Comparison of visual and photometric Bac-T-Screen results

Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens

The use of screens to detect "significant levels" of pathogenic microorganisms in urine specimens offers the advantages of both rapidly reporting results and controlling costs. Many of these screens, however, are insensitive at microbial counts below 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of urine. It is increasingly apparent that patients with almost any type of urinary tract infection (except for most patients who are asymptomatic or who have pyelonephritis) may have urine concentrations of pathogens as low as 10(2) to 10(3) CFU/ml. This review documents factors that can contribute to diminished concentrations of microorganisms in urine, lists patient populations in whose urine microorganisms in concentrations well below 10(5) CFU/ml have been associated with infection, and makes recommendations for selection of laboratory tests, including rapid screens, for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections.