Cost-Effectiveness of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

Two recent clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with moderate-to-high risk ambulatory cancer initiating chemotherapy. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy are at particularly increased risk of VTE. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from a health system perspective to determine if DOACs are a feasible prophylactic strategy in this population.

METHODS

A simple decision tree was created from a health system perspective, comparing two strategies: prophylactic DOAC taken for 18 weeks during chemotherapy versus no VTE prophylaxis. Rates of VTE (7.3% DOAC v 13.6% no treatment), major bleeding (2.6% v 1.3%), and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (4.6% v 3.3%) were modeled. Cost estimates were obtained from wholesale drug costs, published studies, and Medicare reimbursement data. Probabilistic, one-way, and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the base case model, DOAC prophylaxis is more costly and more effective than no therapy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $256,218 in US dollars/quality-adjusted life year). In one-way sensitivity analyses, reducing the DOAC cost by 32% or raising the baseline VTE rate above 18% renders this strategy potentially cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below $150,000 in US dollars/quality-adjusted life year.

CONCLUSION

Further confirmation of the true baseline VTE rate among women initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer will determine whether prophylactic dose DOAC is a value-based strategy. Less costly VTE prophylaxis options such as generic DOACs (once available) and aspirin also warrant investigation.

Patient's compliance is a contributor to failure of extended antithrombotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) continue to be a major source of morbidity following colorectal surgery. Selective extended VTE prophylaxis for high-risk patients is recommended; however, provider compliance is low. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the "global" extended use of enoxaparin in all colorectal patients is feasible and safe.

METHODS

This is a prospective study conducted at a tertiary care center. All Patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures from November 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018 were discharged on 30 days of enoxaparin. Safety of use and patient compliance were examined.

RESULTS

Total of 270 patients received extended prophylaxis during the study period (100% of intended patients) with five VTE recorded (1.85%). There was no significant difference in rates of VTE or complications when compared to years of selective prophylaxis (1.26% for 2016, 2.32% for 2017). Only 64% of patients reported full compliance.

CONCLUSION

Global use of extended enoxaparin prophylaxis is safe, but does not decrease rates of VTE when compared to selective use. Patient's non-adherence is likely a significant contributing factor.

[Rate of thrombosis and bleeding after urological surgery under standardized anticoagulation]

BACKGROUND

According to the current definition of the German guideline for prevention of venous thromboembolism, urological surgery includes a high number of high-risk patients. All patients undergoing urological surgery between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed with regard to complications (bleeding or thrombosis).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective and monocentric cohort study. Included were all patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2016 at the Urological Department at the University Hospital of Luebeck. Information was collected relating to anticoagulation, patient-specific and surgery-specific risk factors, and complications.

RESULTS

In all, 3609 surgeries were analyzed: 77.8% of patients received no medical prophylaxis, 10.2% received an aggregation inhibitor, and 8.5% synthetic, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin. Heparin was administered to 80.4% of patients after surgery. During an average hospital stay of 4.5 days, 93.3% of the patients received no change in anticoagulation. Merely 0.8% of all patients suffered from clinical thomboembolic events within 28 days. In contrast the number of bleedings was higher with 20.3% (minor: 4.8%, major: 15.5%).

CONCLUSION

We found a slight risk for postoperative thromboembolism (0.8%). The risk for postoperative bleeding in contrast was 20.3%, including 15.5% major bleedings. The results are discussed in relation to the current guidelines.