Tumor markers in breast cancer follow-up: a potentially useful parameter still awaiting definitive assessment. Forza Operativa Nazionale sul Carcinoma Mammario (FONCaM)

Early Detection of Recurrences in the Follow-up of Primary Breast Cancer in an Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Phase

Aims and background

Periodic follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer is a common procedure for the early detection of recurrent disease in the asymptomatic state. Anyway, there is no clinical evidence that treatment of metastases may improve the prognosis if applied in the asymptomatic state. The aim of the present study was to investigate the modality of detection of the first relapse in the asymptomatic vs the symptomatic state.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 717 breast cancer patients who had been consecutively referred to the Parma Oncology Division during the period 1986 to December 1988. Recurrences were detected in the course of periodic follow-up.

Results

A total of 211 of the 408 patients evaluated had a first relapse with a median follow-up of 94.7 months. Local and distant recurrences were 49% and 47%, respectively. Bone recurrences represented 24% of the total first recurrences, then chest wall recurrences in 23%, local regional nodes in 13%, lung in 7%, liver in 4%, and brain in 2%. The distribution of the studied patients according to recurrence site and asymptomatic or symptomatic state was different: 69% of asymptomatic patiens (110) had a local recurrence vs 31% of symptomatic patients (101). A difference in survival was recorded in favor of cases detected in the asymptomatic state (P <0.001).

Conclusions

The present study suggests that an early detection of local recurrence might have a favorable impact on the prognosis of patients followed after primary treatment for breast cancer. It should be considered that any difference in survival could also be explained by several “biases” and that breast cancer follow-up is still an area of investigation open to discussion in which many questions remain to be clarified.

Haemostatic Changes; Plasma Levels of Alpha2-Antiplasmin-Plasmin Complex and Thrombin-Antithrombin III Complex in Female Breast Cancer

Aims and background

Disorders of hemostasis in patients with malignancies are based on several mechanisms, such as ability of the tumor to alter the coagulation system by producing blood clotting factors or decreasing their inhibitors by increasing fibrinolysis, and by inducing an alteration of blood vessels in relation to the state of local invasion. We investigated the fibrinolytic system marker alpha2-antiplasmin-plasmin complex (APP) and clotting system marker thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) in patients with breast cancer and compare them with CA 15-3, the most well-known breast cancer antigen.

Methods

Plasma levels of APP and TAT and serum level of CA 15-3 were determined in 57 patients with breast cancer (28 in remission and 29 with active breast cancer) and 13 healthy women.

Results

In patients with active breast cancer, plasma APP levels were significantly elevated compared to those of other groups (P<0.05). In addition, we observed a poor but positive correlation between plasma levels of APP and those of CA 15-3 (r=0.24; P=0.038). Plasma TAT levels, which reflect the activation of thrombin, were also significantly elevated in patients with active breast cancer (P<0.01), and there was a significant correlation between CA 15-3 and TAT (r=0.24; P=0.041).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that increased APP and TAT levels might reflect enhanced activation of coagulation and the fibrinolytic system in patients with active breast cancer.

Diagnostic efficacy of CA 15-3 and CEA in the early detection of metastatic breast cancer-A retrospective analysis of kinetics on 743 breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the diagnostic capacity of CEA and CA 15-3 kinetics for the early detection of metastatic disease in comparison to fixed cut off values.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, a total of 743 patients with early breast cancer and available baseline values of CEA and CA 15-3 were included. A reproducible increase of 100% of single or combined markers was considered as a strong indicator of metastatic disease.

RESULTS

187 patients developed metastatic disease and 556 remained disease-free. On the basis of tumor marker kinetics, we reached a specificity of >98% for both biomarkers and a sensitivity of 40.6% for CEA alone, 55.6% for CA 15-3 alone and 66.3% for the combination of both markers. Using fixed cut-off values (CEA: 4ng/mL, CA 15-3: 30U/mL) we ended up with a specificity of 86.3% and a sensitivity of 70.6% for the combination of CEA and CA 15-3. Using higher cut-off values (CEA: 6ng/mL, CA 15-3: 60U/mL) we reached a specificity of 96.9% and a sensitivity of 49.7% for the combination.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the interpretation of these markers in follow-up using individual baseline values and kinetics leads to a significant superior profile of specificity and sensitivity.

