Interferon-alpha and somatostatin analog in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: single agent or combination?

Treatment strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are often diagnosed when metastatic. The liver is the main site of metastases. Unfortunately, optimal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases remains a topic of debate. The aim of this study was to make a systematic review of the current literature about the results of the different treatments of neuroendocrine liver metastases.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted for English language publications from 1995 to 2021. Outcomes were analyzed according to survival, disease-free survival, and in the case of systemic therapies, progression-free survival.

RESULTS

5509 patients were analyzed in the review. 67% of patients underwent surgery achieving 5 years overall survival despite only 30% percent without a recurrence. 60% of patients that had received a transplant reached 5 years survival with a low disease-free survival rate (20%). Five-year survival rate was 36.2% for patients undergoing loco-regional therapies.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is the best treatment when metastases are resectable, with the highest rate of survival, although liver transplantation shows good results for patients not eligible for surgery. Loco-regional therapies may be useful when surgical resection is contraindicated, or selectively used as a bridge to surgery or transplantation. Systemic therapies are indicated in patients for whom curative treatment cannot be obtained.

Patterns of Use and Clinical Outcomes with Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Nationwide French Retrospective Cohort Study in the Real-Life Setting

Introduction

Long-acting somatostatin analogues such as lanreotide autogel (LAN) and octreotide long-acting release (OCT) are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, only few real-world studies have compared the two medications. This retrospective, observational cohort study used a French claims database to compare patterns of use with LAN vs. OCT in patients with NETs.

Methods

Data on LAN and OCT patterns of use were obtained retrospectively from the National System of Health Data (SNDS), a national French claims database. Patients 18 years of age or older who initiated treatment for NETs between 2009 and 2016, and who received at least six subsequent dispensings of first-line LAN or OCT during the first year of treatment, were included. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs.

Results

Patients receiving LAN (n = 2327) vs. OCT (n = 2090) had greater median treatment duration (31.8 months vs. 22.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001; log-rank test) and were less likely to discontinue treatment; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.80). In year 1, a significantly lower percentage of patients receiving LAN vs. OCT switched treatments (10.4% vs. 22.2%, respectively; p < 0.0001), received an average monthly dose per trimester above recommended dose (3.0% vs. 7.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001), and used rescue medication (3.1% vs. 10.0%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Dispensing of pancreatic enzymes was significantly higher in patients receiving LAN than OCT (16.4% vs. 13.9%, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with GEP-NETs, those receiving LAN (n = 1478) vs. OCT (n = 1278) had greater treatment duration and less treatment discontinuation, switching, dosage above the recommended dose, and rescue medication use, but no significant difference in dispensing of pancreatic enzymes or time to second-line treatment.

Conclusion

These real-world data suggest potential clinical and economic advantages of LAN over OCT in the management of patients with NETs in the French population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02060-1.

An update on the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasia and differ in their clinical presentation, behavior, and prognosis based on both histological features and cancer stage at the time of diagnosis. Although small-sized tumors can be surgically resected, locally advanced and metastatic tumors confer a poor prognosis. In addition, only limited treatment options are available to the latter group of patients with PNETs, such as hormonal analogs, cytotoxic agents, and targeted therapy. In selected patients, liver-directed therapies are also used. As expected, clinicians taking care of these patients are challenged to develop an effective and comprehensive treatment strategy for their patients amid a wide variety of treatment modalities. Targeted therapy for PNETs is limited to sunitinib and everolimus. Presently, a number of clinical studies are ongoing to assess the efficacy of newer targeted agents alone and in combination with previous agents for the treatment of advanced PNETs. The authors reviewed the current treatment and also discussed the emerging agents and emphasized the need to identify biomarkers.

Clinical Efficacy of a Novel Therapeutic Principle, Anakoinosis

Classic tumor therapy, consisting of cytotoxic agents and/or targeted therapy, has not overcome therapeutic limitations like poor risk genetic parameters, genetic heterogeneity at different metastatic sites or the problem of undruggable targets. Here we summarize data and trials principally following a completely different treatment concept tackling systems biologic processes: the principle of communicative reprogramming of tumor tissues, i.e., anakoinosis (ancient greek for communication), aims at establishing novel communicative behavior of tumor tissue, the hosting organ and organism via re-modeling gene expression, thus recovering differentiation, and apoptosis competence leading to cancer control - in contrast to an immediate, "poisoning" with maximal tolerable doses of targeted or cytotoxic therapies. Therefore, we introduce the term "Master modulators" for drugs or drug combinations promoting evolutionary processes or regulating homeostatic pathways. These "master modulators" comprise a broad diversity of drugs, characterized by the capacity for reprogramming tumor tissues, i.e., transcriptional modulators, metronomic low-dose chemotherapy, epigenetically modifying agents, protein binding pro-anakoinotic drugs, such as COX-2 inhibitors, IMiDs etc., or for example differentiation inducing therapies. Data on 97 anakoinosis inducing schedules indicate a favorable toxicity profile: The combined administration of master modulators, frequently (with poor or no monoactivity) may even induce continuous complete remission in refractory metastatic neoplasia, irrespectively of the tumor type. That means recessive components of the tumor, successively developing during tumor ontogenesis, are accessible by regulatory active drug combinations in a therapeutically meaningful way. Drug selection is now dependent on situative systems characteristics, to less extent histology dependent. To sum up, anakoinosis represents a new substantive therapy principle besides novel targeted therapies.

Treatment options for PNET liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. About 40-80% of patients with PNET are metastatic at presentation, usually involving the liver (40-93%). Liver metastasis represents the most significant prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to present an up-to-date review of treatment options for patients with liver metastases from PNETs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify all pertinent studies published up to May 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search evaluated all the therapeutic options for patients with liver metastases of PNETs, including surgical treatment, loco-regional therapies, and pharmacological treatment. All the different treatment options showed particular indications in different presentations of liver metastases of PNET. Surgery remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option in patients with PNETs and resectable liver metastases, even if relapse rates are high. Efficacy of medical treatment has increased with advances in targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, and the introduction of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Several techniques for loco-regional control of metastases are available, including chemo- or radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with PNET metastases should be multidisciplinary and must be personalized according to the features of individual patients and tumors.

Advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small intestine and pancreas: clinical developments, controversies, and future strategies

In this Review, we discuss clinical developments and controversies in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) that are relevant for clinicians and clinical researchers. We describe advances in genetics, blood-based biomarkers, functional imaging, and systemic therapy of advanced NETs and discuss results of recent phase 3 studies, systemic treatment of advanced disease with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, biotherapy, chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted therapy, and the potential role of immunotherapy in the treatment of NETs. Suggested treatment algorithms for NETs of ileal or jejunal origin and of pancreatic origin are presented.

Metronomic and metronomic-like therapies in neuroendocrine tumors - Rationale and clinical perspectives

Metronomic therapy is characterized by the administration of regular low doses of certain drugs with very low toxicity. There have been numerous debates over the empirical approach of this regimen, but fewest side effects are always something to consider in order to improve patients' quality of life. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies relatively slow-growing; therefore their treatment is often chronic, involving several different therapies for tumor growth control. Knowing that these tumors are highly vascularized, the anti-angiogenic aspect is highly regarded as something to be targeted in all patients harboring NETs. Additionally the metronomic schedule has proved to be effective on an immunological level, rendering this approach as a multi-targeted therapy. Rationalizing that advanced NETs are in many cases a chronic disease, with which patients can live for as long as possible, a systemic therapy with regular low doses and a very low toxicity is in many cases a judicious manner of pursuing stabilization. Metronomic schedule is usually correlated with chemotherapy in oncology, but other therapies, such as radiotherapy and biotherapy can be delivered in a metronomic like manner. This review describes clinical trials and case series involving metronomic therapies alone or in combination in patients with advanced NETs. Nowadays level of evidence about metronomic therapy in NETs is quite low, therefore future prospective clinical studies are needed to validate the metronomic approach in specific clinical settings.

Refractory carcinoid syndrome: a review of treatment options

Carcinoid syndrome (CSy) is a constellation of symptoms that may commonly present in patients with well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) being the first-line option for symptom management. However, symptomatic progression eventually occurs and in this scenario of a refractory CSy; several treatment options have been studied such as dose escalation of SSA, interferon and liver-directed therapies. Nevertheless, recent phase III trials have contributed to the understanding and management of this condition. We performed a comprehensive review of interventional studies examining refractory CSy to provide the evidence for current treatment options and propose a treatment sequence.

Diagnostic Computed Tomography Coregistration With In-111-DTPA-Octreotide Single Photon Emission Tomography/Low-Dose Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

In-111-DTPA-octreotide (OctreoScan) is still pivotal for neuroendocrine tumor imaging, despite the introduction of Ga-68-octreotide tracers. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) assists in the localization of SPECT findings but often results in uncertain interpretation. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of coregistration of In-111-DTPA-octreotide SPECT/LDCT with diagnostic CT on interpretation.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive studies, in which coregistration was performed because of uncertain interpretation, were evaluated. Presence of somatostatin receptors was categorized retrospectively as definitely positive, probably positive, probably negative, or definitely negative with and without rigid registration with diagnostic CT, and possible added value of coregistration was evaluated.

RESULTS

Coregistration was performed in 35 studies. However, on subsequent reading, 4 SPECT/CTs yielded definite results and were omitted. Coregistration was helpful in 30 of the remaining 31 cases, changing reading to definitely positive (7) or to definitely negative (23). In 13 of the 23 cases, diagnosis changed from probably positive to definitely negative. Coregistration contributed in 42 of 48 sites, with greatest benefit in the liver (13/14), pancreas (10/10), and lymph nodes (6/6).

CONCLUSIONS

Coregistration is becoming increasingly easier and may be utilized when SPECT/LDCT is inconclusive.

Telotristat ethyl: a new option for the management of carcinoid syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with neuroendocrine tumour-related carcinoid syndrome treated with somatostatin analogues (SSA) won't achieve adequate symptom relief with the SSA alone; new treatment options are required. Telotristat ethyl is a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, developed for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome. Areas covered: This review summarises the evidence supporting the role of telotristat ethyl in the management of carcinoid syndrome. Rationale, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, clinical experience, efficacy and toxicity profiles are covered. Expert opinion: The efficacy of telotristat ethyl in producing a statistically-significant and clinically-meaningful reduction in daily bowel movements has been confirmed in phase III clinical trials. Two pivotal trials, TELESTAR and TELECAST, explored the role of telotristat ethyl in the management of patients with carcinoid syndrome refractory to SSAs focusing on patients with ≥4 and <4 daily bowel movements, respectively. In addition, benefit was confirmed in patient-reported outcomes. Based on activity and safe toxicity profile, telotristat ethyl is pending regulatory agencies evaluation and is likely to add to the armamentarium used to treat carcinoid syndrome. Long-term safety and efficacy data will be available from the ongoing TELEPATH study. The impact on carcinoid heart disease, mesenteric fibrosis and other long-term complications of carcinoid syndrome as well as its role earlier in patients' pathways remain investigational.

Summary of emerging personalized medicine in neuroendocrine tumors: are we on track?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies, with differences in prognosis and effective therapies. Traditionally, NETs have been characterized by tumor grade, site of primary tumor, functional status, and presence of underlying familial syndrome. However, increased feasibility and utilization of next-generation sequencing and other methodologies have revealed new genomic and epigenetic aberrations. In the last decade, treatment options available for metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs have expanded, with approval of antiangiogenic and mTOR-directed targeted therapies, and our armamentarium of active therapies is likely to further increase. Cytotoxic therapies also are an important option for pancreatic NETs, and MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression may be an important biomarker for efficacy of alkylating agents. Peptide receptor radioligand therapy is an emerging treatment that uses functional imaging to personalize dosimetry to the tumor and avoid nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless, there is a critical need for further biomarkers, particularly multianalyte biomarkers, to aid in prognostication and predict efficacy of therapies.

