Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients?

Factors affecting the long-term prognosis of patients in the AYA generation with epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian carcinoma (OvCa) is more common in the elderly, but also affects the adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation, which refers to those aged 15-39 years. Although the characteristics of OvCa may differ between AYAs and non-AYAs, limited information is currently available on differences in prognostic factors. Therefore, we herein investigated prognostic factors for and the prognosis of OvCa in AYAs. We also examined the prognostic impact of fertility-sparing surgery in a subgroup analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 4897 patients with OvCa from the databases of multiple institutions and ultimately included 1161 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We performed a survival analysis to compare AYAs and non-AYAs with backgrounds that conformed to those of AYAs using the propensity score (PS) matching method. A Cox regression analysis was also conducted to evaluate each predictor of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the original population. As a subgroup analysis, a multivariate analysis stratified by the AYA and non-AYA generations was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 119 AYA patients were included in this study. After PS adjustments, no significant differences were observed in RFS or OS between AYAs and non-AYAs. Prognostic factors differed between AYAs and non-AYAs, particularly in histology and cytology. A multivariate analysis stratified by the AYA and non-AYA generations described that uterine-preserving surgery (UPS) did not have a significant impact on the prognosis of AYAs or non-AYAs. In cases with recurrence, no significant differences were observed in RFS and recurrent sites in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Characteristic prognostic factors for EOC in AYAs were identified. The present results indicate the limited prognostic impact of UPS for EOC in AYAs.

The impact of lymphadenectomy on the survival outcomes of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A retrospective study of the SEER database and Chinese registry

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare pathological type of ovarian cancer with a poor prognosis, and lymphadenectomy is controversial in patients with OCCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy on the prognosis of patients with OCCC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and institutional registries in China. The SEER cohort included 1777 women diagnosed with OCCC between 2010 and 2019, while the Chinese cohort included 199 women diagnosed between April 2004 and April 2021. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analysis. We also employed propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for baseline imbalances between the lymphadenectomy group and the no-lymphadenectomy group.

RESULTS

Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that lymphadenectomy was not associated with better overall survival (OS) in either early (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84[0.50-1.43], p = 0.528) or advanced (HR 0.78[0.50-1.21], p = 0.270) patients in the SEER cohort after PSM. Additionally, in the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, lymphadenectomy did not significantly improve OS in both early (p = 0.28) and advanced (p = 0.49) patients in the SEER cohort after PSM. Similarly, in the Chinese cohort, lymphadenectomy had no significant effect on OS (early p = 0.22; advanced p = 0.61) or RFS (early p = 0.18; advanced p = 0.83) in both early and advanced patients.

CONCLUSION

In completely homogeneous groups, lymphadenectomy in women diagnosed with OCCC had no effect on either recurrence-free survival or overall survival compared to patients without lymphadenectomy.

The impact of lymphadenectomy on ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) shares treatment strategies with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Due to OCCC's rarity, there's a lack of prospective studies on its surgery, resulting in heterogeneous and limited existing data. This study aims to clarify the prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy in OCCC patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until July 2023 for studies investigating lymphadenectomy's effects on OCCC patients. We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021270460).

RESULTS

Among 444 screened articles, seven studies (2883 women) met inclusion criteria. Our analysis revealed that lymphadenectomy significantly improved disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.60-0.95, P = 0.02) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.34-0.99, P = 0.05). However, it did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.60-1.06, P = 0.12) or progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.64-1.42, P = 0.79). Notably, some earlier studies reported no survival benefit, warranting cautious interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy does not significantly enhance OS and PFS for OCCC but does improve DFS and DSS. Tailoring treatment to individual patient profiles is imperative for optimal outcomes. Precise preoperative or intraoperative lymph node metastasis detection is essential for identifying candidates benefiting from lymphadenectomy. Collaborative international efforts and an OCCC database are pivotal for refining future treatment strategies.

The prognostic impact of limited-staging surgery in patients with stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-center study with a propensity score-adjusted analysis

OBJECTIVE

Complete-staging surgery is recommended for stage IA ovarian cancer, but may be omitted for various reasons, including the preservation of fertility and an advanced age. We herein investigated the prognostic impact of limited-staging surgery in patients with stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 4730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors from the databases of multiple institutions and ultimately included 293 with stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer. Limited-staging surgery was defined as one that did not involve hysterectomy, systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy or the collection of ascites cytology. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis with propensity scores and estimated the hazard ratios of recurrence and death with limited-staging surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 176 out of 293 patients (39.9%) were assigned to the limited-staging surgery group. After propensity score adjustments, no significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival or overall survival between the limited- and complete-staging surgery groups. Even in the subgroup analysis with age stratification, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were similar in the limited- and complete-staging surgery groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results indicate the limited prognostic impact of limited-staging surgery for stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer.

Immune-Hot tumor features associated with recurrence in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a distinct histotype of ovarian cancer, which usually presages a worse prognosis upon recurrence. Identifying patients at risk for relapse is an unmet need to improve outcomes. A retrospective cohort analysis of 195 early-stage OCCC patients diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2019 at National Taiwan University Hospital was conducted to identify prognostic factors for recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Molecular profiling of tumors was performed in a case-controlled cohort matched for adjuvant therapy for biomarker discovery. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed that paclitaxel-based chemotherapy was associated with better PFS than nonpaclitaxel chemotherapy (HR = 0.19, P = .006). The addition of bevacizumab was associated with better PFS, compared to no bevacizumab (HR = 0.09, P = .02). Neither showed significant improvement in OS. Recurrence is associated with an Immune-Hot tumor feature (P = .03), the CTLA-4-high subtype (P = .01) and increased infiltration of immune cells in general. The Immune-Hot feature (HR = 3.39, P = .005) and the CTLA-4-high subtype (HR = 2.13, P = .059) were associated with worse PFS. Immune-Hot tumor features could prognosticate recurrence in early-stage OCCC.

Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological malignancies. Opinions differ regarding the role of ultra-radical (extensive) cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity associated with ultra-radical/extensive surgery in the management of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 11), MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid up to November 2021. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies (NRS), analysed using multivariate methods, that compared ultra-radical/extensive and standard surgery in women with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We identified three NRS and conducted meta-analyses where possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three retrospective observational studies for inclusion in the review. Two studies included women exclusively undergoing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and the other study including both PDS and interval debulking surgical (IDS) procedures. All studies were at critical risk of bias due to retrospective and non-randomised study designs. Meta-analysis of two studies, assessing 397 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures, as part of PDS, may have a lower risk of mortality compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.82; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis including women with more-extensive disease (carcinomatosis) (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; n = 283, very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. One study reported a comparison of radical versus standard surgical procedures associated with both PDS and IDS procedures, but a multivariate analysis was only undertaken for disease-free survival (DFS) and therefore the certainty of the evidence was not assessable for overall survival (OS) and remains very low. The lack of reporting of OS meant the study was at high risk of bias for selective reporting of outcomes. One study, 203 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures as part of PDS may have a lower risk of disease progression or death compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis in one study including women with carcinomatosis (adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82; n = 139; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. A combined analysis in one study found that women who underwent radical procedures (using both PDS and IDS) may have an increased chance of disease progression or death than those who received standard surgery (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; n = 527; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. In absolute and unadjusted terms, the DFS was 19.3 months in the standard surgery group, 15.8 in the PDS group and 15.9 months in the IDS group. All studies were at critical risk of bias and we only identified very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes reported in the review. Perioperative mortality, adverse events and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were either not reported or inadequately reported in the included studies. Two studies reported perioperative mortality (death within 30 days of surgery), but they did not use any statistical adjustment. In total, there were only four deaths within 30 days of surgery in both studies. All were observed in the standard surgery group, but we did not report a risk ratio (RR) to avoid potentially misleading results with so few deaths and very low-certainty evidence. Similarly, one study reported postoperative morbidity, but the authors did not use any statistical adjustment. Postoperative morbidity occurred more commonly in women who received ultra-radical surgery compared to standard surgery, but the certainty of the evidence was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found only very low-certainty evidence comparing ultra-radical surgery and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer. The evidence was limited to retrospective, NRSs and so is at critical risk of bias. The results may suggest that ultra-radical surgery could result in improved OS, but results are based on very few women who were chosen to undergo each intervention, rather than a randomised study and intention-to-treat analysis, and so the evidence is very uncertain. Results for progression/DFS were inconsistent and evidence was sparse. QoL and morbidity was incompletely or not reported in the three included studies. A separate prognostic review assessing residual disease as a prognostic factor in this area has been addressed elsewhere, which demonstrates the prognostic effect of macroscopic debulking to no macroscopic residual disease. In order to aid existing guidelines, the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced-stage ovarian cancer could be addressed through the conduct of a sufficiently powered, RCT comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery, or well-designed NRSs, if this is not possible.

Obesity contributes to the stealth peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The clinical significance of a higher BMI on the prognosis of ovarian cancer remains controversial; therefore, a more detailed analysis is demanded. This study investigated the impact of BMI on peritoneum-specific recurrence to clarify the involvement of adipose tissue in the proliferation of cancer cells at sites of peritoneal dissemination.

METHODS

Among 4,730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors, 280 diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB to IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer and who underwent complete resection in the primary surgery were included in the present study.

RESULTS

There were 42, 201, and 37 women in the low, normal, and high BMI groups, respectively. Peritoneum-specific recurrence-free survival and overall survival were both significantly shorter in patients with a high BMI than in those with a normal BMI (p = 0.028 and 0.018, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the distribution of sites of recurrence between these two groups. A multivariate analysis identified obesity as an independent prognostic factor in addition to pT3 tumor staging and positive ascites cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a high BMI had a significantly worse prognosis than those with a normal BMI, and peritoneal adipose tissue may have contributed to this difference.

Who are the long-term survivors of recurrent ovarian carcinoma?: a retrospective analysis of a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence and hallmarks of long-term survivors of recurrent ovarian carcinoma (LTSROC) in a large-scale retrospective cohort of patients from a multicenter study group.

METHODS

We performed a regional multicenter retrospective study between January 1986 and September 2021 using clinical data collected under the central pathological review system. Patients who underwent surgery for primary OC at diagnosis and developed recurrent tumors after the initial treatment were included. We defined LTSROC as patients who survived for 5 years or longer after initial tumor recurrence and examined factors affecting the long-term survival of ROC and outcomes of LTSROC.

RESULTS

We collected information on patients with malignant ovarian tumors and finally 657 of them that developed ROC were included in the study population. Sixty-eight (10.4%) patients were LTSROC while 399 (60.7%) were short-term survivors of recurrent ovarian carcinoma. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, negative ascites cytology [odds ratio (OR) 1.865; 95% CI 1.026-3.393; p = 0.041] and a recurrence-free interval (RFI) of 1 year or longer (OR 2.896; 95% CI 1.546-5.425; p < 0.001) were identified as independent factors associated with LTSROC. Approximately 80% of LTSROC presented with solitary recurrent tumors. Furthermore, more than 50% of LTSROC underwent tumor debulking surgery for the first recurrent tumor with or without chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

RFI of 1 year or longer and negative ascites cytology in the initial surgery were identified as independent predictive factors for LTSROC.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for young women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who have undergone fertility-sparing surgery?: a multicenter retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

In young patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) who were received fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. Here, we performed a multicenter study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to explore the effect of chemotherapy on patients' survival.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2015, a retrospective study was carried out, including 1183 patients with stage I EOC. Among them, a total of 101 women with stage I EOC who underwent FSS were investigated, including 64 and 37 patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two arms using original and IPTW cohorts.

RESULTS

During 62.6 months (median) of follow-up, recurrence was noted in 11 (17.2%) women in the chemotherapy arm and 6 (16.2%) patients in the observation arm. In the unweighted cohort, the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival (OS/RFS) rates of chemotherapy and observation arms were 86.3/80.8 and 90.2/79.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups {Log-rank: P = 0.649 (OS)/P = 0.894 (RFS)}. In the IPTW cohort after adjusting for various clinicopathologic covariates, we also failed to identify a difference in RFS/OS between the two groups {RFS (chemotherapy vs. observation), HR: 0.501 (95% CI 0.234-1.072), P = 0.075: OS (chemotherapy vs. observation), HR: 0.939 (95% CI 0.330-2.669), P = 0.905}.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after adjusting clinicopathologic covariates, performing adjuvant chemotherapy may not improve the oncologic outcome in young patients who have undergone FSS.

Acute Presentation of Large Size Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma as Double Torsed Ovarian Tumor

We report a 46-year-old patient who presented to the emergency department with complaints of acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. An abdominal CT scan revealed a large (207 × 155 × 182 mm) thin-walled inhomogeneous tumor connected to the uterus and right ovary. Emergency surgery laparotomy was performed. Inside the abdominal cavity, a 30 × 30 cm heterogenous, dark blue tumor in the right adnexa area, torsed two times, weighing 3700 g was found. Histological examination revealed right ovary clear cell carcinoma. We emphasize the rare nature of the histology and presentation of this case report. Ovarian clear cell carcinomas are relatively rare malignancies, presenting in 5 to 10% of ovarian malignant tumors in the west.

Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study

Objective

The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results

The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes.

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for advanced-stage patients with ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma can improve oncologic outcomes. This multi-centered retrospective study was performed under the same chemotherapeutic protocol and criteria. Inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to make weighted cohorts.

The post-progression survival of patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: results from a randomized phase III study in JGOG3017/GCIG

OBJECTIVE

In this study we sought to investigate the clinical factors that affect post-progression survival (PPS) in patients with recurrent or persistent clear cell carcinoma (CCC). We utilized the JGOG3017/Gynecological Cancer InterGroup data to compare paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and irinotecan plus cisplatin (CPT-P) in the treatment of stages I to IV CCC.

