Addition of either irinotecan or methotrexate to bolus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid every 2 weeks in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a randomised study by the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group

Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic management of people with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who did not respond to first-line treatment represents a formidable challenge.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of second-line systemic therapy in people with metastatic CRC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to May 2016), Ovid MEDLINE In-process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (1946 to May 2016) and Ovid Embase (1974 to May 2016). There were no language or date of publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy (survival, tumour response) and toxicity (incidence of severe adverse effects (SAEs)) of second-line systemic therapy (single or combined treatment with any anticancer drug, at any dose and number of cycles) in people with metastatic CRC that progressed, recurred or did not respond to first-line systemic therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors performed a descriptive analysis of each included RCT in terms of primary (survival) and secondary (tumour response, toxicity) endpoints. In the light of the variety of drug regimens tested in the included trials, we could carry out meta-analysis considering classes of (rather than single) anticancer regimens; to this aim, we applied the random-effects model to pool the data. We used hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) to describe the strength of the association for survival (overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)) and dichotomous (overall response rate (ORR) and SAE rate) data, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-four RCTs (enrolling 13,787 participants) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Available evidence enabled us to address multiple clinical issues regarding the survival effects of second-line systemic therapy of people with metastatic CRC.1. Chemotherapy (irinotecan) was more effective than best supportive care (HR for OS: 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80; 1 RCT; moderate-quality evidence); 2. modern chemotherapy (FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin plus oxaliplatin), irinotecan) is more effective than outdated chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil) (HR for PFS: 0.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.73; 2 RCTs; high-quality evidence) (HR for OS: 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94; 1 RCT; moderate-quality evidence); 3. irinotecan-based combinations were more effective than irinotecan alone (HR for PFS: 0.68, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.76; 6 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence); 4. targeted agents improved the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy both when considered together (HR for OS: 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91; 6 RCTs; high-quality evidence) and when bevacizumab was used alone (HR for PFS: 0.67, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.75; 4 RCTs; high-quality evidence).With regard to secondary endpoints, tumour response rates generally paralleled the survival results; moreover, higher anticancer efficacy was generally associated with worse treatment-related toxicity, with the important exception of bevacizumab-containing regimens, where the addition of the targeted agent to chemotherapy did not result in a significant increase in the rate of SAE. Finally, we found that oral (instead of intravenous) fluoropyrimidines significantly reduced the incidence of adverse effects (without compromising efficacy) in people treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens.We could not draw any conclusions on other debated aspects in this field of oncology, such as ranking of treatments (not all possible comparisons have been tested and many comparisons were based on single trials enrolling a small number of participants) and quality of life (virtually no data available).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy offers a survival benefit to people with metastatic CRC who did not respond to first-line treatment, especially when targeted agents are combined with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. Further research is needed to define the optimal regimen and to identify people who most benefit from each treatment.

The impact of personalized medicine on survival: comparisons of results in metastatic breast, colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancers

Breast, colorectal and lung cancers represent the three most incident forms of cancer worldwide. Among these three "big killers", lung cancer is considered the one with the worst prognosis due to its high mortality even in early stages. Due to their more favorable prognosis, breast and colorectal cancers might appear to have benefited from major advances. Most oncologists who are faced with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) find the reported results very frustrating when compared with those for metastatic breast (MBC) and colorectal cancers (MCRC). The aim of this analysis was to quantify and compare the relative magnitude of overall survival (OS) improvements in the first-line approaches in metastatic NSCLC, MBC and MCRC through the analysis of the main landmark meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of commercially available drugs. Five items were considered and analyzed for each cancer. Moreover we evaluated the real clinical impact of the results reported by each item on the entire population; for each "big killer" an overall hazard ratio (HR) was estimated: 0.88 (95%(+) CI: 0.72-1.07) for MBC, 0.94 (95%(+) CI: 0.82-1.07) for MCRC, and about 0.80 (95%(+) CI: 0.73-0.90) for advanced NSCLC. We showed that, in the last decades, these three tumors had important and constant OS improvements reached step by step. The relative magnitude of OS improvement seems higher in metastatic NSCLC than MBC and MCRC.

Correlation of progression-free and post-progression survival with overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Polychemotherapy and biological drugs have increased therapeutic options and outcomes of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). We examined the relation between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS) in trials of modern (oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based) chemotherapy alone or with targeted therapies for advanced CRC. We also evaluated surrogacy of PFS and OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A PubMed search identified 34 randomized trials. We split the OS, PFS and PPS and evaluated the correlation between OS and either PFS or PPS.