Medical management of secretory syndromes related to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Although recent epidemiological evidence indicates that the prevalence of non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) is rising, a significant number of GEP-NETs still present with symptoms related to the secretion of biologically active substances leading to the development of distinct clinical syndromes. In the past, these syndromes were associated with substantial morbidity and mortality due to the lack of specific therapies; however, since the introduction of long-acting somatostatin analogues and medications such as proton pump inhibitors, their control has been greatly improved. As a result, nowadays, the main cause of morbidity and mortality in GEP-NETs is mostly directly related to tumour growth and the extent of metastatic disease. However, in some patients with functioning tumours and extensive disease, control of the secretory syndrome still remains problematic, necessitating the employment of several cytoreductive techniques, which may not always be sufficient. Recently, new agents directed against tumour growth, or exerting increased binding activity to receptors expressed in these tumours, or interfering with the synthetic pathway of some of the compounds secreted by these tumours, have been developed. Since there are no specific guidelines addressing the totality of the management of the secretory syndromes related to GEP-NETs, this review aims at critically analysing the medical management of previously recognised secretory syndromes; it also addresses areas of uncertainty, assesses the newer therapeutic developments and also addresses recently described but poorly characterised secretory syndromes related to GEP-NETs.

The Post-Surgical Long-Term Behaviour of Lung Carcinoid Tumours

Here, we report a retrospective evaluation of long-term behaviour of lung carcinoids after surgery. A total of 23 patients (17 with typical pulmonary carcinoids and 6 with atypical pulmonary carcinoids) were enrolled in our hospital from April 1994 to July 2009. All patients underwent intervention at the Unit of Surgery and then were followed at the Unit of Oncology. The standard protocol for patient monitoring consisted of follow-up at 3 months after surgery, 6 months after first control and annually for 5 years. The follow-up evaluations consisted in blood tests, imaging of chest and abdomen, bone scintigraphy, and brain computed tomography. In case of disease recurrence, patients underwent chemotherapy (etoposide, carboplatin) and radiotherapy. All patients were followed for a mean of follow-up period of 100 months, ranging between 20 and 203 months. In the group of typical carcinoid, the observed recurrence rate at 5 years was zero, at 10 years was 5.8 %, whereas the observed mortality rate at 5 and 10 years was zero. In the group of atypical carcinoid, both the recurrence rate and the mortality rate at 5 and 10 years were 16.6 %. A statistical significant difference (p = 0.002) in the recurrence rate between stage I and stage II was observed. The overall prognosis of pulmonary carcinoids was favourable, and the typical carcinoids presented a better prognosis than the atypical ones. The stage at time of diagnosis could be considered as a predictive prognostic factor.

Raised circulating Neurokinin A predicts prognosis in metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours. Lowering Neurokinin A indicates improved prognosis

Background

Assessing prognosis is important in patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel as disease progression and survival is variable. We previously identified raised Neurokinin A as an independent indicator of poor prognosis and have shown that prognosis worsens when circulating Neurokinin A rises ≥50 ng/L. In the present study we have examined survival in relation to Neurokinin A concentrations.

Methods

Patients in whom Neurokinin A rose ≥50 ng/L between January 1989 and December 2010 were identified. All circulating Neurokinin A concentrations were recorded and survival was followed up to 31 December 2014 or to death.

Results

Median survival, from the date when Neurokinin A was first ≥50 ng/L was 11.1 (2.0–117.8) months if Neurokinin A remained ≥50 ng/L and 72.4 (4.8–152.6) months when Neurokinin A was reduced below 50 ng/L and controlled below that concentration for ≥3 months (P < 0.001). Survival was significantly better for patients attending the neuroendocrine tumour specialist clinic than for those not attending (P = 0.009). Comparing patients identified during 1989–2000, and those during 2001–2010, Neurokinin A was successfully reduced in the earlier period in 30.3% patients with median survival 23.2 (2.0–152.6) months and this improved in 58.1% with median survival of 43.3 (2.0–141.1) months in the later period (P = 0.019). Significance was greater between the earlier and later periods when only patients attending the neuroendocrine tumour clinic were compared (P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Circulating Neurokinin A ≥ 50 ng/L is a strong indicator of poor prognosis when Neurokinin A remains above this concentration. Lowering Neurokinin A below 50 ng/L indicates a significant improvement in prognosis (P < 0.001). This prognostic indicator reflects improved treatment and survival in more recent years.

GEP-NETs update: Biotherapy for neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a less frequent and heterogeneous group of tumours, which has experienced, in recent years, a significant increase in effective therapeutic possibilities overcoming the disappointing results from chemotherapy. Initial improvements in treatment strategies came from somatostatin analogues (SSAs) that have widely demonstrated a significant improvement in symptomatic relief and tumour control growth by a complex mechanism of action over cell survival, angiogenesis and immunomodulation. Recent investigations have pointed out novel SSAs with a wider binding profile (pasireotide), chimeric molecules against somatostatin receptors and dopamine receptors and the combination with targeted agents, such as mTOR inhibitors or antiangiogenic agents. Immunotherapy is the second cornerstone in NET treatment and has been represented with interferon alpha for a long time, with a demonstrated activity on tumour and clinical response. Its less manageable adverse events have limited its usage. However, different checkpoints in immune system regulation have been effectively targeted in different solid tumours, and novel approaches are currently arising in NETs. In conclusion, biotherapy remains an active treatment strategy for initial approach in patients with NETs. Further investigation on patients' selection, molecular profiles, treatment sequence or combination and optimisation of current and novel biotherapy agents is required.

Beyond adenocarcinoma: current treatments and future directions for squamous, small cell, and rare lung cancer histologies

Lung cancer encompasses a diverse spectrum of histologic subtypes. Until recently, the majority of therapeutic advances were limited to the minority of patients with adenocarcinoma. With the advent of comprehensive genomic profiling of squamous and small cell lung cancers, new therapeutic targets have emerged. For squamous tumors, the most promising of these include fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2), and G1/S checkpoint regulators. In 2014, the antiangiogenic agent ramucirumab was approved for all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histologies, including squamous tumors. Immunotherapeutic approaches also appear to be promising for these cases. Genomic analysis of small cell lung cancer has revealed a high mutation burden, but relatively few druggable driver oncogenic alterations. Current treatment strategies under investigation are focusing on targeting mitotic, cell cycle, and DNA repair regulation, as well as immunotherapy. Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors represent a diverse spectrum of diseases that may be treated with somatostatin analogs, cytotoxic agents, and molecularly targeted therapies. Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs and combinations with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors also show potential. Large cell neuroendocrine tumors share numerous clinical, pathologic, and molecular features with small cell lung cancer; however, whether they should be treated similarly or according to a NSCLC paradigm remains a matter of debate.

