Experiences at a large teaching hospital with levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

Review: Novel targets in the management of pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases in the US. It accounts each year for 500,000 hospitalizations and 45,000 deaths and represents one of the most common causes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The mortality rate due to severe CAP has shown little improvement in the past three decades, remaining between 21% and 58% in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Antimicrobial agents are the cornerstone of therapy against CAP, but there are some novel antibiotic and nonantibiotic therapies that have been recently tested that may potentially impact outcomes of patients with severe CAP. We will review the most recent data regarding novel therapies in patients with the highest risk of death such as those with severe CAP.

Community-Acquired Respiratory Complications in the Intensive Care Unit: Pneumonia and Acute Exacerbations of COPD

This chapter will review the two most common lower respiratory tract infections in the intensive care unit (ICU), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). In addition we will provide an overview of the topics including recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment.

The role of new therapies for severe community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is the most common cause of death from infectious diseases. CAP patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission carry the highest mortality rates. This paper aims to review the current literature regarding epidemiology, risk factors, severity criteria and reasons for admitting the hospitalized patient to the ICU, and the empiric and specific antibiotic therapeutic regimens employed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple sets of clinical practice guidelines have been published in the past few years addressing the treatment of CAP. The guidelines all agree that CAP patients admitted to the hospital represent a major concern, and appropriate empiric therapy should be instituted to improve clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

The cost, morbidity and mortality of CAP patients requiring ICU admission remain unacceptably high. These are heterogeneous groups of patients, so it is important to use risk-stratification based on clinical parameters and prediction tools. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is an important component in the management of both groups of patients. In particular, it is essential to administer an appropriate antimicrobial agent from the initiation of therapy, so that the risks of treatment failure and the morbidity of CAP may be minimized.

Reliability of assessment of adherence to an antimicrobial treatment guideline

Assessment procedures for adherence to a guideline must be reliable and credible. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability of assessment of adherence, taking account of the professional backgrounds of the observers. A secondary analysis explored the impact of case characteristics on assessment. Six observers (two hospital pharmacists, two internists and two clinical microbiologists) assessed a random sample of 22 prescriptions made to infectious disease cases admitted to a department of internal medicine between February and August 2001. Agreement between observers with regard to adherence of these prescriptions to guideline recommendations concerning drug choice, duration of treatment, dosage and route of administration was measured using Cohen's kappa. Case characteristics were compared between cases where observers agreed and disagreed with two-sided Fisher's exact test. Agreement between all professionals was moderate for drug choice (0.59), fair for duration of therapy (0.36), moderate for dosage (0.48), and fair for route of administration (0.37). Agreement on drug choice was good within (0.75 and 0.83) and between (0.74) the internists and the hospital pharmacists, but was less within (0.31) the clinical microbiologists and between the clinical microbiologists and the internists (0.44) and the hospital pharmacists (0.42). Within the clinical microbiologists, agreement was good for dosage (0.79) and route of administration (0.66). There was frequent disagreement between observers regarding cases with combination therapy and non-immunocompromised patients. Despite the small number of cases, our results suggest that internists and hospital pharmacists can reliably be used to assess adherence for drug choice. The level of agreement seems to be affected by combination therapy and the immune status of the patient.

Antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a clinical diagnosis that has a significant impact on health care management around the world. Early clinical suspicion and prompt empiric antimicrobial therapies are mandatory in patients with CAP. This article provides a review of recent studies and guidelines addressing antimicrobial therapy for hospitalized patients with CAP.

Optimizing fluoroquinolone utilization in a public hospital: a prospective study of educational intervention

Fluoroquinolone (FQ) utilization should be optimized, with the aim of controlling both multidrug-resistant bacteria and costs. In the present study, the appropriateness of FQ prescriptions for urinary tract infections (UTIs) before and after an educational intervention was examined prospectively. FQ-prescribing physicians received oral and written guidelines between the two phases of the study. All patients admitted to Saint-Antoine University Hospital (Paris) and treated with FQs for UTIs during the study period were included. The main outcome measures of the appropriateness of FQ prescriptions were based on the principles of Antibiotic Utilization Review. The study involved 127 patients. The main prescribing errors before the intervention were wrong routes of administration and failure to take into account antibiotic susceptibility results. The rate of erroneous prescriptions fell by 74.4% after intervention. About 71% of the improvement can be attributed to the intervention (71.4%; 95% confidence interval, 39.3-86.8). The intervention had an overall positive impact on FQ prescription quality. The decrease in inappropriate prescriptions was due mainly to the use of antibiotic susceptibility results (23% vs. 11.5%, P<0.05) and better consideration of indications (18.9% vs. 3.8%; P<0.05). Future educational interventions will cover other indications and will take into account costs and local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization

Consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia from January 2000 to September 2003 were included in this prospective observational cohort study. A total of 459 patients, 259 treated with levofloxacin in single drug therapy at a dose of 500 mg once a day and 209 with the combination of ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin at a dose of 2 g once a day and 500 mg every 12 h, respectively, were included. The hospital admission decision was made using a clinical guideline based on the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). Fifteen (6%) patients died in the group treated with levofloxacin in single drug therapy and 25 (12%) in the group treated with ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin (P = 0.024). The mortality differences between both treatment groups, adjusted by the PSI score, show an OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.87). There were no statistically significant differences between the duration of treatments or hospital stay. These data suggest that levofloxacin as single drug therapy is more effective than the combination of ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of moderate to severe pneumonia that requires hospitalization.

