Reported medication errors associated with methotrexate

Methotrexate-induced Severe Pancytopenia in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Toxicity associated with low doses of methotrexate (MTX) is low, but it may be fatal. Bone marrow suppression and mucositis are among the common side effects of low dose MTX toxicity. Different risk factors have been reported for toxicities associated with low doses of MTX, including accidental use of higher doses, renal dysfunction, hypoalbuminemia, and polypharmacy. In this paper, we present a female patient who had mistakenly used 7.5 mg of MTX daily instead of the same dose of MTX on Thursday and Friday. She was presented with mucositis and diarrhea to the emergency department. Moreover, we searched the databases Scopus and PubMed for available studies and case reports on toxicities associated with MTX dosing errors. The most frequently observed toxicities included gastrointestinal lesions, nausea, vomiting, skin lesions, and bone marrow suppression. Leucovorin, hydration, and urine alkalinization were among the most frequently used treatments. Finally, we summarize the data on the toxicities of low doses of MTX in different diseases.

Toxicological Aspects of Methotrexate Intoxication: Concentrations in Postmortem Biological Samples and Autopsy Findings

The aim of this study was the establishment of a UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS method to determine methotrexate in postmortem biological samples and quantify the postmortem distribution of methotrexate in a case of fatal intoxication of this drug. A volume of 100 μL or 100 mg of postmortem specimens was precipitated with 400 μL of cold methanol and then analyzed using UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS. The validation parameters of the method were as follows: limit of quantification: 0.1−1.0 ng/mL or ng/g, coefficient of determination: >0.998 (R2), matrix effect, intra- and inter-day accuracies and precisions: not greater than 13.6%, 14.8% and 17.4%, respectively. The recoveries were: 89.0−113.6%. The postmortem distribution studies revealed methotrexate concentrations as follows: blood—7.2 ng/mL, vitreous humor—0.8 ng/mL, liver—43.7 ng/g, kidney—20.6 ng/g, bone marrow—29.9 ng/g, lumbar vertebra—20.0 ng/g. The highest concentrations of methotrexate after poisoning were found in the tissues with the most rapidly dividing cells. The method described is simple, precise and selective. Methotrexate concentrations can be routinely determined in postmortem specimens. Determination of methotrexate in the postmortem biological material is possible after a few days of intensive treatment.

Methotrexate Pneumonitis After a Low-Dose Medication Error: A Case Report

Methotrexate is recommended as the first choice of standard drug therapy following the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Pneumonitis related to methotrexate is a serious, unpredictable adverse event that may become life-threatening. We reported a case of a 68-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis that misunderstood the directions for use and took methotrexate daily, instead of weekly, leading to hepatic, hematological, and pulmonary toxicity.Although the histological evaluation was not performed, patient’s clinical presentation, in addition to subsequent investigational findings, supported a diagnosis of pneumonitis resulting from MTX exposure. Toxic dosing over a long period of time along with the concomitant taking of pantoprazole and hypoalbuminemia could have increased the incidence of some adverse events. Concerning pneumonitis related to methotrexate, the toxic dose may have accelerated the pulmonary manifestations, but we do not know if correct dose had been taken, this adverse event would occur. This case enlightened two important issues in rheumatoid arthritis treatment: the possibility of medication errors and the rare, but potentially life-threatening, methotrexate-induced pneumonitis. Improving education and warnings when prescribing and dispensing low-dose methotrexate is essential.

Extracorporeal Treatment for Methotrexate Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup

Methotrexate is used in the treatment of many malignancies, rheumatological diseases, and inflammatory bowel disease. Toxicity from use is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Rescue treatments include intravenous hydration, folinic acid, and, in some centers, glucarpidase. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature following published EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) methods to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments in the management of methotrexate toxicity. The quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations (either "strong" or "weak/conditional") were graded according to the GRADE approach. A formal voting process using a modified Delphi method assessed the level of agreement between panelists on the final recommendations. A total of 92 articles met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic data were available on 90 patients (89 with impaired kidney function). Methotrexate was considered to be moderately dialyzable by intermittent hemodialysis. Data were available for clinical analysis on 109 patients (high-dose methotrexate [>0.5 g/m²]: 91 patients; low-dose [≤0.5 g/m²]: 18). Overall mortality in these publications was 19.5% and 26.7% in those with high-dose and low-dose methotrexate-related toxicity, respectively. Although one observational study reported lower mortality in patients treated with glucarpidase compared with those treated with hemodialysis, there were important limitations in the study. For patients with severe methotrexate toxicity receiving standard care, the EXTRIP workgroup: (1) suggested against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is not administered; (2) recommended against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is administered; and (3) recommended against extracorporeal treatments instead of administering glucarpidase. The quality of evidence for these recommendations was very low. Rationales for these recommendations included: (1) extracorporeal treatments mainly remove drugs in the intravascular compartment, whereas methotrexate rapidly distributes into cells; (2) extracorporeal treatments remove folinic acid; (3) in rare cases where fast removal of methotrexate is required, glucarpidase will outperform any extracorporeal treatment; and (4) extracorporeal treatments do not appear to reduce the incidence and magnitude of methotrexate toxicity.

