Inconsistent Results With Different Secondary Reflex Assays for Resolving HER2 Status

Systemic analysis of the DNA replication regulator origin recognition complex in lung adenocarcinomas identifies prognostic and expression significance

BACKGROUND

DNA replication alteration is a hallmark of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and is frequently observed in LUAD progression. Origin recognition complex (ORC) 1, ORC2, ORC3, ORC4, ORC5, and ORC6 form a replication-initiator complex to mediate DNA replication, which plays a key role in carcinogenesis, while their roles in LUAD remain poorly understood.

METHODS

The mRNA and protein expression of ORCs was confirmed by the GEPIA, HPA, CPTAC, and TCGA databases. The protein-protein interaction network was analyzed by the GeneMANIA database. Functional enrichment was confirmed by the Metascape database. The effects of ORCs on immune infiltration were validated by the TIMER database. The prognostic significance of ORCs in LUAD was confirmed by the KM-plot and GENT2 databases. DNA alteration and protein structure were determined in the cBioProtal and PDB databases. Moreover, the protein expression and prognostic value of ORCs were confirmed in our LUAD data sets by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining.

RESULTS

ORC mRNA and protein were significantly increased in patients with LUAD compared with corresponding normal tissue samples. The results of IHC staining analysis were similar result to those of the above bioinformatics analysis. Furthermore, ORC1 and ORC6 had significant prognostic values for LUAD patients. Furthermore, the ORC cooperatively promoted LUAD development by driving DNA replication, cellular senescence, and metabolic processes.

CONCLUSION

The ORC, especially ORC1/6, has important prognostic and expression significance for LUAD patients.

Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Focused Update

OBJECTIVES

The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) guideline focused update revises the HER2 scoring criteria. We evaluated the impact on HER2 rates in breast carcinoma diagnosed at our center.

METHODS

In a retrospective series of breast core biopsies with invasive carcinoma diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 (n = 1,350), HER2 status was classified according to 2013 and 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and changes in HER2 status identified.

RESULTS

The 2018 guidelines reclassified the HER2 status of 6% of patients. Most changed from HER2 equivocal status (equivocal by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization under the 2013 guidelines) to HER2-negative status (2018 guidelines). The HER2-positive rate decreased by 0.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2018 guidelines decrease the rate of HER2 equivocal and positive breast cancer and reduce repeat HER2 testing on excision specimens. Approximately 0.4% of patients will become newly ineligible for anti-HER2 therapy.

HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX

In breast cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization. Oncotype DX also reports HER2 status by an rt-PCR-based assay. Assay concordance between IHC and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (including alternative probe HER2 FISH) vs Oncotype DX HER2 rt-PCR has not been described in the post-2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2 Guideline revision setting. We performed a retrospective review of HER2 equivocal invasive breast carcinoma from 2014 to 2016 with the Oncotype DX HER2 result. Fifteen patients with HER2 equivocal invasive breast cancer had Oncotype DX performed. Of these, 13 underwent alternative probe HER2 FISH yielding 4 negative, 6 equivocal and 3 positive results. All 15 cases were classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX rt-PCR, including the three cases which were positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH, yielding a discordance rate for Oncotype DX rt-PCR HER2 of 20% (3/15). All three patients with HER2-positive breast cancer on the basis of alternative probe HER2 FISH received anti-HER2-targeted therapy. Treatment decisions based on HER2 status should utilize the IHC/FISH result as Oncotype DX results may incorrectly disqualify some patients from being eligible for anti-HER2 therapy based on the current 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines.

HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization discordances in invasive breast carcinoma with micropapillary features

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) recommendations for HER2 testing contain a recommendation for pathologists with respect to invasive micropapillary carcinoma. The guidelines suggest that HER2 immunohistochemical staining that is intense but incomplete and would be considered 1+ may actually be HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Thus, pathologists should consider reporting the immunohistochemistry as equivocal (2+) and employ an alternative testing methodology. This recommendation is based largely on one paper wherein the authors tested a series of 22 micropapillary carcinomas that were considered 1+ by immunohistochemistry and identified HER2 amplification in one case (5%). In order to assess for a possible discordance between HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we evaluated a series of invasive carcinomas with micropapillary features using both methodologies. As described by the WHO, invasive carcinomas with micropapillary features have small, hollow, or morula-like clusters of cells surrounded by clear stromal spaces. All cases had HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization performed, and for cases with equivocal fluorescence in situ hybridization results, an alternative Chromosome 17 probe (RAI1) was employed. All assays were scored according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Specifically for this study, immunohistochemistry was scored irrespective of the presence of micropapillary features. Overall, we identified HER2 amplification in 21 (47%) of the cases assayed, with the corresponding immunohistochemistry being 1+ (n=9), 2+ (n=11), and 3+ (n=1). The ASCO/CAP recommendation that this morphology may deviate from the typical staining pattern is highlighted, as we found that 43% of cases with micropapillary features and HER2 staining that would otherwise be scored as 1+ were HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. This study supports the ASCO/CAP recommendation that pathologists should consider reporting immunohistochemistry in this morphology as equivocal and perform reflex testing using in situ hybridization.

Impact of 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines on HER2 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing in Breast Cancers : Experience From a National Reference Laboratory

OBJECTIVES

We compared the impact of 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing results on breast cancers.

METHODS

HER2 FISH testing performed between May 2015 and April 2016 following 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines was included. HER2 to control probe ratios, mean HER2, and control probe copy numbers were used to reassign HER2 status using 2007 ASCO/CAP and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines.

RESULTS

HER2 FISH results were available in 2,017 cases. A total of 342 (17.0%) cases were amplified, 301 (14.9%) were equivocal, and 1,374 (68.1%) were nonamplified. After additional testing with the alternate probe, amplified cases increased to 21.6%. HER2 positivity rates following the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines were significantly higher compared with the 2007 ASCO/CAP and FDA guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines lead to a higher number of HER2 FISH positive and equivocal cases. In a reference laboratory setting where an alternative control probe was used to resolve equivocal FISH cases, 31.2% of patients with initial equivocal results became HER2 positive.