Clinical implications of 750 mg, 5-day levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the time to symptom resolution and i.v.-to-p.o. transition in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients treated with 750 mg or 500 mg levofloxacin.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A retrospective, subset analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing 750 mg levofloxacin for 5 days to 500 mg levofloxacin for 10 days for the treatment of CAP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 528 CAP patients were included. Baseline symptoms were re-evaluated on Day 3 of therapy, and time to i.v.-to-p.o. transition was recorded for inpatients.

RESULTS

For the overall population, 67.4% of patients receiving 750 mg levofloxacin had resolution of fever by Day 3 of therapy, compared to 54.6% of 500 mg treated patients (P = 0.006). Patients who started on 750 mg levofloxacin i.v. (N = 108) transitioned to p.o. in an average of 2.68 days while those starting on 500 mg i.v. (N = 124) transitioned in 2.95 days (P = 0.144). The median time for i.v.-to-p.o. switch was 2.35 days and 2.75 days for patients receiving 750 mg and 500 mg levofloxacin, respectively (P = 0.098, log rank test). By Day 3 of therapy, 68% of patients receiving the 750 mg dose had transitioned from i.v. to p.o. levofloxacin, compared with 61% of the 500 mg group (P = 0.280). The safety profiles were comparable for the two regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The 750 mg levofloxacin dose resulted in a greater proportion of patients with resolution of CAP symptoms by Day 3 when compared with 500 mg therapy. Consequently, the 750 mg regimen trended toward more rapid transition to p.o., potentially resulting in lower overall drug costs. Time to switch from i.v. to p.o. was determined by the investigators' discretion rather than a set protocol. Additionally, length of stay data was not collected in this study, which can significantly impact overall healthcare costs. Further research is required to fully understand the economic impact of the 750 mg, 5-day levofloxacin regimen.

Drug costs and bacterial susceptibility after implementing a single-fluoroquinolone use policy at a university hospital

The University of Kentucky Hospital investigated the feasibility of choosing a sole fluoroquinolone for its formulary in an effort to reduce costs without affecting clinical outcomes. A three-step process was used to plan, implement, and monitor the selection program. Based on the range of clinical indications, safety profile, local susceptibility, cost, and dosing convenience, levofloxacin was chosen over ciprofloxacin and gatifloxacin as the sole fluoroquinolone. Since the implementation of the program in May 2001, susceptibility to levofloxacin has been maintained or increased for the most common pathogens. In addition, University Hospital has saved nearly 100,000 dollars in antibiotic acquisition costs during the first 12 months after the switch. This assessment did not take into account effects in clinical outcomes, such as clinical failures (such as readmission rates), mortality, and adverse events, or measure changes in overall medical expenditures beyond drug acquisition costs. In the future, monitoring of overall patient care and medical care costs, in addition to susceptibility patterns and drug costs, will allow for a better understanding of the long-term benefits of this switch.

A novel method of estimating cost of therapy by using patient population characteristics: analysis of fluoroquinolones in various populations with different distributions of renal function

INTRODUCTION

Formulary decisions regarding a given drug class are often made in the absence of patient outcome and/or sophisticated pharmacoeconomic data. Analyses that consider factors beyond simple acquisition costs may be useful in such situations. For example, the cost implications of using manufacturers' recommendations for dosing in patients with renal dysfunction may be important, depending on the distribution of various levels of renal function within a patient population.

METHODS

Using four 1000-patient populations representing different renal function distributions and a fifth population of our medical center's distribution, we determined the costs of therapy for intravenous and oral levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin for a 10-day course of therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Costs considered were average wholesale prices (AWPs), 50% of AWP, or same daily price, plus intravenous dose preparation and administration costs when applicable. Costs for each renal function distribution were examined for significant differences with an analysis-of-variance test. Also, costs of failing to adjust dosing regimens for decreased renal function were determined.

RESULTS

Differences in fluoroquinolone costs (AWP, 50% AWP, or when matched as the same daily price) among the populations were found. When considering same daily prices, differences among populations ranged from about 35,000 dollars with intravenous gatifloxacin to more than 51,000 dollars for intravenous levofloxacin (all fluoroquinolones, p>0.05). Within a population, differences in costs among the intravenous fluoroquinolones ranged from 47,000-99,000 dollars. Rank orders of the drugs and population costs of therapy were affected by the pricing structure used and varied by the specific population and drug. Differences among the fluoroquinolones or populations were much smaller (<2100 dollars) when considering oral regimens. Costs potentially incurred by failing to adjust dosing for renal function were substantial.

CONCLUSION

Formulary decisions can be facilitated by considering factors such as patient characteristics and related dosing in addition to simple acquisition costs. In our example, consideration of the distribution of renal function within a given patient population and related dosing for these fluoroquinolones revealed potentially important differences within the class.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia: current outcomes, epidemiology, etiology, and therapy

Severe community-acquired pneumonia is a clinical diagnosis with a significant impact on healthcare management around the world, with the highest morbidity and mortality of all of the forms of community-acquired pneumonia. Patients with severe pneumonia usually require intensive care unit management, including vasopressors or mechanical ventilation. Early clinical suspicion and prompt empiric antimicrobial therapies are mandatory in patients with severe pneumonia. A number of recent studies and guidelines addressing these issues have been published, and they will be reviewed in this article.