Poisoning related to therapeutic error in prolonged low-dose methotrexate treatment

AIMS

To study the predictive factors for the development of clinical manifestations in poisoning due to the erroneous taking of low-dose methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed. Only cases of erroneous administration in non-oncologic outpatients were included (July 2008-March 2020).

RESULTS

Forty-one cases were included. All patients were taking MTX for the first time. In 36 cases, patients took MTX daily instead of weekly. In the other five patients, MTX was sold instead of methylergometrine. Clinical manifestations were absent in 12/41 patients (29.3%). All 29 (70.7%) symptomatic patients recognized the medication error when they developed clinical manifestations: dermatological, haematological and gastrointestinal symptoms. Statistical results showed that symptomatic patients were older, received a higher amount of total dose and were treated for longer. Moreover, the probability of being symptomatic increases as a function of age and of total dose. Asymptomatic patients were treated with folinic acid (30 mg/m² /day) for 5 days. Symptomatic patients were treated with folinic acid together with treatments for the specific clinical manifestations. No patients were treated with glucarpidase. All patients fully recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

When MTX is prescribed for the first time, it is important to clearly communicate with patients to avoid therapeutic errors. In our experience, age, total dose taken and number of days of assumption are predictive for the presence/absence of clinical manifestations. These parameters must be evaluated together to identify patients needing maximum starting treatment with folinic acid and closer monitoring.

Development of an algorithm to detect and reduce complexity of drug treatment and its technical realisation

Background

The increasing complexity of current drug therapies jeopardizes patient adherence. While individual needs to simplify a medication regimen vary from patient to patient, a straightforward approach to integrate the patients’ perspective into decision making for complexity reduction is still lacking. We therefore aimed to develop an electronic, algorithm-based tool that analyses complexity of drug treatment and supports the assessment and consideration of patient preferences and needs regarding the reduction of complexity of drug treatment.

Methods

Complexity factors were selected based on literature and expert rating and specified for integration in the automated assessment. Subsequently, distinct key questions were phrased and allocated to each complexity factor to guide conversation with the patient and personalize the results of the automated assessment. Furthermore, each complexity factor was complemented with a potential optimisation measure to facilitate drug treatment (e.g. a patient leaflet). Complexity factors, key questions, and optimisation strategies were technically realized as tablet computer-based application, tested, and adapted iteratively until no further technical or content-related errors occurred.

Results

In total, 61 complexity factors referring to the dosage form, the dosage scheme, additional instructions, the patient, the product, and the process were considered relevant for inclusion in the tool; 38 of them allowed for automated detection. In total, 52 complexity factors were complemented with at least one key question for preference assessment and at least one optimisation measure. These measures included 29 recommendations for action for the health care provider (e.g. to suggest a dosage aid), 27 training videos, 44 patient leaflets, and 5 algorithms to select and suggest alternative drugs.

Conclusions

Both the set-up of an algorithm and its technical realisation as computer-based app was successful. The electronic tool covers a wide range of different factors that potentially increase the complexity of drug treatment. For the majority of factors, simple key questions could be phrased to include the patients’ perspective, and, even more important, for each complexity factor, specific measures to mitigate or reduce complexity could be defined.

Individual factors increasing complexity of drug treatment-a narrative review

Purpose

Complexity of drug treatment is known to be a risk factor for administration errors and nonadherence promoting higher healthcare costs, hospital admissions and increased mortality. Number of drugs and dose frequency are parameters often used to assess complexity related to the medication regimen. However, factors resulting from complex processes of care or arising from patient characteristics are only sporadically analyzed. Hence, the objective of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of relevant, patient-centered factors influencing complexity of drug treatment.

