1
|
Schulte A, Liu G, Subbaraman MS, Kerr WC, Leslie D, Roberts SCM. Relationships Between Alcohol Policies and Infant Morbidities and Injuries. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:980-988. [PMID: 38340136 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous research has found that policies specifically focused on pregnant people's alcohol use are largely ineffective. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the relationships between general population policies regulating alcohol physical availability and outcomes related to pregnant people's alcohol use, specifically infant morbidities and injuries. METHODS Outcome data were obtained from Merative MarketScan, a longitudinal commercial insurance claims data set. Policy data were obtained from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's Alcohol Policy Information System, the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association, and Liquor Handbooks and merged using policies in effect during the estimated year of conception. Relationships between state-level policies regulating sites, days/hours, and government monopoly of liquor sales and infant morbidities and injuries were examined. Analyses used logistic regression with individual controls, fixed effects for state and year, state-specific time trends, and SEs clustered by state. The study analysis was conducted from 2021 to 2023. RESULTS The analytic sample included 1,432,979 infant-birthing person pairs, specifically people aged 25-50 years who gave birth to a singleton between 2006 and 2019. A total of 3.1% of infants had a morbidity and 2.1% of infants had an injury. State government monopoly on liquor sales was associated with reduced odds of infant morbidities and injuries, whereas gas station liquor sales were associated with increased odds of infant morbidities and injuries. Allowing liquor sales after 10PM was associated with increased odds for infant injuries. No effect was found for allowing liquor sales in grocery stores or on Sundays. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that limiting alcohol availability for the general population may help reduce adverse infant outcomes related to pregnant people's alcohol use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Schulte
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California.
| | - Guodong Liu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | - Douglas Leslie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah C M Roberts
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bruzelius E, Underhill K, Askari MS, Kajeepeta S, Bates L, Prins SJ, Jarlenski M, Martins SS. Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use in the United States: A survey of state policies and systematic review of their public health impacts. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 126:104380. [PMID: 38484529 PMCID: PMC11056296 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use may be associated with unintended adverse health consequences. However, in a rapidly shifting policy climate, current information has not been summarized. We conducted a survey of U.S. state policies that utilize criminal or civil legal system penalties to address prenatal drug use. We then systematically identified empirical studies evaluating these policies and summarized their potential public health impacts. METHODS Using existing databases and original statutory research, we surveyed current U.S. state-level prenatal drug use policies authorizing explicit criminalization, involuntary commitment, civil child abuse substantiation, and parental rights termination. Next, we systematically identified quantitative associations between these policies and health outcomes, restricting to U.S.-based peer-reviewed research, published January 2000-December 2022. Results described study characteristics and synthesized the evidence on health-related harms and benefits associated with punitive policies. Validity threats were described narratively. RESULTS By 2022, two states had adopted policies explicitly authorizing criminal prosecution, and five states allowed pregnancy-specific and drug use-related involuntary civil commitment. Prenatal drug use was grounds for substantiating civil child abuse and terminating parental rights in 22 and five states, respectively. Of the 16 review-identified articles, most evaluated associations between punitive policies generally (k = 12), or civil child abuse policies specifically (k = 2), and multiple outcomes, including drug treatment utilization (k = 6), maltreatment reporting and foster care entry (k = 5), neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome (NDWS, k = 4) and other pregnancy and birth-related outcomes (k = 3). Most included studies reported null associations or suggested increases in adverse outcome following punitive policy adoption. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of U.S. states have adopted policies that respond to prenatal drug use with legal system penalties. While additional research is needed to clarify whether such approaches engender overt health harms, current evidence indicates that punitive policies are not associated with public health benefits, and therefore constitute ineffective policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Bruzelius
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Kristen Underhill
- Cornell University Law School, 306 Myron Taylor Hall Ithaca, NY 14853-4901, USA
| | - Melanie S Askari
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Sandhya Kajeepeta
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Lisa Bates
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Seth J Prins
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Marian Jarlenski
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, A619 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| | - Silvia S Martins
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Subbaraman MS, Schulte A, Berglas NF, Kerr WC, Thomas S, Treffers R, Liu G, Roberts SCM. Associations between alcohol taxes and varied health outcomes among women of reproductive age and infants. Alcohol Alcohol 2024; 59:agae015. [PMID: 38497162 PMCID: PMC10945295 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agae015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE No studies have examined whether alcohol taxes may be relevant for reducing harms related to pregnant people's drinking. METHOD We examined how beverage-specific ad valorem, volume-based, and sales taxes are associated with outcomes across three data sets. Drinking outcomes came from women of reproductive age in the 1990-2020 US National Alcohol Surveys (N = 11 659 women $\le$ 44 years); treatment admissions data came from the 1992-2019 Treatment Episode Data Set: Admissions (N = 1331 state-years; 582 436 pregnant women admitted to treatment); and infant and maternal outcomes came from the 2005-19 Merative Marketscan® database (1 432 979 birthing person-infant dyads). Adjusted analyses for all data sets included year fixed effects, state-year unemployment and poverty, and accounted for clustering by state. RESULTS Models yield no robust significant associations between taxes and drinking. Increased spirits ad valorem taxes were robustly associated with lower rates of treatment admissions [adjusted IRR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.99]. Increased wine and spirits volume-based taxes were both robustly associated with lower odds of infant morbidities [wine aOR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99; spirits aOR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.00] and lower odds of severe maternal morbidities [wine aOR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.97; spirits aOR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.97]. Having an off-premise spirits sales tax was also robustly related to lower odds of severe maternal morbidities [aOR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.96]. CONCLUSIONS Results show protective associations between increased wine and spirits volume-based and sales taxes with infant and maternal morbidities. Policies that index tax rates to inflation might yield more public health benefits, including for pregnant people and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meenakshi S Subbaraman
- Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, 555 12th St, Oakland, CA 94607, United States
| | - Alex Schulte
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, S1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| | - Nancy F Berglas
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, S1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - Sue Thomas
- National Capital Region Center, Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation, 4061 Powder Mill Road Suite 350, Beltsville, MD 20705-3113, United States
| | - Ryan Treffers
- National Capital Region Center, Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation, 4061 Powder Mill Road Suite 350, Beltsville, MD 20705-3113, United States
| | - Guodong Liu
- Center for Applied Studies in Health Economics, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, 90 Hope Drive, Suite 2200, Hershey, PA 17033, United States
| | - Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, S1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Binder A, Kilian C, Hanke S, Banabak M, Berkenhoff C, Petersen KU, Batra A. Stigma and self-stigma among women within the context of the german "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation: A qualitative analysis of online forums and blogs. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 124:104331. [PMID: 38241887 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many countries, including Germany, it is recommended to abstain from alcohol during pregnancy to avoid harm to the baby. In this qualitative research study, analysis of online forums was conducted to explore women's perception of the German "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation with regard to stigma and self-stigma. METHODS We used a grounded theory approach to analyze online forum discussions on alcohol use during pregnancy. Data consisted of 9 discussion threads from 5 different forums and blogs involving 115 participants in total. We used key concepts developed during analysis and the theory of stigma to interpret the posts. RESULTS We identified five key themes: (1) Low alcohol health literacy as a breeding ground for stigmatization; (2) The widespread assumption that maternal abstinence is a prerequisite for being considered a "good mother"; (3) Interpersonal role conflicts and a guilty conscience as a result of stigmatization or self-stigmatization; (4) Paying little attention to the role of psychosocial factors in alcohol consumption, especially regarding partner responsibility during pregnancy.; (5) Understanding the "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation as a complete ban, associated with loss of autonomy. CONCLUSION The current method of communicating the "zero alcohol during pregnancy" recommendation may have unintended consequences. Specifically, misconceptions about the harm associated with low alcohol consumption and setting high expectations of motherhood are factors that can contribute to stigma or self-stigma and potentially undermine self-efficacy, help-seeking behavior, and overcoming the barriers to alcohol health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Binder
- University Hospital Tübingen; Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; DZPG (German Center for Mental Health), partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Carolin Kilian
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara Hanke
- University Hospital Tübingen; Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Meryem Banabak
- University Hospital Tübingen; Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Clara Berkenhoff
- University Hospital Tübingen; Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kay Uwe Petersen
- University Hospital Tübingen; Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anil Batra
- University Hospital Tübingen; Department of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Addiction Medicine and Addiction Research Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; DZPG (German Center for Mental Health), partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Subbaraman MS, Sesline K, Kerr WC, Roberts SC. Associations between state-level general population alcohol policies and drinking outcomes among women of reproductive age: Results from 1984 to 2020 National Alcohol Surveys. ALCOHOL, CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 47:1773-1782. [PMID: 38051149 PMCID: PMC10849058 DOI: 10.1111/acer.15156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policies specific to alcohol use during pregnancy have not been found to reduce risks related to alcohol use during pregnancy. In contrast, general population alcohol policies are protective for the general population. Here, we assessed whether US state-level general population alcohol policies are related to drinking outcomes among women of reproductive age. METHODS We conducted secondary analyses of 1984-2020 National Alcohol Survey data (N = 13,555 women ≤44 years old). State-level policy exposures were government control of liquor retail sales, heavy beer at gas stations, heavy beer at grocery stores, liquor at grocery stores, Sunday off-premise liquor sales, and blood alcohol concentration (BAC) driving limits (no law, 0.10 limit, 0.05-0.08 limit). Outcomes were past 12-month number of drinks, ≥5 drink days, ≥8 drink days, and any DSM-IV alcohol abuse/dependence symptoms. Regressions adjusted for individual and state-level controls, clustering by state, and included fixed effects for survey month and year. RESULTS Allowing Sunday off-premise liquor sales versus not was related to having 1.20 times as many drinks (95% CI: 1.01, 1.42), 1.41 times as many ≥5 drink days (95% CI: 1.08, 1.85), and 1.91 times as many ≥8 drink days (95% CI: 1.28, 2.83). BAC limits of 0.05-0.08 for driving versus no BAC limit was related to 0.51 times fewer drinks (95% CI: 0.27, 0.96), 0.28 times fewer days with ≥5 drinks (95% CI: 0.10, 0.75), and 0.20 times fewer days with ≥8 drinks (95% CI: 0.08, 0.47). CONCLUSIONS US state-level policies prohibiting Sunday off-premise liquor sales and BAC limits of 0.05-0.08 for driving are related to less past 12-month overall and heavy drinking among women 18-44 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meenakshi S. Subbaraman
- Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, 555 12th St, Oakland, CA 94607 USA
| | - Katrina Sesline
