Overall survival with cisplatin-gemcitabine and bevacizumab or placebo as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised phase III trial (AVAiL)

A combined model of serum neutrophil extracellular traps, CD8+ T cells, and tumor proportion score provides better prediction of PD-1 inhibitor efficacy in patients with NSCLC

Immune checkpoint inhibitors provide a definite survival benefit for patients with driver-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but predictors of efficacy are still lacking. There may be a relationship between immune inflammatory state and tumor immune response. We explored the relationship of serum neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) with infiltrating cells in the tumor tissues of patients with NSCLC as well as their relationship with the therapeutic efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Serum myeloperoxidase (MPO)-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) was detected as a marker of NET serum concentration. T cells were detected by immunohistochemical staining, and neutrophils were counted by MPO immunofluorescence staining. Of the 31 patients with NSCLC, a longer progression-free survival after PD-1 inhibitor treatment was associated with higher levels of CD3+ T cells, a lower neutrophil : CD3+-T-cell ratio (NEU/CD3+) and lower neutrophil : CD8+-T-cell ratio (NEU/CD8+) in tumor tissues. Patients with higher serum NETs were more likely to develop progressive disease after treatment (P = 0.003) and to have immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) as well as higher NEU/CD3+ and NEU/CD8+. The combined model of serum NETs, CD8+ T cells, and tumor proportion score (TPS) significantly improved the prediction of PD-1 inhibitor efficacy [P = 0.033; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.881]. Our results indicate that serum NETs are effective predictors of PD-1 inhibitor response and reflect the tissue neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and IrAE levels. The combined model of serum NETs, CD8+ T cells, and TPS is a powerful tool for predicting the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in patients with NSCLC.

Co-encapsulation of fisetin and cisplatin into liposomes: Stability considerations and in vivo efficacy on lung cancer animal model

Lung cancer is a highly vascularized tumor for which a combination between an antitumor agent, cisplatin, and an antiangiogenic molecule, fisetin, appears a promising therapeutic approach. In order to deliver both chemotherapies within the tumor, to enhance fisetin solubility and decrease cisplatin toxicity, an encapsulation of both drugs into liposomes was developed. Purification and freeze-drying protocols were optimized to improve both the encapsulation and liposome storage. The cytotoxicity of the encapsulated chemotherapies was evaluated on Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL) cell lines. The antitumor effect of the combination was evaluated in vivo on an ectopic mouse model of Lewis Lung carcinoma. The results showed that fisetin and cisplatin co-loaded liposomes were successfully prepared. Freeze-drying allowed a 30 days storage limiting the release of both drugs. The combination index between liposomal fisetin and liposomal cisplatin on 3LL cell line after 24 h of exposure showed a clear synergism: CI = 0.7 for the co loaded liposomes and CI = 0.9 for the mixture of cisplatin loaded and fisetin loaded liposomes. The co-encapsulating formulation showed in vivo efficacy against an ectopic murine model of Lewis Lung carcinoma with a probable reduction in the toxicity of cisplatin through co-encapsulation with fisetin.

Pembrolizumab With or Without Lenvatinib for First-Line Metastatic NSCLC With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Tumor Proportion Score of at least 1% (LEAP-007): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial

INTRODUCTION

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was found to have antitumor activity and acceptable safety in previously treated metastatic NSCLC. We evaluated first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC in the LEAP-007 study (NCT03829332/NCT04676412).

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC with programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of at least 1% without targetable EGFR/ROS1/ALK aberrations were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo once daily; all patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and overall survival (OS). We report results from a prespecified nonbinding futility analysis of OS performed at the fourth independent data and safety monitoring committee review (futility bound: one-sided p < 0.4960).

RESULTS

A total of 623 patients were randomized. At median follow-up of 15.9 months, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS was 14.1 (11.4‒19.0) months in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group versus 16.4 (12.6‒20.6) months in the placebo plus pembrolizumab group (hazard ratio = 1.10 [95% CI: 0.87‒1.39], p = 0.79744 [futility criterion met]). Median (95% CI) PFS was 6.6 (6.1‒8.2) months versus 4.2 (4.1‒6.2) months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.64‒0.95]). Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57.9% of patients (179 of 309) versus 24.4% (76 of 312). Per data and safety monitoring committee recommendation, the study was unblinded and lenvatinib and placebo were discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not have a favorable benefit‒risk profile versus placebo plus pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab monotherapy remains an approved treatment option in many regions for first-line metastatic NSCLC with programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of at least 1% without EGFR/ALK alterations.

