Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment

Research on the perspectives of people affected by dementia with Lewy bodies: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is associated with specific challenges, including heterogeneity in clinical presentation and a less favourable prognosis relative to other dementia subtypes. These challenges necessitate person-centred care informed by the perspectives of those affected by DLB. This scoping review aimed to map the extent, type, and nature of research focusing on the perspectives of individuals with DLB and their care partners.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched six databases and two grey literature sources to identify all types of work providing information on the perspectives of individuals with DLB and/or their care partners. Two reviewers independently applied study selection criteria. Data from eligible articles were extracted, charted, and summarised using descriptive numerical analysis and basic qualitative content analysis. The review included 140 sources, of which 89.3% were research articles. Excluding non-structured reflections and commentary articles (n = 4), 68.4% of sources were quantitative and 65.4% were cross-sectional. The most common method of collecting perspective data was standardised measures assessing multidimensional concepts, such as caregiver burden. In total, 13 topics were identified, with 'emotional and psychological well-being' (n = 64) being the most widely investigated. There was a significant gap before the next most common topic: 'perspectives related to the symptom and illness experience' (n = 34).

CONCLUSION

While a range of methods was identified in this review, the evidence base is characterised by a predominance of standardised measures, with comparatively less use of qualitative approaches or non-standardised tools incorporating bespoke questions tailored to the study population. There was a disproportionate focus on specific topics, leading to research gaps. We recommend exploring novel methods to systematically capture perspectives in DLB cohorts, particularly on topics of highest priority to those affected.

The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Stakeholder preference evaluations are increasingly emphasized in healthcare policy and health technology assessment. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are the most common method for quantifying preferences among patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. While prior reviews (1990-2017) have examined DCE trends, no comprehensive synthesis exists for studies published since 2018. This updated review (2018-2023) provides critical insights into evolving methodologies and global trends in health-related DCEs.

METHODS

A systematic search (2018-2023) of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science identified relevant studies. Studies were screened for inclusion and data were extracted, including details on DCE design and analysis. To enable trend comparisons, the search strategy and extraction items aligned with previous reviews.

RESULTS

Of 2663 identified papers, 1279 met the inclusion criteria, reflecting a significant rise in published DCEs over time. DCEs were conducted globally, with a remarkable increase in publications from Asia and Africa compared with previous reviews. Experimental designs and econometric models have advanced, continuing prior trends. Notably, most recent DCEs were administered online.

DISCUSSION

The rapid growth of DCE applications underscores their importance in health research. While the methodology is advancing rapidly, it is crucial that researchers provide full transparency in reporting their methods, particularly in detailing experimental designs and validity tests, which are too often overlooked. Key recommendations include improving reporting of experimental designs, applying validity tests, following good practices for presenting benefit-risk attributes, and adopting open science practices. Ensuring methodological rigor will maximize the impact and reproducibility of DCE research in health economics.

Antihypertensive Deprescribing and Functional Status in VA Long-Term Care Residents With and Without Dementia

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing antihypertensives is of growing interest in geriatric medicine, yet the impact on functional status is unknown. We emulated a target trial of deprescribing antihypertensive medications compared with continued use on functional status measured by activities of daily living (ADL) in a long-term care population.

METHODS

We included 12,238 Veteran Affairs long-term care residents age 65+ who had a stay ≥ 12 weeks between 2006 and 2019. After 4+ weeks of stable antihypertensive medication use, residents were classified as either deprescribed antihypertensives (reduced ≥ 1 medication or ≥ 30% dose) or continued users. Residents were followed up for 2 years, or censored at discharge, admission to hospice, protocol deviation (per-protocol analysis only), or Sept 30, 2019. The outcome was ADL dependencies (scored 0-28; higher score = worse functionality), assessed approximately every 3 months. Our primary approach was to estimate per-protocol effects using linear mixed-effects regressions with inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting, overall and stratified by dementia status. We estimated intention-to-treat effects as a secondary analysis.

RESULTS

In long-term care residents, ADL scores worsened by a mean of 0.29 points (95%CI = 0.27, 0.31) per 3 months and antihypertensive deprescribing did not impact this worsening (difference between groups -0.04 points every 3 months, 95%CI = -0.15, 0.06). In the non-dementia subgroup, ADL worsened by 0.15 points (95%CI = 0.11, 0.19) every 3 months. However, residents who were deprescribed showed a slightly improved ADL score over time while the continued users showed ADL decline (difference between groups -0.23 points every 3 months, 95%CI = -0.43, -0.03). Deprescribing was not associated with ADL change in the dementia subgroup. The intention-to-treat results were not meaningfully different.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihypertensive deprescribing did not have a deleterious effect on functional status in long-term care residents with or without dementia. This may be reassuring to residents and clinicians who are considering antihypertensive medication reduction or discontinuation in long-term care settings.

