A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer

The role of chemotherapy in treatment of advanced breast cancer: an overview for clinical practice

This review aims to evaluate the role of chemotherapy-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC), with the purpose to optimize selection, sequencing and duration of treatment with the currently available agents for clinical practice. Data from observational as well as randomized phase II and III studies were included. Chemotherapy yielded a median overall survival (OS) of 2 years in registration studies, with comparable efficacy of different agents. Combining chemotherapy agents did not yield OS improvement and caused greater toxicity compared with single-agent chemotherapy. Continuing chemotherapy till progression or unacceptable toxicity generated greater efficacy without detrimental impact on quality of life compared with a limited amount of cycles. In real-world studies, benefits after third-line chemotherapy were modest compared with first- and second-line. Furthermore, effects of previous chemotherapy predicted effects of next-line therapy in real-world. Physicians increasingly prescribed capecitabine or taxanes as first- or second-line chemotherapy over time.

Characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer patients enrolled in the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsored phase I clinical trials

PURPOSE

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Given the availability of approved therapies and abundance of phase II and III clinical trials, historically few BC patients have been referred for consideration of participation on a phase I trial. We were interested in determining whether clinical benefit rates differed in patients with BC from other patients enrolled in phase I trials.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) sponsored phase I trials from 1993 to 2012. We report an analysis of demographic variables, rates of response to treatment, grade 4 toxicities, and treatment-related deaths.

RESULTS

De-identified data from 8087 patients were analyzed, with 1,376 having a diagnosis of BC. The median time from initial cancer diagnosis to enrollment in a CTEP-sponsored phase I clinical trial was 614 days for all patients. Breast cancer patients were enrolled on average 790 days after initial diagnosis, while non-BC patients had a median enrollment time of 582 days (p < 0.001). Breast cancer patients had more clinical responses than non-BC patients (18.3% vs. 4.3%, respectively). Along with the higher rate of response, BC patients remained on phase I trials longer than non-BC patients with a median of 70 days while the latter were on trial for a median of 57 days. The overall rate of death related to the treatment drugs was 0.47%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm our hypothesis that when compared to a general population of patients with cancer enrolled on phase I clinical trials, BC patients tend to derive clinical benefit from these therapies with similar toxicity profile. This evidence further supports enrollment of BC patients on phase I trials.

Use of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Putting Taxanes in Perspective

Agents that target microtubule (MT) dynamics have been used extensively for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Among these agents are taxanes (solvent-based paclitaxel [sb-paclitaxel], docetaxel, and nab-paclitaxel) and non-taxanes, such as eribulin and ixabepilone. Although these agents have been approved for the treatment of MBC, questions regarding the ideal agent, regimen (single agent vs. combination vs. sequential), and schedule still remain. This systematic review examined pivotal trials for taxanes, eribulin, and ixabepilone as well as first-line taxane trials in MBC. Only randomized trials that enrolled ≥ 100 patients were included. Publications on combination regimens with targeted agents were excluded unless they also included a comparison between nontargeted regimens. The studies were grouped into taxane versus taxane, sb-paclitaxel versus non-taxane, and docetaxel versus non-taxane regimens. In taxane versus taxane comparisons, the efficacy of sb-paclitaxel and docetaxel appeared similar, nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks (q3w) appeared superior to sb-paclitaxel q3w, and weekly nab-paclitaxel appeared superior to docetaxel. In general, taxane regimens demonstrated higher overall response rates (ORRs) versus non-taxane regimens; however, only 2 trials demonstrated longer overall survival (OS) for taxane regimens. Taxanes will likely continue to be used in earlier lines of therapy, whereas eribulin and ixabepilone may be more appropriate for later lines of treatment. Ongoing research may identify biomarkers that could help in selecting the appropriate MT-targeted agent for a given patient.

Risk of treatment related death and febrile neutropaenia with first line palliative chemotherapy for de novo metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice in a middle resource country

BACKGROUND

The risk of febrile neutropaenia (FN) and treatment related death (TRD) with first line palliative chemotherapy for de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains unknown outside of a clinical trial setting despite its widespread usage. This study aimed to determine rates in a large cohort of patients treated in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who were treated with first line palliative chemotherapy for de novo MBC from 2002-2011 in UMMC were identified from the UMMC Breast Cancer Registry. Information collected included patient demographics, histopathological features, treatment received, including the different chemotherapy regimens, and presence of FN and TRD. FN was defined as an oral temperature >38.5° or two consecutive readings of >38.0° for 2 hours and an absolute neutrophil count <0.5x109/L, or expected to fall below 0.5x109/L (de Naurois et al, 2010). TRD was defined as death occurring during or within 30 days of the last chemotherapy treatment, as a consequence of the chemotherapy treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 18.0 software. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival compared using log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 1st January 2002 and 31st December 2011, 424 patients with MBC were treated in UMMC. A total of 186 out of 221 patients with de novo MBC who received first line palliative chemotherapy were analyzed. The mean age of patients in this study was 49.5 years (range 24 to 74 years). Biologically, ER status was negative in 54.4% of patients and Her-2 status was positive in 31.1%. A 5-flourouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy regimen was chosen for 86.6% of the cases. Most patients had multiple metastatic sites (58.6%). The main result of this study showed a FN rate of 5.9% and TRD rate of 3.2%. The median survival (MS) for the entire cohort was 19 months. For those with multiple metastatic sites, liver only, lung only, bone only and brain only metastatic sites, the MS was 18, 24, 19, 24 and 8 months respectively (p-value= 0.319).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we surmise that FEC is a safe regimen with acceptable FN and TRD rates for de novo MBC.

Combination versus sequential single agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy can cause greater tumour cell kill if the drug dose is not compromised, while sequential single agent chemotherapy may allow for greater dose intensity and treatment time, potentially meaning greater benefit from each single agent. In addition, sequentially using single agents might cause less toxicity and impairment of quality of life, but it is not known whether this might compromise survival time.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of combination chemotherapy compared to the same drugs given sequentially in women with metastatic breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, using the search terms "advanced breast cancer" and "chemotherapy", MEDLINE and EMBASE on 31 October 2013. The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov were also searched (22 March 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of combination chemotherapy compared to the same drugs used sequentially in women with metastatic breast cancer in the first-, second- or third-line setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data from published trials. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived from time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed-effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables (risk ratios (RR)), and toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where available.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials reporting on nine treatment comparisons (2317 patients randomised) were identified. The majority of trials (10 trials) had an unclear or high risk of bias. Time-to-event data were collected for nine trials for overall survival and eight trials for progression-free survival. All 12 trials reported results for tumour response. In the 12 trials there were 1023 deaths in 2317 women randomised. There was no difference in overall survival, with an overall HR of 1.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.16; P = 0.45), and no significant heterogeneity. This result was consistent in the four subgroups analysed (risk of bias, line of chemotherapy, type of schema of chemotherapy, and relative dose intensity). In particular, there was no difference in survival according to the type of schema of chemotherapy, that is whether chemotherapy was given on disease progression or after a set number of cycles. In the eight trials that reported progression-free survival, 678 women progressed out of the 886 women randomised. The combination arm had a higher risk of progression than the sequential arm (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.31; P = 0.01) with no significant heterogeneity. This result was consistent in all subgroups. Overall tumour response rates were higher in the combination arm (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.24; P = 0.008) but there was significant heterogeneity for this outcome across the trials. In the seven trials that reported treatment-related deaths, there was no significant difference between the two arms, although the CIs were very wide due to the small number of events (RR 1.53; 95% CI 0.71 to 3.29; P = 0.28). The risk of febrile neutropenia was higher in the combination arm (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.65; P = 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, or treatment-related deaths. Overall quality of life showed no difference between the two groups, but only three trials reported this outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Sequential single agent chemotherapy has a positive effect on progression-free survival, whereas combination chemotherapy has a higher response rate and a higher risk of febrile neutropenia in metastatic breast cancer. There is no difference in overall survival time between these treatment strategies, both overall and in the subgroups analysed. In particular, there was no difference in survival according to the schema of chemotherapy (giving chemotherapy on disease progression or after a set number of cycles) or according to the line of chemotherapy (first-line versus second- or third-line). Generally this review supports the recommendations by international guidelines to use sequential monotherapy unless there is rapid disease progression.

