Minimal-preparation CT colon in detection of colonic cancer, the Oxford experience

Prioritisation of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes of a novel triage pathway

OBJECTIVE

The 2-week-wait (2ww) referral pathway is used in England to fast-track patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). A two-stage triage pathway was used to prioritise lower gastrointestinal (LGI) endoscopy for suspected CRC during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

All patients referred for an LGI endoscopy via a 2ww referral pathway between March 2020 and July 2020 were assessed. The first stage triaged patients to high, standard or low risk of CRC based on symptoms and faecal immunochemical test (FIT), and offered CT scans to those at high risk. The second stage, endoscopy prioritisation (EP), incorporated the CT results, FIT and symptoms to triage into four groups, EP1-EP4; with EP1 being the most urgent and EP4 the least. The primary outcome measure was CRC detection.

RESULTS

514 patients were included. The risk of CRC was triaged as high in 190/514 patients (37%), standard in 274/514 patients (53%) and low in 50/514 (10%) patients. 422/514 patients (82%) underwent endoscopy with triage to EP1 in 52/422 (12%), EP2 in 105/422 (25%), EP3 in 210/422 (50%) and EP4 in 55/422 (13%). CRC was detected in 23 patients (5.4%). CRC was significantly more frequent in the EP1 group (23.1%, relative risk (RR)=16.2) and EP2 group (6.7%, RR=4.7) compared with EP3 group (1.4%). All CRC lesions were identified by CT imaging when performed prior to LGI endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

This triage pathway designated 83% of patients with CRC to either EP1 or EP2. During a period of limited endoscopy provision, this pathway effectively prioritises endoscopy for those at greatest risk of CRC.

Utility of minimal preparation computed tomography colonography in detecting colorectal cancer in elderly and frail patients

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancers result in substantial morbidity and mortality to the Australian society each year. The usual investigation for bowel malignancy is optical colonoscopy (OC), with computed tomography colonography (CTC) used as an alternative investigation. The catharsis and colon insufflation associated with these investigations pose a higher risk in the elderly and frail. Risks include perforation, serum electrolyte disturbance and anaesthesia/sedation risks. Minimal preparation computed tomography colonography (MPCTC) eliminates these risks.

AIMS

To audit the accuracy of a MPCTC programme for the investigation of colonic masses in symptomatic elderly and frail patients.

METHODS

This paper audits a 6-year period of MPCTC in an Australian tertiary referral hospital. A total of 145 patients underwent MPCTC during the study period.

RESULTS

There were seven true positives, two false positives and two false negatives. Analysis of this population indicates a sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.51-1.05), specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.01), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.78 (95% CI 0.51-1.05) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.01). These findings are concordant with other published studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This audit confirms that minimal preparation CT colonography is a reasonable alternative to OC and CTC in detecting colorectal cancer in symptomatic elderly and frail patients, without the procedural risks inherent in more invasive investigations. For most patients, MPCTC ruled out significant colorectal carcinoma with a high NPV.

The Accuracy of Colorectal Cancer Detection by Computed Tomography in the Unprepared Large Bowel in a Community-Based Hospital

PURPOSE

This retrospective study examined the performance of general radiologists in a community-based hospital in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC) with computed tomography (CT) in the unprepared large bowel.

METHODS

The pathology database at a community hospital over the past 7 years (2009-2015) was retrospectively analysed for pathologically proven CRC (924 cases). The provincial hospital information profile for these patients was reviewed to determine if they had an abdominal CT for any reason in the year prior to biopsy. Metrics such as age, sex, time between the CT and biopsy or surgery, whether CRC was initially detected by the radiologist, and if this was an emergency presentation was evaluated. In the cases where CRC was not identified, the CT scans were reanalysed to determine if the CRC was identifiable in retrospect. The sensitivity of detecting CRC by CT scan in the unprepared large bowel was calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 924 biopsy proven CRC cases, 22% (207 of 924) of the patients had a CT prior to biopsy. Of these cases, 47% (97 of 207) presented on an emergency basis. Of the cases with imaging in the year prior, about 60% (125 of 207) had cancer prospectively detected by the radiologist. Upon re-examination of the cases in which CRC was not initially detected, 59% were visualized in retrospect.

CONCLUSIONS

Community general radiologists can successfully detect CRC with a high degree of accuracy. Reformatted images, bowel wall thickening when regional nodes are prominent, and minimizing oral contrast were helpful in improving detection.

The performance of routine computed tomography for the detection of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) colonography in expert hands are the most sensitive investigations for colorectal cancer, some patients may not tolerate the necessary bowel preparation and insufflation of gas into the colon. We assessed the performance of unprepared contrast CT for the detection of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who had contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis and then went on to have colonoscopy at our institutions between 2007 and 2010.