Generating and translating evidence for safe and effective medication management in aged care homes

Generating and translating high-quality evidence is integral to providing safe and effective medication management for residents of aged care homes. Residents are often under-represented in trials of medication effectiveness and safety. This paper reviews opportunities and challenges for generating and translating evidence for safe and effective medication management in aged care homes. There are an increasing number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in aged care homes. Observational studies can also help address the evidence-practice gap arising from underrepresentation of residents in RCTs. Stepped-wedge and helix counterbalanced designs may help overcome limitations of traditional RCTs for evaluating medication management interventions in the aged care setting. Strategies for generating evidence include building effective partnerships with aged care homes and organizations, using novel trial designs, leveraging existing data and knowledge sharing through international platforms. Strategies for translating evidence include using quality indicators for audit and feedback, provision of education and training, engaging internal and external stakeholders, and development of local action plans and guideline implementation tools. There is an emerging interest in the role of knowledge brokers to facilitate knowledge translation. Future directions for generating and translating evidence include strengthening international research collaboration, industry partnerships, standardizing aged care home data to support national and international comparisons, and optimizing the use of technology. Initiatives may include improving access to routinely collected administrative health and medication data for conducting high-quality observational studies. Future studies should assess outcomes prioritized by residents to ensure that medication management strategies are tailored to their needs.

Are People Living With Dementia Receiving High Intensity Statin Therapy After Stroke? A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background and Aims

This Australian population-based study investigated statin intensity after hospitalization for ischemic stroke in a matched cohort of people living with and without dementia.

Methods

We identified all patients aged ≥ 30 years hospitalized in the state of Victoria, Australia, for ischemic stroke from July 1, 2013 to April 30, 2018 from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Data set. People with dementia were matched 1:4 for sex, 5-year age group and index date ± 90 days with people without dementia. Records of statin dispensing within 60 days postdischarge were extracted from prescription claims data. The intensity of the first postdischarge statin dispensing was determined. Odds ratios for high versus low-moderate intensity and no statin dispensing were estimated using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for factors including age, sex, and comorbidity.

Results

The cohorts comprised 11,105 people (dementia: N = 2221; without dementia: N = 8884 and 52% were female. Compared to people without dementia, people with dementia had 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%-44%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus a low-moderate intensity statin and 54% (95% CI: 48%-59%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin. Compared to men, women with and without dementia had 16% (95% CI: 5%-25%) lower odds of receiving a high- versus low-moderate intensity statin and 28% (95% CI: 19%-35%) lower odds of receiving a high intensity versus no statin.

Conclusions

People living with dementia are less likely to receive high-intensity statins post-discharge compared to people without dementia. There is a gender gap in receipt of guideline-recommended high-intensity statin therapy for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke.

Clinical Implications

Guidelines recommend all people with reasonable life expectancy receive a high-intensity statin after stroke to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events. More research is needed to understand why people living with dementia might not receive guideline recommended care, and how statin use and statin intensity impact the health outcomes of people living with dementia and stroke.

Deprescribing Hypertension Medication in Older Adults: Can It Lower Drug Burden Without Causing Harm?

Due to the high prevalence of older individuals with multiple morbidities, polypharmacy, and exposed to unnecessary or inappropriate treatments that can cause potentially serious adverse effects, better medication management should be an objective of all health professionals. This is particularly important in older patients with hypertension. Antihypertensive deprescribing and non-pharmacological strategies have been disseminated as viable and safe alternatives for improving the quality of care for hypertension in the older population.

Deprescribing Opportunities for Frail Residents of Nursing Homes: A Multicenter Study in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain

OBJECTIVE

Deprescribing opportunities may differ across health care systems, nursing home settings, and prescribing cultures. The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of STOPPFrail medications according to frailty status among residents of nursing homes in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain.

DESIGN

Secondary cross-sectional analyses of data from 4 cohort studies.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1142 residents in 31 nursing homes.

METHODS

Medication data were extracted from resident records. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL-NH scale (non-frail 0-2; frail 3-6; most-frail 7-14). Chi-square tests and prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare STOPPFrail medication use across cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 84.7% of non-frail, 95.6% of frail, and 90.6% of most-frail residents received ≥1 STOPPFrail medication. Overall, the most prevalent STOPPFrail medications were antihypertensives (53.0% in China to 73.3% in Australia, P < .001), vitamin D (nil in China to 52.7% in Australia, P < .001), lipid-lowering therapies (11.1% in Japan to 38.9% in Australia, P < .001), aspirin (13.5% in Japan to 26.2% in China, P < .001), proton pump inhibitors (2.1% in Japan to 32.0% in Australia, P < .001), and antidiabetic medications (12.3% in Japan to 23.5% in China, P = .010). Overall use of antihypertensives (PR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25), lipid-lowering therapies (PR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18), aspirin (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64), and antidiabetic medications (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.72) were more prevalent among non-frail and frail residents compared with most-frail residents. Antihypertensive use was more prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Japan, but less prevalent with increasing frailty in Australia. Antidiabetic medication use was less prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Spain but was consistent across frailty groups in Australia and Japan.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

There were overall and frailty-specific variations in prevalence of different STOPPFrail medications across cohorts. This may reflect differences in prescribing cultures, application of clinical practice guidelines in the nursing home setting, and clinician or resident attitudes toward deprescribing.