Methods

A purposeful literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify potential complexity factors relating to the prescribed drug (i.e. dosage forms or other product characteristics), the specific medication regimen (i.e. dosage schemes or additional instructions), specific patient characteristics and process characteristics. Factors were included if they were associated to administration errors, nonadherence and related adverse drug events detected in community dwelling adult patients.

Results

Ninety-one influencing factors were identified: fourteen in “dosage forms”, five in “product characteristics”, twelve in “dosage schemes”, nine in “additional instructions”, thirty-one in “patient characteristics” and twenty in “process characteristics”.

Conclusions

Although the findings are limited by the non-systematic search process and the heterogeneous results, the search shows the influence of many factors on the complexity of drug treatment. However, to evaluate their relevance for individual patients, prospective studies are necessary.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-019-02818-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cytopenia induced by low-dose methotrexate: An analysis of 433 cases from the French pharmacovigilance database

INTRODUCTION

Up to 5% of individuals exposed to low-dose methotrexate (MTX) (i.e., ≤30 mg/week) may develop cytopenia. However, MTX-induced cytopenia have been poorly described.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All cases of cytopenia (i.e., anaemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bi- or pancytopenia) in patients receiving low-dose MTX reported to the French pharmacovigilance database during 2006-2016 were analysed. Three groups were defined: cytopenia due to MTX medication errors (e.g., daily rather than weekly administration), cytopenia in people receiving several medications including MTX, cytopenia in people receiving only MTX.

RESULTS

433 cases were analysed. Eighty-four cases (19.4%) were due to medication errors, 180 (41.6%) occurred in individuals exposed both to MTX and other drugs, and 169 (39.0%) occurred in individuals only exposed to MTX. By comparison to other patients, those with cytopenia due to medication errors were older (74 ± 13 vs 69 ± 15 years, p = 0.002), received more frequently MTX orally (92.9% vs 65.3%, p<0.001) and had more frequently pancytopenia (71.4% vs 54.4%, p = 0.005). By comparison to individuals exposed to multiple drugs (n = 180), those exposed only to MTX (n = 169) were older (71 ± 15 vs 67 ± 14, p = 0.02), and had more often pancytopenia (62.7% vs 46.7%, p = 0.001). Among those only exposed to MTX, most cases (n = 140, 82.8%) were considered as toxic rather than idiosyncratic reactions and a trigger (e.g. diarrhoea) was found in 59.3% of those cases. Overall 30 (6.9%) deaths occurred, including 8 in the "medication error" group and 8 in the "MTX only" group.

CONCLUSION

These data may be useful for defining optimal biological monitoring of patients prescribed low-dose MTX.

Development of an algorithm to detect methotrexate wrong frequency error using computerized health care data

PURPOSE

We validated an algorithm to detect frequency errors in computerized healthcare data and estimated the incidence of these errors in an integrated healthcare system.

METHODS

We applied Sentinel System analytic tools on the electronic health records of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, January 1, 2010, through May 30, 2015,to identify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with new use of methotrexate (365-day baseline period). We identified potential methotrexate frequency errors using ICD-9 code 995.20 (adverse drug event), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 96409 for injection of leucovorin and prescription refill patterns. We performed chart review to confirm the frequency errors, assessed performance for detecting frequency errors, and estimated the incidence of chart-confirmed errors.

RESULTS

The study included 24,529 methotrexate dispensings among 3,668 RA patients. Among these, 722 (3%) had one dispensing and 23,807 (97.1%) had ≥2 dispensings during 1-year follow-up period. We flagged 653 (2.7%) with a potential medication error (46 with one dispensing and 607 with ≥2 dispensings). We sampled 94 for chart review, and confirmed three methotrexate errors. All three confirmed frequency errors involved a first methotrexate dispensing followed by injected rescue therapy, leucovorin, (positive predictive value, 60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15-95%). No potential errors were found among patients with ≥2 dispensings. We estimated the frequency error incidence among one methotrexate dispensing to be 0.4% (95%CI, 0.1% to 1.2%).

CONCLUSION

Rescue therapy is a specific indicator of methotrexate overdose among first methotrexate dispensings. This method is generalizable to other medications with serious adverse events treated with antidotes.

Adverse consequences of low-dose methotrexate medication errors: data from French poison control and pharmacovigilance centers

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to carefully describe the context of methotrexate medication errors, to details medical consequences and management approaches, and to determine the rate of fatal outcome.

