High activity and reduced neurotoxicity of bi-fractionated oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans.

Quality of life and symptoms in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol LTS-01

PURPOSE

Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQL) in long-term survivors (LTS) of colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Long-term CRC survivors (≥5 years) treated in previous National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials were recruited from 60 sites. After obtaining consent, a telephone survey was administered, which included HRQL instruments to measure physical health (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL], SF-12 Physical Component Scale [PCS], SF-36 Vitality Scale), mental health (SF-12 Mental Component Scale [MCS], Life Orientation Test, and Impact of Cancer), and clinical symptoms (Fatigue Symptom Inventory [FSI], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Module [EORTC-CR38], and Brief Pain Inventory). A multivariable model identified predictors of overall quality of life (global health rating).

RESULTS

Participants (N = 708) had significantly higher HRQL compared with age group-matched non-cancer controls with higher mean scores on SF-12 PCS (49.5 vs. 43.7, p = <0.05), MCS (55.6 vs. 52.1, p = <0.05), and SF-36 Vitality Scale (67.1 vs. 59.9, p = <0.05). Multivariable modeling has demonstrated that better overall physical and mental health (PCS and MCS), positive body image (EORTC-CR38 scale), and less fatigue (FSI), were strongly associated with overall quality of life as measured by the global health rating. Interestingly, ability to perform IADLs, experience of cancer, gastrointestinal complaints, and pain, were not important predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In long-term CRC survivors, overall physical and mental health was excellent compared with general population. Other disease-related symptoms did not detract from good overall health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

LTS of CRC within the setting of a clinical trial have higher HRQL than the general population, and treatment regimens do not appear to be associated with any significant late effects on quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NSABP LTS-01: NCT00410579.

The place of targeted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Despite the high prevalence of colorectal cancer in a continuously aging population and the substantial advances in the treatment of metastatic disease during the past decade, the treatment of elderly patients with advanced, unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer is a clearly unmet need. Since older patients are under-represented or even excluded from randomized trials, the evidence that oncologists use as guidance is weak. However, small prospective studies, pooled analyses and observational studies show that combination approaches are safe, efficacious and feasible in the geriatric population with metastatic colorectal cancer. The use of biologic agents targeting angiogenesis and the epidermal growth factor receptor, which have been shown to clearly improve outcomes in multiple prospective trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, is a vital component of the aforementioned combination approaches. Herein, we review all available data concerning the management of elderly patients with these agents and underscore the differences between this age subgroup and younger patients.

An update on the management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the elderly

SUMMARY 

The availability of new chemotherapeutic and targeted agents has changed the life expectancy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer thanks to the possibility of sequentially administering fluoropyrimidines combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus monoclonal antibodies. This approach is seldom feasible in the elderly, especially because of the poor tolerability of some agents. Frail patients should only receive palliative treatment. Oppositely, fit elderly patients can be treated with more aggressive therapies, similarly to the younger ones. What is not sufficiently known is how to manage the elderly categorized as intermediate. In the coming years, it appears necessary how to accurately differentiate the elderly through a comprehensive geriatric assessment performed with validated scales and uniformed criteria simpler than those currently available.

The impact of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer on the autonomous nervous system

BACKGROUND

The oxaliplatin (ΟΧΑ)-based regimens FOLFOX and XELOX can cause peripheral neuropathy. It is unknown if ΟΧΑ, alone or in combination regimens, affects the Autonomous Nervous System (ANS). Accordingly, we evaluated the impact of ΟΧΑ-based chemotherapy on the ANS.

METHODS

We enrolled 36 patients with colorectal cancer, treated with adjuvant mFOLFOX6 or XELOX chemotherapy, and 22 healthy volunteers. For the assessment of ANS function, participants completed a questionnaire and underwent neurophysiological examination at three time points (baseline, 3-4 months and 6-8 months after the first chemotherapy cycle). ANS testing included assessment of the adrenergic cardiovascular function (orthostatic hypotension-OH), parasympathetic heart innervation (ratio 30/15) and Sympathetic Skin Response (SSR).

