Pharmacokinetic study of patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma treated with rituximab as 'in vivo purge' and consolidative immunotherapy following autologous stem cell transplantation

Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome

Individual variations in concentrations of rituximab in different B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtypes and their relevance to efficacy were still unclear. From 2016 to 2021, a prospective clinical trial was conducted, and 510 samples with 6 uncommon subtypes of B-cell lymphoma were enrolled to examine the pharmacokinetic behaviour of rituximab and its impact on clinical outcomes, including complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Considerable variability was observed in the rituximab trough concentration in the first cycle (C_1-trough, 1.16-55.52 μg/ml) in patients with different lymphoma subtypes. Patients with "double-hit" lymphoma (4.01 ± 0.77 μg/ml) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 15.65 ± 16.45 μg/ml) had much lower C_1-trough and worse outcomes. Great individual variation in the C_1-trough existed among patients with mucosa-associated lymphoma (MALT), and the high C_1-trough observed in patients treated with the RB regimen was associated with a better response than was obtained with R-CHOP (38.41 ± 14.13 μg/ml vs 15.49 ± 8.80 μg/ml, p = 0.0029). Despite the high aggressiveness of the cancer, Burkitt lymphoma patients receiving intensive chemotherapy had the highest C_1-trough (28.85 ± 9.35 μg/ml) and maintained long-term PFS. The C_1-trough in patients with mixed, unclassifiable B-cell lymphoma was close to 20 μg/ml, and these patients had acceptable outcomes. Overall, a low rituximab C_1-trough was associated with adverse consequences, including persistent progression, early recurrence and a short OS, however, some high-risk factors appeared to be balanced by the presence of a high C_1-trough. Basal levels of circulating CD19⁺ lymphocytes differed between and within patients with diverse lymphoma subtypes and were negatively correlated with C_1-trough. Therefore, the traditional doses of rituximab are inadequate for patients with "double-hit" lymphoma and MCL. Increasing the initial rituximab dose according to the disease, high-risk factors and even the baseline CD19⁺ lymphocyte count will be new methods to optimize therapeutic regimens for patients with different lymphoma subtypes.

Epcoritamab induces potent anti-tumor activity against malignant B-cells from patients with DLBCL, FL and MCL, irrespective of prior CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment

Epcoritamab (DuoBody-CD3xCD20, GEN3013) is a novel bispecific IgG1 antibody redirecting T-cells toward CD20⁺ tumor cells. Here, we assessed the preclinical efficacy of epcoritamab against primary tumor cells present in the lymph node biopsies from newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (RR) B-NHL patients. In the presence of T-cells from a healthy donor, epcoritamab demonstrated potent activity against primary tumor cells, irrespective of prior treatments, including CD20 mAbs. Median lysis of 65, 74, and 84% were achieved in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 16), follicular lymphoma (n = 15), and mantle cell lymphoma (n = 8), respectively. Furthermore, in this allogeneic setting, we discovered that the capacity of B-cell tumors to activate T-cells was heterogeneous and showed an inverse association with their surface expression levels of the immune checkpoint molecule Herpesvirus Entry Mediator (HVEM). In the autologous setting, when lymph node (LN)-residing T-cells were the only source of effector cells, the epcoritamab-dependent cytotoxicity strongly correlated with local effector cell-to-target cell ratios. Further analyses revealed that LN-residing-derived or peripheral blood-derived T-cells of B-NHL patients, as well as heathy donor T-cells equally mediated epcoritamab-dependent cytotoxicity. These results show the promise of epcoritamab for treatment of newly-diagnosed or relapsed/refractory B-NHL patients, including those who became refractory to previous CD20-directed therapies.

Comparative assessment of pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics between RTXM83™, a rituximab biosimilar, and rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a population PK model approach

PURPOSE

The main objective was to quantify any potential differences in pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (AUC and C_max) between RTXM83, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, and its reference product, using a population PK model approach.