Potentials of interferon therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. To improve survival for patients with pancreatic cancer, research has focused on other treatment modalities like adding biological modulators such as type-I interferons (IFNs). Type I IFNs (ie, IFN-α/IFN-β) have antiproliferative, antiviral, and immunoregulatory activities. Furthermore, they are able to induce apoptosis, exert cell cycle blocking, and sensitize tumor cells for chemo- and radiotherapy. A few years ago in vitro, in vivo, and several clinical trials have been described regarding adjuvant IFN-α therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Some studies reported a remarkable increase in the 2- and 5-year survival. Unfortunately, the only randomized clinical trial did not show a significant increase in overall survival, although the increased median survival implicated that some patients in the experimental group benefited from the adjuvant IFN-α therapy. Furthermore, encouraging in vitro and in vivo data points to a possible role for adjuvant IFN therapy. However, up till now, the use of IFNs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This review, therefore, aims to describe, based on the available data, whether there is a distinct role for IFN therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Role of surgery and transplantation in the treatment of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumor

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a heterogeneous group of cancers, with indolent behavior. The most common primary origin is the gastro-intestinal tract but can also appear in the lungs, kidneys, adrenals, ovaries and other organs. In general, NET is usually discovered in the metastatic phase (40%-80%). The liver is the most common organ involved when metastases occur (40%-93%), followed by bone (12%-20%) and lung (8%-10%).A number of different therapeutic options are available for the treatment of hepatic metastases including surgical resection, transplantation, ablation, trans-arterial chemoembolization, chemotherapy and somatostatin analogues. Recently, molecular targeted therapies have been used, usually in combination with other treatment options, to improve outcomes in patients with metastases. This article emphasizes on the role of surgery in the treatment of liver metastases from NET.

A case of metastatic gastric neuroendocrine tumor: therapeutic considerations

Despite remarkable progression in the treatment and classification system of neuroendocrine tumor (NET), some questions have remained unanswered. The lack of an established treatment strategy for gastric NET is one of the problems. Because of its paucity, gastric NET is not discussed in independent, large-scaled prospective studies and tends to be excluded from clinical trials. Moreover, a separate classification system and some distinguished clinical features render the treatment of gastric NET more complicated. Here, we present a case of a female gastric NET patient with G2 proliferation index and multiple liver metastases. Based on the histologic grade and a high serum gastrin level, we initially treated her with somatostatin analogue. However, the patient did not respond. After that, cytotoxic chemotherapy with the etoposide plus cisplatin regimen only showed response in the short-term period. However, combination therapy with octreotide and interferon brought about significant regression of the tumor. Herein, we present our case together with a literature review of the treatment of metastatic gastric NET.

New insights into the role of chronic inflammation and cytokines in the etiopathogenesis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Although previously considered rare, recent epidemiological studies have revealed that the incidence (3.6/100,000) and prevalence (35/100,000) of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the past few decades. Despite the progress in the understanding of GEP-NET molecular biology, there is still little advance in the early diagnosis due to lack of specific tumor markers. As the tumors are mostly detected in their late stage, they are not well controlled by either biotherapy or conventional chemotherapy, and thus represent a significant clinical issue. Chronic inflammation has been implicated in the development of GEP-NETs. This review presents recent findings that link pro-inflammatory cytokines to the molecular basis of GEP-NET tumorigenesis, leading to a more personalized approach to disease management and therapy.

Evaluation of the WHO 2010 grading and AJCC/UICC staging systems in prognostic behavior of intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Background

The increasing incidence and heterogeneous behavior of intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (iNETs) pose a clinicopathological challenge. Our goal was to decribe the prognostic value of the new WHO 2010 grading and the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems for iNETs. Moreover, outcomes of patients treated with somatostatin analogs were assessed.

Methods

We collected epidemiological and clinicopathological data from 93 patients with histologically proven iNETs including progression and survival outcomes. The WHO 2010 grading and the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems were applied for all cases. RECIST criteria were used to define progression. Kaplan-Meier analyses for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.

Results

Mean follow-up was 58.6 months (4–213 months). WHO 2010 grading yielded PFS and disease-specific OS of 125.0 and 165.8 months for grade 1 (G1), 100.0 and 144.2 months for G2 and 15.0 and 15.8 months for G3 tumors (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001). Using AJCC staging, patients with stage I and II tumors had no progression and no deaths. Stage III and IV patients demonstrated PFS of 138.4 and 84.7 months (p = 0.003) and disease-specific OS of 210.0 and 112.8 months (p = 0.017). AJCC staging also provided informative PFS (91.2 vs. 50.0 months, p = 0.004) and OS (112.3 vs. 80.0 months, p = 0.005) measures with somatostatin analog use in stage IV patients.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore the complementarity of WHO 2010 and AJCC classifications in providing better estimates of iNETS disease outcomes and extend the evidence for somatostatin analog benefit in patients with metastatic disease.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: biology, diagnosis,and treatment

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), a group of endocrine tumors arising in the pancreas, are among the most common neuroendocrine tumors. The genetic causes of familial and sporadic PNETs are somewhat understood, but their molecular pathogenesis remains unknown. Most PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential. The biological behavior of an individual PNET is unpredictable; higher tumor grade, lymph node and liver metastasis, and larger tumor size generally indicate a less favorable prognosis. Endocrine testing, imaging, and histological evidence are necessary to accurately diagnose PNETs. A 4-pronged aggressive treatment approach consisting of surgery, locoregional therapy, systemic therapy, and complication control has become popular in academic centers around the world. The optimal application of the multiple systemic therapeutic modalities is under development; efficacy, safety, availability, and cost should be considered when treating a specific patient. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of specific types of PNETs and familial PNET syndromes, including the novel Mahvash disease, are summarized.

Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represent a heterogenous group of tumors arising from a variety of neuroendocrine cell types. The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs have markedly increased over the last three decades. Symptoms are often absent in early disease, or vague and nonspecific even in advanced disease. Delayed diagnosis is thus common. Chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker but has limitations as does the proliferative marker Ki-67%, which is often used for tumor grading and determination of therapy. The development of a multidimensional prognostic nomogram may be valuable in predicting tumor behavior and guiding therapy but requires validation. Identification of NENs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) allows for SSTR scintigraphy and positron emission tomography imaging using novel radiolabeled compounds. Complete surgical resection of limited disease or endoscopic ablation of small lesions localized in stomach or rectum can provide cure; however, the majority of GEP-NENs are metastatic (most frequently the liver and/or mesenteric lymph nodes) at diagnosis. Selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from advanced surgical techniques including hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Somatostatin analogs are effective for symptomatic treatment and exhibit some degree of antiproliferative activity in small intestinal NENs. There is a place for streptozotocin, temozolomide, and capecitabine in the management of pancreatic NENs, while new agents targeting either mTOR (everolimus) or angiogenic (sunitinib) pathways have shown efficacy in these lesions.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: update on therapeutics

OBJECTIVE

To review the available literature addressing the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and carcinoid tumors.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant literature was identified by a PubMed search (January 1977-December 2011) of English-language literature using the terms gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, pancreatic neuroendocrine, carcinoid, and pancreatic islet cell tumor.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All published studies and abstracts, as well as relevant consensus guidelines, evaluating the current literature about PNETs and carcinoid tumors were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a genetically diverse group of complex malignancies with varying biological and clinical courses. Historically believed to be rare, recent epidemiologic data suggest their incidence is rising. Two of the most commonly diagnosed GEP-NETs are PNETs and carcinoid tumors. Both subtypes are well-differentiated tumors and present as low or intermediate grade. The systemic manifestations of PNETs and carcinoid tumors are diverse and are related to the secretion of affected hormones and biogenic amines. Surgical resection of localized disease remains the only curative option. However, the utility of this approach is limited because most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Recent advances have led to an improvement in outcomes in patients with PNETs and carcinoid tumors. This review describes traditional therapies as well as emerging strategies being investigated to help manage these cancers. Treatment of poorly differentiated GEP-NETs is beyond the scope of this review.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of new therapies for PNETs and carcinoid tumors has introduced a paradigm shift in the management of this heterogeneous malignancy.

[Medicinal therapy of metastasized neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system.]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system are classified according to the WHO classification system 2010 into neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). The proliferation index Ki-67 and the grading of NETs is essential for the prognosis and therapy plan. Also NET tumor biology and therapeutic options may differ depending on the primary NET tumor location. Palliative therapy of inoperable NETs involves local ablative methods in cases of primary liver metastasis, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in NETs expressing somatostatin receptors and different options for medicinal therapy. This manuscript reviews the current role of biotherapy with somatostatin analogues and interferon-alpha for symptom and tumor control. In addition conventional chemotherapy regimens and novel molecular targeted therapeutic options, such as sunitinib or everolimus in NET of the pancreas are reviewed. Possible therapeutic algorithms are discussed.

New treatment strategies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours

Malignant well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas and the gastrointestinal tract are rare and clinically challenging heterogeneous neoplasms. This review focuses on neuroendocrine tumours grade 1 and grade 2 (new WHO classification 2010), in comparison to the neuroendocrine tumours grade 3 group, corresponding to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Surgical resection of the primary and metastases remains the only curative treatment, however many patients with neuroendocrine tumours are diagnosed once unresectable metastases have occurred; management of functioning syndromes with somatostatin analogues remains the priority. Pasireotide, a new somatostatin analogue, is currently undergoing evaluation for carcinoid syndrome. Treatment options for advanced neuroendocrine tumours differ from pancreatic gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumours: (a) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, streptozotocin-based chemotherapies are challenged by other cytotoxic agents (dacarbazine, temozolomide and oxaliplatin); two randomized, placebo-controlled phase III studies have demonstrated that everolimus and sunitinib significantly improved progression-free-survival; (b) in midgut neuroendocrine tumours, octreotide improved time-to-progression in patients with a low proliferation index and low liver burden; preliminary data suggesting efficacy of bevacizumab are still to be confirmed; the effect of everolimus associated with octreotide was almost significant on progression-free-survival in a phase III trial. Liver-directed therapies are effective in both tumour types. New techniques of embolization need further evaluation and must be formally compared to other therapies. Finally, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has shown promising activity in non-comparative studies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours.

A multimodal approach to the management of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are often indolent malignancies that commonly present with metastatic disease in the liver. Surgical, locoregional, and systemic treatment modalities are reviewed. A multidisciplinary approach to patient care is suggested to ensure all therapeutic options explored.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) clinical document

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract are rare, and pose a significant clinical challenge because of the tumor heterogeneity and lack of standardized guidelines for treatment. This manuscript summarizes the available literature concerning these tumors in an effort to provide the clinician a framework from which to guide patient management.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for all research articles published in English between January 1, 1966 and March 1, 2011 in which the studied population included women diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract. Although preference was given to prospective studies, studies were not limited by design or by numbers of subjects given the limited availability of reports.

RESULTS

Most, but not all, neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract have an aggressive clinical course and those of the cervix histologically and clinically share similarities with small cell lung cancer. Cumulative data supports a multi-modality therapeutic strategy. A proposed management algorithm for neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix is outlined. For less frequent disease sites including the adnexa, uterus, vagina and vulva, as well as well differentiated carcinoid tumors, surgical resection is appropriate in selected cases. Etoposide/platinum based chemotherapy is used for neuroendocrine carcinomas but not for well differentiated carcinoid tumors. Well differentiated carcinoid and atypical carcinoid tumors should be managed similar to gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs).

CONCLUSIONS

Most neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract require a multi-modality therapeutic approach, determined by extent of disease and primary organ of involvement. Pathologic diagnosis is critical to guide therapy.

Effect of interferon-alpha treatment on [68Ga-DOTA,Tyr3,Thre8]octreotide uptake in CA20948 tumors: a small-animal PET study

In peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors, improvements have been made by increasing the affinity for receptors and by protecting critical organs (e.g., kidneys). However, tumor parameters involved in radiopeptide uptake are still under investigation. Interferon-α (IFNα) is used as biotherapy for neuroendocrine tumors. Several mechanisms of action are described, but the potential effect of IFNα on tumor uptake of labeled peptide has not been studied in vivo yet.

