Complex interventions for improving independent living and quality of life amongst community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Movement Framework for Older Adults: Application of the Geriatric 5Ms

Physical therapy for older adults must evolve to address the increasingly complex needs of older adults, who are living longer and managing multiple chronic conditions within challenging psychosocial and environmental contexts. Foundational models, such as the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and the Patient/Client Management model provide structural guidance but fail to fully integrate critical components necessary for comprehensive geriatric care. These models often emphasize immediate medical concerns rather than considering the broader, multifaceted influences on function and overall well-being. The prevailing focus remains on restorative approaches rather than proactive prevention and individualized management strategies, limiting their effectiveness in optimizing movement, function, and quality of life. The Movement Framework for Older Adults (MFOA) offers a paradigm shift in geriatric physical therapy by bridging these gaps and prioritizing a holistic, movement-centered approach. Rooted in the Geriatric 5Ms-Mind, Mobility, Medication, Multicomplexity, and what Matters Most-the MFOA provides a structured yet adaptable model by integrating movement with the physiological, cognitive, psychosocial, and pharmacological factors influencing mobility and function. This approach compels clinicians to assess and address the unique needs of each older adult, moving beyond impairment-based care toward a more comprehensive, person-centered strategy. Developed by the APTA Academy of Geriatrics' Geriatric Movement System Task Force, the MFOA builds upon existing frameworks by explicitly incorporating movement and the Geriatric 5Ms into the assessment and intervention process. It aligns with hypothesis-driven clinical reasoning, equipping physical therapists with a systematic method to analyze movement impairments and functional limitations. This paper introduces the MFOA as a critical advancement in geriatric physical therapy, strengthening the foundation of current practice and enhancing its relevance to the evolving landscape of aging and health care. By emphasizing movement as a fundamental determinant of function and well-being, the MFOA empowers physical therapists to deliver targeted, effective, and person-centered care that aligns with what Matters Most to older adults.

Experience of carers for older people with delirium: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

There is a gap in our understanding of the experiences and needs of carers for patients with delirium and a scarcity of research on the topic in the UK. This study aims to explore the needs and experiences of carers for person with delirium and offer suggestions to support them.

METHOD

A qualitative interview study with carers of patients with delirium. Data were analysed using an abductive analysis approach.

RESULTS

Fourteen carers were interviewed. We identified four themes; carers' involvement in providing care for the person with delirium, carers' perspectives of caregiving, support for carers and impact for caregiving on carers. Carers felt a responsibility to support the patient and to obtain information on delirium and its management on their own. Caregiving for a person with delirium had an emotional impact on the carer and they needed to change their lifestyle to maintain their caregiving responsibilities, as a result of the limited support they had.

CONCLUSION

More support for the carer in care plans with focus on emotional support, support groups for carers of people with delirium and assigning a case worker should be taken into consideration when developing interventions for people with delirium at home. These solutions may mitigate the impact of caregiving role on the mental and physical wellbeing of the carer for older person with delirium.

Brain health services for the secondary prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia: Opportunities, challenges, and the business case for existing and future facilities

A European Task Force has recently developed and published the concept and protocols for the setup of the innovative health offer of Brain Health Services for the secondary prevention of dementia and cognitive impairment (dBHS). dBHS are outpatient health care facilities where adult persons can find an assessment of their risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, have their risk level and contributing factors communicated using appropriate language supported by adequate communication tools, can decide to participate to programs for personalized risk reduction if at higher risk, and benefit from cognitive enhancement interventions. This health offer is distinct from that of currently active memory clinics. The ultimate aim of dBHS is to extend healthy life, free from cognitive impairment. Here, we (i) discuss the pertinent opportunities and challenges for those persons who want to benefit from dBHS, professionals, and wider society, (ii) describe the concepts, protocols, organizational features, and patient journeys of some currently active dBHS in Europe, and (iii) argue in favor of the business case for dBHS in Europe.