Alleviating hypoxia to improve cancer immunotherapy

Tumor hypoxia resulting from abnormal and dysfunctional tumor vascular network poses a substantial obstacle to immunotherapy. In fact, hypoxia creates an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) through promoting angiogenesis, metabolic reprogramming, extracellular matrix remodeling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), p53 inactivation, and immune evasion. Vascular normalization, a strategy aimed at restoring the structure and function of tumor blood vessels, has been shown to improve oxygen delivery and reverse hypoxia-induced signaling pathways, thus alleviates hypoxia and potentiates cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of tumor tissue hypoxia and its impacts on immune cells and cancer immunotherapy, as well as the approaches to induce tumor vascular normalization. We also summarize the evidence supporting the use of vascular normalization in combination with cancer immunotherapy, and highlight the challenges and future directions of this overlooked important field. By targeting the fundamental problem of tumor hypoxia, vascular normalization proposes a promising strategy to enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy and improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients.

Protective effect of Clinacanthus nutans in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity on human kidney cell (PCS-400-010) elucidated by an LCMS-based metabolomics approach

Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity has been widely reported in numerous studies. The objective of this study is to assess the potential nephroprotective effects of Clinacanthus nutans (Burm. f.) Lindau (Acanthaceae) leaf extracts on human kidney cells (PCS-400-010) in vitro using an LCMS-based metabolomics approach. Orthogonal partial least square-discriminant analysis identified 16 significantly altered metabolites when comparing the control and pre-treated C. nutans cisplatin-induced groups. These metabolites were found to be associated with glycerophospholipid, purine, and amino acid metabolism, as well as the glycolysis pathway. Pre-treatment with C. nutans aqueous extract (125 μg/mL) for 24 h, followed by 48 h of cisplatin induction in PCS-400-010 cells, demonstrated a nephroprotective effect, particularly involving the regulation of amino acid metabolism.

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs

BACKGROUND

Whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should choose an immune-combination therapy regimen after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance is currently unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated 118 NSCLC patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + chemotherapy (I + C), ICIs + chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (I + C + A), chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (C + A) after inefficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We assessed the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of these treatments.

RESULTS

The ORR was 26.1% vs 38.2% vs 16.3% in the three groups (P = 0.093). The divergence in DCR was also statistically significant (65.2% vs 85.3% vs 74.4%, P = 0.209). The median PFS was no statistically significant difference in PFS (3.09 vs 6.31 vs 5.91 months, P = 0.809), but the Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 12-month-PFS indicated an apparent survival advantage in the I + C + A group (P = 0.001). In addition, the I + C/I + C + A group showed higher median PFS than the C + A group in patients with brain metastases (median PFS, 6.44 vs 4.21 months, P = 0.022). The divergence in ORR of patients in the brain group was also statistically significant (P = 0.045). The I + C + A group showed superior efficacy in patients with liver metastases (median PFS, 0.95 vs 6.44 vs 3.48 months, P < 0.0001). The Cox proportional hazard modeling analysis suggested that the age, brain metastases, and liver metastases were all connected with the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that advanced NSCLC patients after resistance to EGFR-TKIs may achieve better outcomes from triple therapy. Patients with brain metastases favor ICIs-related combination therapies and patients with liver metastases prefer I + C + A therapy.

Comparison of the profiles of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC lacking driver gene mutations: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Numerous first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were developed for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking driver gene mutations. However, this group consists of a heterogeneous patient population, for whom the optimal therapeutic choice is yet to be confirmed.

Objective

To identify the best first-line immunotherapy regimen for overall advanced NSCLC patients and different subgroups.

Design

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

We searched several databases to retrieve relevant literature. We performed Bayesian NMA for the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs) with a grade equal or more than 3 (grade ⩾ 3 tr-AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels, histologic type, central nervous system (CNS) metastases and tobacco use history.

Results

For the PD-L1 non-selective patients, sintilimab plus chemotherapy (sinti-chemo) provided the best OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.42-0.83]. Nivolumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-bev-chemo) was comparable to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo-bev-chemo) in prolonging PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.91). Atezo-bev-chemo remarkably elevated the ORR than chemotherapy (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.51-6.59). Subgroup analysis showed pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro-chemo) ranked first in OS in subgroups of PD-L1 < 1%, non-squamous, no CNS metastases, with or without smoking history, and ranked second in OS in subgroups of PD-L1 ⩾ 1% and PD-L1 1-49%. Cemiplimab and sugemalimab plus chemotherapy ranked first in OS and PFS for squamous subgroup, respectively. For patients with CNS metastases, nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-ipili-chemo) and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy provided the best OS and PFS, respectively.