RESULTS

The values of the 30/15 ratio were significantly reduced at the two time point assessments compared to baseline (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, both P < 0.001), while patients had more often diastolic OH at the 6-8 month evaluation compared to baseline (P = 0.039). In contrast, SSR was not affected. The incidence of positive responses in the questionnaire assessing the subjective impact of symptoms attributable to ANS dysfunction was higher at the two time points compared to baseline (P = 0.036 and P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with significant effects on the adrenergic cardiovascular reaction and the parasympathetic heart innervation, whereas SSR remains untouched.

First-line bevacizumab and capecitabine-oxaliplatin in elderly patients with mCRC: GEMCAD phase II BECOX study

Background:

Subgroup analyses of clinical studies suggest that bevacizumab plus XELOX is effective and tolerable in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The prospective BECOX study examined the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus XELOX, followed by bevacizumab plus capecitabine in elderly patients with mCRC.

Methods:

Patients aged ⩾70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 out of 1 and confirmed mCRC were included. Patients received bevacizumab 7.5 mg kg⁻¹ and oxaliplatin 130 mg m⁻² on day 1, plus capecitabine 1000 mg m⁻² bid orally on days 1–14 every 21 days; oxaliplatin was discontinued after 6 cycles. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP).

Results:

The intent-to-treat population comprised 68 patients (65% male, median age 76 years). Median TTP was 11.1 months; median overall survival was 20.4 months; overall response rate was 46%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included diarrhoea (18%) and asthenia (16%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of special interest for bevacizumab included deep-vein thrombosis (6%) and pulmonary embolism (4%).

Conclusions:

Bevacizumab plus XELOX was effective and well tolerated in elderly patients in the BECOX study. The adverse-event profile was similar to previous reports; no new safety concerns were identified. Fit elderly patients with mCRC should be considered for treatment with bevacizumab plus XELOX.

Capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (AXELOX) as 1st line treatment for fit and vulnerable elderly patients (aged >70 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease of the elderly. However, geriatric patients are often excluded from clinical trials. The combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (XELOX/BEV) has not been assessed in an elderly population.

Methods

We conducted a phase II study of XELOX plus bevacizumab combination as first line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic CRC. Treatment consisted of capecitabine 750 mg/m² twice a day during days 1–7, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. The primary endpoint was overall response rate.

Results

In the 48 enrolled patients response rate according was 46.8% (95% CI: 32.54%–61.07%), while 13 patients had stable disease, for an overall disease control rate of 74.4% (95% CI: 57.8–91.2). Progression free survival was 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.9–9.8 months) and the median overall survival 20.1 months (95% CI: 15.6–25.7 months). Response rate and progression free survival has been correlated with baseline albumin and haemoglobin levels. There was one treatment-related death. Grade 3–4 toxicities were asthenia (4.2%), neurotoxicity (2.1%) and diarrhea 6.3%).

Conclusions

The combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab is an effective and safe combination for the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic CRC.

Trial registration

Clinical trials NCT01024504, 26 November 2010.

Elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: overall issues and first-line chemotherapy options

SUMMARY The aging phenomenon is resulting in an ever greater incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the elderly. Chronologic age is not the best or only way to define elderly patients because aging varies greatly. Comprehensive geriatric assessment has proved beneficial for more appropriate therapeutic options although its influence on treatment decisions and outcomes remains to be validated. Fit elderly patients with metastatic CRC derive similar benefits to their younger counterparts, but only one Phase III trial exists to define the best treatment. New strategies such as maintenance therapies, which are particularly appropriate in these patients, are needed. As very few data are available for the vulnerable/frail elderly population, it is important to better define these terms and the efficacy (if any) of treatment modalities in this group. Translational research in geriatric oncology must be improved in this heterogeneous population to identify biological and clinical correlates of cancer and aging, ameliorating personalized treatment in elderly metastatic CRC patients.