Effects of multidisciplinary teamwork in non-hospital settings on healthcare and patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that multidisciplinary teams can improve health outcomes for patients with chronic conditions, enhance the quality and coordination of care, and promote teamwork among staff in hospital settings. However, their effectiveness in non-hospital settings remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of multidisciplinary teams on patients with chronic conditions, health professionals, and healthcare in non-hospital settings.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EconLit, OpenGrey, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang for randomised controlled trials published before March 2025. Narrative syntheses were used to synthesise the characteristics of multidisciplinary teams, interventions, and effects. Data were statistically pooled using both random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analyses to synthesize the outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were analyzed, with a total of 8186 participants. Nurses, general practitioners, and specialists were the most common members of the multidisciplinary teams. Staffing models, shared care and role expansion or task shifting are the most common multidisciplinary teamwork interventions. Narrative syntheses revealed improvements in self-management, self-efficiency, satisfaction, health behaviours, and knowledge. A meta-analysis found a significant reduction in hospitalisation days for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (MD=-0.66, 95% CI -1.05 to -0.26, I2 = 0%) and significant improvement in quality of life for patients with chronic heart failure (MD=-4.63, 95% CI: -8.67 to -0.60, I2 = 0%). There is no consistent evidence of other indicators of this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary teamwork can improve patient-reported outcomes for patients with chronic conditions in non-hospital settings, but the effects on clinical outcomes, health utilisation, and costs are not evident.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO on January 21, 2019, with the registration number CRD42019121109.

A personalised health intervention to maintain independence in older people with mild frailty: a process evaluation within the HomeHealth RCT

Background

Frailty is common in later life and can lead to adverse health outcomes. Services aimed at preventing decline in early stages of frailty may support older people to remain independent for longer. We developed and tested a new service, HomeHealth, in a randomised controlled trial. HomeHealth was a multidomain behaviour change service based in the voluntary sector in England targeting mobility, socialising, nutrition and psychological well-being.

Objective

To describe the population reach, fidelity, acceptability, context and mechanisms of impact of the HomeHealth service.

Design and methods

Mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised trial.

Setting and participants

HomeHealth trial participants (older people aged 65+ years with mild frailty) and service providers.

Data sources and analysis

Population reach was evaluated through comparison to local census data. Fidelity of audio-recorded appointments was assessed by two independent raters using a structured checklist. Using data from appointments attended, types of goals set and progress towards goals, we described appointment characteristics, goals and signposting, and evaluated three mechanisms of impact: (1) effect of appointment attendance on independence, (2) effect of goal progress on independence and (3) whether selecting a particular goal type led to improvements in the corresponding intermediate outcome. We thematically analysed qualitative interviews with 49 older people, 7 HomeHealth workers and 8 stakeholders to explore acceptability and context.

Results

HomeHealth participants were similar with regards to deprivation, education and housing status to the local older population but with lower rates of minority ethnic groups. HomeHealth was delivered with good fidelity (81.7%) in voluntary sector organisations. Appointments were well attended (mean 5.33 out of the 6 intended), but attendance was not associated with better independence scores at 12 months [mean difference 1.29 (-8.20 to 10.78)]. Participants varied in progress towards goals within appointments (mean progress 1.15/2.00), but greater goal progress was not associated with improved independence scores at 12 months [mean difference -0.40 (-2.38 to 1.58)]. Mobility goals were most frequently selected (49%), but type of goal had no impact on independence and little impact on intermediate outcomes. Forty-one per cent were signposted or referred to other supportive services, with ongoing support where needed throughout this process. Qualitative data indicated that HomeHealth was acceptable, empowering for those who saw a need for change and fitted well within host voluntary sector organisations.

Limitations

Census data were only available for all adults aged over 65 in local areas rather than a mildly frail population, who are likely to be older, female and less diverse, and therefore population reach calculations may be less accurate. Goal progress was assessed using a simple scale rather than a validated instrument.

Conclusions

HomeHealth represents an acceptable and implementable intervention for older people with mild frailty but may work via different mechanisms than those intended.

Future work

Future work should explore how to best screen older people with mild frailty for readiness to change to maximise benefits from similar services and identify other possible mechanisms of effects.

Funding

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128334.