Conclusions

Sinti-chemo and nivo-bev-chemo were two effective first-line regimens ranked first in OS and PFS for overall patients, respectively. Pembro-chemo was favorable for patients in subgroups of PD-L1 < 1%, PD-L1 ⩾ 1%, PD-L1 1-49%, non-squamous, no CNS metastases, with or without smoking history. Addition of bevacizumab consistently provided with favorable PFS results in patients of all PD-L1 levels. Cemiplimab was the best option in squamous subgroup and nivo-ipili-chemo in CNS metastases subgroup due to their advantages in OS.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without tumor PD-L1 expression in Asia

Aim: We pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled studies to evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with untreated advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score <1% in East Asia. Methods: The analysis included 107 patients from China, Japan, Korea, Thailand and Taiwan (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 56; chemotherapy alone, n = 51). Results: For pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, median overall survival was 21.3 versus 12.6 months (HR, 0.55 [95% CI: 0.35-0.87]) and median progression-free survival was 8.4 versus 6.0 months (HR, 0.64 [95% CI: 0.43-0.96]). Conclusion: The analysis supports the use of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for East Asian patients with PD-L1-negative, advanced NSCLC.

Targeting Cell Signaling Pathways in Lung Cancer by Bioactive Phytocompounds

Lung cancer is a heterogeneous group of malignancies with high incidence worldwide. It is the most frequently occurring cancer in men and the second most common in women. Due to its frequent diagnosis and variable response to treatment, lung cancer was reported as the top cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2020. Many aberrant signaling cascades are implicated in the pathogenesis of lung cancer, including those involved in apoptosis (B cell lymphoma protein, Bcl-2-associated X protein, first apoptosis signal ligand), growth inhibition (tumor suppressor protein or gene and serine/threonine kinase 11), and growth promotion (epidermal growth factor receptor/proto-oncogenes/phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase). Accordingly, these pathways and their signaling molecules have become promising targets for chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agents. Recent research provides compelling evidence for the use of plant-based compounds, known collectively as phytochemicals, as anticancer agents. This review discusses major contributing signaling pathways involved in the pathophysiology of lung cancer, as well as currently available treatments and prospective drug candidates. The anticancer potential of naturally occurring bioactive compounds in the context of lung cancer is also discussed, with critical analysis of their mechanistic actions presented by preclinical and clinical studies.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Angiogenesis Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Driver-negative NSCLC in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors may have synergistic effects in elderly patients with advanced driver-negative NSCLC, but its true efficacy remains unclear. In addition, chemotherapy tolerance in elderly NSCLC patients is poor, and the precise identification of the population that may benefit from ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is also the focus of current research. Methods: We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with or without antiangiogenic agents in elderly patients with advanced driver-gene negative NSCLC ≥65 years of age in the Cancer Center of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, ORR, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: A total of 36 patients in the IA group (immune checkpoint inhibitors plus angiogenesis inhibitors group) and 43 patients in the NIA group (immune checkpoint inhibitors without angiogenesis inhibitors group) were enrolled in the study between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021. The median follow-up time for patients in the IA group and NIA group was 18.2 months (95%CI: 14 - 22.5 months) and 21.4 months (95%CI: 16.7 -26.1 months), respectively. The median PFS and median OS were longer in the IA group compared to the NIA group (8.1 months vs 5.3 months; HR for PFS: 0.778, 95%CI: 0.474-1.276, P=0.32; NA vs 30.9 months; HR for OS: 0.795, 95%CI: 0.396-1.595, P=0.519). There were no significant differences in median PFS and median OS between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the IA group had significantly longer PFS in the subgroup with PD-L1 expression ≥50% (P=0.017), and the association between different groups and disease progression was still different in the two subgroups (P for interaction = 0.002). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (23.3% vs 30.5%, P=0.465). The incidence of irAEs in the IA group was lower than that in the NIA group (39.5% vs 19.4%, P=0.05), and the cumulative incidence of treatment interruptions due to irAEs was significantly reduced (P=0.045). Conclusion: In elderly patients with advanced driver-negative NSCLC, the addition of antiangiogenic agents to ICIs therapy did not provide significant clinical benefit, but the incidence of irAEs and treatment interruptions due to irAEs was significantly reduced. In the subgroup analysis, we found that the clinical benefit of this combination therapy was observed in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, which warrants further exploration.

First-Line Treatment of Driver-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy-based regimens are an established standard of care for the first-line treatment of driver-negative (EGFR/ALK/ROS WT) advanced non-small cell lung cancer. With multiple immune-based regimens approved in the first-line setting, clinicians are faced in practice with a variety of treatment choices. This article summarizes the most up-to-date trial data on treatments for driver-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer, including immunotherapy monotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy, and combination immunotherapy, providing a framework for clinicians based on PD-L1 and smoking status. A multibiomarker assay that may best predict immunotherapy response remains an active area of research.

