Synchronous Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

Pathologic Assessment and Staging of Multiple Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: A Paradigm Shift with the Emerging Role of Molecular Methods

Non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) commonly present as 2 or more separate tumors. Biologically, this encompasses 2 distinct processes: separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs), representing independently arising tumors, and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs), representing intrapulmonary spread of a single tumor. The advent of computed tomography imaging has substantially increased the detection of multifocal NSCLCs. The strategies and approaches for distinguishing between SPLCs and IPMs have evolved significantly over the years. Recently, genomic sequencing of somatic mutations has been widely adopted to identify targetable alterations in NSCLC. These molecular techniques have enabled pathologists to reliably discern clonal relationships among multiple NSCLCs in clinical practice. However, a standardized approach to evaluating and staging multiple NSCLCs using molecular methods is still lacking. Here, we reviewed the historical context and provided an update on the growing applications of genomic testing as a clinically relevant benchmark for determining clonal relationships in multiple NSCLCs, a practice we have designated "comparative molecular profiling." We examined the strengths and limitations of the morphology-based distinction of SPLCs vs IPMs and highlighted pivotal clinical and pathologic insights that have emerged from studying multiple NSCLCs using genomic approaches as a gold standard. Lastly, we suggest a practical approach for evaluating multiple NSCLCs in the clinical setting, considering the varying availability of molecular techniques.

Mutually exclusive driver mutations identifies 2 separate primaries in a collision tumor initially interpreted as a solitary lung adenocarcinoma with tumor heterogeneity

Distinction of histologically heterogenous, single primary tumor from two or more collision tumors with different primaries could represent a challenge to practicing pathologists. Histologic variations including differences in degree of differentiating within a tumor, are typically interpreted as tumor heterogeneity in a contiguous small size tumor biopsy. The authors report a case of adult former smoker female who presented with lung mass and a metastatic lytic lesion of acetabulum. A needle biopsy of a lung mass revealed an adenocarcinoma with well and moderately differentiated components. Next generation sequencing studies proved 2 different primaries in this small needle biopsy.

Integrating NGS-derived mutational profiling in the diagnosis of multiple lung adenocarcinomas

MICROABSTRACT

Integration of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) information for use in distinguishing between Multiple Primary Lung Cancer and intrapulmonary metastasis was evaluated. We used a probabilistic model, comprehensive histologic assessment and NGS to classify patients. Integrating NGS data confirmed initial diagnosis (n = 41), revised the diagnosis (n = 12), while resulted in non-informative data (n = 8). Accuracy of diagnosis can be significantly improved with integration of NGS data.

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPM) is challenging. The goal of this study was to evaluate how Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) information may be integrated in the diagnostic strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with multiple lung adenocarcinomas were classified using both the comprehensive histologic assessment and NGS. We computed the joint probability of each pair having independent mutations by chance (thus being classified as MPLC). These probabilities were computed using the marginal mutation rates of each mutation, and the known negative dependencies between driver genes and different gene loci. With these NGS-driven data, cases were re-classified as MPLC or IPM.

RESULTS

We analyzed 61 patients with a total of 131 tumors. The most frequent mutation was KRAS (57.3%) which occured at a rate higher than expected (p < 0.001) in lung cancer. No mutation was detected in 25/131 tumors (19.1%). Discordant molecular findings between tumor sites were found in 46 patients (75.4%); 11 patients (18.0%) had concordant molecular findings, and 4 patients (6.6%) had concordant molecular findings at 2 of the 3 sites. After integration of the NGS data, the initial diagnosis was confirmed for 41 patients (67.2%), the diagnosis was revised for 12 patients (19.7%) or was considered as non-informative for 8 patients (13.1%).

CONCLUSION

Integrating the information of NGS data may significantly improve accuracy of diagnosis and staging.

Molecular testing in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: Approaches and challenges

Precision medicine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a rapidly evolving area, with the development of targeted therapies for advanced disease and concomitant molecular testing to inform clinical decision-making. In contrast, routine molecular testing in stage I-III disease has not been required, where standard of care comprises surgery with or without adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III disease, without the integration of targeted therapy. However, the phase 3 ADAURA trial has recently shown that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib, reduces the risk of disease recurrence by 80% versus placebo in the adjuvant setting for patients with stage IB-IIIA EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC following complete tumor resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, according to physician and patient choice. Treatment with adjuvant osimertinib requires selection of patients based on the presence of an EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutation. Other targeted agents are currently being evaluated in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. Approval of at least some of these other agents is highly likely in the coming years, bringing with it in parallel, a requirement for comprehensive molecular testing for stage I-III disease. In this review, we consider the implications of integrating molecular testing into practice when managing patients with stage I-III non-squamous NSCLC. We discuss best practices, approaches and challenges from pathology, surgical and oncology perspectives.

Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas With Spatially Separate Lung Lesions: Analysis of Clonal Relationship by Comparative Molecular Profiling

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMAs) often present with spatially separate lung lesions. Clonal relationship between such lesions, particularly those involving contralateral lobes, is not well established. Here, we used comparative genomic profiling to address this question.