METHODS

We enrolled 166 patients with recurrent or persistent CCC and assessed the impact of variables, including platinum sensitivity, treatment arm, crossover chemotherapy, primary stage, residual tumor at primary surgery, performance status, ethnicity, and tumor reduction surgery at recurrence on the median of PPS in patients with recurrent or persistent CCC.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients received TC, and 89 patients received CPT-P. The median PPS for patients with platinum-resistant disease was 10.9 months, compared with 18.8 months for patients with platinum-sensitive disease (hazard ratio [HR]=1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.30-2.72; log-rank p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the platinum sensitivity (resistant vs. sensitivity; HR=1.60; p=0.027) and primary stage (p=0.009) were identified as independent predictors of prognosis factors for PPS in recurrent or persistent CCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed that platinum sensitivity and primary stage are clinical factors that significantly affect PPS in patients with recurrent or persistent CCC as well as other histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer. PPS in patients with recurrent CCC should establish the basis for future clinical trials in this population.

A CLEARER VIEW ON OVARIAN CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA

Introduction: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a less common subtype accounting for approximately 5% of all epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Clinical experience and research findings confirm the remarkable differences in clinical behavior, molecular alterations and pathogenesis of OCCC. The diagnosis of OCCC is typically set at a younger age, and earlier stage and in a background of endometriosis.Results: Molecularly, OCCCs rarely harbor BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and have fewer copy number variants (CNVs). The most common molecular changes occur in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex genes, the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/Ras signaling pathway.Five-year disease-specific survival of patients with OCCC is worse compared to high grade serous carcinomas (HGSOC). The current treatment options for OCCC are based on studies that included patients with predominantly HGSOC and only a minor proportion of cancers with clear cell histology. In order to improve outcomes for patients with OCCC, research should be specific for this subtype.Discussion: As the available information about the specific characteristics of OCCC is increasing, especially at a molecular level, it should be possible to continuously improve the specific diagnostics and treatment. Since OCCC is so rare, it is essential to collect new evidence at an international level. To avoid extrapolation from EOC trials with possible erroneous conclusions, patients should always be encouraged to participate in specific histological trials and basket trials, while paying extra attention to OCCC-like subtypes.

A large-scale multi-institutional study evaluating prognostic aspects of positive ascites cytology and effects of therapeutic interventions in epithelial ovarian cancer

Positive ascites cytology is a strong prognostic factor in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer (OvCa). However, limited information is currently available on the impact of positive ascites cytology on patient prognoses under each clinical background. We herein investigated the comprehensive impact of positive ascites cytology on patients with epithelial OvCa and the effectiveness of additional therapeutic interventions, including complete staging surgery and chemotherapy. Among 4730 patients with malignant ovarian neoplasms, retrospectively identified in multiple institutions, 1906 with epithelial OvCa were included. In the investigation of its effects on clinical factors using a multivariate analysis, positive ascites cytology correlated with a poor prognosis. Positive ascites cytology had a significantly worse prognosis than those with negative cytology in all subgroups except for patients with stage IV tumors and a mucinous histology. Chemotherapy may be effective in reducing the negative impact of positive ascites cytology on the prognosis of patients in terms of progression-free and overall survivals, while complete staging surgery did not improve the prognosis of patients with positive ascites cytology. Collectively, our findings suggested that positive ascites cytology had a negative impact on the prognosis of patients with epithelial OvCa, but not those with stage IV tumors or a mucinous histology.

Does complete-staging lymphadenectomy improve survival outcomes in stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian carcinoma? A multi-institutional retrospective study with propensity score-weighted analysis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the prognostic impact of complete-staging lymphadenectomy on patients with clinically apparent Stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

We conducted a regional multi-institutional retrospective study between 1986 and 2018. Amongst 4897 patients with malignant ovarian tumours diagnosed under central pathological review, 259 women with Stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian carcinoma were eligible. We evaluated differences in survival of patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Group A) and those with only pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or clinical lymph node evaluation (Group B). To analyse the therapeutic effects, the baseline imbalance between patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and others was adjusted with an inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score involving independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

In total, 145 patients (56.0%) received both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. With propensity score-based adjustment, estimated survival was better in Group A compared with that in Group B but not significant. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy also led to no significant improvement of overall survival in most of the subgroups. However, point estimations of the hazard ratio for lymphadenectomy in patients with an age of 45 or younger (hazard ratio, 0.304; 95% confidence interval, 0.094-0.982), a Grade 1-2 (hazard ratio, 0.441; 95% confidence interval, 0.204-0.954) and T1c2-3 tumour (hazard ratio, 0.449; 95% confidence interval, 0.164-1.231) were better compared with those with the opposite characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete-staging lymphadenectomy was not a significant prognostic factor in patients with Stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian carcinoma, where we still need to explore appropriate candidate for the procedure.

Impact of incomplete surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for the intraoperative rupture of capsulated stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study with an in-depth subgroup analysis

Objective

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of incomplete surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with intraoperative rupture of capsulated stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa).

Methods

A regional retrospective study was conducted between 1986 and 2019. Among 4,730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors, 534 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA and IC1 epithelial OvCa were eligible. Differences in survival outcomes were examined between patients with stage IA and IC1 tumors and the effects of uterine preservation, complete-staging lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy were investigated by an in-depth subgroup analysis. To analyze therapeutic effects, baseline imbalances were adjusted using propensity score (PS).

Results

The prognosis of patients with stage IC1 tumors was worse than those with stage IA. Surgical spill did not affect the site of recurrence. In the PS-adjusted subgroup analysis, uterine preservation (hazard ratio [HR]=1.669; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.052–2.744), incomplete-staging lymphadenectomy (HR=1.689; 95% CI=1.211–2.355), and the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=3.729; 95% CI=2.090–6.653) significantly increased the HR of recurrence for patients with stage IC1 tumors compared to those with stage IA tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy decreased the impact of rupture with uterine preservation (HR=0.159; 95% CI=0.230–1.168) or incomplete-staging lymphadenectomy (HR=0.987; 95% CI=0.638–1.527).

Conclusion

The present results suggest intraoperative rupture of capsulated stage I epithelial OvCa is associated with a poor prognosis. When chemotherapy is given for patients receiving incomplete surgery, there is no longer an increased risk of recurrence observed with the rupture.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a clinical and molecular perspective

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary has distinct biology and clinical behavior. There are significant geographical and racial differences in the incidence of clear cell carcinoma compared with other epithelial ovarian tumors. Patients with clear cell carcinoma are younger, tend to present at an early stage, and their tumors are commonly associated with endometriosis, which is widely accepted as a direct precursor of clear cell carcinoma and has been identified pathologically in approximately 50% of clear cell carcinoma cases. The most frequent and important specific gene alterations in clear cell carcinoma are mutations of AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) (~50% of cases) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) (~50% cases). More broadly, subgroups of clear cell carcinoma have been identified based on C-APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like) and C-AGE (age-related) mutational signatures. Gene expression profiling shows upregulation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-beta (HNF1β) and oxidative stress-related genes, and has identified epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like tumor subgroups. Although the benefit of platinum-based chemotherapy is not clearly defined it remains the mainstay of first-line therapy. Patients with early-stage disease have a favorable clinical outcome but the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage or recurrent disease is poor. Alternative treatment strategies are required to improve patient outcome and the development of targeted therapies based on molecular characteristics is a promising approach. Improved specificity of the histological definition of this tumor type is helping these efforts but, due to the rarity of clear cell carcinoma, international collaboration will be essential to design appropriately powered, large-scale clinical trials.