Combining Multikinase Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Cluster of Differentiation 47 Signaling Pathways Is Predicted to Increase the Efficacy of Antiangiogenic Combination Therapies

Angiogenesis is a critical step in tumor growth, development, and invasion. Nascent tumor cells secrete vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that significantly remodels the tumor microenvironment through interaction with multiple receptors on vascular endothelial cells, including type 2 VEGF receptor (VEGFR2). The complex pathways initiated by VEGF binding to VEGFR2 lead to enhanced proliferation, survival, and motility of vascular endothelial cells and formation of a new vascular network, enabling tumor growth. Antiangiogenic therapies that inhibit VEGF signaling pathways were among the first drugs that targeted stroma rather than tumor cells. Despite improvements in progression-free survival and higher response rates relative to chemotherapy in some types of solid tumors, the impact on overall survival (OS) has been limited, with the majority of tumors eventually relapsing due to resistance or activation of alternate angiogenic pathways. Here, we developed a molecularly detailed computational model of endothelial cell signaling and angiogenesis-driven tumor growth to investigate combination therapies targeting different nodes of the endothelial VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling pathway. Simulations predicted a strong threshold-like behavior in extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) activation relative to phosphorylated VEGFR2 levels, as continuous inhibition of at least 95% of receptors was necessary to abrogate phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2). Combinations with mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK) and spingosine-1-phosphate inhibitors were found to be effective in overcoming the ERK1/2 activation threshold and abolishing activation of the pathway. Modeling results also identified a mechanism of resistance whereby tumor cells could reduce pERK1/2 sensitivity to inhibitors of VEGFR2 by upregulation of Raf, MEK, and sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1), thus highlighting the need for deeper investigation of the dynamics of the crosstalk between VEGFR2 and SphK1 pathways. Inhibition of VEGFR2 phosphorylation was found to be more effective at blocking protein kinase B, also known as AKT, activation; however, to effectively abolish AKT activation, simulations identified Axl autophosphorylation or the Src kinase domain as potent targets. Simulations also supported activating cluster of differentiation 47 (CD47) on endothelial cells as an effective combination partner with tyrosine kinase inhibitors to inhibit angiogenesis signaling and tumor growth. Virtual patient simulations supported the effectiveness of CD47 agonism in combination with inhibitors of VEGFR2 and SphK1 pathways. Overall, the rule-based system model developed here provides new insights, generates novel hypothesis, and makes predictions regarding combinations that may enhance the OS with currently approved antiangiogenic therapies.

Role of Surgical Pathologist for the Detection of Immuno-oncologic Predictive Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers

Until very recently, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have been the mainstay of treatment in non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLCs). However, recent advances in molecular immunology have unveiled some of the complexity of the mechanisms regulating cellular immune responses and led to the successful targeting of immune checkpoints in attempts to enhance antitumor T-cell responses. Immune checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4, programmed cell death protein-1, and programmed death ligand (PD-L) 1 have been shown to play central roles in evading cancer immunity. Thus, these molecules have been targeted by inhibitors for the management of cancers forming the basis of immunotherapy. Advanced NSCLC has been the paradigm for the benefits of immunotherapy in any cancer. Treatment decisions are made based on the expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cells and the presence or absence of driver mutations. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and no driver mutations are treated with single-agent immunotherapy whereas, for all other patients with a lower level of PD-L1 expression, a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy is preferred. Thus, PD-L1 blockers are the only immunotherapeutic agents approved in advanced NSCLC without any oncogenic driver mutations. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, however, may not be the best biomarker in view of its dynamic nature in time and space, and the benefits may be seen regardless of PD -L1 expression. Each immunotherapy molecule is prescribed based on the levels of PD-L1 expression as assessed by a Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic assay. Other biomarkers that have been studied include tumor mutational burden, the T-effector signature, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, radiomic assays, inflammation index, presence or absence of immune-related adverse events and specific driver mutations, and gut as well as local microbiome. At the current time, none of these biomarkers are routinely used in the clinical decision-making process for immunotherapy in NSCLC. However, in individual cases, they can be useful adjuncts to conventional therapy. This review describes our current understanding of the role of biomarkers as predictors of response to immune checkpoint molecules. To begin with a brief on cancer immunology in general and in NSCLC, in particular, is discussed. In the end, recent advancements in laboratory techniques for refining biomarker assays are described.

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy improved clinical outcomes over bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in adenocarcinoma patients

PURPOSE

No definite conclusion has yet to be reached for the first-line treatment combined with chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients with negative driver genes. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of Beva+ChT and IO+ChT as first-line treatment for this population and investigated whether the statuses of BM, PD-L1 expression, and KRAS and TP53 mutations could influence the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data of patients with adenocarcinoma NSCLC who received first-line therapy were retrospectively collected and the patients were assigned to the IO+ChT and Beva+ChT groups. The disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between the two groups. The survival effects of BM, PD-L1 expression, and KRAS and TP53 mutations were also evaluated.