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - William C. Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - Sarah C.M. Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barber CM, Terplan M. Principles of care for pregnant and parenting people with substance use disorder: the obstetrician gynecologist perspective. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1045745. [PMID: 37292372 PMCID: PMC10246753 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1045745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Substance use in pregnant and parenting persons is common, yet still underdiagnosed. Substance use disorder (SUD) is one of the most stigmatized and undertreated chronic medical conditions, and this is exacerbated in the perinatal period. Many providers are not sufficiently trained in screening or treatment for substance use, so gaps in care for this population persist. Punitive policies towards substance use in pregnancy have proliferated, lead to decreased prenatal care, do not improve birth outcomes, and disproportionately impact Black, Indigenous, and other families of color. We discuss the importance of understanding the unique barriers of pregnancy-capable persons and drug overdose as one of the leading causes of maternal death in the United States. We highlight the principles of care from the obstetrician-gynecologist perspective including care for the dyad, person-centered language, and current medical terminology. We then review treatment of the most common substances, discuss SUD during the birthing hospitalization, and highlight the high risk of mortality in the postpartum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecily May Barber
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mishka Terplan
- Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
White SA, McCourt A, Bandara S, Goodman DJ, Patel E, McGinty EE. Implementation of State Laws Giving Pregnant People Priority Access to Drug Treatment Programs in the Context of Coexisting Punitive Laws. Womens Health Issues 2023; 33:117-125. [PMID: 36272928 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to increased prenatal drug use since the 2000s, states have adopted treatment-oriented laws giving pregnant and postpartum people priority access to public drug treatment programs as well as multiple punitive policy responses. No prior studies have systematically characterized these state statutes or examined implementation of state priority access laws in the context of co-existing punitive laws. METHODS We conducted legal mapping to examine state priority access laws and their overlap with state laws deeming prenatal drug use to be child maltreatment, mandating reporting of prenatal drug use to child protective services, or criminalizing prenatal drug use. We also conducted interviews with 51 state leaders with expertise on their states' prenatal drug use laws to understand how priority access laws were implemented. RESULTS Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia have a priority access law, and more than 80% of these jurisdictions also have one of the punitive prenatal drug use laws described. Leaders reported major barriers to implementing state priority access laws, including the lack of drug treatment programs, stigma, and conflicts with punitive prenatal drug use laws. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that state laws granting pregnant and postpartum people priority access to drug treatment programs are likely insufficient to significantly increase access to evidence-based drug treatment. Punitive state prenatal drug use laws may counteract priority access laws by impeding treatment seeking. Findings highlight the need to allocate additional resources to drug treatment for pregnant and postpartum people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A White
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Alexander McCourt
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sachini Bandara
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daisy J Goodman
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Esita Patel
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emma E McGinty
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wolfson L, Poole N. Supportive alcohol policy as a key element of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder prevention. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 19:17455057231151838. [PMID: 36718116 PMCID: PMC9893348 DOI: 10.1177/17455057231151838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
In Canada, a Four-Part Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) Prevention has been developed that describes a continuum of multi-sectoral efforts, including broad awareness campaigns, safe and respectful conversations around pregnancy and alcohol use, and holistic and wraparound support services for pregnant and postpartum women with alcohol, and other health and social concerns. Supportive alcohol policy is at the centre of the four mutually reinforcing levels of prevention. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe alcohol policies related to specific levels of FASD prevention, and to consider the implications of alcohol policies on FASD prevention and women's and fetal health. The majority of the evidence focused on alcohol in pregnancy guidelines, alcohol warning labels, and knowledge and uptake of national or regional alcohol and pregnancy guidelines. Several US studies described shifts in alcohol and pregnancy policy over the 7-year period, including moves to punitive approaches that criminalize women's substance use or prompt child apprehension. This review indicates that more attention could be paid to the role of alcohol policy in FASD prevention and in promoting women's and fetal health, and that policy actions and advocacy could be important catalysts for both FASD prevention and women's health promotion. Moving forward, it is essential that alcohol policies are rooted in evidence; attend to and promote women's health including health during pregnancy; and are collaborative in order to prompt a higher standard of care, and more holistically respond to the factors that contribute to women's alcohol use during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Wolfson
- Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Canada FASD Research Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Lindsay Wolfson, Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, E209-4500 Oak Street Box 48, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
| | - Nancy Poole
- Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Canada FASD Research Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McCOURT ALEXANDERD, WHITE SARAHA, BANDARA SACHINI, SCHALL THEO, GOODMAN DAISYJ, PATEL ESITA, McGINTY EMMAE. Development and Implementation of State and Federal Child Welfare Laws Related to Drug Use in Pregnancy. Milbank Q 2022; 100:1076-1120. [PMID: 36510665 PMCID: PMC9836249 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Over the past several decades, states have adopted policies intended to address prenatal drug use. Many of these policies have utilized existing child welfare mechanisms despite potential adverse effects. Recent federal policy changes were intended to facilitate care for substance-exposed infants and their families, but state uptake has been incomplete. Using legal mapping and qualitative interviews, we examine the development of state child welfare laws related to substance use in pregnancy from 1974 to 2019, with a particular focus on laws adopted between 2009 and 2019. Our findings reveal policies that may disincentivize treatment-seeking and widespread implementation challenges, suggesting a need for new treatment-oriented