Development and external validation of the electronic frailty index 2 using routine primary care electronic health record data

BACKGROUND

The electronic frailty index (eFI) is nationally implemented into UK primary care electronic health record systems to support routine identification of frailty. The original eFI has some limitations such as equal weighting of deficit variables, lack of time constraints on variables known to resolve and definition of frailty category cut-points. We have developed and externally validated the eFI2 prediction model to predict the composite risk of home care package; hospital admission for fall/fracture; care home admission; or mortality within one year, addressing the limitations of the original eFI.

METHODS

Linked primary, secondary and social care data from two independent retrospective cohorts of adults aged ≥65 in 2018 was used; the population of Bradford using the Connected Bradford dataset (development cohort, 78 760 patients) and the population of Wales, from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank (external validation cohort, 660 417 patients). Candidate predictors included the original eFI variables, supplemented with variables informed by literature reviews and clinical expertise. The composite outcome was modelled using Cox regression.

RESULTS

In internal validation the model had excellent discrimination (C-index = 0.803, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.0971) with good calibration (Calibration slope = 1.00). In external validation, the model had good discrimination (C-index = 0.723, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.064), with some evidence of miscalibration (Calibration slope = 1.104).

CONCLUSIONS

The eFI2 demonstrates robust prediction for key frailty-related outcomes, improving on the original eFI. Our use of novel methodology to develop and validate the eFI2 will advance the field of frailty-related research internationally, setting a new methodological standard.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a home-based health promotion intervention for older people with mild frailty in England: a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Health promotion for people with mild frailty has the potential to improve health outcomes, but such services are scarce in practice. We developed a personalised, home-based, behaviour change, health promotion intervention (HomeHealth) and assessed its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in maintaining independent functioning in activities of daily living in older adults with mild frailty.

METHODS

This trial was an individual, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial done in England. Participants were mainly recruited from general practices in three different areas of England (the London north Thames region, east and north Hertfordshire, and west Yorkshire). Participants were individuals residing in the community who were registered with a general practice, 65 years and older with mild frailty (scoring 5 on the CFS), with a life expectancy of more than 6 months, and with capacity to consent to participate. We excluded adults residing in nursing or care homes, those with moderate-to-severe frailty or with no frailty, those receiving palliative care, and those already case managed (eg, receiving a similar ongoing intervention from the voluntary sector or community service). Eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the HomeHealth intervention or to treatment as usual. HomeHealth is a multidomain health promotion intervention delivered by the voluntary sector at home in six sessions over 6 months. The primary outcome was independent functioning (assessed using the modified Barthel Index [BI]) at 12 months. Outcome assessments were masked and were analysed by intention to treat using linear mixed models. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using seemingly unrelated regression and bootstrapping. The trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN54268283).

FINDINGS

We recruited 388 participants between Jan 8, 2021 and July 2, 2022 (mean age 81 years, SD 6·5; 249 (64%) of 388 were women and 139 (36%) were men). 195 participants were randomly assigned to HomeHealth and 193 to treatment as usual. Median follow-up was 363 days (IQR 356-370) in the HomeHealth group and 362 days (IQR 355-373) in the treatment-as-usual group. HomeHealth did not improve BI scores at 12 months (mean difference 0·250, 95% CI -0·932 to 1·432). HomeHealth was superior to treatment as usual with a negative point estimate for incremental costs (-£796; 95% CI -2016 to 424) and positive point estimate for incremental QALYs (0·009, -0·021 to 0·039). There were 55 serious adverse events in the HomeHealth group and 85 in the treatment-as-usual group; none were intervention related.

INTERPRETATION

HomeHealth is a safe intervention with a high probability of cost-effectiveness, driven by a reduction in unplanned hospital admissions. HomeHealth should be considered as a health promotion intervention for older people with mild frailty.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

The care of non-institutionalized ADL-dependent people in the Orcasitas neighborhood of Madrid (Spain) during the Covid-19 pandemic and its relationship with social inequalities, intergenerational dependency and survival

Background

Mortality among people with dependency to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL) is higher than that of non-dependent people of the same age. Understanding the evolutionary course and factors involved in non-institutionalized ADL dependency, including the influence of the family structure that supports this population, would contribute to improved health planning.