METHODS

Data on methotrexate medication errors were obtained from the French network of poison control and pharmacovigilance centres, which collected and documented reported drug-induced adverse effects. Cases were included if the intake was more than 2-fold the intended weekly dose or a weekly cumulative dose ≥ 30 mg and a follow-up of at least 4 days after the last dose. Data were analysed for demographics, treatment indication, prescribed dose, drug interactions, clinical complications and medical outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy four patients were included. The causes of methotrexate errors resulted from an erroneous prescription renewal (23.3%), incomprehensiveness of the weekly schedule by patients or at-home caregivers (56.2%) and administration of a wrong dose by a health care professional (20.5%). Of the 70 patients who took methotrexate daily, the mean daily dose received over the whole duration of the error was 9.6 ± 4.1 mg (range 2.5-22.5) with a mean duration of the error of 11.7 ± 12.2 days (range 2 to 90). Thirteen (18%) patients remained asymptomatic and 61 (82%) developed complications of which 46 (62.2%) were severe. Nine (14.8%) patients died within 11 to 45 days after the first dosing error. Compared to patients with no or mild symptoms, those with severe symptoms were more likely to be older (75.6 ± 10.8 vs. 69.5 ± 12.9 years) and to be exposed to a higher cumulative dose (94.8 ± 46.2 vs. 68.0 ± 45.7 mg).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that dosing errors with methotrexate can be lethal and persisted despite several warnings from drug agencies. Further measures are awaited from the European Medicine Agency.

A decade of Australian methotrexate dosing errors

OBJECTIVE

Accidental daily dosing of methotrexate can result in life-threatening toxicity. We investigated methotrexate dosing errors reported to the National Coronial Information System (NCIS), the Therapeutic Goods Administration Database of Adverse Event Notifications (TGA DAEN) and Australian Poisons Information Centres (PICs).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective review of coronial cases in the NCIS (2000-2014), and of reports to the TGA DAEN (2004-2014) and Australian PICs (2004-2015). Cases were included if dosing errors were accidental, with evidence of daily dosing on at least 3 consecutive days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Events per year, dose, consecutive days of methotrexate administration, reasons for the error, clinical features.

RESULTS

Twenty-two deaths linked with methotrexate were identified in the NCIS, including seven cases in which erroneous daily dosing was documented. Methotrexate medication error was listed in ten cases in the DAEN, including two deaths. Australian PIC databases contained 92 cases, with a worrying increase seen during 2014-2015. Reasons for the errors included patient misunderstanding and incorrect packaging of dosette packs by pharmacists. The recorded clinical effects of daily dosage were consistent with those previously reported for methotrexate toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Dosing errors with methotrexate can be lethal and continue to occur despite a number of safety initiatives in the past decade. Further strategies to reduce these preventable harms need to be implemented and evaluated. Recent suggestions include further changes in packet size, mandatory weekly dosing labelling on packaging, improving education, and including alerts in prescribing and dispensing software.

Methylene Blue is a Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor; Severe Harm and Death Associated with Low-Dose Methotrexate; Potentially Dangerous Mix-up between Cancer Drugs

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them at your inservice training programs.

Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Errors Reporting Program. Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.

Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported directly to ISMP through the ISMP Web site ( www.ismp.org ), by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE, or via e-mail at ismpinfo@ismp.org . ISMP guarantees the confidentiality and security of the information received and respects reporters' wishes as to the level of detail included in publications.

Implementing oral chemotherapy services in community pharmacies: a qualitative study of chemotherapy nurses' and pharmacists' views

Objectives

Changes in health-care provision have led to cancer patients being offered oral chemotherapy in the community. Three levels of oral chemotherapy services have been proposed (levels 1, 2 and 3) with community pharmacies playing differing roles within them. This study aims to explore health-care professionals' views on oral chemotherapy services being delivered by community pharmacies and to gain insights into the barriers, facilitators and training/knowledge needs of community pharmacists with respect to providing them.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of three chemotherapy nurses, five oncology pharmacists and five community pharmacists. Data were analysed thematically using Framework Analysis.

Key findings

Findings for level 1 and 2 services included uncertainty on community pharmacists' professional responsibilities, the expertise of GPs in prescribing oral chemotherapy and the training and competency of community pharmacists. The lack of patient information, care and support provision was emphasised for all the models. Although level 1 was achievable in current practice, level 2 was considered the safest option, while level 3 was ideal but risky option.