METHODS

Twenty-six male CA20948 tumor-bearing Lewis rats were imaged before and during IFNα treatment using quantitative small-animal PET with [(68)Ga-DOTA,Tyr(3),Thre(8)]octreotide. Imaging was performed at days 0, 3, and 7. Animals were divided into 3 groups according to the treatment: control (injected daily with saline), half (4 d of IFNα treatment from day 0 to day 3, then saline), and full (7 d of IFNα). A daily dose of IFNα (1.5 mIU) was administered subcutaneously. Quantitative PET results are expressed as percentage injected dose per cm(3) and normalized to baseline (day 0) values. Tumor size was monitored by PET and caliper measurements.

RESULTS

Gross tumor uptake and tumor volumes increased in all groups over the 7-d period. On day 3, mean ± SD ratios to day 0 were 1.2 ± 0.2, 1.3 ± 0.5, and 1.2 ± 0.4, respectively, for control, half, and full groups. On day 7, respective values were 1.1 ± 0.2, 1.3 ± 0.6, and 1.5 ± 0.4. At day 3, a comparison among groups showed no statistically significant difference. At day 7, the full group showed a significantly higher ratio in activity concentration than the control group (P = 0.021). A good correlation was found between tumor volumes assessed by small-animal PET and caliper measurements (R = 0.89, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

As expected, over a period of 7 d, both tumor volumes and radiopeptide uptake increased in all animals. However, the activity concentration increased significantly more at day 7 in animals treated for 7 d with IFNα, compared with controls. This is the first, to our knowledge, in vivo indication that IFNα is able to increase tumor uptake of the labeled analog in a small-animal model of neuroendocrine tumors. The mechanisms underlying this effect (flow, vascular permeability, receptor upregulation) remain unknown and need to be further investigated.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors have been steadily growing in incidence and prevalence during the last two decades, showing an incidence of 4-5/1,000,000 population. They represent a heterogeneous group with very varying tumor biology and prognosis. About half of the patients present clinical symptoms and syndromes related to substances released from the tumors (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, insulinoma, glucagonoma, etc) and the other half are so-called nonfunctioning tumors mainly presenting with symptoms such as obstruction, jaundice, bleeding, and abdominal mass. Ten percent to 15% of the pancreatic endocrine tumors are part of an inherited syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatosis, or tuberousclerosis. The diagnosis is based on histopathology demonstrating neuroendocrine features such as positive staining for chromogranin A and specific hormones such as gastrin, proinsulin, and glucagon. Moreover, the biochemical diagnosis includes measurement of chromogranins A and B or specific hormones such as gastrin, insulin, glucagon, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the circulation. In addition to standard localization procedures, radiology (computed tomography [CT] scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and most recently positron emission tomography with specific isotopes such as (11)C-5 hydroxytryptamin ((11)C-5-HTP), fluorodopa and (68)Ga-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-octreotate are performed. Surgery is still one of the cornerstones in the management of pancreatic endocrine tumors, but curative surgery is rarely obtained in most cases because of metastatic disease. Debulking and other cytoreductive procedures might facilitate systemic treatment. Cytotoxic drugs, biological agents, such as somatostatin analogs, alpha interferons, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are routinely used. Tumor-targeted radioactive treatment is available in many centres in Europe and is effective in patients with tumors that express high content of somatostatin receptors type 2 and 5. In the future, treatment will be based on tumor biology and molecular genetics with the aim of so-called personalized medicine.

Biological targeted therapies in patients with advanced enteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas

Enteropancreatic (EP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) represent relatively rare and heterogeneous malignancies. They are the most common group among neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In most cases they are advanced at diagnosis and slow-growing, therefore conditioning a better prognosis compared with non neuroendocrine carcinomas from the same sites. No standard medical therapy exists, except for somatostatin analogs in functioning tumors, and octreotide LAR in functioning or non functioning well differentiated NECs from small bowel. Several systemic therapeutic options exist, including chemotherapy, somatostatin analog, interferon, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and molecular targeted drugs. Among them some therapies have specific biological tumor targets and can be defined as "biological targeted therapies". This review focuses on the status of EP NECs targeted therapies in the light of recent advances. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are the first therapeutic target detected in EP NECs. Through them SS analogs and PRRT act, producing symptomatic, biochemical, and, to a lesser extent, antiproliferative effects. New SS analogs, covering a higher number of SSTR subtypes, were developed, including pasireotide (SOM230), which controls 25% of carcinoid syndromes resistant to full dose octreotide LAR. Chimeric analogs, which bind SSTR2/SSTR5 and dopamine-2 receptor subtype (D2), are in preclinical phase of development. Among the numerous molecular targeted agents investigated in NETs, mTOR inhibitors and VEGF/VEGFR/PDGFR inhibitors are in most advanced clinical phase of investigation. In particular, everolimus, sunitinib, and bevacizumab are all studied in phase III trials. Both everolimus and sunitinib produced significant survival benefit versus placebo in advanced progressing well-differentiated pancreatic NECs. Sunitinib data have been presented at the last ASCO in June 2010, and everolimus data will be presented at next ESMO in September 2010.

Novel anticancer agents in clinical trials for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies that arise from endocrine cells located in various anatomic locations, with a dramatic increase in incidence during the last 30 years. Limited therapeutic options are currently available for patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs, including carcinoids and pancreatic NETs. Streptozotocin-based chemotherapy and somatostatin analogues are drugs that are currently used for the treatment of progressive metastatic NETs. Recently, sunitinib demonstrating efficacy in pancreatic islet cell carcinomas has opened a new avenue for the treatment of NETs, and further trials shall be considered in NET types such as carcinoids, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and several other endocrine tumors that depend on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor for angiogenesis. In addition, drugs with distinct mechanisms of action, such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, currently investigated in phase 3 trials, may also supply novel options to control tumor growth and metastasis. Although acknowledged as rare tumors, recent data demonstrated the feasibility of large randomized trials in this disease. Furthermore, data from large trials also showed the importance of selecting an appropriate patient population when designing randomized studies. This review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of well-differentiated NETs. Based on recent data, novel strategies may now be designed using those anticancer agents to optimize the current treatment of patients with NETs.