Methods

A longitudinal study carried out in the ADL-dependent population of the Orcasitas neighborhood, Madrid (Spain), between June 2020, when the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown ended, and June 2023. A total of 127 patients participated in the study, 78.7% of whom were women and 21.3% were men. Risk analysis was performed via odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR). Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression.

Results

A total of 54.33% of the ADL-dependent persons did not live with their adult children and 45.67% did, being associated living independently with economic capacity and the married marital status but not with the dependency level. In women, being married increased the probability of living independently of their adult children (OR = 12.632; 95% CI = 3.312-48.178). Loss of mobility (OR = 0.398; 95% CI = 0.186-0.853), economic capacity of the dependent (HR = 0.596; 95% CI = 0.459-0.774), and living independently and having better economic capacity (HR = 0.471; 95% CI = 0.234-0.935) were associated with 3-year survival. Those who lived with their adult children had a worse autonomy profile and higher mortality (HR = 1.473; 95% CI = 1.072-2.024). Not being employed, not being married, and not owning a home were significantly associated with being an essential family caregiver. Caregivers were mostly women (OR = 1.794; 95% CI = 1.011-3.182).

Conclusion

Among ADL-dependent persons, economic capacity influenced the ability to living independently and affected survival after 3 years. Loss of mobility (wheelchair use) was a predictor of mortality. Social inequalities promote that adult children end up as essential family caregivers. This generates reverse dependency and maintains a vulnerability that is transmitted from generation to generation, perpetuating social and gender inequalities. Dependent parent care in this cohort maintained an archaic pattern in which the eldest daughter cared for her parents. This study made it possible to show that ADL dependence is accompanied by complex interrelationships that must be considered in socio-health planning.

A Lifestyle Monitoring System for Older Adults Living Independently Using Low-Resolution Smart Meter Data

BACKGROUND

Monitoring the lifestyles of older adults helps promote independent living and ensure their well-being. The common technologies for home monitoring include wearables, ambient sensors, and smart household meters. While wearables can be intrusive, ambient sensors require extra installation, and smart meters are becoming integral to smart city infrastructure. Research Gap: The previous studies primarily utilized high-resolution smart meter data by applying Non-Intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring (NIALM) techniques, leading to significant privacy concerns. Meanwhile, some Japanese power companies have successfully employed low-resolution data to monitor lifestyle patterns discreetly.

SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

This study develops a lifestyle monitoring system for older adults using low-resolution smart meter data, mapping electricity consumption to appliance usage. The power consumption data are collected at 15-min intervals, and the background power threshold distinguishes between the active and inactive periods (0/1). The system quantifies activity through an active score and assesses daily routines by comparing these scores against the long-term norms. Key Outcomes/Contributions: The findings reveal that low-resolution data can effectively monitor lifestyle patterns without compromising privacy. The active scores and regularity assessments calculated using correlation coefficients offer a comprehensive view of residents' daily activities and any deviations from the established patterns. This study contributes to the literature by validating the efficacy of low-resolution data in lifestyle monitoring systems and underscores the potential of smart meters in enhancing elderly people's care.

Proactive care for frailty

Many providers aspire to scale up proactive care that prevents escalation of health and care needs, delays onset of disability, and reduces demand for emergency department attendance or admission to hospital or care home. NHS England offers guidance on personalised and coordinated multi-professional support and interventions for people with moderate or severe frailty. This article reflects on the growing international evidence for an integrated proactive approach for older people with frailty and why investing in high-quality, joined-up care for older people across the whole system improves outcomes for people, reduces demand for services, increases system resilience, and delivers economic and societal benefits. Facing up to frailty requires creative whole system workforce planning and development that will be challenging to deliver in the current financial and recruitment context yet all the more worthwhile as scaling up proactive care has the potential to be a game changer.

Preventive interventions to improve older people's health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews of preventive, non-disease-specific primary care trials for older people often report effects according to what is thought to be the intervention's active ingredient.

AIM

To examine the effectiveness of preventive primary care interventions for older people and to identify common components that contribute to intervention success.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in 22 publications from 2009 to 2019.