policies and refined state and federal guidance. CONTEXT Amid increasing drug use among pregnant individuals, legislators have pursued policies intended to reduce substance use during pregnancy. Many states have utilized child welfare mechanisms despite evidence that these policies might disincentivize treatment-seeking. Recent federal changes were intended to facilitate care for substance-exposed infants and their families, but implementation of these changes at the state level has been slowed and complicated by existing state policies. We seek to provide a timeline of state child welfare laws related to prenatal drug use and describe stakeholder perceptions of implementation. METHODS We catalogued child welfare laws related to prenatal drug use, including laws that defined child abuse and neglect and established child welfare reporting standards, for all 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), from 1974 to 2019. In the 19 states that changed relevant laws between 2009 and 2019, qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders to capture state-level perspectives on policy implementation. FINDINGS Twenty-four states and DC have passed laws classifying prenatal drug use as child abuse or neglect. Thirty-seven states and DC mandate reporting of suspected prenatal drug use to the state. Qualitative findings suggested variation in implementation within and across states between 2009 and 2019 and revealed that implementation of changes to federal law during that decade, intended to encourage states to provide comprehensive social services and linkages to evidence-based care to drug-exposed infants and their families, has been complicated by existing policies and a lack of guidance for practitioners. CONCLUSIONS Many states have enacted laws that may disincentivize treatment-seeking among pregnant people who use drugs and lead to family separation. To craft effective state laws and support their implementation, state policymakers and practitioners could benefit from a treatment-oriented approach to prenatal substance use and additional state and federal guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ALEXANDER D. McCOURT
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUnited States
| | - SARAH A. WHITE
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUnited States
| | - SACHINI BANDARA
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUnited States
| | - THEO SCHALL
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUnited States
| | - DAISY J. GOODMAN
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeHanoverNew HampshireUnited States
| | - ESITA PATEL
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUnited States
| | - EMMA E. McGINTY
- Division of Health Policy and EconomicsDepartment of Population Health SciencesWeill Cornell MedicineNew York, New YorkUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Afraid to Seek Care? A fixed effects analysis of State Fetal Protection Legislation and prenatal healthcare utilization from 2002 to 2015. SSM Popul Health 2022; 20:101273. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
11
|
Roberts SCM, Raifman S, Biggs MA. Relationship between mandatory warning signs for cannabis use during pregnancy policies and birth outcomes in the Western United States. Prev Med 2022; 164:107297. [PMID: 36228875 PMCID: PMC9762150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
As U.S. states legalize recreational cannabis, some enact policies requiring Mandatory Warning Signs for cannabis during pregnancy (MWS-cannabis). While previous research has found MWS for alcohol during pregnancy (MWS-alcohol) associated with increases in adverse birth outcomes, research has not examined effects of MWS-cannabis. This study uses Vital Statistics birth certificate data from June 2015 - June 2017 in seven western states and policy data from NIAAA's Alcohol Policy Information System and takes advantage of the quasi-experiment created by Washington State's enactment of MWS-cannabis in June 2016, while nearby states did not. Outcomes are birthweight, low birthweight, gestation, and preterm birth. Analyses use a Difference-in-Difference approach and compare changes in outcomes in Washington to nearby states in the process of legalizing recreational cannabis (Alaska, California, Nevada) and, as a secondary analysis, nearby states continuing to criminalize recreational cannabis (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming). Birthweight was -7.03 g lower (95% CI -10.06, -4.00) and low birthweight 0.3% higher (95% CI 0.0, 0.6) when pregnant people were exposed to MWS-cannabis than when pregnant people were not exposed to MWS-cannabis, both statistically significant (p = 0.005 and p = 0.041). Patterns for gestation, -0.014 weeks earlier (95% CI -0.038, 0.010) and preterm birth 0.2% higher (95% CI -0.2, 0.7), were similar, although not statistically significant (p = 0.168 and 0.202). The direction of findings was similar in secondary analyses, although statistical significance varied. Similar to MWS-alcohol, enacting MWS-cannabis is associated with an increase in adverse birth outcomes. The idea that MWS-cannabis provide a public health benefit is not evidence-based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States of America.
| | - Sarah Raifman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States of America
| | - M Antonia Biggs
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Development of a Blueprint for Integrated Care for Vulnerable Pregnant Women. Matern Child Health J 2022; 26:451-460. [PMID: 35000072 PMCID: PMC8917045 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03340-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose There has been increasing awareness of perinatal health and organisation of maternal and child health care in the Netherlands as a result of poor perinatal outcomes. Vulnerable women have a higher risk of these poor perinatal outcomes and also have a higher chance of receiving less adequate care. Therefore, within a consortium, embracing 100 organisations among professionals, educators, researchers, and policymakers, a joint aim was defined to support maternal and child health care professionals and social care professionals in providing adequate, integrated care for vulnerable pregnant women. Description Within the consortium, vulnerability is defined as the presence of psychopathology, psychosocial problems, and/or substance use, combined with a lack of individual and/or social resources. Three studies focussing on population characteristics, organisation of care and knowledge, skills, and attitudes of professionals regarding vulnerable pregnant women, were carried out. Outcomes were discussed in three field consultations. Assessment The outcomes of the studies, followed by the field consultations, resulted in a blueprint that was subsequently adapted to local operational care pathways in seven obstetric collaborations (organisational structures that consist of obstetricians of a single hospital and collaborating midwifery practices) and their collaborative partners. We conducted 12 interviews to evaluate the adaptation of the blueprint to local operational care pathways and its’ embedding into the obstetric collaborations. Conclusion Practice-based research resulted in a blueprint tailored to the needs of maternal and child health care professionals and social care professionals and providing structure and uniformity to integrated care provision for vulnerable pregnant women.
