Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter

Diabetes mellitus modifies the association between chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder biomarkers and aortic stiffness in peritoneal dialysis patients

This study aimed to investigate the relationship of four chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) biomarkers, including intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), soluble klotho, and fetuin-A, with aortic stiffness in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, comparing those with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). A total of 213 patients (mean age 58 ± 14 years; 81 (38.0%) patients with DM) were enrolled. Their aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured using pressure applanation tonometry, while serum intact PTH, FGF23, α-klotho, and fetuin-A levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Overall, patients with DM had higher aortic PWV than those without (9.9 ± 1.8 vs. 8.6 ± 1.4 m/s, p < 0.001). Among the four CKD-MBD biomarkers, FGF23 levels were significantly lower in DM group (462 [127-1790] vs. 1237 [251-3120] pg/mL, p = 0.028) and log-FGF23 independently predicted aortic PWV in DM group (β: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-1.16, p = 0.029 in DM group; β: 0.10, 95% confidence interval: - 0.24-0.45, p = 0.546 in nonDM group; interaction p = 0.016). In conclusion, the association between FGF23 and aortic PWV was significantly modified by DM status in PD patients.

Evaluation of Intracardiac Pressures Using Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation with Sonazoid Microbubbles

Purpose To investigate if the right ventricular (RV) systolic and left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressures can be obtained noninvasively using the subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique with Sonazoid microbubbles. Materials and Methods Individuals scheduled for a left and/or right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board-approved clinical trial from 2017 to 2020. A standard-of-care catheterization procedure was performed by advancing fluid-filled pressure catheters into the LV and aorta (n = 25) or RV (n = 22), and solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheters into the LV and aorta in a subset of participants (n = 18). Study participants received an infusion of Sonazoid microbubbles (GE HealthCare), and SHAPE data were acquired using a validated interface developed on a SonixTablet (BK Medical) US scanner, synchronously with the pressure catheter data. A conversion factor, derived using cuff-based pressure measurements with a SphygmoCor XCEL PWA (ATCOR) and subharmonic signal from the aorta, was used to convert the subharmonic signal into pressure values. Errors between the pressure measurements obtained using the SHAPE technique and pressure catheter were compared. Results The mean errors in pressure measurements obtained with the SHAPE technique relative to those of the fluid-filled pressure catheter were 1.6 mm Hg ± 1.5 [SD] (P = .85), 8.4 mm Hg ± 6.2 (P = .04), and 7.4 mm Hg ± 5.7 (P = .09) for RV systolic, LV minimum diastolic, and LV end-diastolic pressures, respectively. Relative to the measurements with the solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheter, the mean errors in LV minimum diastolic and LV end-diastolic pressures were 7.2 mm Hg ± 4.5 and 6.8 mm Hg ± 3.3 (P ≥ .44), respectively. Conclusion These results indicate that SHAPE with Sonazoid may have the potential to provide clinically relevant RV systolic and LV diastolic pressures. Keywords: Ultrasound-Contrast, Cardiac, Aorta, Left Ventricle, Right Ventricle ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT03245255 © RSNA, 2024.

Positive Association of Serum Galectin-3 with the Development of Aortic Stiffness of Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

A novel cardiovascular stress biomarker known as galectin-3 might be useful for anticipating adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the current investigation was to assess the association between serum galectin-3 levels and aortic stiffness (AS) in 196 patients on peritoneal dialysis. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent examination and a cuff-based volumetric displacement were employed to determine the levels of serum galectin-3 and the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), respectively. The AS group had 48 patients in total (24.5%) with cfPWV greater than 10 m/s. The AS group, when compared with the group without AS, had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in addition to greater fasting glucose levels, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and serum galectin-3 levels. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis demonstrated that serum glactin-3 levels, in addition to gender and age, were significantly and independently associated with cfPWV and AS. Serum galectin-3 levels were linked with AS, according to a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with an area under the curve of 0.648 (95% confidence interval, 0.576-0.714; p = 0.0018). In summary, there was a significant correlation between serum galectin-3 levels and cfPWV in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis therapy for end-stage kidney disease.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Cardiac Chamber Pressures Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation With Definity Microbubbles

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive and accurate assessment of intracardiac pressures has remained an elusive goal of noninvasive cardiac imaging.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate if errors in intracardiac pressures obtained noninvasively using contrast microbubbles and the subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique are <5 mm Hg.

METHODS

In a nonrandomized institutional review board-approved clinical trial (NCT03243942), patients scheduled for a left-sided and/or right-sided heart catheterization procedure and providing written informed consent were included. A standard-of-care catheterization procedure was performed advancing clinically used pressure catheters into the left and/or right ventricles and/or the aorta. After pressure catheter placement, patients received an infusion of Definity microbubbles (n = 56; 2 vials diluted in 50 mL of saline; infusion rate: 4-10 mL/min) (Lantheus Medical Imaging). Then SHAPE data was acquired using a validated interface developed on a SonixTablet scanner (BK Medical Systems) synchronously with the pressure catheter data. A conversion factor (mm Hg/dB) was derived from SHAPE data and measurements with a SphygmoCor XCEL PWA device (ATCOR Medical) and was combined with SHAPE data from the left and/or the right ventricles to obtain clinically relevant systolic and diastolic ventricular pressures.

RESULTS

The mean value of absolute errors for left ventricular minimum and end diastolic pressures were 2.9 ± 2.0 and 1.7 ± 1.2 mm Hg (n = 26), respectively, and for right ventricular systolic pressures was 2.2 ± 1.5 mm Hg (n = 11). Two adverse events occurred during Definity infusion; both were resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the SHAPE technique with Definity microbubbles is encouragingly efficacious for obtaining intracardiac pressures noninvasively and accurately. (Noninvasive, Subharmonic Intra-Cardiac Pressure Measurement; NCT03243942).

Enhancing central blood pressure accuracy through statistical modeling: A proof-of-concept study

Background

Non-invasive estimation of central blood pressure (BP) may have better prognostic value than brachial BP. The accuracy of central BP is limited in certain populations, such as in females and the elderly. This study aims to examine whether statistical modeling of central BP for clinical and hemodynamic parameters results in enhanced accuracy.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional analysis of 500 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization. Non-invasive brachial cuff and central BP were measured simultaneously to invasive aortic systolic BP (AoSBP). Central BP was calibrated for brachial systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (Type I calibration; C1SBP) or brachial mean and diastolic BP (Type II calibration; C2SBP). Differences between central SBP and the corresponding AoSBP were assessed with linear regression models using clinical and hemodynamic parameters. These parameters were then added to C1SBP and C2SBP in adjusted models to predict AoSBP. Accuracy and precision were computed in the overall population and per age or sex strata.

Results

C1SBP underestimated AoSBP by 11.2 mmHg (±13.5) and C2SBP overestimated it by 6.2 mmHg (±14.8). Estimated SBP amplification and heart rate were the greatest predictors of C1- and C2-AoSBP accuracies, respectively. Statistical modeling improved both accuracy (0.0 mmHg) and precision (±11.4) but more importantly, eliminated the differences of accuracy seen in different sex and age groups.

Conclusion

Statistical modeling greatly enhances the accuracy of central BP measurements and abolishes sex- and age-based differences. Such factors could easily be implemented in central BP devices to improve their accuracy.