RESULTS

From April 2018 to October 2020, a total of 105 patients with first-line therapy were included in our analysis; 54 (51.4%) patients were included in the IO+ChT group and 51 (48.6%) patients were included in the Beva+ChT group. The results showed that OS (NR vs. 18.3 m, p = 0.011) and PFS (14.9 m vs. 6.3 m, p < 0.001) were superior in patients in the IO+ChT group than in patients in the Beva+ChT group. Further analysis revealed that the OS (median OS: NR vs. 14.7 months, p = 0.039) and PFS (median PFS: 18.5 vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.001) advantages of the IO+ChT group were also seen in the PD-L1 > 1% subgroup but were not seen in the PD-L1 < 1%, BM or KRAS mutation subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs combined with ChT improved clinical outcomes over Beva combined with ChT as first-line therapy for adenocarcinoma patients without driver gene alterations, especially in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%.

A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based treatments for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: In the absence of head-to-head trials comparing immunotherapies for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NsqNSCLC), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative efficacy of these treatments. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials evaluating first-line-to-progression and second-line treatments for advanced NsqNSCLC informed Bayesian NMAs for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) end points. Results: Among first-line-to-progression treatments, pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum showed the greatest OS benefit versus other regimens and a PFS benefit versus all but three regimens. Among second-line treatments, an OS benefit was seen for atezolizumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab versus docetaxel. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum showed the maximum OS benefit in the first-line setting. In the second-line setting, anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapies were better than docetaxel.

Role of antiangiogenic agents in first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

"Anti-angiogenetic drugs plus chemotherapy" (anti-angio-chemo) and "immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy" (ICI-chemo) are superior to traditional chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the absence of a direct comparison of ICI-chemo with anti-angio-chemo, the superior one between them has not been decided, and the benefit of adding anti-angiogenetic agents to ICI-chemo remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the role of antiangiogenic agents for advanced NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy versus therapeutic regimens involving ICIs or anti-angiogenetic drugs were included. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and rate of grade 3-4 toxicity assessment. R-4.3.1 was utilized to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies with a sample size of 25,046 were finally enrolled. "Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" significantly improved the ORR compared with "Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy" (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-5.87). The trend also favored "Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" in PFS and OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39-1.31; HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.77-1.16, respectively). In addition, "Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy" and "Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy" significantly prolonged the PFS compared to "Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.97; respectively). Meanwhile, "Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy" and "Sintilimab + Chemotherapy" yielded more OS benefits than "Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.83; HR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.46-0.91; respectively). Scheme between "Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" and "Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy" made no significant difference (OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 0.56-2.42) concerning the rate of grade 3-4 toxicity. It seemed that ICI-chemo yielded more improvement in quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) than "Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" in cost-effectiveness analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that ICI-chemo is associated with potentially longer survival, better cost-effectiveness outcomes, and comparable safety profiles than anti-angio-chemo. Also, adding bevacizumab to ICI-chemo seemed to provide additional therapeutic benefits without adding treatment burden. Our findings would supplement the current standard of care and help the design of future clinical trials for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar compared with reference bevacizumab in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A retrospective study

Background

Bevacizumab has played an important role in the systemic treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without gene mutation. In recent years, bevacizumab biosimilar has received marketing approval based on the results of phase III clinical studies. However, more clinical data are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar in clinical application.

Materials and methods

We identified 946 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were treated with bevacizumab biosimilar or bevacizumab from January 1, 2019 to November 30, 2021. Comparisons and statistical analyses of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab were made in terms of efficacy and safety. Efficacy evaluation was performed directly in accordance with RECIST v1.1. Adverse events were graded following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

Results

The objective response rates (ORRs) were 28.9% in the biosimilar group (n=551) and 30.9% in the reference group (n=395; unstratified ORR risk ratio: 0.934, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-1.138; unstratified ORR risk difference: -0.020, 95% CI: -0.118-0.035). The estimated median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 6.27 (95% CI: 5.53-7.01) and 4.93 (95% CI: 4.24-5.62) months in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (P=0.296). The number of treatment lines, combined treatment regimens and with or without radiotherapy were significant factors affecting the PFS of both groups (P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.039). Different genetic mutations and dose intensity were not the main factors affecting PFS (P=0.627, P=0.946). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 76.41% in the biosimilar group and 71.65% in the reference group (P=0.098). The incidences of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were 22.14% and 19.49% in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (P=0.324).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab biosimilar is equivalent in efficacy to bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC. It showed acceptable toxicity profile and no new adverse events. Patients who were excluded by clinical trials can also benefit from bevacizumab biosimilar.