METHODS

Rituximab PK and PD data were obtained from a randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical study (RTXM83-AC-01-11) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that received 375 mg/m² intravenous RTXM83 or its reference product with CHOP regimen, every 3 weeks, for six cycles. Rituximab levels were quantified by Meso Scale Discovery assay. PK analysis was performed using NONMEM 7.3.0. The effect of disease and patient covariates on RXTM83 PK was investigated. Model was evaluated using visual predictive check and non-parametric bootstrap.

RESULTS

In total, 251 DLBCL patients (127 and 124 in RXTM83-CHOP and rituximab-CHOP arms, respectively) and 5341 serum concentrations (2703 for RXTM83 and 2638 for rituximab, respectively) were available for the population PK analysis. The volume of distribution of the central compartment (V₁) and clearance of RXTM83 were estimated at 3.19 L and 12.5 mL/h, respectively. Body surface area allowed to explain the interindividual variability for V₁. A statistical analysis showed that systemic exposure (AUC and C_max) of RTXM83 was similar to rituximab. The 90% confidence intervals for all pairwise comparisons were within the predefined bioequivalence interval of 0.80-1.25. PD similarity of B-cell depletion and recovery was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The time course of RTXM83 was well characterized by the model developed. The systemic exposure of RTXM83 and its associated variability were similar to those for rituximab reference in DLBCL patients, demonstrating PK similarity. The PD similarity of RTXM83 and rituximab reference product was also demonstrated.

Critical appraisal of rituximab in the maintenance treatment of advanced follicular lymphoma

Rituximab is an IgG1, chimeric monoclonal antibody specifically designed to recognize the CD20 antigen expressed on the surface of normal and malignant B-lymphocytes, from the B-cell precursor to the mature B-cells of the germinal center, and by most neoplasms derived from B-cells. After 2 decades of use, rituximab is firmly positioned in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL), both in the front line and in the relapsing disease, improving previous results by including it in classical chemotherapy regimens. However, the pharmacology of rituximab continues to generate controversial issues especially regarding the mechanisms of action in vivo. The contribution of rituximab as a maintenance treatment in FL has been significant progress in the management of this disease without an increase in side effects or a decrease in the quality of life of patients. With the widespread use of rituximab, there are new security alerts and side effects not previously detected in the pivotal trials that clinicians should learn to recognize and manage. In this article, we will review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab, the management issues in the treatment of advanced FL focusing on maintenance rituximab, its long-term efficacy and safety profile, and its effect on the quality of life.

Population pharmacokinetics of rituximab with or without plasmapheresis in kidney patients with antibody-mediated disease

AIMS

Both rituximab and plasmapheresis can be associated in the treatment of immune-mediated kidney diseases. The real impact of plasmapheresis on rituximab pharmacokinetics is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare rituximab pharmacokinetics between patients requiring plasmapheresis and others without plasmapheresis.

METHODS

The study included 20 patients receiving one or several infusions of rituximab. In 10 patients, plasmapheresis sessions were also performed (between two and six sessions per patient). Rituximab concentrations were measured in blood samples in all patients and in discarded plasma obtained by plasmapheresis using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Data were analysed according to a population pharmacokinetic approach.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of rituximab removed during the first plasmapheresis session ranged between 47 and 54% when plasmapheresis was performed between 24 and 72 h after rituximab infusion. Rituximab pharmacokinetics was adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Plasmapheresis had a significant impact on rituximab pharmacokinetics, with an increase of rituximab clearance by a factor of 261 (95% confidence interval 146-376), i.e. from 6.64 to 1733 ml h(-1) . Plasmapheresis performed 24 h after rituximab infusion decreased the rituximab area under the curve by 26%.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasmapheresis removed an important amount of rituximab when performed less than 3 days after infusion. The removal of rituximab led to a significant decrease of the area under the curve. This pharmacokinetic observation should be taken into account for rituximab dosing, e.g. an additional third rituximab infusion may be recommended when three plasmapheresis sessions are performed after the first rituximab infusion.