Ganglioside-monosialic acid (GM1) prevents oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in patients with gastrointestinal tumors

Background

Oxaliplatin, an effective antineoplastic agent againstgastrointestinal tumors, can cause severe peripheral neurotoxicity, which seriously limits its clinical application. To date, there are no effective treatments for this complication. Ganglioside-monosialic acid (GM1) has been shown to protect neurons against injuries and degeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of GM1 on preventing oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

Methods

In this study, 120 patients with gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled, andthey received the treatment of XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) and FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin, leukovolin and 5-fluorouracil). The patients were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group and control group, with60 patients ineach. On the day chemotherapy was initiated, the experimental group received GM1 intravenously (100 mg once daily) for 3 days, while no neuroprotective agents were applied in the control group. The incidence rates and classification of neurotoxicity in the two groups were evaluated and the differences between the two groups were examined. Furthermore, whether GM1 affected the therapeutic effects of chemotherapy was also examined.

Results

The grade of neurotoxicity in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05, Mann–Whitney U test). The probability of occurrence of low-grade neurotoxicity (grade 0 and 1) in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (logistic ordinal regression); whereas the probability of occurrence of high-grade neurotoxicity (grade 2 and 3) in the experimental group was lower than in the control group (logistic ordinal regression).

Conclusion

The data suggested that GM1 could reduce the grade of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and was an effective neuroprotective agent against oxaliplatin-induced high-grade neurotoxicity in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

Relative effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy in elderly and nonelderly patients with stage III colon cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy effectiveness in clinical practice may differ from the efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials, particularly among populations underrepresented in clinical trials, such as elderly patients with cancer. This review aims to examine the relative effectiveness of chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in elderly versus nonelderly patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality approach. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases. Chemotherapy regimens approved for stage III colon cancer were reviewed. Four effectiveness and 15 safety outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

From 708 identified articles, 25 articles provided data on the relative effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy among elderly versus nonelderly patients. Four of 14 studies showed lower overall survival treatment effects, whereas one of five and one of four studies indicated more favorable treatment effects for time to progression and overall response rate. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were higher among elderly patients for cardiac disorder (2/5 studies), leukopenia (1/5), neutropenia (4/16), thrombocytopenia (2/13), febrile neutropenia (1/4), infection (2/10), dehydration (2/6), diarrhea (6/20), and fatigue (6/13). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lower for neutropenia (2/16 studies), nausea/vomiting (1/16), and neuropathy (1/9).

CONCLUSION

The majority of the evidence suggests that chemotherapy has similar relative effectiveness and safety for patients >65 years of age versus younger patients with stage III colon cancer. When differences are reported, treatment effects are more often worse among the elderly. This review suggests that without other reasons for withholding treatment, elderly patients should receive chemotherapy as often as nonelderly patients.

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)

Elderly patients constitute a subpopulation with special clinical features that differ from those of the general population and are under-represented in clinical trials. We retrospectively analyzed the toxicity and efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of elderly patients affected by metastatic (m) CRC. Seventy-five consecutive patients aged 65-75 years (median age 71 years), 51 males and 24 females, with mCRC and measurable disease, were analyzed. The primary site of metastases was the liver (38.6% of patients). The majority of patients had a performance status (PS) according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS before treatment of 0-1 (96%). The overall response rate was 57.3%, median progression-free survival was 7 months and median overall survival was 27 months. The main hematological and extra-hematological toxicities (grade 3 or 4) were neutropenia (20.0%), and neurological toxicity or diarrhea (6.7%), respectively. No toxic death occurred. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy maintains its efficacy, and safety in elderly patients with mCRC and good PS. This regimen should be considered in the treatment of this particular setting of patients.

KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis from liquid-based cytology brushings of colorectal carcinoma in comparison with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue

Real-time PCR-based molecular diagnostic techniques were used for the comparative identification of the most common KRAS and BRAF mutations from methanol liquid-based cytology samples and matched, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Methanol-based fixation and preservation of brushing samples of colorectal carcinomas could contribute to sample collection, short-term storage and subsequent molecular analysis, by improving workflow and enhancing the identification of putative mutations.

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in the elderly

OPINION STATEMENT

Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality in the United States. The median age of patients at diagnosis is over 70, so as the American population ages, it can be expected that the incidence of CRC will also increase. There is limited prospective data regarding the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic CRC. However, the data that are available suggest that elderly patients with a good performance status have a similar likelihood of response to currently available chemotherapy, though perhaps a somewhat higher likelihood of toxicities such as myelosuppression. This paper reviews the available data and recommendations for the treatment of this patient population.

Capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) or irinotecan (CAPIRI) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer aged > or =70 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged > or =70 years were randomly assigned to receive CAPOX [oxaliplatin 65 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d. days 1-14; q21d] or CAPIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d. days 1-14; q21d). The primary study end point was overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were enrolled. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 2 complete responses (CRs) and 16 partial responses (PRs) were reported with CAPOX (ORR 38%), and 2 CRs and 15 PRs with CAPIRI (ORR 36%; P = 0.831). Median time to progression was 8 months for CAPOX and 7 months for CAPIRI (P = 0.195), with median survival times of 19.3 months and 14.0 months (P = 0.165), respectively. Global health status was improved in 45% and in 21% of patients in the CAPOX and CAPIRI arms, respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events in CAPIRI versus CAPOX patients were diarrhea (32% versus 15%; P = 0.052) and neutropenia (23% versus 6%; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

CAPOX and CAPIRI had similar efficacy in elderly patients, although CAPOX seemed to be better tolerated.

Chemotherapy for operable and advanced colorectal cancer

The majority of colorectal cancer patients receive chemotherapy either to palliate advanced unresectable disease or to reduce the risk of recurrence after radical surgery. Thanks to the improvements in systemic chemotherapy, in the last 20 years the median survival time for patients with unresectable metastatic disease has indeed progressively increased from less than 6 to almost 24 months and recurrences after radical surgery in patients with early-stage tumors have been halved. Although colorectal cancer incidence increase with aging, there is limited scientific evidence based on prospective clinical trials to guide the management of elderly colorectal cancer patients. In addition, aging is a continuum process making strict cut-off difficult to define and homogeneous subgroups hard to identify. There is significant heterogeneity also as regards comorbidities, overall physical ability, mental health and functional status. Specific guidelines for the medical treatment of elderly colorectal cancer patients are therefore difficult to draw. While fit patients are generally treated with adult protocols and frail individuals rarely receive chemotherapy, managing the intermediate vulnerable patients requires a careful balance between the biological and psycho-social costs of treatment, the aggressiveness of the tumor and its perception by the patient. In this review, the major achievements of chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer will be described and the available data addressing the extension of these chemotherapy programs to elderly patients will be discussed. Special emphasis will be given to the development of specific treatment strategies depending on the degree of disease aggressiveness. Empirical suggestions to adapt the chemotherapy programs developed for adult fit patients to subjects with various degrees of vulnerability and frailty will also be given along with practical indications for the use of specific chemotherapeutic agents in the presence of some common elderly-related comorbidities.

Chemotherapy options and outcomes in older adult patients with colorectal cancer

The majority of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are >/=65 years of age, yet older patients with CRC remain under-represented in clinical trials. Older adult patients may be more likely than younger patients to experience chemotherapy-related toxicities due to factors such as existing comorbidities, incompatibility of chemotherapy with other medications, and age-related reduction in the detoxification and elimination potential of the liver and kidneys. However, the older patient group are a heterogeneous population. The available data on treatment of older patients with CRC indicate that fit older adult patients have the potential to derive the same benefit as do younger patients. A comprehensive geriatric assessment can help to identify patients most likely to benefit from standard treatment. In this review, we will evaluate the chemotherapy regimens investigated in older adult patients with CRC, and how the safety profiles and efficacy of chemotherapy in the older adult compare with those observed in younger patients.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in the elderly: Whom to treat and what to use