Does uterine preservation affect survival outcomes of patients with stage I ovarian sex cord-stromal cell tumours? A multi-institutional study

OBJECTIVE

Sex cord-stromal tumours of the ovary are relatively uncommon neoplasms that account for 3 % of all ovarian cancers. Uterine preservation with careful staging is achievable; however, conservative surgery remains controversial. This study examined the prognostic effects of uterine preservation in patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was undertaken between January 1986 and February 2019, and the clinicopathological data of 4897 women with malignant ovarian tumours were collected. Seventy-seven patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours were eligible for inclusion. The characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients were examined. To investigate the prognostic effects of uterine-preserving surgery, baseline imbalances between patients with and without uterine-preserving surgery were adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores composed of independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

The mean ages of patients in the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups were 39.8 and 57.8 years, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustments, no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.205) or recurrence-free survival (p=0.071) were observed between the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups. Estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 98.7 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 95.9 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group, and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 87.2 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 78.2 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group. Uterine-preserving surgery did not significantly affect the site of tumour recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Uterine-preserving surgery may be a feasible surgical option for patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours. Further research is needed to guarantee prognostic accuracy and develop effective therapeutic approaches for sex cord-stromal tumours.

Impact of uterus-preserving surgery on Stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics of women with Stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC) and evaluate the impact of uterus-preserving surgery (UPS) in terms of survival prognosis.

METHODS

A regional multi-institutional retrospective study conducted between January 1986 and March 2017 by reviewing records of the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group. Clinical and pathologic data and survival outcomes were assessed for women with Stage I primary mEOC. The baseline imbalance between women with and those without UPS was adjusted by an inverse probability of treatment weighting method using the propensity score (PS) of independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

Among 4730 women with malignant ovarian tumors, 185 had Stage I primary mEOC and were included in the study. The mean age was 47.6 years (range 12-87 years), and 56 (30.3%) women underwent UPS. After PS-based adjustment, women in the UPS group did not have a poorer prognosis regarding overall survival (P=0.776) or recurrence-free survival (P=0.683). Even after age stratification, there was no statistical difference in survival outcomes between the UPS and non-UPS groups.

CONCLUSION

UPS was not associated with decreased survival and may be a treatment option for women with Stage I primary mEOC irrespective of age.

Prognostic factors and effects of fertility-sparing surgery in women of reproductive age with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of young patients with stage I clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) and evaluate the prognostic factors and effects of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) using propensity score (PS) adjustment.

Methods

We conducted a regional multi-institutional study between 1986 and 2017. Among 4,277 patients with ovarian tumor, clinical and pathological data of 103 fertile women with stage I unilateral CCC were collected. We evaluated survival and reproductive outcomes in these patients. Additionally, to analyze the effects of FSS, baseline imbalance between patients with and those without FSS was adjusted with an inverse probability of treatment weighting using PSs involving independent clinical variables.

Results

The mean patient age was 39.4 years, and the median follow-up period for surviving patients was 55.6 months. In multivariate analysis, stage IC2/IC3 (vs. IA/IC1) was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). FSS was not associated with poorer prognosis when compared to the prognosis with non-preserving surgery with regard to both RFS and OS. No statistical difference in survival outcomes between FSS and other approaches was confirmed after PS adjustment. Among patients who underwent FSS, four deliveries with healthy neonates were noted without any gestational complications.

Conclusion

FSS can be considered in stage I CCC, specifically in stage IA and IC1 patients who strongly desire to have children in the future. Further clinical research is needed to clarify the optimal application of FSS for CCC.

Is standard radical surgery necessary for elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma? ~Propensity score matched analysis~

OBJECTIVE

The impact of 'standard full-staged radical surgery (SRS)' on overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated the impact of SRS on OS in elderly patients with early-stage EOC in a multicentric analysis using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique.

METHODS

Between 1986 and 2017, 3227 patients with EOC were registered and accumulated by the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group, consisting of 14 collaborating institutions, after a central pathological review. Among them, 204 elderly patients aged older than or equal to 65 years who had a stage I EOC were analyzed, including 72 patients who had received SRS (Group I) and 132 who had undergone non-SRS limited surgery (Group II). Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups using a PS-matching technique to adjust for various clinicopathologic risk factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration of all surviving patients was 55.9 months. Consequently, 54 patients (26.5%) developed recurrence. In addition, 33 patients (16.2%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, the 5-year OS rates of Groups I and II were 95.8 and 82.3%, respectively. We identified a marginally significant difference between the two groups (Log-rank: P = 0.086). In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups [OS (Group I vs. II), HR: 0.766 (95% CI: 0.271-2.165), P = 0.615].

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, non-SRS limited surgery may not worsen the oncologic outcome in elderly women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.

Current and future strategies for treatment of ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is one of the five histological types of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). OCCC comprises 23% of all EOC cases in Japan, whereas the rate of OCCC in North America and Europe is much lower. OCCC is generally categorized as a rare gynecologic malignancy, and there is limited evidence for specific treatment. The clinical basis for treatment of OCCC is mostly based on retrospective studies, many of which were performed in Japan. Until recently, most randomized clinical trials for EOC have included OCCC; therefore, current treatment for OCCC is basically the same as that for other histologic types of EOC. However, the clinical characteristics of OCCC differ from those of high-grade serous carcinoma, particularly for chemosensitivity, and there is a need to develop new treatment for OCCC. The molecular background of OCCC has unique features: tumors are usually negative for p53 mutations and positive for ARID1A and/or PIK3CA mutations, whereas p53 mutations are common in high-grade serous or endometrioid carcinomas. These features may help in development of new treatment for OCCC. In this review, we described the current evidence for treatment of OCCC, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and we discuss ongoing clinical trials and preclinical studies of new treatment approaches for OCCC.

Rare ovarian tumors: an update on diagnosis and treatment

Rare ovarian cancers occur frequently. Almost half of ovarian malignancies relate to several different 'rare' histotypes, according to the World Health Organization. The most common tumors are epithelial tumors, including high grade serous carcinomas, the presumed 'frequent ovarian cancers', together with low grade serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, and carcinosarcomas. Sex cord stromal tumors and germ cell carcinomas define two other groups of different subtypes, and small cell carcinomas are an independent high grade subtype closely related to the family of rhabdoid tumors. All of these cancers are primary ovarian cancers, classified by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. However, the tumor subtypes display various epidemiologic, clinical, pathological, prognostic, and therapeutic characteristics. Because of the scarcity of data, current understanding of each subtype is limited and treatment has generally been derived from the more common tumor types. The aim of this article is to review the current literature on rare ovarian malignancies.