RESULTS

The median PPS and PFS were 10.75 and 8.4 months, respectively. For all trials, PPS was strongly associated with OS [regression coefficient (R2)=0.8; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r)=0.88], whereas PFS was moderately associated with OS (R2)=0.43; r=0.64). In trials with targeted therapies, the correlation of PPS with OS was 0.88. However, across all trials, correlation between differences in median PFS (ΔPFS) and median OS (ΔOS) is 0.59 (P=0.0007), confirming PFS/OS surrogacy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that in recent first-line, phase III, trials, OS becomes more associated with PPS than PFS. However, improvements in PFS are strongly associated with improvements in OS. In this setting so, PFS may be an appropriate surrogate for OS.

Prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice with combination hyperthermal intraperitoneal chemotherapy and IL-2

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of local chemoimmunotherapy and hyperthermal intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a mouse model of induced peritoneal carcinomatosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice was produced by intraperitoneal implantation of MCa cells (5 x 10(3)). Interleukin-2 (4.1 x 10(4) IU/mouse) was injected into the abdominal cavity of mice at day 7 and 3 before implantation of tumour cells. Immediately after implantation of MCa cells mice were treated twice with 2 ml of saline that was heated either at 37 degrees C or 43 degrees C and cytostatics (doxorubicin 20 mg kg(-1), cisplatin 10 mg kg(-1), mitomycin 5 mg kg(-1), or 5-FU 150 mg kg(-1)). We followed the survival of animals and side effects appearing with different forms of treatment.

RESULTS

Combined treatment with Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and cytostatics (5-FU, CIS or MIT) significantly affected the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis and increased the survival of mice (ILS% - 37 degrees C = 29.88, 199.32, and 108.52, ILS% - 43 degrees C = 62.69, 260.50, and 178.05, respectively). However, intraperitoneal chemotherapy on survival time of mice with DOX + IL-2 was ineffective as compared with DOX alone.

CONCLUSION

We would like to stress that treatment with IL-2 prior to tumour diagnosis is not clinically practical, rather, the manuscript attempts to describe an experimental proof of principle. Results suggest the synergistic effect of hyperthermia, chemotherapy and immunotherapy; IL-2 significantly increases antitumor activity of hyperthermic chemotherapy and survival rate of mice with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Second-line chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic CRC

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is widely used in colorectal cancer that has relapsed or failed to respond to first-line treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We performed electronic searches in the following databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed; 1964-September 2007), EMBASE (via OVID; 1980-September 2007) and The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy (single or combined treatment with any chemotherapeutic agent, at any dose and number of cycles) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer that progressed, recurred or did not respond to first-line chemotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A descriptive analysis of the included trials was performed, due to the huge clinical heterogeneity between them.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included; one of high quality, five of moderate quality, and one conference abstract. Second-line chemotherapy (irinotecan) showed moderate benefits in overall survival and progression-free survival over Best Supportive Care (BSC) and fluorouracil (5-FU). Fractionated administration has not proven to be more beneficial and is more toxic. Definitive results concerning the benefits and risks of oxaliplatin are pending publication.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Second-line chemotherapy is effective in prolonging time to progression and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Further RCTs are needed to assess the optimal chemotherapy regimen.

Survival and disease-progression benefits with treatment regimens for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many randomised trials have compared different systemic treatment regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. While survival advances have apparently been achieved, the magnitude of these incremental benefits across diverse regimens is less clear. The aim of our study was to estimate the magnitude of survival and disease progression benefits with the use of different regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomised trials comparing systemic treatment regimens in advanced colorectal cancer. Treatment was categorised by use of or no use of fluorouracil-based regimens, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and cetuximab. We used multiple-treatment meta-analysis methodology to combine information from direct comparisons (ie, treatments compared within a randomised trial) and indirect comparisons (ie, treatments compared between trials by combining results on how effective they are against a common comparator treatment) of different chemotherapy regimens. The primary endpoint was death and the secondary endpoint was disease progression. Monte Carlo simulations were used to establish which regimen offered the most benefit for these endpoints. We did analyses of all trials and analysed separately trials that studied first-line treatments and non-first-line treatments.