The median age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer is during the seventh decade, and the incidence of the disease increases continuously with age. However, as the age increases, the possibilities of receiving adequate cancer treatment diminish and the mortality rises. So, there is a huge need for defined treatment strategies in elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma. The geriatric population is a very heterogeneous group where patients with an excellent health status coexist with the patients with both co-morbidities and functional dependency. Therefore, it is necessary to personalize each treatment according to the degree of vulnerability of the elderly patients. It is essential to set up a multidimensional geriatric assessment in order to consider not only the stage of the disease, but also all the factors that may influence the survival and interfere with the treatment. The aim of this review is to discuss the potential benefits and issues of chemotherapy in the elderly patients affected with colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: an update on recent clinical studies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the Western world, with > 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year. One of the strongest risk factors for colon cancer is age. Physicians and their older patients commonly face the dilemma of whether to give/receive systemic chemotherapy for CRC. Evidence supports similar survival benefits with adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients compared with younger age groups. Data on treatment- related side effects did not reveal a different toxicity profile for elderly patients. The safety and efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in fit older patients were proven, and this group of patients could be enrolled in clinical trials. Conversely, frail older patients are more likely to suffer adverse outcomes when faced with stressors and might not benefit from chemotherapy. Despite a growing body of data, a great deal of work is still needed to establish optimal strategies to care for patients diagnosed with cancer later in life. There is a paucity of reports published in the literature because of the difficulty in routinely collecting such data. We report an overview of recent studies (clinical trials, pooled analysis, and population studies) to provide more information and to identify new and better treatment options.

Elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer derive similar benefit without excessive toxicity after first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin-based combinations: comparative outcomes from the 03-TTD-01 phase III study

PURPOSE

Healthy elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer may benefit from chemotherapy as much as the younger population. This analysis compares the outcomes of first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines in elderly versus young patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

348 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/(m2 12 h), days 1-14 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks or weekly infusional 5-FU 2250 mg/m2 over 48 h plus bimonthly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. We evaluated response rate, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity according to age.

RESULTS

ORR for elderly and young patients were 34.9% and 44.7%, respectively (p=0.081). Median TTP did not differ between the two groups: 8.3 months for patients > or =70 years and 9.6 months for those <70 years (p=0.114). Median OS was 16.8 months and 20.5 months for the > or =70 and <70 years groups, respectively (p=0.74). With XELOX, mild paresthesia and an increase in transaminase levels were more frequent for young patients, whereas grade 3/4 diarrhea was higher in those > or =70 years (25% vs. 8%, p=0.005). For FUOX, only paresthesia was significantly lower in patients > or =70 years (53% vs. 71%, p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with MCRC benefit from first-line oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combinations as much as younger patients, without increased toxicity.

A systematic review of the use of quality of life measures in colorectal cancer research with attention to outcomes in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QOL) measures are critical to the evaluation of new cancer treatments, particularly for elderly patients. Our intent was to assess patterns of use of QOL endpoints in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment research and to summarize current knowledge about how CRC treatment affects elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for English-language, human trials published from 1995 to 2005 that met the following criteria: reported on patients with CRC, were not surgery-only cohorts, and included a QOL or functional endpoints. Trials specifically reporting data on elderly patients were reviewed in depth and summarized.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one eligible studies and 10 trials with elderly-specific data were found. The median number of trials published annually increased from 5 (range, 4-8 trials) between 1995 and 1999 to 14.5 (range, 11-22 trials) between 2000 and 2005. Chemotherapy was the most commonly studied treatment (55%), and metastatic CRC (55%) was the most commonly studied population. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30, with or without C38, was the most frequently used instrument (49%). Studies reporting on elderly patients showed that many patients experience a decline in physical function immediately after surgery and have increased need for supportive services. Little information is available on the effect of chemotherapy in elderly patients. Use of QOL and functional measures in treatment-related CRC research has increased; however, it continues to be hampered by a lack of dissemination and methodologic problems.