Prognostic impact of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis

BACKGROUND

The exact impact of full-staging lymphadenectomy on patients with primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma confined to the ovary is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy covering both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with clinically-apparent stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma, using data from multi-institutions under a central pathological review system and analyses with a propensity score-based method.

METHODS

We conducted a regional multi-institutional retrospective study between 1986 and 2017. Among 4730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors, a total of 186 women with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma were eligible. We evaluated differences in survival outcomes between patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and those with only pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or clinical lymph node evaluation. To analyze the therapeutic effects, the baseline imbalance between patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and others was adjusted with an inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score involving independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients received both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. With PS-based adjustment, both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not have additive effects regarding overall survival (P = 0.696) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.978). Multivariate analysis similarly showed no significant impact of both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on their prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is limited for clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma as long as full peritoneal and clinical lymph node evaluations are conducted. The results of this study should be used as the basis for additional studies, including prospective trials.

Rethinking of treatment strategies and clinical management in ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), with unique clinical and molecular characteristics compared with other histological types of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), behaves like a distinct entity and has a poorer prognosis than other EOC types, especially in advanced stages. In addition, OCCC comprises approximately 27% of all EOC cases in Japan, compared with 12% in Western countries. Historically, patients with OCCC have been eligible for chemotherapeutic and surgical trials of EOC. It has been difficult to evaluate the specific impact of these trials on the prognosis of women with OCCC because of its rarity and unique molecular characteristics. Recent studies of OCCC revealed significant molecular variations related to carcinogenesis and molecular targets that could directly facilitate patient stratification and subsequent precision medicine. Thus, treatment strategies specific for OCCC based on its clinical and molecular characteristics are urgently needed. In this review, we highlight the management and treatment of OCCC from clinical aspects.

The impact of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy on long-term oncologic outcome of women with advanced ovarian clear-cell carcinoma

Objective

The impact of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (SRL) remains controversial in patients with advanced ovarian clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) who are optimally debulked.

Methods

Between 1986 and 2017, a total of 3,227 women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were analyzed in a multi-institutional study. Among them, 166 optimally debulked women with stage IIB–IV CCC were collected (residual tumor of <1 cm). All patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) Group I (n=112): underwent standard radical surgery with SRL, 2) Group II (n=54): underwent non-staging limited surgery. The pathological slides were assessed based on central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique to adjust for various clinicopathologic factors.

Results

The median follow-up duration of all surviving women was 52.8 (1.6–184.2) months. Overall, 88 patients (53.0%) experienced recurrence and 68 patients (41.0%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of groups I and II were 57.9 and 64.9%, respectively (log-rank p=0.415). In the PS-adjusted cohort, the 5-year OS rates were 64.9 and 58.8% in women in groups I and II, respectively (p=0.453). Furthermore, in the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in OS between the 2 groups (group I vs. group II; hazard ratio=1.170; 95% confidence interval=0.633–2.187; p=0.615).

Conclusions

This study suggests that the performance of SRL including radical surgery may not lead to a significant improvement in the oncologic outcome of advanced CCC patients with optimal cytoreduction.

Fertility-sparing surgery and oncologic outcome among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer ~propensity score- matched analysis~

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate how much the risks of recurrence and death are increased as a consequence of selecting fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from 14 collaborating hospitals, a non-randomized, observational cohort study was conducted between 1987 and 2015, including 1183 women with stage I EOC. Finally, a total of 285 patients with stage I EOC at reproductive age were recruited. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the FSS (N = 101) and radical surgery (RS) group (N = 184) using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique to adjust for relevant risk factors: the age, substage, histological type, grade, CA125 values, ascites cytology, ascites volume, and chemotherapy.

Results

During 66.0 months (median) of follow-up, 42 patients (14.7%) developed recurrence, and 31 patients (10.9%) died. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P = 0.838), RFS (P = 0.377)}. In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in RFS or OS between the FSS and RS groups {RFS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.262 (95% CI: 0.559–2.852), P = 0. 575; OS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.206 (95% CI: 0.460–3.163), P = 0.704}.

Conclusions

After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, FSS in itself may not worsen the oncologic outcome in young women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.

Fertility-Sparing surgery for young women with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: a multicenteric comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcome of women with stage I ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS).

Materials and nethods

Between 1986 and 2017, a total of 3227 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated based on a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions. We identified 24 and 54 patients with stage I EC who underwent FSS and conventional radical surgery (CRS), respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to compare OS between the two groups.

Results

With follow-up of a total of 78 patients, 9 patients (11.5%) developed recurrence. In addition, 5 patients (6.4%) died of the disease. Recurrence was noted in 3 (10.7%) patients in the FSS group and 6 (11.1%) patients in the CRS group. Death was noted in 2 (8.3%) patients in the FSS group and 3 (5.6%) patients in the CRS group. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P = 0.630), RFS (P = 0.757)}. In the IPTW-adjusted cohort, the 5-year OS rates were 96.6 and 92.4% in patients with FSS and CRS, respectively (P = 0.319). Furthermore, the 5-year RFS rate was 88.6% for the FSS group and 88.1% for the CRS group (Log-rank: P = 0.556).

Conclusions

Young women with stage I EC undergoing FSS showed a relatively satisfactory prognosis, equal to those receiving CRC.

Long-term oncologic outcome and its prognostic indicators in reproductive-age women with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) in reproductive-age women is likely to become an increasingly critical issue regarding possibilities of infertility, hormonal dysfunction, and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term oncologic outcome and its prognostic indicators based on a multicentric cohort of young patients with CCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period of 1990-2015, a total of 164 patients aged 45-year-old or younger were enrolled in the study. Clinicopathologic data of these young patients with CCC collected under a centralized pathological review system were subjected to uni- and multivariable analyses to evaluate overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 73.8 months (range 5.2-244.2) in the surviving patients. Among these patients, 104 (63.4%) had FIGO I disease, and 22 (13.4%), 31 (18.9%), and 7 (4.3%) had II, III, and IV disease, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 74.5%. On stratification by the FIGO stage, the 5-year OS rates were as follows: stage I (90.2%), stage II (57.9%), and stage III/IV (39.3%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Confining analysis to stage I patients, there was no difference in OS between those who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who received radical surgery (P = 0.1593). In relapsed patients, the median survival after recurrence was 11.6 months. In multivariable analysis of stage I patients, the capsule status was an independent prognostic indicator of OS {IC2/IC3 vs. IA/IC1: HR 4.293 (95% CI 1.140-16.422), P = 0.0318}.

CONCLUSION

CCC patients staged greater than IC2/IC3 show a markedly increased risk of mortality. Thus, it is important to diagnose patients staged under IC2/IC3.