Combination versus sequential single agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy can cause greater tumour cell kill if the drug dose is not compromised, while sequential single agent chemotherapy may allow for greater dose intensity and treatment time, potentially meaning greater benefit from each single agent. In addition, sequentially using single agents might cause less toxicity and impairment of quality of life, but it is not known whether this might compromise survival time.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of combination chemotherapy compared to the same drugs given sequentially in women with metastatic breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, using the search terms "advanced breast cancer" and "chemotherapy", MEDLINE and EMBASE on 31 October 2013. The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov were also searched (22 March 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of combination chemotherapy compared to the same drugs used sequentially in women with metastatic breast cancer in the first-, second- or third-line setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data from published trials. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived from time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed-effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables (risk ratios (RR)), and toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where available.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials reporting on nine treatment comparisons (2317 patients randomised) were identified. The majority of trials (10 trials) had an unclear or high risk of bias. Time-to-event data were collected for nine trials for overall survival and eight trials for progression-free survival. All 12 trials reported results for tumour response. In the 12 trials there were 1023 deaths in 2317 women randomised. There was no difference in overall survival, with an overall HR of 1.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.16; P = 0.45), and no significant heterogeneity. This result was consistent in the four subgroups analysed (risk of bias, line of chemotherapy, type of schema of chemotherapy, and relative dose intensity). In particular, there was no difference in survival according to the type of schema of chemotherapy, that is whether chemotherapy was given on disease progression or after a set number of cycles. In the eight trials that reported progression-free survival, 678 women progressed out of the 886 women randomised. The combination arm had a higher risk of progression than the sequential arm (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.31; P = 0.01) with no significant heterogeneity. This result was consistent in all subgroups. Overall tumour response rates were higher in the combination arm (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.24; P = 0.008) but there was significant heterogeneity for this outcome across the trials. In the seven trials that reported treatment-related deaths, there was no significant difference between the two arms, although the CIs were very wide due to the small number of events (RR 1.53; 95% CI 0.71 to 3.29; P = 0.28). The risk of febrile neutropenia was higher in the combination arm (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.65; P = 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, or treatment-related deaths. Overall quality of life showed no difference between the two groups, but only three trials reported this outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Sequential single agent chemotherapy has a positive effect on progression-free survival, whereas combination chemotherapy has a higher response rate and a higher risk of febrile neutropenia in metastatic breast cancer. There is no difference in overall survival time between these treatment strategies, both overall and in the subgroups analysed. In particular, there was no difference in survival according to the schema of chemotherapy (giving chemotherapy on disease progression or after a set number of cycles) or according to the line of chemotherapy (first-line versus second- or third-line). Generally this review supports the recommendations by international guidelines to use sequential monotherapy unless there is rapid disease progression.

Taxane chemotherapy treatment for metastatic breast cancer

SUMMARY The taxanes, paclitaxel, docetaxel and nab-paclitaxel, are among the most active cytotoxic agents for treatment of breast cancer. Significant progress has been made in addressing taxane dose and schedule in both early-stage and metastatic disease. Several studies have clarified the role of retreatment with taxanes in recurrent breast cancer patients previously treated with taxane-containing regimens. In addition, the advent of nab-paclitaxel, designed to reduce allergic reactions and enhance drug delivery to tumor cells, has provided additional therapeutic options. This article summarizes the uses of taxanes in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Vinorelbine and capecitabine in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: sequential or combinational?

PURPOSE

The difference between combinational and pre-planned sequential therapies using regimens that include non-anthracycline and taxane in the first-line setting remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore the interaction between vinorelbine (N) and capecitabine (X) in breast cancer cells and to compare the simultaneous or sequential administration of the two drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as first-line treatment.

METHODS

First, we explored the effects of vinorelbine on thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast cancer cells. Next, we designed a prospective randomized phase II trial of MBC patients comparing the combinational and pre-planned sequential administration of vinorelbine and capecitabine in the first-line metastatic setting. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation between clinical characteristics and class III β-tubulin expression and patient survival was also explored.

RESULTS

Vinorelbine upregulates TP and downregulates TS in breast cancer cells, thereby further sensitizing tumor cells to capecitabine, which indicated the proper order for sequential therapy should be N → X. Sixty patients were eligible for the phase II trial. No significant difference was observed between the combinational arm and the sequential arm in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Only in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases were median PFS and OS significantly prolonged in the combinational arm (8.5 vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.041 and 23.8 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.028, respectively). No association between class III β-tubulin expression and patient outcome was identified. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in the combinational arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the NX regimen and pre-planned sequential N → X regimen are acceptable as first-line treatments with comparable efficacies for MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Sequential monotherapies are recommended as the preferred approach to first-line chemotherapy for most MBC patients in the absence of an imminent visceral crisis and the need for rapid symptom and/or disease control.