Real-world Efficacy Data on Anti-Angiogenic Drugs in Recurrent Small Cell Cervical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is rare but extremely aggressive and resistant to current therapies. We herein evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab, apatinib, and anlotinib in recurrent/metastatic SCCC patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Recurrent/metastatic SCCC patients were recruited between January 2013 and July 2020. Baseline characteristics were extracted from medical records, and patients were divided into an anti-angiogenic group and non-anti-angiogenic group. The efficacy of treatments was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients received anti-angiogenic drugs after tumor recurrence/metastasis; of them, 10 cases received them as first-line treatment, 5 cases as second-line treatment, and 1 case as fourth-line treatment. Another 23 patients received traditional therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The use of anti-angiogenic drugs in first-line treatment significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the controls, with a median PFS of 8 months (2-20 months) and 3 months (1-10 months), respectively (P = .025). This trend was also notable in patients who started anti-angiogenic treatment after the second-line recurrence/metastasis. However, there was no benefits for overall survival (OS) in either the 10 first-line cases or all 16 cases (P = .499 and .31, respectively). Both bevacizumab and small molecule drugs (apatinib and anlotinib) presented similar efficacy in SCCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, this is the largest cohort study that provides real-world data, showing that anti-angiogenic regimens could significantly prolong PFS in recurrent/metastatic SCCC. Aside from bevacizumab, the novel oral small molecule drugs provide more choices with similar efficacy. These findings warrant further validation in well-designed future studies.

A Phase II Trial of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin Plus Pemetrexed Plus Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Patients with Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium (BTCRC)- LUN 17-139

INTRODUCTION

LUN17-139 evaluated the safety and efficacy of Atezolizumab (A) plus Carboplatin (C) plus Pemetrexed (Pem) plus Bevacizumab (B) (ACBPem) in treatment naïve patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Ns-NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, all patients received A (1200-mg, D1) + C (AUC 5, D1) + Pem (500-mg/m2, D1) + B (15-mg/kg D1) q3 week x4. If no PD (progressive disease), patients received maintenance ABPem until PD or intolerable side effects. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The positive PFS result was considered as PFS>6m (historical control). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) defined by complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) ≥ 2 months, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled from November 2018 to October 2020. The study was closed early due to 3 patient deaths, possibly related to treatment. Median age 64 (range 38-83); Men/Women 20/10; PD-L1 TPS < 1%/1-49%/ ≥ 50% (8/15/7). The median follow-up was 20.3 months ( 1-28.1). ORR 42.9% (95% CI, 24.5-62.8%), DCR 96.4% (95% CI, 81.7-99.9%). The median PFS and OS were 11.3m (5.5-14.9,P > .05) and 22.4m (22.4-NR), respectively. Four patients had G4 toxicity (anemia, febrile-neutropenia, severe neutropenia, sepsis), and 3 patients had G5 toxicity (thromboembolism, sepsis, colonic perforation).

CONCLUSION

ABCPem was associated with increased PFS compared to historical controls but this difference did not meet the statistical significance. Three on-treatment deaths and 5 thromboembolic events prompted early closure.

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment of PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line therapy for patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible randomized trials were identified following the systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database from January 2000 to June 2022.

RESULTS

Seven trials involving 1132 patients with PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous NSCLC were included. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy showed significantly superior objective response rate (ORR) compared with chemotherapy alone (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69-4.65). Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy also significantly prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.55-0.74, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.82, p < 0.001) of patients with PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous NSCLC compared to chemotherapy alone. In terms of ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy were at higher risk than chemotherapy alone (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.47-2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy yielded a better ORR, PFS, and OS, and a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events as the first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative nonsquamous advanced NSCLC in comparison to chemotherapy alone. A rational treatment protocol should be selected according to the individual condition of the patients.

Comparison of afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab in untreated stage IIIB/IV epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients: a multicenter clinical analysis study

Background:

Although bevacizumab in combination with afatinib or erlotinib is an effective and safe first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are very few clinical data comparing afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis for the comparison of two combination therapies.

Methods:

Between May 2015 and October 2020, data of 135 stage IIIB/IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib or erlotinib combined with bevacizumab combination therapy in Linkou, Keelung, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed.

Results:

In all, 67 patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab, and 68 patients received erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Afatinib combined with bevacizumab had an objective response rate (ORR) of 82.1% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 97.0%, and the ORR and DCR were 83.8 and 95.6%, respectively, in the erlotinib combined with bevacizumab group (p = 0.798 and p = 1.000). The median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 20.3 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.891–1.953; p = 0.167). The overall survival was 41.9 and 51.0 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively (HR = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.829–2.436; p = 0.201). The secondary EGFR-T790M mutation rates after disease progression were 44% in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and 58.8% in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p = 0.165). Skin toxicity was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both treatment groups. Diarrhea, an AE, occurred significantly more frequently in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group than in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Afatinib combined with bevacizumab was equally as effective as erlotinib combined with bevacizumab for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Prospective clinical studies that explore bevacizumab combined with afatinib or erlotinib for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC are warranted.