Surveillance and monitoring in breast cancer survivors: maximizing benefit and minimizing harm

Although the incidence of breast cancer has increased, breast cancer mortality has decreased, likely as a result of both breast cancer screening and improved treatment. There are well over two million breast cancer survivors in the United States for whom appropriate surveillance continues to be a subject of controversy. The guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the American College of Physicians are clear: only performance of yearly screening mammography is supported by evidence. Although advanced imaging technologies and sophisticated circulating tumor biomarker studies are exquisitely sensitive for the detection of recurrent breast cancer, there is no proof that earlier detection of metastases will improve outcome. A lack of specificity may lead to more tests and patient anxiety. Many breast cancer survivors are not followed by oncologists, and their doctors may not be familiar with these recommendations. Oncologists also disregard the data. A plethora of both blood tests and nonmammographic imaging tests are frequently performed in asymptomatic women. The blood tests, marker studies, and advanced imaging techniques are expensive and, with limited health care funds, may prevent funding for more appropriate aspects of patient care. Abnormal marker studies lead to additional imaging procedures. Repeated CT scans and radionuclide imaging may induce a second cancer because of the radiation dose, and invasive procedures performed as a result of these examinations also add risk to patients without clear benefits. Improved adherence to the current guidelines can cut costs, reduce risks, and improve patient quality of life without adversely affecting outcome.

Tumor marker-guided PET in breast cancer patients-a recipe for a perfect wedding: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Early detection of breast cancer (BC) recurrence is a fundamental issue during follow-up. Although the utilization of new therapeutic protocols aimed at reducing the recurrence risk is defined, the diagnostic approach for early detection remains to be clarified. We aim to provide a critical overview of recently published reports and perform a meta-analysis on the use of tumor markers in BC patients as a guide for fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

METHODS

Medline and Google Scholar were used for searching English and non-English articles that evaluate the role of PET in BC recurrence when an increase in tumor markers is found. All complete studies were reviewed; thus, quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

From 2001 to May 2011, we found 19 complete articles that critically evaluated the role of PET in BC recurrence detection in the presence of elevated tumor markers. The meta-analysis of the 13 studies provided the following results: pooled sensitivity 0.878 (95% CI: 0.838-0.909), pooled specificity 0.693 (95% CI: 0.553-0.805), and pooled accuracy 0.828 (95% CI: 0.762-0.878).

CONCLUSIONS

The current experience confirms the potential of fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and in particular of PET/CT, in detecting occult soft tissue and bone metastases in the presence of a progressive increase of serum tumor markers in BC patients, but this should be better defined in the current practical recommendations.

Could the serial determination of Ca15.3 serum improve the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT?: results from small population with previous breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

A single value of tumor marker elevation is not used for the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) relapse, whereas the serial measurements which confirm a persistent Ca15.3 increase can represent an early signal of tumor relapse, even if described in asymptomatic patients without any other clinical or instrumental signs of cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serial measures of Ca15.3 and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with already treated BC during follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 60 patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years) with previous history of BC, already treated with surgery and other treatments. Three serial measures of Ca15.3 were collected within 1 year before PET/CT examination, respectively, at 12-9 months (297 ± 30 days), 9-3 months (154 ± 51 days) and 3-0 months (46 ± 28 days). Clinical outcome or imaging follow-up data were used to define disease relapse. The increase in tumor marker value was compared with PET/CT results and disease relapse. Coefficient of variation (CV) and ROC curves were used. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

PET/CT was negative in 36 (60%) and positive in 24 (40%) patients. The median time between initial treatment and PET/CT was 3 years. CV of the Ca15.3 serial determinations was significantly higher in patients with positive than negative PET/CT (39 vs. 24%, p < 0.05). Disease relapse was found in 25 (42%) patients, of these 21 (88%) had positive PET/CT. ROC analyses showed that an increase of Ca15.3 between the 2nd and 3rd measures have better individuated positive PET/CT and disease relapse (AUC 0.65 and 0.64, respectively; p < 0.05). DFS was higher in patients with negative than positive PET/CT (65 vs. 15%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial increase of Ca15.3 could be considered optimal to address FDG PET/CT examination during BC patients follow-up. PET/CT performed just on time might allow, earlier and with higher diagnostic accuracy, the detection of disease relapse in BC patients.

FDG PET and tumour markers in the diagnosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers in North America and Western Europe. Positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG PET) represents a non-invasive functional imaging modality that is based on metabolic characteristics of malignant tumours. In breast cancer, FDG PET is more accurate than conventional methods for staging of distant metastases or local recurrences and enables early assessment of treatment response in patients undergoing primary chemotherapy. Recent data indicate a rationale for the use of FDG PET in cases of asymptomatically elevated tumour marker levels in the presence of uncertain results of conventional imaging. Despite the fact that PET cannot rule out microscopic disease, it does have particular value in providing, in a single examination, a reliable assessment of the true extent of the disease. This technique is complementary to morphological imaging for primary diagnosis, staging and re-staging. It may become the method of choice for the assessment of asymptomatic patients with elevated tumour marker levels. This method, however, cannot replace invasive procedures if microscopic disease is of clinical relevance.