A phase I study of PRO131921, a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in patients with relapsed/refractory CD20+ indolent NHL: correlation between clinical responses and AUC pharmacokinetics

PRO131921 is a third-generation, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with increased antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity compared to rituximab. In this phase I study, PRO131921 was administered as a single agent to patients with CD20+, relapsed or refractory, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who had been treated with a prior rituximab-containing regimen. The primary aim of this study was safety and tolerability of PRO131921. The secondary aim of the study, and focus of this report, was to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of PRO131921 and establish a correlation between drug exposure and clinical efficacy. Patients were treated with PRO131921 by intravenous infusion weekly for 4 weeks and the dose was escalated based on safety in a 3+3 design. Twenty-four patients were treated with PRO131921 at doses from 25mg/m(2) to 800 mg/m(2). Analysis of PK data demonstrated a correlation between higher normalized drug exposure (normalized AUC) and tumor shrinkage (p = .0035). Also, normalized AUC levels were higher among responders and subjects displaying tumor shrinkage versus subjects progressing or showing no regression (p = 0.030). In conclusion, PRO131921 demonstrated clinical activity in rituximab-relapsed and refractory indolent NHL patients. The observation that higher normalized AUC may be associated with improved clinical responses has potential implications in future trials of monoclonal antibody-based therapies, and emphasizes the importance of early PK studies to optimize antibody efficacy.

How we manage follicular lymphoma

Major changes have taken place within the last few years in the management of follicular lymphoma (FL) leading to substantial improvement in prognosis and overall survival. For some patients with limited disease stages I and II, radiotherapy may be associated with durable responses; however, it is unclear whether patients are cured and new approaches such as the combination of irradiation with rituximab or even single-agent rituximab need to be explored. Whereas watch and wait is the current standard for stage III and IV disease with low tumour burden, better indices are warranted to potentially select patients for whom early intervention is preferred. For advanced stages with a high tumour burden, immunochemotherapy followed by 2 years of rituximab maintenance is widely accepted as standard therapy, although re-treatment at recurrence may be an alternative option. Highly attractive new therapeutic options have recently arisen from new antibodies, and from new agents targeting oncogenic pathways such as B-cell receptor signalling pathways or inhibition of bcl 2. Furthermore, immunomodulatory drugs may add to the therapeutic armamentarium and may lead to 'chemotherapy-free' therapies in the near future. Hence, the management of FLs has become a moving target and the hope is justified that the long-term perspectives of patients suffering from the disease will be further improved in the near future.

Rituximab for the treatment of follicular lymphoma

Rituximab is the first and most widely adopted anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, and has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with B-cell malignancies. Rituximab is active as a single agent and when combined with chemotherapy improves both response rates and survival compared with chemotherapy alone. This approach has become standard of care in this setting. A number of Phase III studies using extended applications of rituximab have demonstrated that patients achieve a significantly longer progression-free survival, at the cost of an increase in infective complications. This has resulted in the widespread adoption of maintenance rituximab following the completion of primary therapy. Rituximab is useful in both previously untreated patients and at relapse, although a subset of patients develop disease that is rituximab resistant, which along with histologic transformation remains a significant management problem for patients with follicular lymphoma. The toxicities are modest and manageable, including infusion reactions, late-onset neutropenia, impaired humoral immunity, reactivation of hepatitis and possibly pulmonary toxicity.

Practical guidelines for dose individualization of anticancer targeted drugs

For drugs such as anticancer agents every effort should be made to minimize inter-patient variability in drug exposure in order to maximize the benefit while maintaining an acceptable risk level of serious adverse effects. Anticancer drugs generally have a preferential route of elimination, either in urine or in bile and feces. In consequence, dose individualization to renal and liver function permits excessive toxicity to be avoided and expected therapeutic benefit to be achieved. However, less is known about the most appropriate starting doses of antineoplastic agents in these individuals. In this review, we discuss trials that have specifically assessed new targeted agents dosing strategies (mainly monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in the setting of overt biochemical renal and liver dysfunction and we proportionate recommendations and practical guidelines for dose individualization.