Oncologic outcomes after secondary surgery in recurrent clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary

Objective

Complete tumor resection is considered essential in the management of patients with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma. There is a debate regarding whether patients with recurrent ovarian clear-cell carcinoma benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Methods

Details of patients with clear-cell carcinoma were collected by the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group (Nagoya University Hospital and 13 affiliated institutions) and evaluated between January 1990 and December 2015. Histology was confirmed after central pathological review. The primary endpoint of the study was disease-free survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery. Distributions of events were evaluated using the χ2 test. Survival analysis was based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 169 patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (N=25) or medical management (N=144) for recurrent clear-cell carcinoma were collected. The median age for patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery was 50 years (range 35–66). Overall, 18 patients had complete resection. In patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery, the median disease-free and post-recurrence survival periods were 10.9 months and 21.2 months, respectively. Moreover, among 18 patients who underwent complete resection, seven showed no evidence of disease during the observation periods. The median post-recurrence survival periods of patients with complete or incomplete resection were 30.1 months and 10.4 months, respectively (p=0.002). On stratification by the recurrence site, patients with intraperitoneal recurrence showed poorer post-recurrence survival than those with recurrence at other sites (p=0.016). However, comparison between the secondary cytoreductive surgery group versus the medical management group showed there was no difference in post-recurrence survival, even when considering complete tumor resection (p=0.114).

Conclusion

Patients with intraperitoneal recurrence or incomplete tumor resection had the worst survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Survival impact of capsule status in stage I ovarian mucinous carcinoma-A mulicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The influence of capsule rupture on patients' oncologic outcome has been controversial in early-stage ovarian carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of the capsule status in early-stage patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period of 1990-2015, 351 patients with stage I-IV mEOC were identified in the multicentric database. Of these, a total of 194 mEOC patients with a stage I tumor were in the study.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 67.6 (2.0-248.1) months. The FIGO stage distribution was IA in 85 (43.8%), IB in 2 (1.0%), IC1 in 58 (29.9%), IC2 in 18 (9.3%), and IC3 in 31 (16.0%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients with stage IA-B, IC1, and IC2-3 tumors were 95.8, 82.5, and 82.9%, respectively {IA-B vs. IC1: P = 0.0031, IA vs. IC2-3: P = 0.0042}. Similarly, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in patients with stage IA-B, IC1, and IC2-3 tumors were 93.5, 73.0, and 79.2%, respectively (Log-rank: P = 0.0034). Among all patients, 104 received adjuvant chemotherapy and 90 did not. There was no significant difference in each substage group between the non-chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups in the 5-year overall survival rate {chemotherapy (yes vs. no): 87.0 vs. 90.3%: P = 0.5389}. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the capsule status was a significant prognostic factor for OS {IA-B (referent) vs. IC1: HR (95% CI): 3.527 (1.125-12.568), P = 0.0300)}.

CONCLUSION

mEOC patients staged greater than IC1 show a marked risk of mortality even after postoperative chemotherapy.

Update on rare epithelial ovarian cancers: based on the Rare Ovarian Tumors Young Investigator Conference

There has been significant progress in the understanding of the pathology and molecular biology of rare ovarian cancers, which has helped both diagnosis and treatment. This paper provides an update on recent advances in the knowledge and treatment of rare ovarian cancers and identifies gaps that need to be addressed by further clinical research. The topics covered include: low-grade serous, mucinous, and clear cell carcinomas of the ovary. Given the molecular heterogeneity and the histopathological rarity of these ovarian cancers, the importance of designing adequately powered trials or finding statistically innovative ways to approach the treatment of these rare tumors has been emphasized. This paper is based on the Rare Ovarian Tumors Conference for Young Investigators which was presented in Tokyo 2015 prior to the 5th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG).

The possible existence of occult metastasis in patients with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma who underwent complete resection without any residual tumours

The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of possible occult metastasis through long-term survival analyses in patients with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) who had undergone complete resection. During the period of 1990-2015, 799 patients with stage I-IV CCC were identified in the TOTSG database. Of these, a total of 528 patients without a residual tumor were enrolled in the study and classified into four groups: Group 1: FIGO stage IA-IB (N=104), Group 2: FIGO stage IC1 (N=170), Group 3: FIGO stage IC2/IC3 (N=98), and Group 4: FIGO stage II-III (no residual tumor: N=156). Cumulative incidences of recurrence (CIR) and death (CID) were examined. The median age was 54, ranging from 29-87. The 5-year CIR / CID of each group were as follows: Group 1 (7.3% / 3.8%), Group 2 (14.3% / 10.2%), Group 3 (37.7% / 18.4%), and Group 4 (46.5% / 33.8%), respectively {P<0.0001 (recurrence) / P<0.0001 (death)}. Furthermore, confining analysis to relapsed patients, 1-, 2-, and 3-year CID after recurrence were 41.5, 60.9, and 73.9, respectively. Confining analyses to patients with sufficient information about adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year CIR / CID of stage IA-IC1 patients with or without chemotherapy were as follows: recurrence {13.0% (yes) / 9.6% (no)}, death {9.3% (yes) / 4.2% (no)}, respectively {P=0.947 (CIR) / P=0.224 (CID)}. CCC patients staged greater than IC2/ IC3 show a marked risk of mortality, even after complete surgical resection.

Therapeutic significance of full lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Objectives

This study evaluated the therapeutic significance of full lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of 127 consecutive patients with pT1/pT2 and M0 OCCC who were treated between January 1995 and December 2015. We compared survival outcomes between those who did and did not undergo para-aortic lymph node dissection (PAND), and analyzed independent prognostic factors (Cox proportional hazards model with backward stepwise elimination).

Results

Of the 127 patients, 36 (28%) did not undergo lymphadenectomy; 12 (10%) patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) only; and 79 (62%) patients underwent both PLND and PAND. Of the 91 patients with lymphadenectomy, 11 (12%) had lymph node metastasis (LNM). The PAND⁻ and PAND⁺ groups did not significantly differ in age, distribution of pT status, radiologically enlarged lymph nodes, positive peritoneal cytology, capsule rupture, peritoneal involvement, and combined chemotherapy. Cox regression multivariate analysis confirmed that older age (hazard ratio [HR]=2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.0–4.3), LNM (HR=4.4; 95% CI=1.7–11.6), and positive peritoneal cytology (HR=4.2; 95% CI=2.1–8.4) were significantly and independently related to poor disease-specific survival (DSS), but implementation of both PLND and PAND (HR=0.4; 95% CI=0.2–0.8) were significantly and independently related to longer DSS.

Conclusion

Although few in number, there are some patients with early-stage OCCC who can benefit from full lymphadenectomy. Its therapeutic role should be continuously investigated in OCCC patients at potential risk of LNM.