FINDINGS

242 trials published in 1967-2007 (N=56 677 patients) involved 137 different chemotherapy regimens. 37 of these trials were eligible for the multiple-treatment meta-analysis, according to our categorisation, including 47 comparisons of data on death (N=13 875 patients) and 48 comparisons of data on disease progression (N=15 158 patients). Compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin alone, the risk of death was most decreased with the addition of irinotecan plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% credibility intervals (CrI) 0.44-0.84) and considerable benefits were also noted with addition of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (HR 0.72 [95% CrI 0.54-0.97]); oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab (HR 0.72 [0.57-0.90]); bevacizumab alone (HR 0.78 [0.60-1.03]); and oxaliplatin alone (HR 0.87 [0.78-0.98]). The disease progression benefits were even more prominent for the addition of irinotecan plus bevacizumab (HR 0.41 [0.28-0.60]); irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (0.53 [0.38-0.73]); oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab (0.46 [0.34-0.61]); bevacizumab alone (0.56 [0.41-0.76]); oxaliplatin alone (0.64 [0.56-0.73]); irinotecan plus cetuximab (HR 0.62 [0.42-0.92]); and irinotecan alone (HR 0.73 [0.65-0.82]). Findings were similar for first-line and non-first-line treatment analyses although data were sparse for non-first-line treatment analyses. Compared with a patient with an anticipated 1-year survival who is treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin, the absolute survival benefit is estimated at 8 months' prolongation with addition of irinotecan plus bevacizumab, 4.7 months' prolongation with addition of oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin, and 1-1.8 months' prolongation with addition of irinotecan alone or oxaliplatin alone.

INTERPRETATION

Distinct incremental benefits are noted for diverse chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with more prominent effects on disease progression than on death. More data are needed at least for the newest drugs to estimate more accurately the magnitude of the benefit derived from their use.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: incidence and current treatment strategies

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature with regard to the incidence and prognostic significance of peritoneal seeding during surgery for primary colorectal cancer (CRC), the incidence of intraperitoneal recurrence of CRC, and the current treatment strategies of established PC of colorectal origin, with special focus on cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPEC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although hematogenous dissemination forms the greatest threat to patients with CRC, peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), presumably arising from intraperitoneal seeding of cancer cells, is a relatively frequent event in patients with recurrent CRC.

METHODS

The PubMed and Medline literature databases were searched for pertinent publications regarding the incidence and prognostic significance of exfoliated tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity during curative surgery for primary CRC, the incidence of intraperitoneal recurrence of CRC, and the therapeutic results of systemic chemotherapy or cytoreductive surgery followed by IPEC.

RESULTS

The incidence of peritoneal seeding during potentially curative surgery for primary CRC, as reported in 12 patient series, varied widely, from 3% to 28%, which may be explained by differences in methods to detect tumor cells. PC is encountered in approximately 7% of patients at primary surgery, in approximately 4% to 19% of patients during follow-up after curative surgery, in up to 44% of patients with recurrent CRC who require relaparotomy, and in 40% to 80% of patients who succumb to CRC. The reported median survival after systemic 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for PC varies from 5.2 to 12.6 months. Median survival after aggressive cytoreductive surgery followed by (hyperthermic) IPEC in selected patients, as reported in 16 patient series, tends to be better and varies from 12 to 32 months at the cost of morbidity and mortality rates of 14% to 55% and 0% to 19%, respectively. One randomized controlled trial has been published confirming the superiority of aggressive surgical cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy over strictly palliative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal seeding of cancer cells possibly leading to PC is a rather common phenomenon in patients with CRC. Cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant (hyperthermic) IPEC have been shown to be efficacious in selected patients and should therefore be considered in patients with resectable PC of colorectal origin.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan 5-Fluouracil and Leucovorin Regimen in Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients Pretreated With Irinotecan 5-Fluouracil and Leucovorin

OBJECTIVES

Oxaliplatin has been introduced in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer during the past few years. The pre-existing treatment of leucovorin-5-fluorouracil-irinotecan (IFL), although reasonably effective, has needed novel, active agents to increase the response rate and overall survival. We planned this phase 2 study in patients pretreated with IFL, adding oxaliplatin as second-line treatment: our objectives were to determine response rate and overall survival.