Collapse
|
13
|
Faherty LJ, Heins S, Kranz AM, Patrick SW, Stein BD. Association between punitive policies and neonatal abstinence syndrome among Medicaid-insured infants in complex policy environments. Addiction 2022; 117:162-171. [PMID: 34096671 PMCID: PMC8648865 DOI: 10.1111/add.15602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To estimate the association between punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy and odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosis among Medicaid-insured infants, and to estimate this association controlling for the presence of four other policies related to substance use in pregnancy. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Analysis of live births in Medicaid claims data from 39 US states in varying years between 2006 and 2014 using weighted generalized linear models with clustered standard errors and state and year fixed-effects. MEASUREMENTS NAS rates in states without punitive policies were compared with rates in states with policies before and after policy enactment using logistic regression models adjusted for individual and county-level factors and including state and year fixed-effects. We estimated odds of NAS controlling for the presence of a potentially treatment-deterring policy requiring reporting of suspected prenatal substance use, and three treatment-supportive policies that create targeted programs for pregnant and postpartum women, prioritize pregnant women's access to substance use disorder treatment programs and prohibit discrimination towards pregnant women in treatment programs. FINDINGS Among 9 714 798 weighted live births (1 896 082 unweighted), 49 670 (0.51%) had an NAS diagnosis. The findings were inconclusive as to whether or not punitive policies were associated with odds of NAS either in the short or long term. Odds of NAS among infants born in states with reporting policies were lower than those born in states without such policies [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.98]. CONCLUSIONS In the United States, punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy do not appear to be associated with lower odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Reporting policies, which are heterogenous in their components and implementation, appear to be associated with lower odds of NAS when controlling for other relevant policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J. Faherty
- RAND Corporation, Boston, MA,School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Stephen W. Patrick
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee,Mildred Stahlman Division of Neonatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee,Vanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy, Nashville, Tennessee,Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee,RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bradley D. Stein
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA,School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Postnatal depression: identification of risk factors in the short-stay maternity program in Belgium. A cross-sectional study. BJGP Open 2021; 5:BJGPO.2021.0127. [PMID: 34465576 PMCID: PMC9447299 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postnatal depression (PND) is one of the most frequent complications in women of childbearing age in the developed world. The onset of PND is influenced by several risk factors. In an attempt to avoid unnecessary long maternity stays, the Short Stay Maternity programme was launched, shifting care from the hospital environment to the outpatient setting. Aim In order to develop an efficient programme to trace vulnerable women after childbirth and to provide support within primary care, the aim was to create an inventory of the risk factors for PND within the population of women participating in the short-stay programme. Design & setting This study is a cross-sectional study without follow-up. Women in Belgium were invited by email to participate in the Short Stay Maternity programme within 3 months of delivery. Method The questionnaire addressed background features and feelings during the maternity period, supplemented with the validated Dutch version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The primary outcome measure of the questionnaire was the score on the EPDS. Results A total of 131 (27.46%) of the invited women participated. Sixteen participants (12.21%) presented with a positive score on the EPDS. The odds ratio (OR) for a positive score on the EPDS when experiencing negative feelings was 13.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.14 to 44.01). If only material support was provided, the OR for a positive EPDS score was OR 11.2 (95% CI = 2.72 to 55.5). Conclusion In this study, two risk factors were identified for PND: negative feelings during pregnancy and the provision of only material support by the partner.
Collapse
|
15
|
Roberts SCM, Thompson TA, Taylor KJ. Dismantling the legacy of failed policy approaches to pregnant people's use of alcohol and drugs. Int Rev Psychiatry 2021; 33:502-513. [PMID: 34238098 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2021.1905616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Most U.S. states have one or more pregnancy-specific alcohol or drug policies. However, research evidence indicates that some of these policies lead to increases in adverse birth outcomes, including low-birthweight and preterm birth. We offer explanations for why these ineffective policies related to pregnant people's use of alcohol and drugs in the U.S. exist, including: abortion politics; racism and the 'War on Drugs'; the design and application of scientific evidence; and lack of a pro-active vision. We propose alternative processes and concepts to guide strategies for developing new policy approaches that will support the health and well-being of pregnant people who use alcohol and drugs and their children. Processes include: involving people most affected by pregnancy-specific alcohol and drug policies in developing alternative policy and practice approaches as well as future research initiatives. Additionally, we propose that research funding support the development of policies and practices that bolster health and well-being rather than primarily documenting the harms of different substances. Concepts include accepting that policies adopted in response to pregnant people's use of alcohol and drugs cause harms and working to do better, as well as connecting to efforts that re-envision the child welfare system in the U.S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Variations by Education Status in Relationships Between Alcohol/Pregnancy Policies and Birth Outcomes and Prenatal Care Utilization: A Legal Epidemiology Study. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2021; 26 Suppl 2, Advancing Legal Epidemiology:S71-S83. [PMID: 32004225 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Previous research finds that some state policies regarding alcohol use during pregnancy (alcohol/pregnancy policies) increase low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB), decrease prenatal care utilization, and have inconclusive relationships with alcohol use during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This research examines whether effects of 8 alcohol/pregnancy policies vary by education status, hypothesizing that health benefits of policies will be concentrated among women with more education and health harms will be concentrated among women with less education. METHODS This study uses 1972-2015 Vital Statistics data, 1985-2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, policy data from National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's Alcohol Policy Information System and original legal research, and state-level control variables. Analyses include multivariable logistic regressions with education-policy interaction terms as main predictors. RESULTS The impact of alcohol/pregnancy policies varied by education status for PTB and LBW for all policies, for prenatal care use for some policies, and generally did not vary for alcohol use for any policy. Hypotheses were not supported. Five policies had adverse effects on PTB and LBW for high school graduates. Six policies had adverse effects on PTB and LBW for women with more than high school education. In contrast, 2 policies had beneficial effects on PTB and/or LBW for women with less than high school education. For prenatal care, patterns were generally similar, with adverse effects concentrated among women with more education and beneficial effects among women with less education. Although associations between policies and alcohol use during pregnancy varied by education, there was no clear pattern. CONCLUSIONS Effects of alcohol/pregnancy policies on birth outcomes and prenatal care use vary by education status, with women with more education typically experiencing health harms and women with less education either not experiencing the harms or experiencing health benefits. New policy approaches that reduce harms related to alcohol use during pregnancy are needed. Public health professionals should take the lead on identifying and developing policy approaches that reduce harms related to alcohol use during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Terplan M. Can Perinatal Quality Collaboratives Address Racial (In)Justice? Am J Public Health 2020; 110:1728-1729. [PMID: 33180588 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.305982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mishka Terplan
- Mishka Terplan is with Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, and with the National Clinician Consultation Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Care for Incarcerated Pregnant People With Opioid Use Disorder: Equity and Justice Implications. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136:576-581. [PMID: 32769655 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
With the simultaneous rise in maternal opioid use disorder (OUD) and the incarceration of pregnant people in the United States, we must ensure that prisons and jails adequately address the health and well-being of incarcerated pregnant people with OUD. Despite long-established, clear, and evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of OUD during pregnancy, incarcerated pregnant people with OUD do not consistently receive medication treatment and are instead forced into opioid withdrawal. This inadequate care raises multiple concerns, including issues of justice and equity, considerations regarding the legal and ethical obligations of the provision of health care, and violations of the medical and legal rights of incarcerated people. We offer recommendations for improving care for this often-ignored group.