Clear cell carcinoma of ovary and uterus

Clear cell carcinomas of the female genital tract are rare tumours with a fearsome reputation for having poor responses to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy and poor prognosis. However, it is now clear that early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma has an excellent prognosis and may not require any adjuvant therapy. In addition, radiotherapy may also have a key role to play in adjuvant management of clear cell tumours. Identification of patients who truly do not need adjuvant chemotherapy is important. The past 3 years has seen a significant improvement in our understanding of clear cell carcinoma biology-in particular, the role of mutations in the chromatin remodelling gene ARID1A as key drivers that are common to clear cell carcinomas of ovarian and endometrial origin. Moreover, gynaecological clear cell carcinomas appear to share many features with renal clear cell tumours, suggesting a common pathogenesis. This raises the possibility of clinical trials that include patients with clear cell tumours from different organs of origin. Dissecting the role of disordered chromatin organisation in clear cell carcinoma pathogenesis is a key priority. Finally, the role of endometriosis and the attendant chronic inflammation are recognised. The inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 appears to play a key role in clear cell carcinoma biology and is an excellent potential therapeutic target.

Survival benefit of taxane plus platinum in recurrent ovarian cancer with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histology

Objective

This study was conducted to examine the effects of front-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and postrecurrence survival (PRS) of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, when stratifying the histologic type.

Methods

Five hundred and seventy-four patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with sufficient clinical information, including front-line chemotherapy, were analyzed. The pathologic slides were evaluated by central pathologic review. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (n=261), who underwent taxane plus platinum, and group B (n=313), who underwent conventional platinum-based chemotherapy without taxanes.

Results

The median age was 54 years (range, 14 to 89 years). Group A had significantly better median OS (45.0 months vs. 30.3 months, p<0.001) and PRS (23.0 months vs. 13.0 months, p<0.001) compared to group B. The OS and PRS were similar between the groups in patients with clear cell or mucinous histology. In contrast, among patients with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histologies, the OS and PRS of group A were significantly better than those of group B (OS, p<0.001; PRS, p<0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that, among patients with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histologies, chemotherapy including taxane and platinum was an independent predictor of favorable survival outcomes. Conversely, in patients with clear cell or mucinous histology, taxane-including platinum-based combination chemotherapy did not improve the OS and PRS compared to a conventional platinum-based regimen which did not include taxanes.

Conclusion

Since the emergence of taxane plus platinum, the prognosis of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer has improved. However, we here demonstrate that this improvement is limited to patients with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histologies.

Extremely poor postrecurrence oncological outcome for patients with recurrent mucinous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the long-term clinical outcome for patients with recurrent mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (RmOC) in comparison with recurrent serous epithelial ovarian cancer (RsOC).

METHODS

Three hundred and eighty-four patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, including 340 RsOC and 44 RmOC patients, were analyzed in this study. The pathological slides were evaluated under central pathological review. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors was evaluated employing both uni- and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The 3- and 5-year postrecurrence survival (PRS) rates of patients with RmOC were 17.3, and 6.9 %, respectively. In contrast, those of patients with RsOC were 29.8 and 18.8 %, respectively. The PRS of patients with RmOC was significantly poorer than that of patients with RsOC (PRS: P = 0.0006). Moreover, either in the presence or absence of a residual tumor (RT) at initial surgery, the PRS of patients with RmOC was markedly poorer than that of patients with RsOC [RT (-): P < 0.0001: RT (+): P = 0.0912]. In multivariable analysis, a mucinous histology predicted a significantly poorer PRS (RmOC vs. RsOC: hazard ratio (HR) 2.080, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.434-3.016, P = 0.0001). Confining analysis to deceased patients (N = 302), the proportion of RmOC patients who died within 12 months following recurrence was markedly higher than that of RsOC [RmOC 69.2 %, RsOC: 41.1 % (P < 0.0001)].

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcome after recurrence in patients with RmOC was extremely poor. This confirms that RmOC should be considered a different entity from other epithelial ovarian cancers.

Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline

QUESTIONS

What is the optimal strategy for preoperative identification of the adnexal mass suspicious for ovarian cancer? What is the most appropriate surgical procedure for a woman who presents with an adnexal mass suspicious for malignancy?

PERSPECTIVES

In Canada in 2010, 2600 new cases of ovarian cancer were estimated to have been diagnosed, and of those patients, 1750 were estimated to have died, making ovarian cancer the 7th most prevalent form of cancer and the 5th leading cause of cancer death in Canadian women. Women with ovarian cancer typically have subtle, nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, changes in bowel frequency, and urinary or pelvic symptoms, making early detection difficult. Thus, most ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when the cancer has spread outside the pelvis. Because of late diagnosis, the 5-year relative survival ratio for ovarian cancer in Canada is only 40%. Unfortunately, because of the low positive predictive value of potential screening tests (cancer antigen 125 and ultrasonography), there is currently no screening strategy for ovarian cancer. The purpose of this document is to identify evidence that would inform optimal recommended protocols for the identification and surgical management of adnexal masses suspicious for malignancy.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest for the identification question included sensitivity and specificity. Outcomes of interest for the surgical question included optimal surgery, overall survival, progression-free or disease-free survival, reduction in the number of surgeries, morbidity, adverse events, and quality of life.

METHODOLOGY

After a systematic review, a practice guideline containing clinical recommendations relevant to patients in Ontario was drafted. The practice guideline was reviewed and approved by the Gynecology Disease Site Group and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-based Care. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a survey, the results of which were incorporated into the practice guideline.

PRACTICE GUIDELINE

These recommendations apply to adult women presenting with a suspicious adnexal mass, either symptomatic or asymptomatic. IDENTIFICATION OF AN ADNEXAL MASS SUSPICIOUS FOR OVARIAN CANCER: Sonography (particularly 3-dimensional sonography), magnetic resonance imaging (mri), and computed tomography (ct) imaging are each recommended for differentiating malignant from benign ovarian masses. However, the working group offers the following further recommendations, based on their expert consensus opinion and a consideration of availability, access, and harm: Where technically feasible, transvaginal sonography should be the modality of first choice in patients with a suspicious isolated ovarian mass.To help clarify malignant potential in patients in whom ultrasonography may be unreliable, mri is the most appropriate test.In cases in which extra-ovarian disease is suspected or needs to be ruled out, ct is the most useful technique.Evaluation of an adnexal mass by Doppler technology alone is not recommended. Doppler technology should be combined with a morphology assessment.Ultrasonography-based morphology scoring systems can be used to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses. These scoring systems are based on specific ultrasound parameters, each with several scores base on determined features. All evaluated scoring systems were found to have an acceptable level of sensitivity and specificity; the choice of scoring system may therefore be made based on clinician preference.As a standalone modality, serum cancer antigen 125 is not recommended for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses.Frozen sections for the intraoperative diagnosis of a suspicious adnexal mass is recommended in settings in which availability and patient preference allow. SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR AN ADNEXAL MASS SUSPICIOUS FOR MALIGNANCY: To improve survival, comprehensive surgical staging with lymphadenectomy is recommended for the surgical management of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. Laparoscopy is a reasonable alternative to laparotomy, provided that appropriate surgery and staging can be done. The choice between laparoscopy and laparotomy should be based on patient and clinician preference. Discussion with a gynecologic oncologist is recommended. Fertility-preserving surgery is an acceptable alternative to more extensive surgery in patients with low-malignant-potential tumours and those with well-differentiated surgical stage i ovarian cancer. Discussion with a gynecologic oncologist is recommended.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: is there a role of histology-specific treatment?