Rituximab serum concentrations during immuno-chemotherapy of follicular lymphoma correlate with patient gender, bone marrow infiltration and clinical response

BACKGROUND

Treatment of follicular lymphoma with rituximab is currently recommended at a dose of 375 mg/m(2). We aimed to provide a rationale for optimal dosing and scheduling of this anti-CD20 antibody based on pharmacokinetics.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Clinical efficacy of immunochemotherapy with rituximab, fludarabine and mitoxantrone followed by 2-monthly rituximab maintenance was evaluated in 29 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma in a prospective phase II trial (AGMT-NHL9). Pharmacokinetic analysis was assessed in 17 patients.

RESULTS

Induction treatment resulted in high clinical response rates (complete remission 66%; ORR 100%). Significantly higher complete remission rates were observed in female patients (86 vs. 47%; Odds Ratio 6.8, 95% CI: 1.12; 41.82; P=0.05). Rituximab pharmacokinetic analysis showed a high variability ranging over almost 1 order of magnitude at maintenance cycle 1 (area under the curve 1,540-12,025 g/L*days). Median area under the curve was lower in men (81%) and in patients with initial bone marrow infiltration (76%). Higher rituximab serum concentrations before next therapy (C(trough)) were associated with female sex (P=0.04) as well as with absence of initial bone marrow infiltration (P=0.001). C(trough) correlated with remission quality (complete vs. partial remission; P=0.005) and progression-free survival (P=0.03). A decline in rituximab C(trough) below 25,000 ng/mL was observed 9.5 to 62 months before clinical relapse (P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this pilot trial suggest that more differentiated dosing schedules based on gender and bone marrow infiltration should be explored for rituximab therapy for lymphoma. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01560117).

The role of sex and weight on rituximab clearance and serum elimination half-life in elderly patients with DLBCL

Pharmacokinetics of 8 doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) given in combination with 2-week cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone/prednisolone (CHOP-14) was determined by ELISA in 20 elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) 10 minutes before and after each infusion and 1 week and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 months after the last infusion. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling software (NONMEM VI). Concentration-time data were fitted into an open 2-compartment model and total clearance, central compartment volume, intercompartment clearance, and volume of distribution at steady-state (Vd(ss)) were investigated. Total clearance was 9.43 mL/h and Vd(ss) was 9.61 l. Rituximab clearance was reduced (8.21 mL/h vs 12.68 mL/h; P = .003) and elimination half-life was prolonged in women compared with men (t(1/2β) = 30.7 vs 24.7 days; P = .003). Body weight also affected Vd(ss) (0.1 l increase of Vd(ss) per kilogram above median of 75 kg). A sex-dependent effect and the higher weight of males contribute to their faster rituximab clearance, which might explain why elderly males benefit less from the addition of rituximab to CHOP than females. This trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as numbers NCT00052936, EU-20243 (RICOVER-60 Trial), EU-20534, and NCT00726700 (Pegfilgrastim Trial).

Development of a drug-disease simulation model for rituximab in follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

AIM

Rituximab has dramatically improved the survival of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), but the dosing regimen currently used should be optimized. However, the concentration-effect relationship of rituximab has never been described by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling, precluding the simulation of new dosing regimens. The aim of this study was to develop a PK-PD model of rituximab in relapsed/resistant follicular NHL (FL).

METHODS

A model describing the relationship between rituximab concentrations and progression-free survival (PFS) was developed using data extracted from the pivotal study, which evaluated 151 relapsed/resistant FL patients. The influence of FCGR3A genetic polymorphism on the efficacy of rituximab was quantified using data from 87 relapsed/resistant FL patients. The predictive performance of the model was analysed using two independent datasets: a study that evaluated rituximab combined with chemotherapy [rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin and prednisone (R-CHOP)] in 334 relapsed/resistant FL patients and a study that evaluated rituximab monotherapy in 47 asymptomatic FL patients with known FCGR3A genotype.