CONCLUSION

Missing data from patient attrition, limitations of assessment methods, and a small number of patients treated with chemotherapy in the trials reporting on elderly patients seriously limit our ability to draw conclusions from this survey about how treatment affects QOL or function in CRC.

Role of chemotherapy and novel biological agents in the treatment of elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Patients older than 65 years are the fastest growing segment of the cancer population. It is estimated that within 20 years over 75% of cases and 85% of deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC) will be in this setting. Concerns about cancer treatment in the elderly relate to comorbidities, which increase proportionally with age, physiological changes associated with aging which may influence drug metabolism and toxicity, and diminishing life expectancy, which particularly impacts decisions surrounding the benefits of adjuvant therapies. Over the last 10 years, significant improvements in the treatment of advanced CRC with combination therapy have been made. The randomized trials which have defined these improvements did not exclude elderly patients. However, the median age of patients in these trials has generally been approximately 60 years. Thus, it appears that some degree of selection is involved with younger and presumably fitter patients being the subjects in most of the pivotal trials. The availability of new molecularly targeted agents and newly improved existing agents has expanded the range of treatment options available. This variety gives greater flexibility in dealing with different subsets of patients, such as the elderly. However, some fit elderly patients seem to tolerate combination therapy reasonably well, while studies on unfit elderly subjects are needed.

Current treatment strategies in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the Western world, with > 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year. One of the strongest risk factors for colon cancer is age. The incidence rates rise from 10 in 100,000 at age 40-45 years to 300 in 100,000 at age 75-80 years, with the median age at diagnosis of CRC being 71 years. With the general demographic shift toward an aging population, the number of people aged > 65 years is expected to increase. This article reviews the development of treatment for elderly patients with metastatic CRC, from single-agent fluoropyrimidines to combination therapies.

International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients--an analysis of the medical literature

The elderly comprise the majority of patients with cancer and are the recipients of the greatest amount of chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data to make evidence-based decisions with regard to chemotherapy. This is due to the minimal participation of older patients in clinical trials and that trials have not systematically evaluated chemotherapy. This article reviews the available information with regard to chemotherapy and aging provided by a task force of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Due to the lack of prospective data, the conclusions and recommendations made are a consensus of the participants. Extrapolation of data from younger to older patients is necessary, particularly to those patients older than 80 years, for which data is almost entirely lacking. The classes of drugs reviewed include alkylators, antimetabolites, anthracyclines, taxanes, camptothecins, and epipodophyllotoxins. Clinical trials need to incorporate an analysis of chemotherapy in terms of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of aging. In addition, data already accumulated need to be reanalyzed by age to aid in the management of the older cancer patient.

Managing older patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is predominantly a disease of older persons, and our population is aging. Physicians and their older patients commonly face the dilemma of whether or not to give/receive systemic chemotherapy for CRC. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in fit older patients motivated enough to enroll onto clinical trials. Conversely, frail older patients are more likely to suffer adverse outcomes when faced with stressors and may not benefit from chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients are neither fit nor frail, and current evidence is insufficient to either quantify or qualify the benefit of chemotherapy for this intermediate group of patients. Thus, treatment decisions must be individualized based on each older person's physical state (eg, their function and degree of comorbidity) and values. Despite a growing body of data, a great deal of work is still needed to establish optimal strategies to care for patients diagnosed with cancer later in life.