Collapse
|
19
|
Roberts SCM. Good Intentions Are Not Enough: Truly Supporting Pregnant Women With Substance Use Disorders Requires Evaluating the Impact of Our Policies and Practices. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/23293691.2020.1780398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. M. Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California–San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tebeka S, De Premorel Higgons A, Dubertret C, Le Strat Y. Changes in alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking in U.S. Women of childbearing-age and peripartum between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. Addict Behav 2020; 107:106389. [PMID: 32244086 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heavy episodic drinking (HED) is a frequent pattern of alcohol use in women of childbearing age with severe consequences for both women and child, making it a major public health issue. Some states in the US have reported laws that target the use of alcohol during pregnancy. Our aim was to examine the evolution of 12-month alcohol use and 12-month HED prevalence in childbearing age, pregnant and postpartum women between 2001 and 2002 and 2012-2013. METHODS Our data were drawn from the National Epidemiologic Study of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) conducted in 2001-2002 and NESARC-III conducted in 2012-2013, two independent, representative samples of U.S. POPULATION Past-year alcohol use and HED was evaluated according face-to-face interview for all participants. RESULTS Our sample consisted of 24,536 women of childbearing age, including 2846 pregnant and postpartum women. Prevalence of 12-month alcohol use increased from 2001 to 2002 to 2012-2013, in both childbearing-aged women (66.14% to 75.48%; aOR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.46-1.80) and pregnant and postpartum women (57.81% to 66.19%; aOR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.25-1.94). Prevalence of 12-month HED increased from 2001 to 2002 to 2012-2013, in both childbearing-aged women (22.57% to 36.34%; aOR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.79-2.16) and pregnant and postpartum women (17.85% to 28.21%; aOR = 1.84, 95%CI = 1.47-2.30). CONCLUSIONS Alcohol use and HED increased in last 10 years in both childbearing age and pregnant and postpartum US women. That questions the impact of implemented laws, policies and alcohol guidelines in this population within the last 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Tebeka
- APHP, Department of Psychiatry, Universitary Hospital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France; Université de Paris, France; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris F-75014, France.
| | - Alix De Premorel Higgons
- APHP, Department of Psychiatry, Universitary Hospital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France; Université de Paris, France; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris F-75014, France.
| | - Caroline Dubertret
- APHP, Department of Psychiatry, Universitary Hospital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France; Université de Paris, France; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris F-75014, France.
| | - Yann Le Strat
- APHP, Department of Psychiatry, Universitary Hospital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France; Université de Paris, France; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris F-75014, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Martin R, Bruxner G, Ng G, Brewster C, Kothari A. Drowning our sorrows: clinical and ethical considerations of termination in alcohol-affected pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:356. [PMID: 32522252 PMCID: PMC7288674 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03012-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Martin
- Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia
| | - George Bruxner
- Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia.,Metro North Mental Health Service, Herston, 4029, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4067, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gary Ng
- Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia
| | - Catherine Brewster
- Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia.,Department of Alcohol & Other Drugs, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, 4020, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alka Kothari
- Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia. .,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4067, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Faherty LJ, Stein BD, Terplan M. Consensus Guidelines and State Policies: The Gap Between Principle and Practice at the Intersection of Substance Use and Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2:100137. [PMID: 33089133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The opioid crisis has had a substantial effect on women who are pregnant and parenting, focusing both public health and policymaker attention on opioids and on other substance use in pregnancy and postpartum. There is overwhelming consensus on the principle of a non-punitive approach towards substance use in pregnancy. Experts universally endorse supportive policies, which reduce barriers to care, and oppose punitive policies, which can increase the fear of legal penalties, discouraging women from seeking prenatal care and addiction treatment during pregnancy. We review the change over time in state-level policy environments around substance use in pregnancy and contrast the policy response with the principles and guidance from professional societies and federal agencies. Between 2000 and 2015, more states adopted punitive policies than supportive policies, in direct contrast with guidance from professional societies and federal agencies. The increase in punitive policies over the past two decades suggests that the gap between principles and practice is widening. Furthermore, the increase in punitive policies is occurring in the context of significant structural barriers to comprehensive health care across the woman's entire life course, a growing awareness of racial and ethnic inequities in maternal morbidity and mortality, and increasing restrictions at the state level on abortion access. Women with substance use disorder (SUD) need comprehensive, coordinated, evidence-based, trauma-informed, family-centered care. This care should be delivered in a compassionate and non-punitive environment, and clinicians, policymakers, and public health officials all have a role to play in achieving this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Faherty
- Boston, MA, RAND Corporation and Boston University School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics
| | - Bradley D Stein
- Pittsburgh, PA, RAND Corporation and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Woodruff K, Roberts SCM. "Alcohol During Pregnancy? Nobody Does That Anymore": State Legislators' Use of Evidence in Making Policy on Alcohol Use in Pregnancy. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2020. [PMID: 31250804 DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In recent years, U.S. states have passed many laws addressing alcohol use in pregnancy, despite limited evidence on the impact of such policies. This study explores how state legislators use evidence when making policy on alcohol use in pregnancy. METHOD Study data are drawn from semistructured interviews with 29 state lawmakers and their aides in Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia, conducted in March through July 2017. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed by inductive and deductive methods. RESULTS Despite evidence on the harms of alcohol use in pregnancy, most lawmakers did not express concern about this topic. Instead, they expressed concern about opioid use in pregnancy. Personal experiences, anecdotes, and known contacts influenced legislators' views on substance use in pregnancy, whereas evidence, for the most part, did not. The intermediaries who typically bring evidence about problems and solutions to legislators did not appear to be raising the issue of alcohol use in pregnancy on legislators' agenda. CONCLUSIONS Basic evidence on the prevalence and harms of alcohol use in pregnancy did not appear to influence state lawmakers' policy priorities. Concern over opioid use in general may provide a window of opportunity to educate legislators on the relative scope and harms of alcohol and opioid use in pregnancy. It remains unclear why states are passing alcohol-in-pregnancy policies. More research is needed to explore how state lawmakers form their understanding of substance use in pregnancy and related policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Woodruff