RESULTS

For R-CHOP, observed and model-predicted PFS (90% confidence interval) at 24 months were 0.50 and 0.48 (0.40, 0.56), respectively, for the observation arm, and 0.62 and 0.59 (0.50, 0.65), respectively, for the rituximab maintenance arm. For rituximab monotherapy, observed and predicted PFS at 24 months were 0.67 and 0.63, respectively, for FCGR3A-V/V patients, and 0.41 and 0.36 (0.25, 0.49), respectively, for FCGR3A-F carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model provides a satisfactory prediction of PFS at 24 months. It can be used to simulate new dosing regimens of rituximab in populations of FL patients and should improve the design of future clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic associations of ofatumumab, a human monoclonal CD20 antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 1-2 study

The purpose of this phase 1-2 study was to investigate the association between the pharmacokinetic properties of ofatumumab, a human monoclonal CD20 antibody, and outcomes in 33 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia receiving 4 weekly infusions of ofatumumab. The ofatumumab concentration profiles were fitted well by a two-compartment model with different elimination rate constant at first infusion compared to the remaining infusions in line with the observed rapid and sustained B-cell depletion. Exposure to ofatumumab was linked to clinical outcomes: high exposure was associated with higher probability of overall clinical response and longer progression-free survival. This association still remained statistically significant even when adjusting for relevant baseline covariates including tumour burden.

Pharmacokinetics of rituximab associated with CHOP chemotherapy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

The pharmacokinetics of rituximab administered alone at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) once a week have been widely studied but few data are available for the administration of rituximab in combination with other agents. We carried out a pilot pharmacokinetic study in 10 patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with rituximab associated with chemotherapy on a three-weekly basis. Patients received four courses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) associated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone) at 21-day intervals. Blood samples were collected from each patient at selected times throughout the treatment period and analysed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The NONMEM software was used to obtain population and post hoc estimates of rituximab pharmacokinetic parameters and to study possible time-dependent variation during treatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from 10 patients were similar to those described for studies in the absence of chemotherapy. We did not observe any intra-subject variation in pharmacokinetic parameters over the treatment period. Our results suggest that rituximab pharmacokinetics is not affected by combination with CHOP chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the substantial intersubject variability observed in this small sample size highlights the need for further study of the determinants of rituximab pharmacokinetic variability.

Tumor burden influences exposure and response to rituximab: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling using a syngeneic bioluminescent murine model expressing human CD20

Clinical studies have shown a large interindividual variability in rituximab exposure and its significant influence on clinical response in patients receiving similar doses of antibody. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of tumor burden on dose-concentration-response relationships of rituximab. Murine lymphoma cells (EL4, 8 × 103), transduced with human CD20 cDNA and transfected with luciferase plasmid (EL4-huCD20-Luc), were intravenously injected into C57BL/6J mice. Tumor burden detection, dissemination, and progression were evaluated quantitatively by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. Different doses of rituximab (6, 12, 20, or 40 mg/kg) were infused 13 days after lymphoma cell inoculation, and rituximab serum concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Without rituximab, all mice developed disseminated lymphoma and died within 30 days, whereas a significant dose-response relationship was observed in mice receiving rituximab. The 20-mg/kg dose was adequate to study interindividual variability in response because 23% of mice were cured, 59% had partial response, and 18% had disease progression. Rituximab concentrations were inversely correlated with tumor burden; mice with low tumor burden had high rituximab concentrations. Furthermore, rituximab exposure influenced response and survival. Finally, using a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, we demonstrated that tumor burden significantly influenced rituximab efficacy.

Rituximab blocks binding of radiolabeled anti-CD20 antibodies (Ab) but not radiolabeled anti-CD45 Ab

Rituximab therapy is associated with a long in vivo persistence, yet little is known about the effect of circulating rituximab on B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) targeting by the other available anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) (131)iodine-tositumomab and (90)yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan. Therefore we assessed the impact of preexisting rituximab on the binding and efficacy of second anti-CD20 MoAbs to B-NHL and determined whether targeting an alternative lymphoma-associated antigen, CD45, could circumvent this effect. We demonstrated that rituximab concentrations as low as 5 microg/mL nearly completely blocked the binding of a second anti-CD20 MoAbs (P < .001), but had no impact on CD45 targeting (P = .89). Serum from patients with distant exposures to rituximab also blocked binding of anti-CD20 MoAbs to patient-derived rituximab-naive B-NHL at concentrations at low as 7 microg/mL, but did not affect CD45 ligation. A mouse xenograft model (Granta, FL-18, Ramos cell lines) showed that rituximab pretreatment significantly reduced B-NHL targeting and tumor control by CD20-directed radioimmunotherapy (RIT), but had no impact on targeting CD45. These findings suggest that circulating rituximab impairs the clinical efficacy of CD20-directed RIT, imply that novel anti-CD20 MoAbs could also face this same limitation, and indicate that CD45 may represent an alternative target for RIT in B-NHL.