For all levels, training and education for community pharmacists and inter-professional issues were facilitators to oral chemotherapy services. The service environment, dispensing process-related constraints (access to blood test results and protocols) were significant barriers for levels 2 and 3.

Advanced communication skills, patient education and counselling were identified as key areas for education and training for community pharmacists.

Conclusion

The study suggests there are significant concerns and challenges associated with community pharmacies implementing any of the proposed levels of oral chemotherapy services. Educational and training opportunities for community pharmacists and the careful development of safe infrastructures will be essential in the future planning and implementation of any community pharmacy oral chemotherapy service.

Characteristics of medication schedules used by elderly ambulatory patients

PURPOSE

We investigated the prevalence and quality of medication schedules of elderly ambulatory patients and assessed factors associated with the availability of a medication schedule. In particular, we evaluated whether sending out a blank medication schedule template would increase the chances to use such a document.

METHODS

Data originate from the ESTHER study, a cohort study conducted in Saarland, Germany, in which trained study physicians performed home visits. They scanned all medication schedules, recorded the participants' medication, and performed thorough geriatric assessments. As part of the intervention, a blank medication schedule template along with a brochure was mailed to half of the participants (intervention group) 4 weeks prior to the home visits.

RESULTS

In total, 553 of 2470 participants (22.4 %) had a medication schedule. Almost two thirds of the schedules were issued by health care professionals (n = 353, 63.8 %). These schedules offered a higher quality, although important information such as over-the-counter (OTC) medication was regularly missing. Self-reported adherence was higher in participants who used self-issued medication schedules; however, self-reported medication adherence in patients with any medication schedule was poorer compared to those patients not using a schedule. Factors associated with the availability of a medication schedule were male sex, a higher number of medicines to take, and a more complex drug regimen. The intervention did not increase the number of patients having a medication schedule.

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of elderly ambulatory patients had a medication schedule at home. Sending out a brochure along with a blank medication schedule template did not increase the prevalence of medication schedules.

Chemotherapy e-prescribing: opportunities and challenges

Chemotherapy drugs are characterized by low therapeutic indices and significant toxicities at clinically prescribed doses, raising serious issues of drug safety. The safety of the chemotherapy medication use process is further challenged by regimen complexity and need to tailor treatment to patient status. Errors that occur during chemotherapy prescribing are associated with serious and life-threatening outcomes. Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems were shown to reduce overall medication errors in ambulatory and inpatient settings. The adoption of chemotherapy CPOE is lagging due to financial cost and cultural and technological challenges. Institutions that adopted infusional or oral chemotherapy electronic prescribing modified existing CPOE systems to allow chemotherapy prescribing, implemented chemotherapy-specific CPOE systems, or developed home-grown chemotherapy electronic prescribing programs. Implementation of chemotherapy electronic prescribing was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of prescribing errors, most significantly dose calculation and adjustment errors. In certain cases, implementation of chemotherapy CPOE was shown to improve the chemotherapy use process. The implementation of chemotherapy CPOE may increase the risk of new types of errors, especially if processes are not redesigned and adapted to CPOE. Organizations aiming to implement chemotherapy CPOE should pursue a multidisciplinary approach engaging all stakeholders to guide system selection and implementation. Following implementation, organizations should develop and use a risk assessment process to identify and evaluate unanticipated consequences and CPOE-generated errors. The results of these analyses should serve to further enhance the chemotherapy electronic prescribing process and improve the quality and safety of cancer care.

Risk models to improve safety of dispensing high-alert medications in community pharmacies

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether sociotechnical probabilistic risk assessment can create accurate approximations of detailed risk models that describe error pathways, estimate the incidence of preventable adverse drug events (PADEs) with high-alert medications, rank the effectiveness of interventions, and provide a more informative picture of risk in the community pharmacy setting than is available currently.

DESIGN

Developmental study.

SETTING

22 community pharmacies representing three U.S. regions.

PARTICIPANTS

Model-building group: six pharmacists and three technicians. Model validation group: 11 pharmacists; staff at two pharmacies observed.

INTERVENTION

A model-building team built 10 event trees that estimated the incidence of PADEs for four high-alert medications: warfarin, fentanyl transdermal systems, oral methotrexate, and insulin analogs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Validation of event tree structure and incidence of defined PADEs with targeted medications.