Advances in the therapy of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs)

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the digestive tract comprise a broad range of malignancies. The therapeutic approach to these tumours has not evolved as it did in other tumour types in the last two decades. The deeper knowledge of the underlying molecular biology behind the growth of neuroendocrine cells has brought much information to light. We now know that somatostatin analogues may not only be considered as symptomatic treatment but also as antitumour agents. Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antitumoural properties, has been shown to induce significant improvement in progression-free survival in a randomised trial conducted in well-differentiated pancreatic islet-cell NETs. The relevance of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway seems to be crucial in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs. In fact, mTOR inhibitors have shown activity in uncontrolled trials, and large, randomised trial results will be available shortly. In this article, we summarise the most recent available data on medical therapy for GEPNETs.

Plasma chromogranin A response to octreotide test: prognostic value for clinical outcome in endocrine digestive tumors

OBJECTIVES

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) expressing somatostatin receptors may be treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Selection criteria are a positive Octreoscan or a >50% hormone level decrease after octreotide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection (octreotide test) (OT). Plasma chromogranin A (CgA) is the best general GEP-NET marker, but data on CgA response to OT are scanty. Thus, we evaluated whether plasma CgA response to OT could predict the clinical response to SSAs.

METHODS

At diagnosis, 38 GEP-NET patients received octreotide 200 microg s.c., with plasma CgA determination at 0, 3, and 6 h. Long-term SSA treatment was then given by monitoring symptomatic, biochemical, and objective responses, and survival.

RESULTS

Basal plasma CgA levels were significantly higher in patients with functioning than non-functioning tumors (median (range): 220 (18-2,230) vs. 46 (25-8,610) U/l, P=0.03) and in those with than without metastases (171 (18-8,610) vs. 43 (28-220) U/l, P=0.04). CgA levels significantly correlated with WHO classification, clinical TNM staging, and Ki-67 proliferative index. After OT, CgA levels decreased from 146 (18-8,610) to 61 (10-8,535) U/l (basal and nadir values), P<0.001. In patients responsive to OT, a successful objective response occurred in 21/31 patients (68%). Successful symptomatic response occurred in 13/18 patients (72%), biochemical response in 25/31 (81%), and objective response in 21/31 (68%). In the remaining seven unresponsive cases, with CgA decrement <30%, disease progressed to death in six (86%). Median survival from enrollment was 48 months (6-138) in responsive and 6 (6-30) in unresponsive patients (P=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In GEP-NETs, plasma CgA is a reliable marker, and a >30% decrease after OT has a relevant prognostic meaning allowing the identification of the subgroup of patients most likely to be responsive to chronic SSAs.

Nordic Guidelines 2010 for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

The diagnostic work-up and treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours has undergone a major change during the last decade. New diagnostic possibilities and treatment options have been developed. These Nordic guidelines, written by a group with a major interest in the subject, summarises our current view on how to diagnose and treat these patients. The guidelines are meant to be useful in the daily practice for clinicians handling patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors: expression profiling evidences a role for AKT-mTOR pathway

PURPOSE

We investigated the global gene expression in a large panel of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) aimed at identifying new potential targets for therapy and biomarkers to predict patient outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a custom microarray, we analyzed 72 primary PETs, seven matched metastases, and 10 normal pancreatic samples. Relevant differentially expressed genes were validated by either quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays.

RESULTS

Our data showed that: tuberous sclerosis 2 (TSC2) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) were downregulated in most of the primary tumors, and their low expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival; somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) was absent or very low in insulinomas compared with nonfunctioning tumors; and expression of fibroblast growth factor 13 (FGF13) gene was significantly associated with the occurrence of liver metastasis and shorter disease-free survival. TSC2 and PTEN are two key inhibitors of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and the specific inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin or RAD001 inhibited cell proliferation of PET cell lines.

CONCLUSION

Our results strongly support a role for PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in PET, which ties in with the fact that mTOR inhibitors have reached phase III trials in neuroendocrine tumors. The finding of differential SSTR expression raises the potential for SSTR expression to be evaluated as a marker of response to somatostatin analogs. Finally, we identified FGF13 as a new prognostic marker that predicted poorer outcome in patients who were clinically considered free from disease.

A fuller understanding of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours combined with aggressive management improves outcome

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas (PNETs) represent 1-2% of all pancreatic tumours. The terms 'islet cell tumours' and 'carcinoids' of the pancreas should be avoided. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of the history and diagnosis of PNETs followed by a discussion of the available treatment options.

METHODS

A search on PubMed using the keywords 'neuroendocrine', 'pancreas' and 'carcinoid' was performed to identify relevant literature over the last 30 years.

RESULTS

The introduction of a revised classification of neuroendocrine tumours by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2000 significantly changed our understanding of and approach to the management of these tumours. Advances in laboratory and radiological techniques have also led to an increased detection of PNETs. Surgery remains the only treatment that offers a chance of cure with increasing number of non-surgical options serving as beneficial adjuncts. The better understanding of the behaviours of PNETs together with improvements in tumour localisation has resulted in a more aggressive management strategy with a concomitant improvement in symptom palliation and a prolongation of survival.

CONCLUSION

Due to their complex nature and the wide range of therapeutic options, the involvement of specialists from all necessary disciplines in a multidisciplinary team setting is vital to provide optimal treatment of this disease.

Review article: future therapies for management of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) are relatively uncommon tumours that occur anywhere within the gastrointestinal tract. The prevalence of GEP NETs is estimated to be 35 per 100 000 population. Patients often present with metastatic disease and consequently, palliative treatments form the mainstay of therapy.

AIM

To review the current and novel therapeutic options for management of GEP NETs.

METHODS

Searches for all studies related to GEP NETs, NETs and carcinoid tumours in Medline and abstracts from international meetings.

RESULTS

Somatostatin analogues remain the first line therapy for management of symptoms of GEP NETs and may have anti-proliferative action. New somatostatin analogues with different somatostatin receptor affinity have been developed. Radionuclide peptide receptor therapy is established in patients with positive somatostatin scintigraphy. A number of new agents and targeted therapies are currently being evaluated in a phase I and II studies and these include angiogenic inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and immune therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of nonsurgical therapies are available for management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. It is hoped, the development of some of these promising novel therapies will expand the therapeutic armamentarium.