Evaluation of a peptide ELISA for the detection of rituximab in serum

Pharmacokinetic studies of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies necessitate the measurement of their biologically active fraction. The aim of this work was to develop an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, based on its binding to a 20-mer peptide (P20) derived from the extracellular loop of human CD20 (residues 165-184). Derivatives of P20 were prepared by conjugation to bovine serum albumin (BSA-P20ACM) or biotin (Biot-P20ACM). Interactions of P20 and its derived peptides with rituximab were analyzed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and by ELISA. A monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody (MB2A4) was used as the reference in each case. SPR analysis showed that P20 (conjugated or unconjugated) had a lower affinity for rituximab than MB2A4. ELISA methods based on P20 or MB2A4 were both highly accurate and reproducible for rituximab measurement in spiked samples, but the MB2A4-based assay had a lower limit of quantification. Interestingly, discrepant results were obtained with the two ELISA methods when analyzing pharmacokinetic samples, with the rituximab concentrations obtained with the MB2A4-based method being systematically higher than those determined by the P20-based method. Possible interference of circulating CD20 with the P20-based method was supported by competition experiments. Rituximab aggregation in the bloodstream may also account for the bias observed in samples from healthy mice. The P20-based ELISA is far less sensitive than the MB2A-based ELISA, thus limiting its utility for pharmacokinetic studies. However, the discrepancy observed between two different approaches for rituximab measurement indicates that data from different studies should be interpreted with care.

Pharmacokinetics of rituximab and its clinical use: thought for the best use?

Rituximab (MabThera, Rituxan) is a chimaeric monoclonal antibody increasingly used in the treatment of B-lymphoproliferative disorders and autoimmune diseases. Rituximab is now associated with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and should be approved soon in maintenance strategies. During its rapid clinical development, rituximab schedules were dictated more often by logistical rather than by scientific considerations. In addition, early clinical phases have shown that rituximab exposure was variable in patients receiving similar doses and that clinical response was related to rituximab concentrations. There is however limited information on rituximab pharmacokinetics and on factors influencing individual exposure to this monoclonal antibody, although a better understanding of these factors is needed to optimise its dosing regimen. This review focuses on the current knowledge on rituximab pharmacokinetics and on factors influencing individual exposure and suggests ways to improve its clinical use.

Rituximab long-term maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) with either Rituximab alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy has been effective without major side effects. Thus, Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) might represent an improvement in NHL therapy. We therefore retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and side effects of monthly long-term Rituximab maintenance therapy after PBSCT in 27 patients with NHL. In median 10 infusions of Rituximab were given after PBSCT in time intervals of 1 month. Molecular monitoring of t(14;18) was performed using nested as well as quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based on the LightCycler technology. Side effects according to common toxicity criteria (CTC) > II did mainly affect the hematopoietic system. In total, 10 patients (37%) suffered form grade III-IV hematotoxicity. Except for two patients with cutaneous Varicella-Zoster infection no serious infectious complications (CTC grade III/IV) occurred. No patient died because of treatment-related causes. This adverse event data compared favorably to the published data. Three patients had t(14;18) nested RT-PCR positive results before Rituximab therapy and converted to negativity after Rituximab therapy. We conclude that a prolonged Rituximab maintenance therapy after PBSCT with monthly administration is reliable and safe.

