Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients With Lupus Anticoagulant Prozone Effect

Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: Taipan Snake Venom Time with Ecarin Time as Confirmatory Test

Testing for lupus anticoagulants (LA) in the presence of therapeutic anticoagulation is largely discouraged because of the risk of false-positive and false-negative results, although the ability to detect LA in this setting can be clinically valuable. Strategies such as mixing tests and anticoagulant neutralization can be effective, but have their own limitations. The prothrombin activators in venoms from Coastal Taipan and Indian saw-scaled viper snakes provide an additional analytical avenue in that they are insensitive to the effects of vitamin K antagonists and inevitably bypass the effects of direct factor Xa inhibitors. Oscutarin C in Coastal Taipan venom is phospholipid- and Ca²⁺-dependent, so the venom is used in a dilute phospholipid design as an LA screening test called the Taipan snake venom time (TSVT). The ecarin fraction of Indian saw-scaled viper venom is cofactor-independent and operates as a prothrombin-activated confirmatory test, the ecarin time, because the absent phospholipid precludes inhibition by LAs. Bypassing all coagulation factors except prothrombin and fibrinogen renders the assays innately more specific than other LA assays, while TSVT as a screening test has good sensitivity to LAs detected in other assays, as well as occasional antibodies unreactive in other assays.

Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: Dilute Prothrombin Time (dPT)

Lupus anticoagulants (LA) rarely affect routine prothrombin time assays because the high phospholipid (PL) content in thromboplastin reagents tends to overwhelm the antibodies. Dilution of thromboplastin to create a dilute prothrombin time (dPT) screening test renders the assay sensitive to the presence of LA. Technical and diagnostic performances are enhanced if recombinant thromboplastins are employed in place of tissue-derived reagents. Presence of an LA cannot be deduced from an elevated screening test alone since other coagulation disturbances can prolong clotting times. Confirmatory testing with less dilute or undiluted thromboplastin reveals the PL-dependent nature of LA by reducing the clotting time relative to that of the screening test. Where appropriate, such as a known or suspected coagulation factor deficiency, mixing tests are valuable in correcting factor deficiencies and evidencing inhibitory properties of LA, to increase diagnostic specificity. Although LA testing is commonly restricted to dilute Russell's viper venom time and activated partial thromboplastin time, dPT is sensitive to LA unreactive in those assays, and inclusion in routine testing increases detection rates of clinically significant antibodies.

Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) employed in classification, and by default diagnosis, of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Detection of LA is not via calibrated assays but is based on functional behavior of the antibodies in a medley of coagulation assays. A prolonged clotting time in a screening test is followed by demonstration of phospholipid dependence and inhibitory properties in confirmatory and mixing tests, respectively, which are modifications of the parent screening test. Complications arise because no single screening test is sensitive to every LA, and no test is specific for LA, because they are prone to interference by other causes of elevated clotting times. Several screening tests are available but the pairing of dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) with LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is widely used and recommended because it is proven to have good detection rates. Nonetheless, judicious use of other assays can improve diagnostic performance, such as dilute prothrombin time to find LA unreactive with dRVVT and aPTT, and the recently validated Taipan snake venom time with ecarin time confirmatory test that are unaffected by vitamin K antagonist and direct factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulation. Expert body guidelines and their updates have improved harmonization of laboratory practices, although some issues continue to attract debate, such as the place of mixing tests in the medley hierarchy, and areas of data manipulation such as assay cut-offs and ratio generation. This article reviews current practices and challenges in the laboratory detection of LA.