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The Presence and Consequences of Abortion Aversion in Scientific Research Related to Alcohol Use during Pregnancy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16162888. [PMID: 31412544 PMCID: PMC6720613 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Recent research has found that most U.S. state policies related to alcohol use during pregnancy adversely impact health. Other studies indicate that state policymaking around substance use in pregnancy—especially in the U.S.—appears to be influenced by an anti-abortion agenda rather than by public health motivations. This commentary explores the ways that scientists’ aversion to abortion appear to influence science and thus policymaking around alcohol and pregnancy. The three main ways abortion aversion shows up in the literature related to alcohol use during pregnancy include: (1) a shift from the recommendation of abortion for “severely chronic alcoholic women” to the non-acknowledgment of abortion as an outcome of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy; (2) the concern that recommendations of abstinence from alcohol use during pregnancy lead to terminations of otherwise wanted pregnancies; and (3) the presumption of abortion as a negative pregnancy outcome. Thus, abortion aversion appears to influence the science related to alcohol use during pregnancy, and thus policymaking—to the detriment of developing and adopting policies that reduce the harms from alcohol during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Roberts SCM, Berglas NF, Subbaraman MS, Mericle A, Thomas S, Kerr WC. Racial differences in the relationship between alcohol/pregnancy policies and birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization: A legal epidemiology study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 201:244-252. [PMID: 31255852 PMCID: PMC6774667 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES State policies regarding alcohol use during pregnancy (alcohol/pregnancy policies) have been in effect for more than 40 years. Previous research finds some policies increase adverse birth outcomes and decrease prenatal care utilization. This research examines whether effects of alcohol/pregnancy policies vary by race; the general hypothesis is that health benefits of policies are concentrated among White women and health harms of policies are concentrated among Black women. METHODS This study uses 1972-2015 Vital Statistics data and policy data from NIAAA's Alcohol Policy Information System and original legal research. The dataset includes more than 150 million singleton births. Outcomes are preterm birth (PTB), low birthweight (LBW), and prenatal care utilization. Logistic regression models include raceXpolicy interaction terms as main predictors, adjust for individual- and state-level controls, include fixed effects for state, year and state-specific time trends, and account for clustering by state. RESULTS The impact of alcohol/pregnancy policies varied by race for preterm birth, varied in a few cases for low birthweight, and generally did not vary for prenatal care utilization. The hypothesis regarding the direction of differential effects was not supported. Six policies had an adverse impact on PTB and/or LBW for White women. Findings differed for Black women; for Black women, four policies had a beneficial impact for PTB and one had an adverse impact for LBW. CONCLUSIONS The impact of alcohol/pregnancy policies on birth outcomes varies by race. Future research should explore why some policies appear to have opposite effects for White v. Black women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States.
| | - Nancy F Berglas
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| | - Meenakshi S Subbaraman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| | - Amy Mericle
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| | - Sue Thomas
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| | - William C Kerr
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Subbaraman MS, Roberts SCM. Costs associated with policies regarding alcohol use during pregnancy: Results from 1972-2015 Vital Statistics. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0215670. [PMID: 31067248 PMCID: PMC6505739 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE As of 2016, 43 US states have policies regarding alcohol use during pregnancy. A recent study found that out of eight state-level alcohol/pregnancy policies, six are significantly associated with poorer birth outcomes, and two are not associated with any outcomes. Here we estimate the excess numbers of low birthweight (LBW) and preterm births (PTB) related to these policies and their associated additional costs in the first year of life. METHODS Cost study using birth certificate data for 155,446,714 singleton live births in the United States between 1972-2015. Exposures were state- and month/year-specific indicators of having each of eight alcohol/pregnancy policies in place. Outcomes were excess numbers of LBW and PTB and associated costs in the first year of life. Fixed effects regressions with state-specific time trends were used for statistical analyses in 2018. RESULTS In 2015, policies mandating warning signs were associated with an excess of 7,375 LBW; policies defining alcohol use during pregnancy as child abuse/neglect were associated with an excess of 12,372 PTB; these excess adverse outcomes are associated with additional costs of $151,928,002 and $582,698,853 in the first year of life, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Multiple state-level alcohol pregnancy policies lead to increased prevalence of LBW and PTB, which cost hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Policymakers should consider adverse public health impacts of alcohol/pregnancy policies before expanding extant policies to new substances or adopting existing policies in new states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah C. M. Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