METHOD

A search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were: sample mainly aged ≥65 years; delivered in primary care; and non-disease-specific interventions. Exclusion criteria were: non-RCTs; primarily pharmacological or psychological interventions; and where outcomes of interest were not reported. Risk of bias was assessed using the original Cochrane tool. Outcomes examined were healthcare use including admissions to hospital and aged residential care (ARC), and patient-reported outcomes including activities of daily living (ADLs) and self-rated health (SRH).

RESULTS

Many studies had a mix of patient-, provider-, and practice-focused intervention components (13 of 18 studies). Studies included in the review had low-to-moderate risk of bias. Interventions had no overall benefit to healthcare use (including admissions to hospital and ARC) but higher basic ADL scores were observed (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01 to 0.40) and higher odds of reporting positive SRH (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.37). When intervention effects were examined by components, better patient-reported outcomes were observed in studies that changed the care setting (SMD for basic ADLs 0.21, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.40; OR for positive SRH 1.17, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.37), included educational components for health professionals (SMD for basic ADLs 0.21, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.40; OR for positive SRH 1.27, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.55), and provided patient education (SMD for basic ADLs 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.48). Additionally, admissions to hospital in intervention participants were fewer by 23% in studies that changed the care setting (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.95) and by 26% in studies that provided patient education (IRR 0.74, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.97).

CONCLUSION

Preventive primary care interventions are beneficial to older people's functional ability and SRH but not other outcomes. To improve primary care for older people, future programmes should consider delivering care in alternative settings, for example, home visits and phone contacts, and providing education to patients and health professionals as these may contribute to positive outcomes.

How can we improve Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for older people living with frailty in primary care and community settings? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

With advancing age comes the increasing prevalence of frailty and increased risk of adverse outcomes (eg, hospitalisation). Evidence for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a multidimensional holistic model of care, is mixed in community settings. Uncertainties remain, such as the key components of CGA, who delivers it, and the use of technology. This study aimed to understand the perspectives, beliefs and experiences, of both older people and health professionals, to improve the current CGA and explore factors that may impact on CGA delivery in community settings.

DESIGN

A qualitative interview study was conducted with older people and healthcare professionals (HCPs) identified using a maximum variation strategy. Data were analysed using an abductive analysis approach. The non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability framework and the theoretical framework of acceptability guided the categorisation of the codes and identified categories were mapped to the two frameworks.

SETTING

England, UK.

RESULTS

27 people were interviewed, constituting 14 older people and 13 HCPs. We identified limitations in the current CGA: a lack of information sharing between different HCPs who deliver CGA; poor communication between older people and their HCPs and a lack of follow-up as part of CGA. When we discussed the potential for CGA to use technology, HCPs and older people varied in their readiness to engage with it.

CONCLUSIONS

Viable solutions to address gaps in the current delivery of CGA include the provision of training and support to use digital technology and a designated comprehensive care coordinator. The next stage of this research will use these findings, existing evidence and stakeholder engagement, to develop and refine a model of community-based CGA that can be assessed for feasibility and acceptability.

Access to primary eye care for people living with dementia: a call to action for primary care practitioners to 'think vision'

Access to allied health services offers significant benefits for people living with dementia, yet access is currently fragmented and inconsistent. The 2023-2024 budget allocated AU$445million to further enable general practice-led, multidisciplinary teams, with integrated care located within practices, including employment of allied health professionals. Such team care models are recognised by The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners as vital to delivery of high-quality care for older adults. They are especially relevant for over 250,000 Australians who live with dementia in the community. However, not all allied health professionals are currently based within general practices. Future, sustainable general practice-led models of multidisciplinary care that connect patients with external allied health providers could be considered for a comprehensive and collaborative approach to care. Our focus is on people living with dementia, who are at greater risk of preventable vision impairment. Poor vision and/or ocular health can be detected and managed through regular eye examinations, which are predominantly delivered by community-based optometrists in Australia, in a primary care capacity. However, people living with dementia are also less likely to have regular eye examinations. In this paper, we highlight the value of ensuring access to primary eye care services as part of post-diagnosis dementia care. We illustrate the important role of primary care practitioners in building and sustaining connections with allied health professions, like optometry, through effective referral and interprofessional communication systems. This can help break down access barriers to dementia-friendly eye care, through promoting the importance of regular eye tests for people living with dementia.