Major aphthous ulcers induced by nicorandil

Nicorandil effects on platelet function, Hs-CRP, MMP-9 and myocardial antioxidation in patients with unstable angina

Nicorandil effects on platelet activation and myocardial antioxidant function in patients with unstable angina were studied. A total of 157 patients with unstable angina in the First People's Hospital of Foshan were selected and divided into experimental and control group. Patients in experimental group were treated with conventional drugs and nicorandil (15 min/day), t.i.d., for 21 days as one course of treatment, while those in control group were treated with conventional drugs. After treatment, serum indexes were detected and compared between the two groups of patients. Compared with that in control group, the platelet function of patients in the experimental group was significantly improved, and there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Serum anti-oxidation factors in both groups were increased after treatment, and they were increased more significantly in experimental group (P<0.05). Serum inflammatory factors, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and matrix metalloproteinase-9, also declined significantly in the experimental group. Nicorandil reduces inflammatory response and promotes stability of myocardial function in the treatment of unstable angina.

Nicorandil, Gastrointestinal Adverse Drug Reactions and Ulcerations: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Nicorandil is a popular anti-anginal drug in Europe and Japan. Apart from some common adverse drug reactions (ADR), its safety is satisfactory. Several reports have suggested a link between nicorandil, gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration and fistulas. The review aims to critically appraise, synthesize and present the available evidence of all known GI ADR per anatomical location.

METHODS

The study complied with the PRISMA statement. Literature and pharmacovigilance databases were used to provide rate and/or calculate parameters (median age, median dose, history of symptoms, length of therapy and healing time after withdrawal of the drug). Differences in distribution of quantitative variables were analyzed via Mann-Whitney test. Correlation between quantitative variables was assessed with a Spearman's correlation coefficient. A p value <0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

Oral ulcerations occur in 0.2% of the subjects, anal ulcerations are present between 0.07% and 0.37% of patients. Oral and distal GI involvements are the most common ADR (28-29% and 27-31% of all GI ADR, respectively). The hepatobiliary system, the pancreas and salivary glands are not affected by nicorandil exposure. The time to develop oral ulcerations is 74 weeks among people on <30 mg/day compared to only 7.5 weeks in individuals on higher regimens (p = 0.47). There is a significant correlation between dose and ulcer healing time (Spearman's 0.525, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcerative disease is a very commonly reported GI ADR. A delayed ulcerative tendency supports the hypothesis of an ulcerogenic metabolite. Nicorandil seems to act as a cause of the ulcerations, but appears to also work in synergy with other promoting factors. Whether the action of the metabolites relies on a specific mechanism or a simple chemical ulceration is still to be established.

Anal ulceration associated with Nicorandil: case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Use of Nicorandil in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease has been associated with oral, ileal and more recently anal ulceration. We report a series of six cases of peri-anal ulceration in patients on nicorandil therapy, their response to withdrawal of the drug and review the literature.

METHODOLOGY

Systematic case note review of all patients with anal ulceration presenting to a single colorectal unit. Including detailed medical and drug history, morphological and histological appearances of the peri-anal ulcer after biopsy. Nicorandil therapy stopped in conjunction with physician and the progress of the ulcer monitored. Photographs taken before and after cessation of Nicorandil after informed consent. A literature search on Nicorandil combined with the key words: anal, peri-anal, ulceration and adverse drug effects was performed using the Cochrane Library Medline (January 1966 to June 2005) and Embase (January 1974 to June, 2005).

RESULTS

Six patients were identified from our hospital records. Histological examination of all ulcers revealed nonspecific chronic inflammation. Five patients demonstrated healing of ulceration within six weeks of withdrawal of Nicorandil, the remaining patient had circumferential involvement of the anal canal and has not improved at 3-month review. One patient was recommenced on Nicorandil after healing due to refractory angina and ulceration recurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe ulceration due to Nicorandil remains widely under diagnosed and the mechanism of ulceration is unclear. Despite diversion colostomy one of our patients continued with peri-anal ulceration, which may suggest a systemic mechanism rather than local irritation. Biopsy of these lesions is essential to exclude neoplastic process and inflammatory bowel disease.

Nicorandil induced oral ulceration

Oral ulceration has many different causes. The association between Nicorandil and oral ulceration is not a new phenomenon. There have been several previous case reports regarding a possible association although none in publications for general dental practice. In this report we have a case series of seven patients and we compared our findings with those in the current literature.

Perforation of the terminal ileum: a possible complication of nicorandil therapy

Recent reports have implicated nicorandil as a possible causative agent in the pathogenesis of anal and oral ulceration. We report a case of ulceration and perforation of the terminal ileum in a patient taking nicorandil. The possibility of an association between nicorandil therapy and gastrointestinal ulceration is discussed.

Nicorandil associated anal ulceration

OBJECTIVE

Nicorandil is a vasodilator used to control angina. It has been associated with oral and anal ulceration that resolves upon withdrawal of the drug.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report a series of 13 patients with nonspecific anal ulceration all of whom were receiving nicorandil for control of symptoms of ischaemic heart disease.

RESULTS

All the ulcers had similar clinical and histological appearances. All the ulcers healed on withdrawal of the drug.

CONCLUSION

Nicorandil-associated anal ulceration should be considered in the differential diagnoses of nonhealing anal ulcers.

Persistent nicorandil induced oral ulceration

Four patients with nicorandil induced ulceration are described, and the literature on the subject is reviewed. Nicorandil induced ulcers are very painful and distressing for patients. Clinically they appear as large, deep, persistent ulcers that have punched out edges. They are poorly responsive to topical steroids and usually require alteration of nicorandil treatment. The ulceration tends to occur at high doses of nicorandil and all four cases reported here were on doses of 40 mg per day or greater. In these situations reduction of nicorandil dose may be sufficient to promote ulcer healing and prevent further recurrence. However, nicorandil induced ulcers have been reported at doses as low as 10 mg daily and complete cessation of nicorandil may be required.

Oral nicorandil-induced lesions are not aphthous ulcers

OBJECTIVES

(i) To accurately define these lesions determining whether oral nicorandil-induced lesions are aphthous ulcers; (ii) To determine clinical characteristics of oral nicorandil-induced lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two slide conferences were held. A total of 60 dermatologists assigned diagnosis and clinical criteria to 11 photographs of oral nicorandil-induced lesions. Two slides were randomly selected and duplicated to be used as control. The panel of slides included independent lesions and photographs of different lesions of the same patient. Statistical analysis used chi2-test, estimation of the percentage interobserver agreement, and kappa-values.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of non-aphthous ulcer (71.8%) was significantly held in comparison with the diagnosis of oral aphthous ulcer (28.2%; P<0.001). To differentiate aphthous ulcer from non-aphthous ulcer, physicians significantly used three clinical criteria. The diagnosis of non-aphthous ulcer were significantly associated with the absence of yellow-based ulceration (P<0.001), with the linear shape (P=0.006) and the absence of inflammatory halo (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Oral nicorandil-induced lesions are not aphthous ulcers. We propose that at this stage of our knowledge, oral nicorandil-induced ulcer is the most suitable terminology.

Nicorandil associated anal ulceration

Nicorandil is a vasodilator used to control angina. It has been associated with oral ulceration and stomatitis that resolves upon withdrawal of the drug. We report a series of five patients with non-specific anal ulceration, all of whom received nicorandil for symptomatic control of ischaemic heart disease. Histological appearances were similar and the ulcers healed on withdrawal of the drug. Our results suggest that nicorandil might be a cause of anal ulceration.