n=90) groups, the uTi values (mean+/-SE) were 25.3+/-3.1 mg/L and 2.8+/-0.8 mg/L, respectively. uTi (at 2.7 mg/L) had a diagnostic sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 82% (AUC=0.889), whereas CRP (at a cutoff of 10 mg/L) had a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 96%, respectively (AUC=0.921). As a marker of infection (positive in both bacterial and viral groups), uTi had a sensitivity of 91% (AUC=0.884) vs. 89% (AUC=0.828) for CRP. Our data indicate that uTi has sufficient clinical sensitivity for screening systemic infections, and may have diagnostic value as a noninvasive test.