A multicenter phase III prospective randomized trial of high-dose epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) versus docetaxel followed by EC in node-positive breast cancer. GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale) 9902 study

BACKGROUND

The Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale 9902 trial compared four cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) with four cycles of docetaxel (Taxotere, D) followed by four cycles of EC as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to EC (E 120 mg/m(2), C 600 mg/m(2), arm A) for four cycles or four cycles of D (100 mg/m(2)) followed by four cycles of EC (arm B), both regimens every 21 days. Hormone receptor-positive patients were given hormonal therapy for 5 years. Primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

There were 750 patients enrolled. With a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year DFS was 73.4% in both arms, and 5-year OS was 89.5% versus 90.7% in arm A and B [hazard ratio was 0.99 (95% confidence interval for DFS 0.75-1.31; P = 0.95)], respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more common in arm B.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show advantages from the addition of docetaxel to high-dose EC as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. The small sample size and low number of DFS events may have limited the ability to observe statistically significant difference between the two arms.

Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment

BACKGROUND

Zarzio, a new recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim), was evaluated in healthy volunteers and neutropenic patients in phase I and III studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Healthy volunteers in randomized, two-period crossover studies received single- and multiple-dose s.c. injections of 1 microg/kg (n = 24), 2.5 microg/kg (n = 28), 5 microg/kg (n = 28), or 10 microg/kg (n = 40), as well as single-dose i.v. infusions of 5 microg/kg (n = 26), of Zarzio or the reference product (Neupogen). Filgrastim serum levels were monitored; pharmacodynamic parameters were absolute neutrophil count (all studies) and CD34(+) cells (multiple-dose studies). Supportive efficacy and safety data were obtained from an open phase III study in 170 breast cancer patients undergoing four cycles of doxorubicin and docetaxel (Taxotere) chemotherapy, receiving Zarzio (300 or 480 microg) as primary prophylaxis of severe neutropenia.

RESULTS

The results of the studies in healthy volunteers confirm the comparability of the test and reference products with respect to their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Confidence intervals were within the predefined equivalence boundaries. In the phase III study in breast cancer patients, the administration of Zarzio was efficacious and safe, triggering no immunogenicity.

CONCLUSION

The results of these studies demonstrate the biosimilarity of Zarzio with its reference product Neupogen.

Docetaxel versus docetaxel alternating with gemcitabine as treatments of advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a randomised trial

Background: Alternating administration of docetaxel and gemcitabine might result in improved time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and fewer adverse events compared with single-agent docetaxel as treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Patients and methods: Women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive 3-weekly docetaxel (group D) or 3-weekly docetaxel alternating with 3-weekly gemcitabine (group D/G) until treatment failure as first-line chemotherapy. The primary end point was TTF.

Results: Two hundred and thirty-seven subjects were assigned to treatment (group D, 115; group D/G, 122). The median TTF was 5.6 and 6.2 months in groups D and D/G, respectively (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.63–1.16; P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in time-to-disease progression, survival, and response rate between the groups. When adverse events were evaluated for the worst toxicity encountered during treatment, there was little difference between the groups, but when they were assessed per cycle, alternating treatment was associated with fewer severe (grade 3 or 4) adverse effects (P = 0.013), and the difference was highly significant for cycles when gemcitabine was administered in group D/G (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The alternating regimen was associated with a similar TTF as single-agent docetaxel but with fewer adverse effects during gemcitabine cycles.

Prognostic value of serum vascular endothelial growth factor in Egyptian females with metastatic triple negative breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to explore the value of serum vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and VEGF-A level at baseline, mid-therapy and at the end of therapy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Female patients aged 18 years or above with histologically proven metastatic TNBC were included. Serum VEFG-A levels were measured at baseline, after the 3rd and 6th cycles of FAC chemotherapy regimen (Fluorourcil, Adriamycin, and Cyclophamide).