A Pilot Study: Favorable Effects of Clostridium butyricum on Intestinal Microbiota for Adjuvant Therapy of Lung Cancer

Probiotics as medications have previously been shown to change intestinal microbial characteristics, potentially influencing cancer therapy efficacy. Patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) treated by bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to obtain Clostridium butyricum supplement (CBS) or receive a placebo as adjuvant therapy. Clinical efficacy and safety were assessed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE). Intestinal microbiota was longitudinally explored between CBS and placebo groups over time. Patients who took CBS had significantly decreased bacterial richness and abundance, as well as increased the total richness of the genus Clostridium, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus compared to the placebo group (p < 0.05). Beta diversity and the interactional network of intestinal microbiota were distinctly different between CBS and placebo group. However, there were no significant variations between them in terms of microbial taxonomical taxa and alpha diversity. The potential opportunistic pathogen Shewanella was still detectable after treatment in the placebo group, while no distinguishing microbial markers were found in the CBS group. In terms of clinical efficacy, the CBS group had a significantly reduced AE compare to the placebo group (p < 0.05), although no significantly longer PFS and OS. Therefore, favorable modifications in intestinal microbiota and significant improvements in drug safety make probiotics be promising adjunctive therapeutic avenues for lung cancer treatment.

Anlotinib Downregulates RGC32 Which Provoked by Bevacizumab

Background

Bevacizumab is the representative drug in antiangiogenic therapy for lung cancer. However, it induced resistance in some neoplasm. Anlotinib, a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has an inhibitory action on both angiogenesis and malignancy, is possible to reverse the resistance.

Methods

Transwell migration and invasion experiments of bevacizumab with or without anlotinib were conducted to verify the activated/inhibited ability of lung adenocarcinoma cells. We sequenced A549 cells with enhanced migration and invasion abilities after bevacizumab treatment, screened out the differentially expressed gene and further confirmed by western blot and q-PCR assays. We also investigated immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue in mice and human lung adenocarcinoma.

Results

Bevacizumab facilitated migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Differentially expressed gene RGC32 was screened out. Bevacizumab upregulated the expression of RGC32, N-cadherin, and MMP2 through ERK-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways. Anlotinib downregulated their expression and reversed the effect of bevacizumab on A549 cells. In vivo experiments confirmed that higher-dose bevacizumab facilitated metastasis in tumor-bearing nude mice and upregulated the expression of RGC32, N-cadherin, and MMP2, whereas anlotinib abrogated its effect. Expression of both RGC32 and N-cadherin positively correlated with lymph node metastasis and stage in lung adenocarcinoma was found. Survival analysis revealed that higher expressions of RGC32 and N-cadherin were associated with poor progression-free survival and overall survival.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab may promote invasion and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma cells by upregulating RGC32 through ERK-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition, whereas anlotinib reverses the effect. RGC32 and N-cadherin are independent prognostic factors in lung adenocarcinoma.

Metastasis prevention: targeting causes and roots

The spread of tumor cells from the primary focus, metastasis, is the main cause of cancer mortality. Therefore, anticancer therapy should be focused on the prevention of metastatic disease. Key targets can be conditions in the primary tumor that are favorable for the appearance of metastatic cells and the first steps of the metastatic cascade. Here, we discuss different approaches for targeting metastasis causes (hypoxia, metabolism changes, and tumor microenvironment) and roots (angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, and invasion). Also, we emphasize the challenges of the existing approaches for metastasis prevention and suggest opportunities to overcome them. In conclusion, we highlight the importance of clinical evaluation of the agents showing antimetastatic effects in vivo, especially in patients with early-stage cancers, the identification of metastatic seeds, and the development of therapeutics for their eradication.

First-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or bevacizumab has demonstrated a superior effect for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). There are still few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the differences between ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemotherapy) and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (Bev-chemotherapy) in first-line treatment of NS-NSCLC. We identified RCTs in databases and conference abstracts presented at international conferences by Sep 1, 2021. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using randomized effect consistency model to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR). The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Fifteen RCTs (17 articles) of 6561 advanced NS-NSCLC patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy, Bev-chemotherapy, or chemotherapy at first-line were eligible for analysis. NMA results showed that first-line ICI-chemotherapy prolonged OS (HR 0.79, 0.66-0.94) in patients with advanced NS-NSCLC compared with Bev-chemotherapy, while no differences were in PFS, ORR, and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (p > 0.05). Ranking plots suggested that ICI-chemotherapy had the most probability to offer the best OS (probability 0.993), PFS (probability 0.658), and ORR (probability 0.565), and Bev-chemotherapy had the most risks of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (probability 0.833). Therefore, our findings showed that first-line ICI-chemotherapy was associated with better OS than Bev-chemotherapy in patients with advanced NS-NSCLC, and more clinical trials are warranted to confirm these results.