State Policies Targeting Alcohol Use during Pregnancy and Alcohol Use among Pregnant Women 1985-2016: Evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Womens Health Issues 2019; 29:213-221. [PMID: 30876695 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most states have at least one policy targeting alcohol use during pregnancy. The public health impact of these policies has not been examined. We sought to examine the relationship between state-level policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy and alcohol use among pregnant women. METHODS Data include state-level alcohol and pregnancy policy data and individual-level U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data about pregnant women's alcohol use from 1985 to 2016 (N = 57,194). Supportive policies include mandatory warning signs, priority substance abuse treatment, reporting requirements for data and treatment purposes, and prohibitions on criminal prosecution. Punitive policies include civil commitment, Child Protective Services reporting requirements, and child abuse/neglect. Analyses include logistic regression models that adjust for individual- and state-level controls, include fixed effects for state and year, account for clustering by state, and weight by probability of selection. RESULTS Relative to having no policies, supportive policy environments were associated with more any drinking, but not binge or heavy drinking. Of individual supportive policies, only the following relationships were statistically significant: mandatory warning signs was associated with lower odds of binge drinking, and priority treatment for pregnant women and women with children was associated with higher odds of any drinking. Relative to no policies, punitive policy environments were also associated with more drinking, but not with binge or heavy drinking. Of individual punitive policies, only child abuse/neglect was associated with lower odds of binge and heavy drinking. Mixed policy environments were not associated with any alcohol outcome. CONCLUSIONS Most policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy do not seem to be associated with less alcohol consumption during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Roberts SCM, Mericle AA, Subbaraman MS, Thomas S, Treffers RD, Delucchi KL, Kerr WC. Differential Effects of Pregnancy-Specific Alcohol Policies on Drinking Among Pregnant Women by Race/Ethnicity. Health Equity 2018; 2:356-365. [PMID: 30560228 PMCID: PMC6296158 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2018.0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Alcohol use during pregnancy is a significant public health concern. Nearly all U.S. states have enacted policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy, but there has been little research examining their impact, particularly across racial/ethnic groups. Methods: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and about eight state-level, pregnancy-specific alcohol policies from 1985 to 2016, the aim of this study was to examine the differential effects of these policies on drinking among pregnant women by race/ethnicity. Results: We found evidence of differential effects for priority treatment, prohibitions on criminal prosecution, and civil commitment policies. In relation to priority treatment policies, effects benefited versus harmed different racial/ethnic groups depending on whether the priority treatment policies were for pregnant women only or if they gave priority to both pregnant women and pregnant women with children. Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that benefits and harms from these policies do not appear to be equitably distributed across different racial/ethnic groups. Research considering the impact of alcohol/pregnancy policies should consider differential effects by race/ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Amy A Mericle
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | | | - Sue Thomas
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Santa Cruz, California
| | - Ryan D Treffers
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Santa Cruz, California
| | - Kevin L Delucchi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thomas S, Treffers R, Berglas NF, Drabble L, Roberts SCM. Drug Use During Pregnancy Policies in the United States From 1970 to 2016. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0091450918790790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
As U.S. states legalize marijuana and as governmental attention is paid to the “opioid crisis,” state policies pertaining to drug use during pregnancy are increasingly important. Little is known about the scope of state policies targeting drug use during pregnancy, how they have evolved, and how they compare to alcohol use during pregnancy policies. Method: Our 46-year original data set of statutes and regulations in U.S. states covers the entirety of state-level legislation in this policy domain. Data were obtained through original legal research and from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism’s Alcohol Policy Information System. Policies were analyzed individually as well as by classification as punitive toward or supportive of women. Results: The number of states with drug use during pregnancy policies has increased from 1 in 1974 to 43 in 2016. Policies started as punitive. By the mid- to late 1980s, supportive policies emerged, and mixed policy environments dominated in the 2000s. Overall, drug/pregnancy policy environments have become less supportive over time. Comparisons of drug laws to alcohol laws show that the policy trajectories started in opposite directions, but by 2016, the results were the same: Punitive policies were more prevalent than supportive policies across states. Moreover, there is a great deal of overlap between drug use during pregnancy policies and alcohol/pregnancy policies. Conclusion: This study breaks new ground. More studies are needed that explore the effects of these policies on alcohol and other drug use by pregnant women and on birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Thomas
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Treffers
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | - Laurie Drabble
- School of Social Work, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Subbaraman MS, Thomas S, Treffers R, Delucchi K, Kerr WC, Martinez P, Roberts SC. Associations Between State-Level Policies Regarding Alcohol Use Among Pregnant Women, Adverse Birth Outcomes, and Prenatal Care Utilization: Results from 1972 to 2013 Vital Statistics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2018; 42:10.1111/acer.13804. [PMID: 29912478 PMCID: PMC6298847 DOI: 10.1111/acer.13804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policies regarding alcohol use during pregnancy continue to be enacted and debated in the United States. However, no study to date has examined whether these policies are related to birth outcomes-the outcomes they ultimately aim to improve. Here, we assessed whether state-level policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy are related to birth outcomes, which has not been done comprehensively before. METHODS The study involved secondary analyses of birth certificate data from 148,048,208 U.S. singleton births between 1972 and 2013. Exposures were indicators of whether the following 8 policies were in effect during gestation: Mandatory Warning Signs (MWS), Priority Treatment for Pregnant Women, Priority Treatment for Pregnant Women/Women with Children, Reporting Requirements for Data and Treatment Purposes, Prohibitions Against Criminal Prosecution, Civil Commitment, Reporting Requirements for Child Protective Services Purposes, and Child Abuse/Child Neglect. Outcomes were low birthweight (<2,500 g), premature birth (<37 weeks), any prenatal care utilization (PCU), late PCU, inadequate PCU, and normal (≥7) APGAR score. Multivariable fixed-effect logistic regressions controlling for both maternal- and state-level covariates were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Of the 8 policies, 6 were significantly related to worse outcomes and 2 were not significantly related to any outcomes. The policy requiring MWS was related to the most outcomes: specifically, living in a state with MWS was related to 7% higher odds of low birthweight (p < 0.001); 4% higher odds of premature birth (p < 0.004); 18% lower odds of any PCU (p < 0.001); 12% higher odds of late PCU (p < 0.002); and 10% lower odds of a normal APGAR score (p < 0.001) compared to living in a state without MWS. CONCLUSIONS Most policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy do not have their intended effects and are related to worse birth outcomes and less PCU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sue Thomas
- Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation
| | | | - Kevin Delucchi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco
| | - William C. Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - Priscilla Martinez
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - Sarah C.M. Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences
| |
Collapse
|