First-line treatment strategies for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer ranks third in incidence in both men and women after lung, breast and prostate cancer. The prevalence of colorectal cancer increases significantly with age, with 40% of patients in Europe being >75 years of age at the time of initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is expected to increase significantly over the next two decades. Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has evolved dramatically over the last decade. Advances in surgery and chemotherapy are effective in prolonging time to disease progression and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. For >40 years, fluorouracil has been the mainstay of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Recently, however, newer cytotoxic chemotherapies and biological agents effective against colorectal cancer have been shown to improve overall survival in metastatic disease. Thus, a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer today has an expected median survival of 20 months compared with 10 months only a few years ago. There is evidence that elderly individuals derive as much survival benefit from standard chemotherapy approaches in metastatic colorectal cancer as younger patients. Unfortunately, most older patients who might benefit from chemotherapy are not offered this treatment, and the fraction who are not offered it increases with increasing age. Treatment decisions should not be made on the basis of age. Rather, they should be based on functional status, the presence of co-morbidities, and consideration of drug-specific toxicities that can be aggravated in older individuals because of decreased functional reserve. Although the elderly have been under-represented in clinical trials, studies also support the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. This article reviews current optimal first-line treatment strategies for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Persistence of High-Dose Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathy at Long-Term Follow-Up

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) has become a standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer and a valid option for patients in the adjuvant setting. Compared with cisplatin, L-OHP has no renal toxicity, only mild hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity, while neurotoxicity is the limiting toxicity. This side effect has been described as a transient distal dysesthesia, enhanced by exposure to cold, and as a dose-related cumulative mild sensitive neuropathy. We studied two groups of patients (18 and 13) with advanced colorectal cancer, treated with median cumulative doses of L-OHP 862 mg/m2 and 1,033.5 mg/m2. All the patients had been evaluated previously, during treatment, after discontinuation and after a long follow-up of 5 years to verify the incidence and the characteristics of the neuropathy induced by this antineoplastic agent. The clinical and neurophysiological examinations showed an acute and transient neurotoxicity and a cumulative dose-related sensory neuropathy in nearly all the patients. The reversibility of these effects was studied. Five patients continue to manifest symptoms and signs of neurotoxicity after a long follow-up, indicating persistence of this peculiar type of neuropathy.

Oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity: how and why?

In early clinical trials, oxaliplatin has demonstrated significant activity against colorectal cancer in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA), both in metastatic as in radically resected disease. The drug differs from the other two most important platinum compounds (cisplatin and carboplatin) for the absence of nephrotoxicity or for the reduced drug-induced ototoxicity. During its administration, two different types of neurological symptoms can be experienced: the first one occurs during or immediately after the end of the infusion and it appears as a transient peripheral sensory neuropathy manifesting as paresthesias and dysesthesia in the extremities sometimes accompanied by muscular contractions of the extremities or the jaw (triggered or enhanced by exposure to cold). The second one occurs after long-term administration of oxaliplatin presenting with deep sensory loss, sensory ataxia and functional impairment (similar to those observed with cisplatin). This type of neurotoxicity is usually late-onset and correlated with the cumulative-dose of oxaliplatin. The aim of this review is to analyse the mechanism underlying induction of neurotoxicity and the possible treatments to prevent and to treat it.

Reduced dose intensity FOLFOX-4 as first line palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a reduced dose intensity (mini-) FOLFOX-4 regimen as a first-line palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients (> or =70 yr of age) with advanced colorectal cancer, data from prospective databases at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital were analyzed. A total of 20 patients were enrolled between January 2001 and August 2004, and were treated with oxaliplatin 65 mg/m2 on day 1, and with 2-hr infusions of leucovorin 150 mg/m2 followed by a 5-FU bolus (300 mg/m2) and 22-hr continuous infusions (450 mg/m2) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response with an overall response rate of 43.8%. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.7) and overall survival was 13.5 months (95% CI: 11.1-16.0). The main side effects were anemia and neutropenia, which were observed in 20.8% and 17.7%, respectively, of the total cycles administered. There were no grade 4 toxicities and only one patient suffered from febrile neutropenia. No grade 3 toxicities occurred except for anemia (5.2%) and vomiting (1.0%). In conclusion, the mini-FOLFOX-4 regimen was found to be well tolerated with acceptable toxicity, and to provide a benefit for elderly patients with colorectal cancer.