RESULTS

The overall RR was 57%. The median PFS and OS were 7 and 11.2 months, respectively (95% CI: 4.3-9.7 and 3.8-18.5 months, respectively). Patients whose disease progressed despite therapy had a significantly higher baseline VEGF-A level than those who did not progress. VEGF-A level did not drop with continuation of therapy. Patients with high VEGF-A level had a significantly lower PFS but not OS than patients with low levels.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of metastatic TNBC is poor with FAC chemotherapy regimen. Alternative chemotherapeutic regimens and novel therapeutic approaches including targeting of VEGF and/or its receptors are warranted.

Concurrent doxorubicin plus docetaxel is not more effective than concurrent doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E 2197

PURPOSE

The combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is a standard adjuvant regimen. Doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) is one of the most active cytotoxic regimens for metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of this trial was to determine whether adjuvant AT improved disease-free survival compared with AC in operable breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with invasive breast cancer were eligible if there were one to three positive lymph nodes or if the node-negative tumor was greater than 1 cm. Patients were randomly assigned after surgery to receive doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus either cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2); AC) or docetaxel (60 mg/m(2); AT) given every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by hormone therapy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors.

RESULTS

There were 2,882 eligible patients enrolled. After a median follow-up of 79.5 months, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS; 85% in both arms) or overall survival (91% v 92%) at 5 years. The hazard ratio for AC versus AT was 1.02 (95% CI for DFS, 0.86 to 1.22; P = .78). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified stratification factors by ER and PR expression there were trends toward improved DFS for AT in ER/PR-negative disease. Grade 3 neutropenia associated with fever or infection occurred more often with AT (26% v 10%; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

AT did not improve DFS or overall survival in this population, and was associated with more toxicity.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer: looking towards the future

The armamentarium for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is increasing with the introduction of newer chemotherapeutic agents and the development of molecular targeted therapies. The clinical utility of anthracyclines in advanced breast cancer has been limited by significant adverse events; therefore the taxanes are increasingly used in the metastatic setting. Trastuzumab with a taxane as first-line therapy is now standard of care for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Other targeted therapies, including the antiangiogenesis agents such as bevacizumab, are being investigated both as monotherapy and in combination regimens. While the number of available agents is growing rapidly, challenges remain concerning appropriate dose, schedule, treatment duration and management of drug resistance. This paper reviews recent data regarding the established and investigational medical treatments for endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer, and presents treatment recommendations.

Randomized phase II adjuvant trial of dose-dense docetaxel before or after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in axillary node-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

An anthracycline-based combination followed by, or combined with, a taxane is the sequence used in most adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. We hypothesized that administering the taxane before the anthracycline combination would be associated with fewer dose reductions and delays than the reverse sequence. To test this hypothesis, a randomized phase II multicenter adjuvant chemotherapy trial was performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with axillary node-positive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned either to group A (docetaxel [DOC] 75 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] every 14 days for four cycles followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) [AC] IV every 14 days for four cycles); or to group B (AC followed by DOC) at the identical doses and schedule. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg subcutaneous injection was administered 1 day after the chemotherapy in all treatment cycles. The primary objective was to administer DOC without dose reductions or delays before or after AC and calculate the relative dose intensity (RDI) of DOC and AC.

RESULTS

The majority of toxicities were grade 0 to 2 irrespective of sequence. The RDI for DOC was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively, in groups A (DOC followed by AC) and B (AC followed by DOC), with more frequent dose reductions occurring in group B (46% v 18%). The RDI for AC was 0.95 and 0.98 in groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The administration of DOC before AC results in fewer DOC dose reductions and a higher RDI than the reverse sequence. Larger trials evaluating the sequence of DOC before anthracyclines are justified.

Sequential vinorelbine–capecitabine followed by docetaxel in advanced breast cancer: long-term results of a pilot phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the response rate of the combination of capecitabine (C) and vinorelbine (V) followed by Docetaxel (D) in the 1st line treatment of advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy in advanced disease were eligible. Pts received V 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 in combination with C 825 mg/m(2) twice a day from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by 12 consecutive weeks of D 25 mg/m(2)/w.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and November 2003, 40 patients were enrolled. Median age was 57 years. Of patients, 77.5% of pts had visceral involvement and 32.5% had more than two metastatic sites. In the adjuvant setting, 62.5% received anthracycline and 10% Taxanes. In the intent-to-treat population, an overall objective response was observed in 25 patients (62.5, 95% CI, 45.8-77.27) and stable disease in 5 (12.5%). Median time till progression (TTP) was 12.3 months (range 1.5-48; 95% CI, 10.05-14.54). The median survival was 35.7 months (range 2-47). Reported grade 3-4 toxicities under Navcap were neutropenia (4 pts), anemia (1 pt), thrombopenia (1 pt) and febrile neutropenia (3 pts). Reported grade 3-4 toxicities under weekly Docetaxel were neutropenia (1 pt), thrombopenia (2 pts), leucopenia (1 pt) and anemia (1 pt).