RESULTS

Overall, 96 patients were identified as having had CT prior to colonoscopy. The sensitivity of CT in detecting colorectal cancer was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.8-100%) and the specificity was 95.7% (95% CI: 88.8-98.6%). The positive predictive value was 33.3% (95% CI: 6.0-75.9%) and the negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 94.8-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-targeted CT that is negative for colorectal malignancy is usually reassuring but the decision for further investigations should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account of the likelihood of underlying colorectal malignancy and the underlying co-morbidities of the patient. However, video colonoscopy is usually necessary to assess positive CT findings.

Colorectal cancer is reliably excluded in the frail and elderly population by minimal preparation CT

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to retrospectively assess the accuracy of minimal preparation computed tomography (MPCT) in the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) within the frail and elderly population and to evaluate the relevance of extra-colonic findings (ECF).

METHODS

Radiology reports, clinical notes and follow-up reports from 207 patients who underwent MPCT to investigate for CRC between 2005 and 2009 were analysed. Patients were scanned following the administration of oral contrast for 48 h, without bowel preparation or colonic insufflation. MPCT results were measured against patient outcomes, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Twelve cases of clinically relevant CRC were confirmed (5.8 %). MPCT correctly identified 11 of these lesions (sensitivity 91.6 %). Thirty-one patients had a possible CRC identified by MPCT, which was not confirmed by further examination (specificity 84.1 %). This results in a positive predictive value of 26.2 % and a negative predictive value of 99.4 %. Five of the patients with colon cancer underwent curative surgery. Sixty-eight clinically relevant ECF were confirmed, including 14 previously undiagnosed extra-colonic malignancies. ECF were considered to account for the presenting complaint in 15.0 % (31/207) of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal preparation computed tomography is an effective and reliable investigation for the exclusion of clinically relevant CRC in this population. It provides clinicians with a valuable and pragmatic alternative to colonoscopy and CT colonography when invasive examination or cathartic bowel preparation will be poorly tolerated and small polyps are of limited significance. MPCT has an advantage over purely luminal imaging in the detection of extra-colonic pathology and appears to have an equally important role in the detection of CRC.

Investigating the frail elderly patient with lower bowel symptoms: what do we do now and can we improve?

AIMS

To assess the utility of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and minimal preparation CT (MPCT) in investigating lower gastrointestinal (LGI) symptoms in elderly patients who are too frail to undergo colonoscopy or spiral CT.

METHODS

All FS examinations performed in patients aged over 70 between 1 January and 31 December 2008 were analysed. Predictors of usefulness were determined using multivariable analysis. In patients who also underwent MPCT, we analyzed the correlation between FS and MPCT.

RESULTS

426 FS were performed. Bowel preparation was inadequate in 24% of procedures. Indications in which FS was useful were: radiological abnormality (odds ratio [OR] 9.32), history of polyps (OR 4.54) and rectal bleeding (OR 1.73). Indications for which FS was least useful were: change in bowel habit (OR 0.22), diarrhoea (OR 0.46) and constipation (OR 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

LGI investigation in frail elderly patients can be rationalised according to indication. Performing FS and MPCT together is not always necessary.

Accuracy of minimal-preparation computerized tomography in the investigation of suspected colorectal cancer in frail patients: the experience of Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

Traditional methods of investigating suspected colorectal carcinoma (CRC) such as barium enema, colonoscopy and computerized tomography (CT) pneumocolon are often poorly tolerated by frail or elderly patients. Comparatively, minimal-preparation CT (MPCT) is a non-invasive investigation that does not require bowel preparation. The aim of this study was to review MPCTs carried out at the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, and compare findings with current published data. Retrospective analysis of 85 patients (age range 55-99 years) who underwent MPCTs at the Western General Hospital between May 2005 and June 2008 was undertaken. Results were followed up using clinical notes, pathological and surgical databases. Subsequent outcomes were analysed (average follow-up 22 months). The prevalence of CRC within the study cohort was 0.14. Sensitivity of MPCT was 1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1) with a specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-0.97). Thirty percent of patients were found to have extracolonic findings requiring further investigation or intervention. Of the patients, 4.7% had an extracolonic malignancy diagnosed on MPCT. MPCT is a sensitive and specific method of investigating CRC in the elderly, infirm or immobile. Our results were found to be comparable with that of current published data, validating the service provided at the Western General Hospital.

Laxative-free CT colonography

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine if the introduction of faecal tagging to CT colonography (CTC) made the examination easier to tolerate or reduced the number of false-positives.