METHODS

All patients (median age 65) were designated to receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy: leucovorin 200 mg/m2 infused for 60 minutes, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 bolus at 30 minutes from the start of the previous infusion, irinotecan 135 mg/m2 infused for 90 minutes, and oxaliplatin 135 mg/m2 for 90 minutes, infused sequentially on day 1 and repeated every 3 weeks. Standard ondansetron antiemetic treatment and dexamethasone 8 mg were administered to all patients. No prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was permitted.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were recruited and 54 were evaluable for response, survival, and toxicity. All patients had advanced, inoperable, metastatic disease in the liver and/or lungs, abdominal cavity, and multiple sites. All patients had undergone IFL pretreatment and had no response; 40 had disease progression and 14 had stable disease when entering the present study; 302 chemotherapy cycles (mean 5.92) were administered. There was no treatment delay caused by toxicity (either neutropenia or diarrhea). Irinotecan and oxaliplatin were reduced by 25% in 6 (11.1%) patients. No complete responses were observed; 21 (38.9%) patients achieved partial response, 26 (48.2%) had stable disease, and 7 (13%) had disease progression. Median duration of response was 6 months, time to tumor progression (TTP) 8 months, and median overall survival after the initiation of second-line treatment was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-12.6).

CONCLUSION

The addition of oxaliplatin to IFL as second-line treatment rendered a prolongation of survival and a response rate of 38.9% in patients in whom IFL pretreatment had failed.

Safety and Efficacy of Irinotecan plus High-Dose Leucovorin and Intravenous Bolus 5-Fluorouracil for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Two Consecutive Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group Trials

BACKGROUND

A biweekly regimen of irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on day 1 and levo-leucovorin (LV) 250 mg/m2 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 850 mg/m2 via intravenous bolus on day 2 was assessed in 2 consecutive randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual data of 254 patients were merged, and baseline features potentially affecting overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and occurrence of severe toxicity were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In the pooled series, ORR was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27%-39%). Liver-only disease (47% vs. 25%; P=0.0012) and absence of previous weight loss (38% vs. 20%; P=0.0189) were significantly associated with a higher ORR on the multivariate analysis. Absence of weight loss (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.93; P=0.0377) was significantly associated with a longer PFS (7.5 months vs. 6 months). Median OS was 15.1 months (95% CI, 13.5-16.6 months). Primary surgery, good performance status (PS), only one metastatic site, and oxaliplatin-based second-line treatment independently predicted a longer OS. Grade 4 neutropenia was significantly associated with a PS>or=1, whereas risk of grade>or=3 diarrhea was directly related to age and previous weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Patients with no weight loss and/or preserved PS and with a limited disease extent appeared to obtain the greatest benefit from our irinotecan/5-FU/LV regimen, with acceptable toxicity. Notably, the regimen was effective and well tolerated by elderly patients. This regimen may represent the rationale for assessing the addition of novel antiangiogenic drugs to the treatment of metastatic CRC.

Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer

Irinotecan exerts its cytotoxic activity through inhibition of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. It has been approved in most countries worldwide for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Activity is seen in previously untreated patients and in patients refractory to fluorouracil treatment, whether it is given alone or in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Irinotecan was first developed in patients refractory to fluorouracil. Activity in terms of tumour responses and patient benefit was seen in several phase II trials that used either a weekly or a three-weekly schedule. In two randomised trials (irinotecan vs best supportive care, and irinotecan vs an infused fluorouracil-based regimen), irinotecan prolonged median survival by approximately 2.5 months without any deterioration in quality-of-life. It was later studied in previously untreated patients with advanced CRC in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin). In three large randomised trials, median time to tumour progression was prolonged by approximately 2.5 months and overall survival by about 2.5 months compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid alone. Tumour responses were also seen more frequently in the irinotecan arm (35-40% vs 20%). Again, quality-of-life scores were not deteriorated by the addition of irinotecan. Irinotecan has many acute adverse effects. The most prominent and dose limiting being diarrhoea and neutropenia. With irinotecan monotherapy, diarrhoea was seen in 80% of patients and severe grade 3 to 4 diarrhoea occurred in 30-40% of the patients. The severity of diarrhoea can be diminished by preventive actions. Less risk of diarrhoea is generally seen when irinotecan is combined with fluorouracil. Neutropenia is generally short-lived, but may be severe if diarrhoea is also present. This has been noticed particularly when irinotecan has been given in combination with a bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid regimen. Other toxicities include acute cholinergic-like symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. In spite of these adverse effects, irinotecan has been accepted as an important first-line treatment for patients with advanced CRC, in combination with, preferably, an infused fluorouracil-based regimen, and has been approved for use as monotherapy in the second-line indication.