CONCLUSION

The sequential use of Navcap followed by weekly Docetaxel demonstrated an interesting efficacy with a prolonged TTP and OS and warrants further evaluation.

Advanced breast cancer: chemotherapy phase III trials that change a standard

At the present time, there is not a standard regimen in upfront metastatic setting for breast cancer. A wide variety of regimens which includes anthracyclines, taxanes, gemcitabine or capecitabine are currently used, however, there is evidence to support the use of many of these drugs in early breast cancer and consequently limiting their use in first line treatment. The aim of this review is to evaluate every randomized phase III trials conducted in first line metastatic breast cancer. For this reason, all randomized studies that evaluated the role of chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer were analyzed and classified according to their protocol design. So far, sixteen major randomized clinical trials have evaluated the role of chemotherapy as front line in metastatic breast cancer. Some of them have analyzed a different anthracyclines-based regimen as the control arm versus new combinations or new drugs. In others, the aim is to evaluate the most effective therapy after progression to an adjuvant anthracyclines-containing regimen. The suitability of the control arm, the prospective definition of patient's subgroups as well as the statistical methodology have been taken into account.

Achievements in systemic therapies in the pregenomic era in metastatic breast cancer

Over the last decades, the introduction of several new agents into clinical practice has significantly improved disease control and obtained some, albeit rare, survival benefits in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite these results, the choice of treatment for the majority of patients is still empirically based, since the only two predictive factors with level 1 evidence for clinical use are hormonal receptor status for endocrine therapy and HER-2 status for trastuzumab therapy. Important improvements in the endocrine therapy of both pre- and postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive disease have been achieved. For premenopausal women, ovarian function suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs combined with tamoxifen has become the standard treatment, although aromatase inhibitors plus ovarian function suppression are under evaluation. In postmenopausal patients, aromatase inhibitors have proved to be superior to standard endocrine therapies in either first- or second-line treatment and a novel antiestrogen compound, fulvestrant, has been introduced in clinical practice. Chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice for hormone unresponsive or resistant patients. Anthracyclines and taxanes have been used either alone or in combination as first-line chemotherapy, but with the more frequent use of these agents in the adjuvant setting, new standards are needed for first-line chemotherapy, and new and more efficacious treatments are required. In the subgroup of patients with tumors that overexpress HER-2, the use of trastuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy has modified the natural history of these tumors, even if only about one out of two patients obtains a clinical response. In this review we summarize the main achievements and the currently available treatment options for patients with MBC.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel : recent developments

Docetaxel belongs to the class of taxane antineoplastic agents that act by inducing microtubular stability and disrupting the dynamics of the microtubular network. The drug has shown a broad spectrum of antitumour activity in preclinical models as well as clinically, with responses observed in various disease types, including advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of docetaxel are extremely complex and have been the subject of intensive investigation in recent years. Docetaxel is subject to extensive metabolic conversion by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes, which results in several pharmacologically inactive oxidation products. Elimination routes of docetaxel are also dependent on the presence of drug-transporting proteins, notably P-glycoprotein, present on the bile canalicular membrane. The various processes mediating drug elimination, either through metabolic breakdown or excretion, impact substantially on interindividual variability in drug handling. Strategies to individualise docetaxel administration schedules based on phenotypic or genotype-dependent differences in CYP3A expression are underway and may ultimately lead to more selective chemotherapeutic use of this agent.

Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains essentially incurable, and goals of therapy include the palliation of symptoms, delay of disease progression, and prolongation of overall survival time without negatively impacting quality of life. Anthracycline and taxane-based therapies have traditionally shown the highest degree of activity in MBC. Though numerous randomized clinical trials have shown improvements in overall response rates, few have found clear survival benefits. In recent years, however, there has been a small but growing series of clinical trials demonstrating modest, but meaningful survival advantages in metastatic disease. A common feature in many of these trials has been the use of a taxane, and more recently, a taxane combined with an antimetabolite. In addition, the development of targeted biologic agents active against MBC, such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab, has demonstrated great potential for enhancing the effects of chemotherapy and producing meaningful survival improvements. The role of the taxanes, antimetabolites, and biologics in extending survival in MBC is discussed.