METHODS

Our department changed bowel preparation for CT colonography from Picolax (Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd, London, UK) to Gastrografin (Bracco Diagnostics Inc, Princeton, NJ) only with a modified diet. Questionnaires were given to a subgroup of patients within these cohorts. The numbers of false-positives were compared between two cohorts before and after this change. false-positives were defined as lesions reported on CT that were not confirmed by subsequent endoscopic examination. Polyps were matched if they were in the same or adjacent segments, and were within 5 mm of the reported size.

RESULTS

412 patients were identified from the Picolax cohort, and 116 from the Gastrografin cohort. 62 patients in each group completed questionnaires. Gastrografin produced less diarrhoea; 34% had five or more bowel motions in the previous day and night, compared with 77% for Picolax (p<0.001), although more patients found drinking it unpleasant compared with Picolax (85% reported drinking Picolax as "easy" vs 61% for Gastrografin; p=0.002). Picolax produced more non-diagnostic examinations, although this difference was not statistically significant. There was not a significant reduction in the numbers of false-positives (2 out of 112 for Gastrografin group, 14 out of 389 for the Picolax group; p=0.54).

CONCLUSION

Switching from Picolax to Gastrografin as a CTC preparation technique produced less diarrhoea, but did not reduce the number of false-positives.

Gas insufflation of minimal preparation CT of the colon reduces false-positives

OBJECTIVES

Minimal preparation CT of the colon (MPCT colon) is used for investigation of suspected colorectal cancer in frail and/or elderly patients who would be expected to tolerate laxative bowel preparation poorly. Although it has good sensitivity for colorectal cancer it has a poor specificity. We wished to investigate whether distension of the colon with carbon dioxide alone would reduce the number of false-positives, but without making the test arduous or excessively uncomfortable.

METHODS

134 patients were recruited and underwent MPCT colon with gas insufflation and antispasmodics. Results were compared with a cohort of 134 patients undergoing standard protocol MPCT colon. The numbers of false-positives were compared, as was reader confidence. All trial patients were given a questionnaire documenting their experience.

RESULTS

The number of false-positives was 15% in the control group and 5% in the trial group; this difference was statistically significant, (p=0.01). Reader confidence was increased in the trial group. Patient tolerance was good, with 95% saying they would have the test again.

CONCLUSION

Use of gas insufflation and antispasmodics reduces the false-positives from 15% to 5% without adversely affecting patient tolerance.

Reduction of perception error by double reporting of minimal preparation CT colon

Minimal preparation CT colon (MPCTC) is a useful test for frail elderly patients, who tolerate full bowel preparation poorly, and has the potential advantage of identifying extra-colonic pathology. Double reporting has been shown to reduce perception errors in a variety of radiological investigations, and we sought to determine its usefulness for MPCTC. A prospective consecutive cohort of 186 patients undergoing MPCTC for lower gastrointestinal symptoms was double reported. Radiologists were blinded to each report. Data for each report were divided into colonic and extra-colonic findings, with the latter being graded as clinically relevant or irrelevant. Discrepancies between the two reports were identified. A positive colonic lesion was defined as one where direct endoscopic visualisation was recommended. A clinically relevant extra-colonic lesion was defined as one that could impact on future patient management. 13% (24/186) of patients had a significant colonic lesion; 7 of these were identified only by 1 observer, although only 1 was confirmed endoscopically to be cancer. The positive predictive value for colon cancer was 69% for single reporting and 54.5% for double reporting. There were 67 clinically relevant extra-colonic lesions, and 25 of these were reported only by only 1 observer. In conclusion, double reporting found one extra-colonic cancer, but at the expense of five unnecessary endoscopic procedures. This seems a reasonable trade-off and we would therefore recommend double reporting. However, implementation would have a significant impact on manpower and service delivery.

Three-day regimen improves faecal tagging for minimal preparation CT examination of the colon

This study set out to determine whether extending the length of oral contrast administration in minimal preparation CT of the colon improves faecal tagging. Two cohorts of 50 patients each were compared, one with a 2-day the other with a 3-day faecal tagging regimen. The degree of faecal tagging was graded by two blinded observers. The 3-day regimen showed significantly better tagging in the rectum and sigmoid colon (p = 0.006 and p = 0.009, respectively, using the Mann-Whitney test). The percentage of patients who had faecal tagging in the sigmoid colon graded as "complete" was 64% for the 3-day regimen as opposed to 34% for the 2-day regimen. The corresponding percentages for the rectum were 64% for the 3-day regimen and 36% for the 2-day regimen. Extending the length of oral contrast administration from 2 to 3 days significantly improves the quality of faecal tagging in the rectum and sigmoid colon.