Several clinical trials to establish standard treatment modality for ovarian cancers included a high abundance of patients with serous histologic tumors, which were quite sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. On the other hand, ovarian tumor with rare histologic subtypes such as clear cell or mucinous tumors have been recognized to show chemo-resistant phenotype, leading to poorer prognosis. Especially, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC) is a distinctive tumor, deriving from endometriosis or clear cell adenofibroma, and response rate to platinum-based therapy is extremely low. It was implied that complete surgical staging enabled us to distinguish a high risk group of recurrence in CCC patients whose disease was confined to the ovary (pT1M0); however, complete surgical staging procedures could not lead to improved survival. Moreover, the status of peritoneal cytology was recognized as an independent prognostic factor in early-staged CCC patients, even after complete surgical staging. In advanced cases with CCC, the patients with no residual tumor had significantly better survival than those with the tumor less than 1 cm or those with tumor diameter more than 1 cm. Therefore, the importance of achieving no macroscopic residual disease at primary surgery is so important compared with other histologic subtypes. On the other hand, many studies have shown that conventional platinum-based chemotherapy regimens yielded a poorer prognosis in patients with CCC than in patients with serous subtypes. The response rate by paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) was slightly higher, ranging from 22% to 56%, which was not satisfactory enough. Another regimen for CCC tumors is now being explored: irinotecan plus cisplatin, and molecular targeting agents. In this review article, we discuss the surgical issues for early-staged and advanced CCC including possibility of fertility-sparing surgery, and the chemotherapy for CCC disease.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Different histologic types of epithelial ovarian cancer may represent different diseases with unique clinical and molecular characteristics. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary has been reported as having a worse prognosis than high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This article critically reviews the literature pertinent to the pathology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients with ovarian CCC.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for all research articles published in English between January 01, 1977 and January 30, 2012 which reported on patients diagnosed with ovarian CCC. Given the rarity of this tumor, studies were not limited by design or number of reported patients.

RESULTS

Ovarian CCC tumors represent 5-25% of ovarian cancers. Its histologic diagnosis can be challenging, resulting often times in misclassification of these tumors. Ovarian CCC tends to present at earlier stages and has been associated with endometriosis, ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations. When compared to stage-matched controls, patients with early-stage ovarian CCCs may have a better prognosis than patients with high-grade serous tumors. For those with advanced stage disease, high-grade serous histology confers a better prognosis than ovarian CCC. Patients with Stage IC-IV have a relatively poor prognosis and efforts should center in discovery of more effective treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian CCC is a biologically distinct entity, different from high-grade serous EOC. Future studies should explore the role of targeted therapies in the management of ovarian CCC.

Low-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: population-based outcomes in British Columbia, Canada, with evidence for a survival benefit as a result of irradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the population-based outcomes of stage I and II ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) in a North American population treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel and abdominopelvic irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed of 241 patients referred in the carboplatin/paclitaxel era. Irradiation was to be used with a few defined exceptions. However, because of differing beliefs as to its effectiveness, its use was consistently avoided by specific oncologists, allowing the opportunity to study its possible effect on disease-free survival (DFS) in these concurrent cohorts.

RESULTS

Five- and 10-year DFS rates were 84% and 70% for stage IA/B; 67% and 57% for stage IC; and 49% and 44% for stage II, respectively. Five- and 10-year DFS rates for those with stage IC disease based purely on rupture were similar to rates for patients with stage IA/B, at 92% and 71%, respectively. The remaining patients with stage IC had 48% 5- and 10-year DFS. Multivariate analysis using a decision tree identified positive cytology as the most important factor (72% relapse rate if positive and 27% if negative or unknown). If, in addition, the capsule surface was involved, then the relapse rate was 93%. Irradiation had no discernible survival benefit for patients with stage IA and IC (rupture alone), whereas for the remainder of patients with stage IC and stage II, it improved DFS by 20% at 5 years (relative risk, 0.5); the benefit was most evident in the cytologically negative/unknown group.

CONCLUSION

DFS is similar in this North American population with early OCCC to the DFS reported in Asia. A potential benefit from irradiation was evident in a subset.

Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: is it possible?

BACKGROUND

Clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC) is often diagnosed at childbearing age, or sometimes during treatment for infertility. Therefore, most young women with early-stage CCC wish to preserve their reproductive and endocrine functions if possible.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data collected under the central pathological review system were subjected to survival analyses. We analyzed patients with stage I CCC who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS, n = 16) and compared their long-term survival with those receiving radical surgery (n = 205), or patients with non-CCC undergoing FSS (n = 64).

RESULTS

There was no difference in both the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with CCC who underwent FSS and those who received radical surgery [CCC/FSS (n = 16) versus CCC/radical (n = 205); OS: P= 0.519, DFS: P= 0.265]. Moreover, patients with CCC who underwent FSS did not show a poorer OS and DFS than non-CCC patients who underwent FSS (CCC/FSS versus non-CCC/FSS; OS: P= 0.584, DFS: P= 0.401), or those at the corresponding stage with no CCC. Furthermore, according to the series of patients with CCC in both the current study and four studies in the literature, there was no difference in the recurrence rate between patients with or without CCC who were treated conservatively (CCC/FSS: 13.2% versus non-CCC/FSS: 10.9%, P= 0.614).

CONCLUSIONS

Although our study did not have sufficient power to yield a definite conclusion, our data suggests that at least patients with stage IA CCC may be treated with FSS.

Long-term survival of young women receiving fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer in comparison with those undergoing radical surgery

Objectives:

To compare the clinical outcome of patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) with those who underwent radical surgery (RS).

Methods:

After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions, a total of 572 patients were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were divided into three groups: group A {FSS (n=74); age, ⩽40} groups B and C [RS; age, 40⩾{(B), n=52} 40<{(C), n=446}].

Results:

Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients in the groups were as follows: group A, 90.8% (OS)/87.9% (DFS); group B, 88.3% (OS)/84.4% (DFS); group C, 90.6% (OS)/85.3% (DFS), respectively (OS, P=0.802; DFS, P=0.765). Additionally, there was no significant difference in OS and DFS among the three groups stratified to stage IA or IC (OS (IA), P=0.387; DFS (IA), P=0.314; OS (IC), P=0.993; DFS (IC), P=0.990, respectively). Furthermore, patients with a grade 1–2 or 3 tumours in the FSS group did not have a poorer prognosis than those in the RS group.

Conclusions:

Stage I EOC patients treated with FSS showed an acceptable prognosis compared with those who underwent RS.