Phase II trial of fortnightly irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients resistant to previous fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This phase II study investigated the anti-tumour activity and toxicity of CPT-11 (250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 60 minutes) administered every 2 weeks as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n = 63) with histology diagnosis of advanced CRC and proven resistance to previous fluoropyrimidine therapy were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 510 CPT-11 cycles were administered, with a mean of 8 cycles per patient (range: 1-32). The median relative dose intensity was 93%. Partial response (PR) was obtained in 11 patients (17.5%; 95%CI: 8.1%-26.7%) and 29 patients (46.0%) showed stable disease (clinical benefit of 63.5%). The median duration of response was 6.8 months (95%CI: 6.1-7.5 months), median survival was 8.8 months (95%CI: 6.3-11.5 months) and median time to disease progression was 4.5 months (95%CI: 3.9-5.0 months). Overall, this schedule of CPT-11 chemotherapy was well tolerated by the patient. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3/4 haematological toxicity (20.6% of patients and 4.1% of cycles). Neutropenia with concurrent fever or infection occurred in 7 patients (11.1%). Late onset diarrhoea was the most frequent grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity (19.0% of patients and 2.3% of cycles). Other, lower-incidence, toxicities were anaemia, fever, infection, mucositis, nausea and vomiting. There were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that CPT-11, administered as 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 60 minutes every 2 weeks, was active and well tolerated schedule in the second-line chemotherapy of advanced CRC patients. This bi-weekly scheme could be used as an alternative to the weekly or the every-three-week schedule as well as in combined therapies with other chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of advanced, metastatic, CRC.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (OXAFAFU) versus irinotecan plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (IRIFAFU) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial

PURPOSE

The primary end point of this phase III trial was to compare the response rate (RR) of oxaliplatin (OXA) plus levo-folinic acid (l-FA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus with that of irinotecan (IRI) plus l-FA and 5-FU bolus in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomly allocated to receive: IRI 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, l-FA 250 mg/m(2) intravenously plus 5-FU 850 mg/m(2) on day 2 (IRIFAFU); or OXA 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, l-FA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 1050 mg/m(2) on day 2 [OXAFAFU high dose (hd)]. Cycles were given every 2 weeks. After a planned interim analysis, OXA was reduced to 85 mg/m(2) and 5-FU to 850 mg/m(2) [OXAFAFU low dose (ld)].

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-four patients (IRIFAFU, 135; OXAFAFUhd, 71; OXAFAFUld, 68) were treated. Forty-two confirmed responses were achieved with IRIFAFU, 29 with OXAFAFUhd and 32 with OXAFAFUld. The response rate with OXAFAFU [44%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 52%] was significantly higher (P=0.029) than that of IRIFAFU (31%; 95% CI 23% to 40%). Occurrence of grade > or =3 neutropenia with OXAFAFUld was similar to that for IRIFAFU (29% versus 31%), while severe diarrhoea was significantly lower (12% versus 24%). Median failure-free survival (7 versus 5.8 months; P=0.046) and overall survival of patients (18.9 versus 15.6 months; P=0.032) were significantly prolonged with OXAFAFU.

CONCLUSIONS

OXAFAFU was more active and less toxic than IRIFAFU, and it should be preferred in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients.

A tailored regimen including capecitabine and oxaliplatin for treating elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group trial 0108

From September 2001 to November 2002, 35 patients aged 70-81 (median, 75) years, with measurable metastatic lesions from colorectal carcinoma, were treated with a combination of oxaliplatin (OXA) infused i.v. over 2 h on day 1, and capecitabine, assumed orally twice a day (12-h apart) from day 2 to day 15. An alternated dose escalation for both drugs was planned over the first three cycles for each patient, in the absence of WHO grade > or =2 toxicity on previous cycle: starting doses were 85 mg/m2 for OXA, and 2000 mg/m2 (day) for capecitabine on first cycle; on second cycle, OXA was planned at 100mg/m2, while capecitabine was planned at 2500 mg/(m2 day) on third cycle. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until progression, or for a maximum of 12 cycles. A total of 212 cycles were administered, with a median of 6 (range, 1-12) cycles/patient. Dose escalation was performed in 18 (51%) patients for OXA, and in 4 (11%) patients for capecitabine. No grade 4, and 10 (29%) cases of grade 3 toxicity of any type were reported. Abdominal symptoms (pain, nausea, or vomiting) affected 66% of patients, but they were of grade 3 in only 2 (6%) patients. Grade 3 diarrhoea occurred in 3 (9%) patients. Two complete and 12 partial responses (PR) were reported, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% CI, 24-58%). Progression of disease occurred in 23 (66%) patients, and 18 (51%) died. The actuarial median progression-free and survival time were 6.9 and 14.1 months, respectively.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Intravenous to Oral Administration