Peptide receptor therapies in neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare tumors, mainly originating from the digestive system, able to produce bioactive amines and hormones. NETs tend to be slow growing and are often diagnosed when metastatic. The localization of a NETs and the assessment of the extent of disease are crucial for management. Commonly used diagnostic techniques include morphological imaging (ultrasound, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance), and functional imaging (somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, positron emission tomography techniques). Treatment is multidisciplinary and should be individualized according to the tumor type, burden, and symptoms. Therapeutic tools include surgery, interventional radiology, and medical treatments such as somatostatin analogues, interferon, chemotherapy, new targeted drugs and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues. NETs usually over-express somatostatin receptors, thus enabling the therapeutic use of somatostatin analogues, one of the basic tools, able to reduce signs and symptoms of hormone hypersecretion, improve quality of life, and slow tumor growth. PRRT with somatostatin analogues 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE has been explored in NETs for more than a decade. Present knowledge and clinical studies indicate that it is possible to deliver high-absorbed doses to tumors expressing sst2 receptors, with partial and complete objective responses in up to 30% of patients. Side effects, involving the kidney and the bone marrow, are mild if adequate renal protection is used. Moreover, a consistent survival benefit is reported. As NETs may also express cholecystokinin 2, bombesin, neuropeptide Y or vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors even simultaneously, the potential availability and biological stability of radio-analogues will improve the multireceptor targeting of NETs.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) have long fascinated clinicians and investigators despite their relative rarity. Their clinical presentation varies depending on whether the tumor is functional or not, and also according to the specific hormonal syndrome produced. Tumors may be sporadic or inherited, but little is known about their molecular pathology, especially the sporadic forms. Chromogranin A appears to be the most useful serum marker for diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. Initially, therapy should be directed at the hormonal syndrome because this has the major initial impact on the patient's health. Most PETs are relatively indolent but ultimately malignant, except for insulinomas, which predominantly are benign. Surgery is the only modality that offers the possibility of cure, although it generally is noncurative in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or nonfunctional PETs with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Preoperative staging of disease extent is necessary to determine the likelihood of complete resection although debulking surgery often is believed to be useful in patients with unresectable tumors. Once metastatic, biotherapy is usually the first modality used because it generally is well tolerated. Systemic or regional therapies generally are reserved until symptoms occur or tumor growth is rapid. Recently, a number of newer agents, as well as receptor-directed radiotherapy, are being evaluated for patients with advanced disease. This review addresses a number of recent advances regarding the molecular pathology, diagnosis, localization, and management of PETs including discussion of peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy and other novel antitumor approaches. We conclude with a discussion of future directions and unsettled problems in the field.

Thymidylate synthase expression in gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

The predictive role of the quantification of thymidylate synthase (TS) in tumors treated with antifolate drugs, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), has been extensively reported in a variety of human tumors. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent potential targets of antifolate agents, but no data on TS expression level in these tumors are currently available.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A series of 116 NETs were collected, including 58 gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and 58 lung NETs. In 24 well-differentiated GEP neuroendocrine carcinomas (WD-NEC), a 5-FU-based treatment was given. Total RNA was extracted from microdissected paraffin blocks. TS mRNA quantification was done by real-time PCR, whereas protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

By means of both quantification by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry, a higher TS expression in pulmonary small cell lung cancer and large cell NEC compared with typical and atypical carcinoids was observed (P < 0.01). Similarly, in GEP tumors, a higher TS expression in poorly differentiated carcinomas than both WD-NEC and benign tumors (P < 0.01) was found. In patients with WD-NEC treated with 5-FU, high TS mRNA levels were associated with shorter time to progression (P = 0.002) and overall survival (P = 0.04). This negative prognostic role was confirmed in multivariate analysis adjusting for major prognostic variables (P = 0.01). No association between TS mRNA and survival was observed in WD-NEC patients not receiving 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, for the first time, (a) reports the differential TS expression in the spectrum of NETs and (b) indicates TS as a possible predictive marker of treatment efficacy in WD-NEC patients treated with 5-FU.

Transarterial chemoembolization of liver metastases from well differentiated gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors with doxorubicin-eluting beads: preliminary results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of progressive liver metastases from well differentiated gastroenteropancreatic endocrine (GEP) tumors with drug-eluting beads (DEBs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2004 to July 2005, eight men and 12 women aged 34 to 75 years (mean +/- SD, 59 y +/- 12), including 13 patients with bilobar disease and seven with unilobar disease, underwent 34 sessions of TACE with DEBs (500-700 mum) loaded with doxorubicin. Morphologic response was evaluated with computed tomography (CT) at 1 and 3 months according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. Clinical and laboratory data were also assessed.

RESULTS

The complete dose of 4 mL of DEBs loaded with 100 mg doxorubicin was injected during 22 TACE sessions and 1-3.5 mL of DEBs was injected during 12 TACE sessions. Three months after TACE, 16 of 20 patients (80%) exhibited a partial response, three (15%) had stable disease, and one (5%) had progressive disease. The mean size of the largest metastasis in each patient decreased from 42 mm +/- 24 before treatment (median, 39.5 mm) to 33 mm +/- 23 (median, 29 mm) 1 month after treatment and 30 mm +/- 21 (median, 26.5 mm) 3 months after treatment. After a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 6-24 months), nine patients' disease remained controlled without tumor progression and 10 patients had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 15 months. Postembolization syndrome lasted less than 7 days in 23 sessions (67%) and more than 7 days in seven sessions (22%), and no symptoms at all were observed in four sessions (11%). Peak aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and bilirubin levels after TACE were 35-490 IU (mean, 125 IU +/- 77; normal, <35 IU), 20-440 IU (mean, 149 IU +/- 155; normal, <45 IU), and 8-90 mol/L (mean, 26 IU +/- 25; normal, <17 IU), respectively, at 2-3 days. In five patients, follow-up CT at 1 month revealed TACE-induced peripheral liver necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE with DEBs is well tolerated and appears effective. A comparative study with a standard TACE or transarterial embolization regimen is warranted to define the best protocol for transarterial treatment of GEP liver metastases.