RESULTS

PADEs with the highest incidence included dispensing the wrong dose/strength of warfarin as a result of data entry error (1.83/1,000 prescriptions), dispensing warfarin to the wrong patient (1.22/1,000 prescriptions), and dispensing an inappropriate fentanyl system dose due to a prescribing error (7.30/10,000 prescriptions). PADEs with the lowest incidence included dispensing the wrong drug when filling a warfarin prescription (9.43/1 billion prescriptions). The largest quantifiable reductions in risk were provided by increasing patient counseling (27-68% reduction), conducting a second data entry verification process during product verification (50-87% reduction), computer alerts that can't be bypassed easily (up to 100% reduction), opening the bag at the point of sale (56% reduction), and use of barcoding technology (almost a 100,000% increase in risk if technology not used). Combining two or more interventions resulted in further overall reduction in risk.

CONCLUSION

The risk models define thousands of ways process failures and behavioral elements combine to lead to PADEs. This level of detail is unavailable from any other source.

Methotrexate safety improvement in nursing home residents

OBJECTIVE

Improve the safety of methotrexate use in nursing home residents by reducing methotrexate errors.

DESIGN

Concurrent cohort analysis.

SETTING

Long term care facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

Residents who received methotrexate from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009.

INTERVENTION

A 3-pronged approach involving modification to dispensing systems and practices, mandatory staff training, and measurement was implemented in June 2008 and monitored through December 2009. Software programming to the pharmacy operating systems occurred forcing a mandatory second clinical review of all methotrexate orders during the pharmacist verification process, before dispensing. Pharmacists were required to call and clarify orders that failed to fulfill prespecified safety criteria before approving the prescription for dispensing. All pharmacists were required to complete a brief, concise, focused, mandatory training program that emphasized the proper use, adverse effects, boxed warnings, appropriate dosing schedules, and new dispensing requirements for methotrexate.

MEASUREMENTS

On a daily basis, methotrexate orders from the previous day were summarized and forwarded to a Clinical Intervention Center for analysis and measurement. Prescriptions that triggered preestablished safety concerns were triaged back to their respective pharmacies for verification or modification. The results of the Methotrexate Safety Program were measured by tracking the number of prescriptions filled, number of patients treated, number of sentinel events, and number of safety variances identified.

RESULTS

All assigned pharmacists (n = 2293) completed the mandatory training between June and December 2008. In 2009, a total of 369 new employees completed the training. The prescriptions per year and patients treated per year remained comparable, whereas the number of sentinel events decreased from 3 in 2007 and 4 in 2008 to 0 following program implementation. The most prevalent variance was daily dosing of methotrexate when weekly was intended. The measurement process detected and averted 497 variances in 2008 and 693 variances in 2009 that could have resulted in sentinel events.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of intensification of dispensing practices, mandatory training, and measurement eradicated sentinel events associated with methotrexate in nursing homes.

Oral Syringes: A Crucial and Economical Risk-Reduction Strategy that has Not Been Fully Utilized; Caution regarding Once-Weekly Levothyroxine; When Drug Strengths Differ by 10-Fold; Lower Colchicine Dose Effective and Safer

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them at your inservice training programs.

Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Errors Reporting Program. Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.

Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported directly to ISMP through the ISMP Web site ( www.ismp.org ), by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE, or via e-mail at ismpinfo@ismp.org . ISMP guarantees the confidentiality and security of the information received and respects reporters' wishes as to the level of detail included in publications.

Methods to enhance the safety of methotrexate prescribing

The treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions often involves a difficult balance between the benefits of disease modification and the risks attendant with the use of disease-modifying agents. Methotrexate is a useful and commonly used disease-modifying agent but has a particularly notable reputation for causing morbidity and mortality. We explore ways in which the safety of methotrexate prescribing may be improved. There has been considerable debate as to the whether some of the side-effects can be mitigated by co-prescription of folate with methotrexate. Whereas no definitive conclusion can yet be reached, evidence suggests that the improvement in side-effect profile is limited to fewer elevations of liver enzymes, but that this may be at the expense of decreased methotrexate efficacy. The question remains as to whether the improved tolerability more than compensates for the decreased efficacy or whether folic acid should be used in a more circumspect way. However, a very specific danger arises from the fact that methotrexate is prescribed once weekly for inflammatory conditions, leading to errors at both the prescription and patient level. We highlight simple ways of improving safety to decrease such errors.