Long-term follow-up of jejunoileal bypass patients

Reasons and operative outcomes after reversal of gastric bypass and jejunoileal bypass

Limited information is available regarding reversal of gastric bypass. While reversal will lead to weight regain and return of comorbid conditions, procedure reversal is sometimes necessary due to complications. The decision to reverse versus revise is difficult; currently, there are no established guidelines. The objective was to review one center's experience with reversals of gastric bypass and jejunoileal bypass procedures and identify potential indications as well as technical feasibility and short-term outcomes. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database from 1999 to 2010 was conducted; 12 patients who underwent reversal of non-banding bariatric procedures were included. There was no major perioperative morbidity in elective patients; one patient whose reversal was part of a second-look operation had massive intestinal necrosis. There was one (8.3 %) non-procedure-related postoperative death. No leaks were identified in any of the reversals. Leak rates were compared with other revisional procedures such as reversals, revisions, and conversions, with no statistical significance regarding leak rates between all three groups; however, revisions and conversions were performed via open or laparoscopic approach, while reversals were performed exclusively via open approach. Reversals of bariatric (non-banding) procedures, either combined or purely malabsorptive, are technically challenging. Indications remain poorly defined. In our experience, short gut syndrome, renal failure, marginal ulceration, and malnutrition were the most common indications for reversal, differing from previously published data. Indications can depend on patient and surgeon preferences, but primarily on surgeon experience and type of complications. Based on this initial experience, these operations can be performed using the open approach with good outcomes.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist health-care professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Does obesity surgery improve psychosocial functioning? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to present a review of the psychosocial outcome of bariatric surgery with special consideration of psychiatric comorbidity, psychopathology, psychosocial functioning, econometric data, and general quality of life (QoL).

PURPOSE

A review of all (non-) controlled trials of the last two decades both with a retrospective and prospective design and a follow-up period of at least 1 y.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The relevant literature was identified by a search of computerized databases. All articles published in English and German since 1980 were reviewed. Based on the requirements of the evidenced-based guidelines of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, each study was rated by a level of evidence.

RESULTS

In all, 171 publications were reviewed. Using the above inclusion/exclusion criteria, 63 articles including two systematic reviews were identified. A total of 40 studies focused on psychosocial outcome after obesity surgery.

CONCLUSION

Mental health and psychosocial status including social relations and employment opportunities improve for the majority of people after bariatric surgery thus leading to an improved QoL. Psychiatric comorbidity, predominantly affective disorders, and psychopathologic symptoms decrease postsurgically. A substantial percentage of bariatric surgery patients suffer from binge eating disorder or binge eating symptoms. The effect of bariatric surgery on the outcome of binge eating symptoms largely depends on the type of operation. With the exception of patients with a severe psychiatric comorbidity, the concern that obesity surgery will reinforce psychic symptoms and lead to a reduction in the QoL seems to be unfounded.

Reoperative bariatric surgery. Lessons learned to improve patient selection and results

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the spectrum of presentation, safety, and efficacy of operative bariatric surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The only lasting therapy for medically complicated clinically severe obesity is bariatric surgery. Several operative approaches have resulted in disappointing long-term weight loss or an unacceptable incidence of complications that require revisionary surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive patients who underwent reoperative bariatric surgery from 1985 to 1990 were observed prospectively. One, two, or three previous bariatric procedures had been performed in 77%, 18%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Reoperation was required for unsatisfactory weight loss after gastroplasty or gastric bypass (61%), metabolic complications of jejunoileal bypass (23%), or other complications (16%), including stomal obstruction, alkaline- or acid-reflux esophagitis, and anastomotic ulcer. Revisionary procedures included conversion to vertical banded gastroplasty (33% of operations) and vertical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (52% of operations); partial pancreato-biliary bypass was used selectively in four patients with severe, medically complicated obesity.

RESULTS

A single patient died postoperatively of a pulmonary embolus; serious morbidity occurred in 11%. Weight loss (mean +/- SEM) after reoperation for unsuccessful weight loss was greater with gastric bypass than with vertical banded gastroplasty (54 +/- 6% versus 24 +/- 6% of excess body weight). Metabolic complications of jejunoileal bypass were corrected, but 67% of the patients were dissatisfied with their postoperative lifestyle because of changes in eating habits or weight gain (64% of patients). Stomal complications and esophageal reflux symptoms were reversed in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperative bariatric surgery in selected patients is safe and effective for unsatisfactory weight loss or for complications of previous bariatric procedures. Conversion to gastric bypass provides more effective weight loss than vertical banded gastroplasty.