Population pharmacokinetics of rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) in rheumatoid arthritis patients during a phase II clinical trial

Rituximab is a B cell-depleting anti-CD20 chimeric IgGkappa monoclonal antibody being investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model in rheumatoid arthritis patients. In addition, the final pharmacokinetic model was used to assess the variability in drug exposure (AUC0-infinity) for fixed versus body surface area-based dosing. A total of 102 patients were included in this population pharmacokinetic analysis. A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model described the data reasonably well. Body surface area and gender were the most significant covariates for both CL and Vc. Body surface area alone only explained about 19.7% of the total interindividual variability of CL. In a simulation study, body surface area-based dosing normalized drug exposure over a wide range of body surface area but did not seem to improve the predictability of rituximab AUC0-infinity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Therefore, no rationale for body surface area-based dosing for rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients was found.

Mantle cell lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma is the B-cell lymphoma with the worst prognosis. Until now, no standard treatment has resulted in cure. Improvements in understanding of the disease are needed to advance therapeutic efforts.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pathology and immunohistochemistry can identify the subset of patients with the worse prognosis. New data suggest that at least a subset of mantle cell lymphoma cases have undergone some form of antigene selection, and particular types of Ig gene rearrangement seem to give a better prognosis. The cell cycle, the ATM, gene and the nuclear factor kappaB pathways are the main targets of the genetic abnormalities occurring in mantle cell lymphoma: new genomic and expression data have been recently published. Unfortunately, this progress has not yet brought any major improvements in therapeutic approaches, which still remain highly unsatisfactory. Autologous and allogenic bone marrow transplantations appear to be the only current treatments that might improve the outcome of patients with PMCL. New additional treatment modalities are currently under investigation.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes all the most recent data published on the biology and treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.

Phase II trial of individualized rituximab dosing for patients with CD20-positive lymphoproliferative disorders

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility and efficacy of pharmacokinetic (PK) -based maintenance dosing of rituximab and possibly design a more rational maintenance schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with CD20-positive lymphoproliferative disorders were treated with four weekly infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m(2). All patients without progressive disease were then monitored for 1 year and received a single infusion of 375 mg/m(2) when the level decreased below 25 microg/mL.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 31 patients were assessable with a variety of histologic subtypes. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire group was 59% with 27% complete responses (CRs) and 32% partial responses. The median PFS for all patients was 19 months, with a median follow-up of 25 months. In 22 patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LGNHL), the ORR was 63% with 36% CR and median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. Of 29 assessable patients, 22 were available for PK-based maintenance. The median time to repeat bolus was 5 months (range, 1 to 9 months) for the first, 3.5 months (range, 2 to 5 months) for the second, and 3 months (range, 2 to 4 months) for the third infusion. Ninety-five percent of patients required three or fewer infusions to be maintained in the therapeutic range.

CONCLUSION

Individualized PK dosing for rituximab produced efficacy comparable to other published maintenance strategies. PK data from this trial suggest that a rational maintenance strategy in patients with LGNHL would be a single dose of 375 mg/m(2) of rituximab every 3 to 4 months.

Rituximab in the treatment of relapsed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Several reports have defined nonfamilial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) as an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies to von Willebrand's factor-cleaving protease (vWF-CP). This raises the possibility that rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20 present in B-lymphoid cells, may have utility in the treatment of TTP. We report five consecutively treated patients with relapsed TTP who responded rapidly to immune suppression by rituximab at our institution. These two male and three female patients had a median age of 37 years (27-70). The median time from diagnosis to therapy was 24 months (8-60). Prior therapies included plasma exchange and corticosteroids in all cases, splenectomy (4), vincristine and aspirin (3), and azathioprine (2). The median number of plasma exchanges received prior to therapy was 59 (21-158). The cohort had a median platelet count of 48 x 10(9)/l (23-110), median hemoglobin of 9 g/dl (8-11), and median lactate dehydrogenase of 632 IU/l (311-945) prior to administration of rituximab. Analysis of vWF-CP activity demonstrated absent or decreased activity with detectable inhibitors in four patients. All patients attained a complete response. The median time to response after the first dose of rituximab was 5 weeks. Responses are maintained in all patients from 10 to 21 months after treatment. This report adds to the evidence that rituximab has efficacy in nonfamilial TTP and warrants further study.