Ca 15-3 in the follow-up of localised breast cancer: a prospective study

Altogether, 243 female breast cancer patients with localised disease diagnosed between 1991 and 1995 in the Tampere University Hospital area were followed prospectively after primary treatment until the first relapse. In the follow-up period, the serum tumour marker Ca 15-3 was analysed every 6 months to ascertain the validity of this marker in detecting the first relapse. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were analysed in different metastatic situations. During the 5 years of follow-up, 59 (24%) relapses were discovered. Ca 15-3 was elevated in 21/59 (36%) of the relapsed cases at least once. The 59 patients were subjected to 199 tests, of which 25 (13%) were positive. Among the 184 patients without recurrence, there were 6 (3%) with a positive Ca 15-3 level. The test failed to detect locoregional relapse or contralateral breast cancer. It was elevated in approximately half of bone-only metastases and in all of the liver-only metastases. In the pulmonary-only recurrences, the marker value was not elevated. We conclude that the Ca 15-3 tumour marker test is specific, but not sensitive enough to indicate the first relapse earlier than other methods. The positive predictive value especially remained poor in patients with a relatively good prognosis. Our results confirm that the test is not suitable alone for breast cancer follow-up.

Interpretation of sequential measurements of cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) based on analytical imprecision and biological variation in the monitoring of ovarian cancer

The main objective with cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) monitoring of ovarian cancer patients is to detect an early change of disease activity with high reliability. We hypothesized that a monitoring scheme for ovarian cancer patients with serological tumor markers should take into account the stochastic variation, i.e. the probability that observed increases and decreases may solely be due to analytical imprecision and normal intra-individual biological variation. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed characteristic of the within-subject mean steady state concentrations and the associated variability in healthy individuals with an age distribution representative for ovarian cancer patients. Thirty-one healthy women with a median age of 55 years comprised the study population. Sixteen blood samples were collected from each subject in four series, with four samples per series, over a period of approximately 1 year. We found that, i) natural logarithmic-transformed concentrations were more homogeneously distributed between individuals than the original concentrations, ii) the within-subject mean steady state levels, the standard deviations, and the coefficients of variation differed among subjects, and iii) the steady state variability differed among the markers. In conclusion, our data indicate that the assessment of sequential CA 125, CEA, and TPA concentrations is more complex than hitherto recognized. We suggest that it is necessary to adjust the assessment criteria to the type of marker, and that assessment may be facilitated if based on natural logarithmic transformed concentrations.

Clinical experience with recombinant human thyrotrophin (rhTSH) in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer

The purpose of this work was to gain clinical experience with and to identify the optimal conditions for the use of recombinant human TSH (rhTSH, commercially available as Thyrogen) in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The study involved 22 patients for a total of 27 administration cycles of rhTSH, for either diagnostic (in 19 instances) and/or therapeutic purposes (in 8 instances). There were 19 patients with papillary cancer (follicular variant in 4, columnar variant in 1) and 3 patients with follicular cancer (1 Hurtle cell variant). All patients had previously undergone total thyroidectomy and 1-5 cycles of 131I-therapy. Thyrogen was administered i.m. according to the suggested protocol: 0.9 mg i.m. on days 1 and 2, radioiodine on day 3. Peak serum TSH levels between 68-237 microIU/mL were observed after rhTSH administration; these were on average 65% higher, on a patient-by-patient basis, than peak serum TSH observed after conventional withdrawal of thyroxine treatment in 19 patients, while in 3 patients they were 28% lower, but still in the potent stimulation range (86-94 microIU/mL). There was general agreement between imaging results obtained under rhTSH stimulation and those obtained on prior occasions during thyroxine withdrawal, although radioiodine uptake was interpreted as less intense following Thyrogen administration. Of 18 patients undergoing rhTSH administration for diagnostic purposes, 11 patients had a negative radioiodine whole-body scan (WBS) and 7 had a positive WBS. Three of the WBS-negative patients were shown to be actually affected by tumor recurrence, respectively by PET with [18F]FDG (in 2 cases) and by post-131I therapy scan. Serum thyroglobulin (hTg) increased to abnormal levels following rhTSH stimulation in 3/7 of the WBS-positive patients as well as in 1/11 WBS-negative patients. In 3/7 WBS-positive as well as in 3/11 WBS-negative patients, serum hTg progressively rose under rhTSH stimulation, yet still remaining below 3 ng/mL. Post-131I therapy scans following Thyrogen administration showed good radioiodine uptake in 7/8 patients, the single unsuccessful case being most likely due to expansion of the iodine pool because of recent use of an iodinated contrast medium. The overall results show the feasibility and practical advantages of employing rhTSH stimulation in the general clinical setting rather than thyroxine withdrawal in the management of DTC patients. Caution should be raised on the interpretation of the serum hTg response to such potent but short-lived TSH stimulation.