METHODS

Patients with genomic analysis performed on two IMAs located in different lung regions were identified. Molecular assays included DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for 410 to 468 genes (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), RNA-based NGS for 62 genes (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Fusion), or non-NGS assays.

RESULTS

Comparative genomic profiling was performed on two separate IMAs in 24 patients, of whom 19 had contralateral lesions. Tumors from all but one patient shared matching driver alterations, including KRAS (n = 19), NRG1 (n = 2), ERBB2 (n = 1) or BRAF (n = 1). In addition, in patients with paired tumors profiled by NGS (n = 12), shared driver alterations were accompanied by up to 4 (average 2.6) other identical mutations, further supporting the clonal relationship between the tumors. Only in a single patient separate IMAs harbored entirely nonoverlapping mutation profiles, supporting clonally unrelated, distinct primary tumors. Notably, in a subset of patients (n = 3), molecular testing confirmed a clonal relationship between the original resected IMAs and subsequent contralateral IMA presenting after an extremely long latency (8.1-11.7 y).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparative molecular profiling supports that nearly all separate pulmonary IMA lesions represent intrapulmonary spread arising from a single tumor and documents a subset with a remarkably protracted course of intrapulmonary progression. This study reinforces the unique biology and clinical behavior of IMAs while further highlighting the value of genomic testing for clarifying the clonal relationship between multiple lung carcinomas.

The Common Thread: A Case of Synchronous Lung Cancers and a Germline CHEK2 Mutation

Patients with one form of cancer are at increased risk for another, and this is true for lung cancer, where synchronous primary lung cancers are an increasing multifaceted challenge.^1,2 Here, we present the case of a middle age woman who was found to have bilateral lung masses. Biopsy and subsequent testing revealed unique synchronous lung adenocarcinomas, each with unique genetic signatures. Despite having two unique tumors, she was found to have CHEK2 mutations in both tumors and in germline testing. Because of this extensive testing that showed unique tumors, she was ultimately diagnosed with stage IIIb and IA2 lung cancers, and this changed her treatment options. Consideration of unique primary tumors leads to thorough diagnostics, which changed this patient's diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. We hope this case raises awareness for multiple primary tumors, as well as CHEK2 as an important oncogene.

Does histological assessment accurately distinguish separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases? A study of paired resected lung nodules in 32 patients using a routine next-generation sequencing panel for driver mutations

AIM

Various approaches have been reported for distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases in patients with two lung nodules. The aim of this study was to determine whether histological assessment is reliable and accurate in distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases using routine molecular findings as an adjunct.

METHODS

We studied resected tumour pairs from 32 patients with lung adenocarcinomas in different lobes. In 15 of 32 tumour pairs, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for common driver mutations was performed on both nodules. The remainder of tumour pairs underwent limited NGS, or EGFR genotyping. Tumour pairs with different drivers (or one driver/one wild-type) were classified as molecularly unrelated, while those with identical low-frequency drivers were classified as related. Three pathologists independently and blinded to the molecular results categorised tumour pairs as related or unrelated based on histological assessment.

RESULTS

Of 32 pairs, 15 were classified as related by histological assessment, and 17 as unrelated. Of 15 classified as related by histology, 6 were classified as related by molecular analysis, 4 were unrelated and 5 were indeterminate. Of 17 classified as unrelated by histology, 14 were classified as unrelated by molecular analysis, none was related and 3 were indeterminate. Histological assessment of relatedness was inaccurate in 4/32 (12.5%) tumour pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

A small but significant subset of two-nodule adenocarcinoma pairs is inaccurately judged as related by histological assessment, and can be proven to be unrelated by molecular analysis (driver gene mutations), leading to significant downstaging.

A multidisciplinary approach for the differential diagnosis between multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas and intrapulmonary metastases

PURPOSE

The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases has a significant impact on tumor staging and therapeutic choices. Several criteria have been proposed to solve this diagnostic issue, but a definitive consensus is still missing. We tested the efficacy of a combined clinical, histopathological and molecular ("real world") approach for the correct classification of multiple lung tumors in a selected cohort of patients.

METHODS

24 multiple lung tumors with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma from 10 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological, pathological and clinical information, including follow-up, were integrated with molecular profiling via a routine multigene panel sequencing.

RESULTS

Comprehensive histologic assessment revealed readily distinguishable histologic patterns between multiple tumors suggesting unrelated lesions in 7 cases, in agreement with clinical, radiological and molecular data, thus leading to final diagnosis of MPLCs. In the remaining 3 cases, the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and intrapulmonary metastases was challenging, since the histologic features of the lesions were similar or identical. The final interpretation (2 MPLCs and 1 most likely intrapulmonary metastases) was reached thanks to the integration of all available data, and was confirmed by follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach including a routinely affordable multigene panel sequencing is a useful tool to discriminate MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastases in multiple lung nodules sharing the adenocarcinoma histotype.