This article reviews the current status of the topoisomerase I (top I) inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. We focus on oral drug administration, the mode of administration that is generally preferred by patients with cancer. However, the great majority of the studies have been performed with intravenous (I.V.) administration. The most extensively investigated GI malignancy in phase I/II studies is colorectal cancer (CRC), for which I.V. irinotecan is currently approved in the United States and Europe. We discuss the activity and efficacy of irinotecan as a single agent in CRC and in combination regimens. Also, results obtained with monotherapy and in combination treatment in other GI malignancies such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer are discussed. Few phase I studies have been performed with oral irinotecan and its clinical activity has not yet been fully determined. Several top I inhibitors are discussed, including topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, rubitecan, exatecan, and lurtotecan. None of these agents, given orally or intravenously, have shown activity in CRC similar to that of I.V. irinotecan. However, several agents show promising results in other GI malignancies, eg, rubitecan and exatecan in pancreatic cancer. A complicating factor in the oral administration of the top I inhibitors is the often encountered low and variable oral bioavailability. This can partly be explained by the high affinity for the drug efflux pumps BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein, which are highly expressed in the epithelial apical membrane of the GI tract. A novel approach to improve the oral bioavailability of the top I inhibitors by temporary blockade of the drug transporter BCRP is described.

Current Approaches to First-Line Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer

The multiplicity of chemotherapy regimens currently available to treat colorectal cancer in the first-line setting precludes the identification of a single standard regimen for front-line therapy. The previous standard, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), formerly the only agent with any significant activity against colorectal cancer, is now the base for newer combination regimens that are improving survival in this disease. When irinotecan and oxaliplatin were proven to be active in colorectal cancer, the pursuit of combination regimens began. Targeted agents such as bevacizumab also show activity and improve the outcome of 5-FU-based regimens. The history and development of 5-FU-based treatment regimens that include the newer drugs irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab are discussed in light of the impact these advances have made in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer: integrating irinotecan into combination and sequential chemotherapy

The chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has undergone a succession of refinements. Through the biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA), the use of infusional rather than bolus regimens and the combination of 5-FU/FA with other active agents (notably irinotecan), first-line response rates (RRs) of 40% can be achieved, with patients surviving up to 17 months. Significant benefits on survival are also seen with second-line chemotherapy. The question of how best to sequence combination chemotherapy was addressed in a recent trial in which patients were randomized to receive either an irinotecan-based combination with 5-FU/FA (FOLFIRI) followed by an oxaliplatin-based combination (FOLFOX), or the two regimens in the reverse order. In both arms, RRs were greater than 50% and median survival exceeded 20 months. The primary end point was time to progression after two lines of treatment, and this was not significantly different. However, the sequence FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX appears preferable because of the better tolerability of FOLFIRI in first-line use. Use of the sequence FOLFIRI/FOLFOX is also supported by the greater chance of a second-line response with FOLFOX. Concern has been expressed about the safety of irinotecan combined with bolus 5-FU/FA. Infusional regimens have a better risk/benefit ratio than bolus regimens. However, the adverse event profile with both approaches is manageable, and irinotecan plus 5-FU/FA can be considered one standard of care in metastatic CRC.

Irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil I.V. bolus every other week may be a suitable therapeutic option also for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of biweekly irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus in metastatic colorectal carcinoma according to the age of patients. For this purpose, we have analysed 108 patients randomly allocated to receive irinotecan 200 mg m(-2) i.v. (1-h infusion) on day 1, and L-leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) i.v. (1-h infusion) plus 5-fluorouracil 850 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2 every 2 weeks (IRIFAFU) in our previous SICOG 9801 trial. According to age, patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: younger (</=54 years, n=37), middle-aged (55-69 years, n=64), and elderly (>/=70 years, n=17). Apart from gender, pretreatment characteristics were well balanced across the three groups. WHO grade >/=3 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected on the whole 46 and 16 patients, respectively, without any significant difference according to age-grouping. Patients aged </=54 years stayed on therapy for a longer time (median 24 vs 14-15 weeks), and received more cycles (median 9 vs 7), than the older ones. Only one patient in the young group withdrew consent to therapy as opposed to four patients each in the aged and elderly one. Response rate was 38% for younger patients, 34% for aged, and 35% for the elderly ones. Median time to progression was 7.4, 8.0, and 5.3 months, and median survival time was 13.4, 15.3, and 13.9 months, respectively. We conclude that IRIFAFU given every other week may represent a suitable therapeutic option also for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Capecitabine treatment results in increased mean corpuscular volume of red blood cells in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Capecitabine is a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is selectively activated after oral administration to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by a sequential triple enzyme pathway in liver and tumor cells. The cytotoxic activity of the metabolized 5-FU depends on thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition, leading to defective DNA synthesis. Capecitabine has shown promising activity in all tumor types sensitive to 5-FU and is therefore investigated in many clinical trials. Since we observed an increase of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of red blood cells under therapy with capecitabine, the current investigation aimed to quantitate this effect and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. A total of 154 patients suffering from advanced cancer received capecitabine (2500 mg/m2/day for 14 days every 21 days) either as monotherapy, or in combination with other antineoplastic agents or biological response modifiers. During 3 consecutive cycles of therapy a complete blood cell count including the red cell indices MCV, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration was performed before each application of capecitabine. In addition, vitamin B12, folic acid and homocysteine were determined to define their role in increasing MCV. Restaging was performed after 9 weeks. Within 9 weeks, a statistically significant increase of MCV (without other hematologic abnormalities or clinical symptoms) could be observed (p<0.0001). Vitamin B12, folic acid and homocysteine levels did not change significantly during the observation period. When comparing the different increases of MCV during 9 weeks (deltaMCV) with respect to tumor response, deltaMCV tended to higher values in patients with tumor remission or stable disease than in patients with tumor progression. We conclude that serum levels within the normal range rule out severe deficiencies of vitamin B12, folic acid or homocysteine as an account of macrocytemia. We therefore hypothesize that an increased MCV (without concomitant anemia) in patients receiving capecitabine might be due to the 5-FU-induced TS inhibition also in erythroid precursor cells. Whether this increase in MCV might serve as a surrogate marker for tumor response has to be evaluated in further investigations.

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil triplet regimen every other week: a dose-finding study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs in first-line as well as second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown synergism with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We planned this phase I study to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and the recommended doses (RDs) for a triplet regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and 6S-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU on day 2, every 2 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At least three patients had to be treated at each dose level, and the trial proceeded if no more than 33% of patients showed a DLT after the first cycle. Starting from OXA 85 mg/m(2) (over 2 h) and IRI 150 mg/m(2) (over 1 h), an alternated escalation was planned up to 110 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2), respectively. Thereafter, a fixed dose of LFA, 250 mg/m(2) (as 2-h infusion), plus an escalating dose of 5-FU (from 650 to 800 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus) was added on day 2 to the previous dose level of OXA and IRI.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients, all but four affected by advanced colorectal primaries, entered this study. The MTDs for OXA and IRI given on the same day were 110 and 200 mg/m(2): these doses caused a DLT in three of six patients. The previous dose level (110 and 175 mg/m(2), respectively) on day 1 was safely followed on day 2 by LFA plus 5-FU up to 800 mg/m(2). Indeed, only one of three patients treated at this last level had a DLT. This cohort was then expanded including a total of 14 patients, and on the whole series five cases of DLT occurred: WHO grade 4 neutropenia (two patients), grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (three patients). Cumulative toxicity was analysed in 43 patients for a total of 347 cycles: grade 4 neutropenia was detected in 13 patients (30%); it was not dose-related, nor was it exacerbated by the addition of modulated 5-FU. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was suffered by nine (21%) and five (12%) patients, respectively. Two complete and nine partial responses were reported on 40 evaluable patients (six patients were disease-free at study entry), giving a response rate of 27.5% (95% confidence interval 15% to 44%); nine of 18 (50%) assessable patients of the two last cohorts treated with the triplet regimen achieved a complete response (two patients) or a partial response (seven patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The RDs for this biweekly regimen were: OXA 110 mg/m(2) plus IRI 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 800 mg/m(2) on day 2. This regimen appeared active in pretreated gastrointestinal malignancies, and it is worthy of being evaluated in advanced colorectal carcinoma after failure of 5-FU-based adjuvant or palliative treatment.