Assessment of biological variation and analytical imprecision of CA 125, CEA, and TPA in relation to monitoring of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Changes in serial tumor marker results during monitoring of patients with ovarian cancer are due not only to deterioration or amelioration of the patient's condition, but also to preanalytical sources of variation (CPP), total random analytical error, and within-subject normal biological variation. The aim of the study was to assess (i) the analytical imprecision (CVA) and the average inherent intra- and interindividual biological variation (CVTI and CVG, respectively) for CA 125, CEA, and TPA in a group of healthy women; (ii) the significance of changes in serial results of each marker; and (iii) the index of individuality.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 31 healthy women. Sixteen blood samples from each subject were collected in four series over a period of approximately 1 year. Data analysis was based on ANOVA. The index of individuality was calculated as ((CV2A + CV2TI)/CV2G)1/2 and the critical difference for a change between two consecutive concentrations as radical2xZx(CV2P + CV2A + CV2TI)1/2 (Z = 1.65 for unidirectional and 1.96 for bidirectional changes, P </= 0.05).

RESULTS

The averages of CVTI and CVG were 35.5 and 70.6% for CA 125, 13.9 and 58.3% for CEA, and 31.4 and 62.5% for TPA, respectively. The indices of individuality were 0.5 for CA 125, 0.3 for CEA, and 0.5 for TPA. The critical differences of CA 125, CEA, and TPA were 84.6, 37.6, and 76. 3%, respectively (Z = 1.65). There were no significant differences in CA 125, CEA, and TPA concentrations between smokers and nonsmokers or in CA 125 and CEA concentrations between pre- and postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women had higher TPA concentrations than premenopausal (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

CVA and CVTI contribute considerably to the variation in serial results and should, therefore, be included in the criteria for serum tumor marker assessment during monitoring of patients with ovarian cancer.

Evaluation of an intensive strategy for follow-up and surveillance of primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Controversies over the frequency and intensity of the follow-up care of breast cancer patients exist. Some physicians have adopted an intensive approach to follow-up care that consists of frequent laboratory tests and routine imaging studies, including chest radiographs, bone scans, and CT scans, whereas others have established a minimalist approach consisting of only history, physical examinations, and mammograms.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate the role of intensive follow-up on detection of breast cancer recurrence and to examine the impact of follow-up on overall survival.

METHODS

During a 10-year period (1986-1996), 129 patients with recurrent disease were identified from a prospective database of 1898 breast cancer patients. The patients with recurrent disease were divided into minimalist or intensive groups according to method of detection.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 126 (21%) patients were assigned to the intensive method of detection group (LFT, CEA, CA 15-3, chest radiograph, CT scan, and bone scan); 99 of 126 (79%) patients were assigned to the minimal detection group (history, physical examination, and mammography). Distant disease to the bone was the most common initial tumor recurrence, at 27%. History, physical examination, and mammography detected recurrent cancer in approximately the same amount of time as LFTs, tumor markers, CT scans, and chest radiographs (P = .960). When the recurrent patients were divided into intensive and minimalist groups and analyzed by time to detection of recurrence, there was no significant difference between the time to detection in those recurrences detected by intensive methods and those recurrences detected by minimalist methods (P = .95). The independent variables age, tumor size, type of surgery, number of positive nodes, time to recurrence, method of detection, and site of recurrence (regional or distant) were subject to univariate and multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model. Only two variables had an impact on survival by multivariate analysis: early timing of the recurrence (P = .0011) and the site of the recurrence (P = .02). Timing was defined as early (< or =365 days from the time of diagnosis to recurrence) or late (> or =365 days from the time of diagnosis to recurrence). Early recurrence was the first variable found to be significant on stepwise forward regression analysis. The primary site of recurrence was significant at step two. The method of detection--intensive or minimal--did not significantly affect survival (P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no survival benefit to routine intensive follow-up regimens in detecting recurrent breast cancer. Expensive diagnostic tests such as bone scans, CT scans, and serial tumor markers are best used for detection of metastasis in symptomatic patients.