Docetaxel in the treatment of breast cancer: current experience and future prospects

It has become clear over the past 10 years that docetaxel, a semisynthetic taxoid antineoplastic agent, is among the most promising compounds to have been developed in the 1990s for the treatment of breast cancer. Data indicate that this drug became standard therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease who have failed anthracycline treatment, and secondarily showed very encouraging results in the first-line metastatic setting either in monochemotherapy or when docetaxel was combined with an anthracycline. More recently, docetaxel also became one of the standard therapies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and a promising partner for novel biologic therapies. Current research is further exploring the effect of docetaxel on outcome of early breast cancer in order to fully determine the extent that this chemotherapeutic agent will change the natural history of breast cancer.

Concomitant Versus Sequential Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Early-Stage and Metastatic Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the Western world. Chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in women with early-stage breast cancer. Although anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens are considered most effective, the optimal way to administer them (sequentially vs. in combination) remains in question. In metastatic breast cancer, cytotoxic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors or rapidly progressive disease, regardless of hormone receptor status. The combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab improves DFS and OS rates in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. In patients with HER2-negative tumors, the choice of single-agent sequential versus combination chemotherapy should be individualized. Sequential chemotherapy can produce OS rates similar to those of combination regimens and avoids the overlapping toxic effects of combination chemotherapy. However, response rates are generally higher and time to progression is longer with combination chemotherapy. At present, no predictive markers of response to chemotherapy are clinically useful in making treatment decisions for individual patients. Prospective studies are needed in order to validate the clinical utility of novel markers of response to specific chemotherapies and/or various schedules of administration.

Therapeutic Index by Combination of Adriamycin and Docetaxel Depends on Dosing Time in Mice

Although the combination of adriamycin and docetaxel showed a better cure rate against metastatic breast cancer, severe myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity were dose-limiting factors. The purpose of this study was to establish a suitable dosing schedule, based on a chronopharmacologic approach, to relieve severe adverse effects. In experiment 1, adriamycin or docetaxel was injected i.p. at 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, or 22 hours after light onset (HALO) to estimate toxicities. In experiment 2, the dosing time dependency of toxicity and pharmacokinetics were assessed in the combination of adriamycin and docetaxel. In addition, G2-M phase in myelocyte cells was determined in nontreated mice. Adverse effects caused by adriamycin were shown to be the worst at 2 HALO and the best at 14 HALO. On the other hand, docetaxel-induced adverse effects were more severe at 14 HALO than at 2 HALO. In the combination study, the D(2)-A(1)4 group, in which docetaxel was administered at 2 HALO followed by adriamycin at 14 HALO, showed the most toxicity relief of all the treated groups. In the pharmacokinetic study, the dosing time dependency of toxicities was not related to the daily variation of pharmacokinetics of adriamycin and docetaxel. A significant 24-hour rhythm of G2-M phase distribution was found in myelocyte cells of nontreated mice. The daily variation of leukopenia caused by docetaxel corresponded to the 24-hour rhythm of G2-M phase distribution. These findings reveal that the therapeutic index of the combined chemotherapy can be improved by administering adriamycin and docetaxel at the time when the most adverse effects are relieved in each drug.

Phase I trial of liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet; D-99) and weekly docetaxel in advanced breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I trial to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of non-pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet; D-99) administered with weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with no prior chemotherapy for MBC received D-99 (60 or 50 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 and escalating doses of docetaxel (25, 30 and 35 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 in cohorts of three to six patients. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 50 mg/m2 of D-99 in combination with 25 mg/m2 of weekly docetaxel. The most common grade 4 toxicity was neutropenia that occurred in 42 (41%) of treatment cycles, with 10 hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia. Serious protocol-defined cardiac events occurred in three (14%) patients, with two (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1% to 30%) developing congestive heart failure (CHF) after a total cumulative anthracycline dose (adjuvant doxorubicin + D-99) of 540 mg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

D-99 in combination with weekly docetaxel, at the doses and schedule as administered in this trial, is not recommended for phase II testing. Additional trials, using different doses and schedules, are required to evaluate the potential side-effects and efficacy of D-99 and docetaxel.