Intestinal adaptation following jejuno-ileal bypass

The changes in functional and excluded loops were studied in two groups of patients at intervals up to 5 years after jejuno-ileal bypass. Macroscopic and histological observations confirmed that the compensatory increase of the absorbing surface of the functioning loop occurs, with an increase in length and width of the loop, hypertrophy of villi and microvilli, and increase in number and geometrical surface of the villous cells. In the excluded intestinal loop, atrophy occurs, evidenced by the reduction in number and size of microvilli, even if the height of villi may appear normal. The bacteriological studies of the functioning and excluded loops show bacterial colonization, which was not constant over the course of time.

Multiple nutritional deficiencies and metabolic complications 20 years after jejunoileal bypass surgery

We have reported a patient with multiple nutritional and metabolic abnormalities following JI bypass. Most of her biochemical abnormalities were corrected with cautious but vigorous supplementation, and her nutritional status improved, as documented by several positive nitrogen balances and normalization of most of her vitamin and trace element serum concentrations. This case clearly demonstrates many of the metabolic complications that can result from the JI bypass procedure and the meticulous followup that is needed during nutritional rehabilitation.

Small-intestinal and colonic changes after biliopancreatic bypass for morbid obesity

Morphologic and functional adaptations of the functioning intestine were evaluated in 41 patients before and after biliopancreatic bypass for morbid obesity. This surgical procedure diverts pancreatobiliary secretions via the duodenum and the jejunum into the colon, the remaining small intestine being anastomosed to the stomach after antrectomy. In the proximal ileum there was an 80% increase of the height of villi; the specific activities of maltase, sucrase, and aminopeptidase in brush border membranes remained unaffected, and that of lactase tended to decrease. In the distal ileum villi heights increased only by 58%, and disaccharidase activities (except for maltase) were slightly enhanced. In the colon the mucosa displayed, in some patients, focal appearance of true villi, and brush border enzyme activities increased concomitantly. We conclude that biliopancreatic bypass induces an adaptation of all intestinal segments of the functioning intestine; this adaptation tends to compensate for the shortening of the gut continuity.

A preliminary study of the relationship between preoperative depression and weight loss following surgery for morbid obesity

Fifty-two consecutive morbidly obese patients were evaluated psychiatrically before they were scheduled to undergo gastroplasty and again an average of twenty-six months later. Ten patients did not undergo surgery; six patients who did undergo gastroplasty were unavailable for follow up. In the remaining thirty-six patients, there was a statistically significant correlation between the degree of clinically estimated preoperative depression and the percent of body weight lost following surgery. Amount of preoperative weight was also correlated with postoperative weight loss, but depression before surgery was a more significant predictor of postoperative weight loss. Patients who expressed less distress prior to surgery tended to lose less weight after surgery and were more likely to manifest increased psychiatric distress postoperatively.

Jejunoileal bypass for morbid obesity. Late follow-up in 100 cases

To evaluate the results of jejunoileal bypass for morbid obesity, we studied 100 patients with intact bypasses an average of more than five years after surgery. Mean weight loss at five years was 102.7 lb (46.6 kg) (33 per cent). Although nearly half the patients regained some weight between one and five years after surgery, only 17 per cent regained 20 lb (9 kg) or more. Medical benefits (such as improved glucose tolerance and lowered blood pressure) were maintained at five years, but side effects and complications continued to occur in the late postoperative period. Diarrhea (more than three stools per day) persisted in 58 per cent of the patients, and electrolyte disturbances occurred in over a third. Diminished levels of B12 or folate or both were present in 88 per cent. Twenty-one per cent of the patients had nephrolithiasis, and 20 per cent of those who were at risk required cholecystectomy. Progressive hepatic structural abnormalities occurred in 29 per cent of the patients, and there was a 7 per cent incidence of cirrhosis. Although 81 per cent of the patients had satisfactory results at five years, side effects and complications continued to occur, mandating careful follow-up indefinitely. The risk-to-benefit ratio at five years after surgery seems acceptable, but the continued untoward effects of the bypass in the late postoperative period have led us to abandon this procedure in favor of gastric bypass. Only continued longitudinal follow-up will determine whether on balance jejunoileal bypass represents such a serious long-term health hazard that prophylactic restoration of intestinal continuity is indicated.