Combined Immunotherapy with Chemotherapy versus Bevacizumab with Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Driver-Gene-Negative Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: A network meta-analysis was conducted to summarize randomized control trials and updated results to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of existing first-line therapies for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without known driver gene mutations. Patients and Methods: Eligible studies were identified following a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and the China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database from January 2000 to December 2021. Results: Nineteen trials involving 8176 patients with driver-gene-negative advanced non-squamous NSCLC were included. For patients with driver-gene-negative advanced NSCLC, immunotherapy + chemotherapy (IC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR), 0.80; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.67−0.95) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53−0.86) compared with bevacizumab + chemotherapy (BC), with a similar objective response rate and incidence of ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (risk ratios (RR), 0.98; 95% CI: 0.79−1.21/RR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.61−1.28; respectively) compared with BC. IC yielded a superior PFS rate (HR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.05−2.38) compared to BC in the subgroup of patients < 65 years old. Conclusions: Currently, IC is a more efficient first-line therapy for driver-gene-negative advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients, with prolonged PFS and OS, as well as a comparatively lower risk of ≥3 TRAEs compared to BC.

First-line chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors or bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK fusions

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy (Chemo) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or bevacizumab (Bev) in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK fusions. Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize relative treatment outcomes. Results: Chemo + ICIs is superior to Chemo + Bev in both overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.96) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97), with comparable severe adverse events. However, for patients with liver metastasis, Chemo + Bev has a 59.8% probability of providing better overall survival benefit. For specific regimens, pembrolizumab + Chemo showed an absolute advantage over other regimens. Conclusion: First-line Chemo + ICIs is superior to Chemo + Bev in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer except for patients with liver metastasis.

Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab

Background

BCD-021 is a bevacizumab biosimilar which was shown to be equivalent to reference bevacizumab in a wide panel of physicochemical studies as well as preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a first-line treatment of inoperable or advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with no previous treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 3:2 to BCD-021 or reference bevacizumab and were treated with bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin. Therapy continued for 6 cycles (every 3 weeks), until progression of the disease or unbearable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was the overall response rate. The study goal was to prove the equivalent efficacy of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab. Equivalence margins for 95% CI for the difference in the overall response rates were set at [-18%; 18%], for 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate were set at [67%; 150%].

Results

In total 357 patients were enrolled in the study, 212 in the BCD-021 group and 145 in the reference bevacizumab group. The ORR was 34.63% in the BCD-022 group and 33.82% in the reference bevacizumab group. Limits of 95% CI for the difference in overall response rates between the groups were [-9.47%; 11.09%]. Limits of 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate between the groups were [79.6%; 131.73%]. For both approaches CI lied within predetermined equivalence margins. Profile of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the groups (any AEs were reported in 86.89% of patients in BCD-021 group and 89.05% of patients in reference group). No unexpected adverse reactions were reported throughout the study. No statistically significant differences regarding anti-drug antibody occurrence rate was found between BCD-022 (n=4; 1.96%) and comparator (n=5; 3.65%). Both drug products showed low occurrence rate and short life of anti-bevacizumab antibodies. Pharmacokinetics assessment after 1^st and 6^th study drug injection also demonstrated equivalent PK parameters by all outcome measures.

Conclusions

Thus, the results of this study demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 and referent bevacizumab drug.

Trial registration

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Number NCT01763645, date of registration 09/01/2013).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7.

Impact of Targeted Therapy on the Survival of Patients With Advanced-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Oncosalud - AUNA

Background

Lung cancer is still a prevalent and fatal neoplasm in developing countries. In the last decades, chemotherapy (CHT) maintenance occupied an important role in the treatment, as well as targeted therapies. We aimed to evaluate the survival impact of targeted therapy in advanced lung cancer at a private Peruvian institution (Oncosalud - AUNA).

Methods

We reviewed retrospectively medical records of patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLS) (clinical stage III-IV) who received CHT and maintenance treatment with target therapy (TT) or CHT. The impact was assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons of survival curves were performed using log-rank or Breslow test and Cox model.

Results

The median age of the patients was 65 years. Clinical characteristics, as well as the treatment type, showed no significant difference between the two groups. The maintenance schedule in those receiving CHT was generally pemetrexed (70%) and in those receiving TT was erlotinib (60.7%). In patients receiving TT, the median PFS was 13 months compared to 7 months in those receiving CHT; likewise, the median OS was 45 and 17 months, respectively. The PFS and OS curves showed significant differences (P < .05), achieving a better survival in subjects treated with TT.

Conclusion

Progression-Free Survival and OS were superior in patients who received targeted therapy than those treated only with CHT, the 2 years rate of PFS and OS was nearly double to those who received only CHT-based treatments.

Phase 3 Trial of BI 695502 Plus Chemotherapy Versus Bevacizumab Reference Product Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC

Introduction

Biological therapies such as bevacizumab have improved survival in patients with NSCLC. This study was conducted to confirm the equivalent efficacy of the biosimilar candidate BI 695502 to the bevacizumab reference product (RP).

Methods

In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of adult patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC received up to 18 weeks of induction treatment with BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP 15 mg/kg plus paclitaxel and carboplatin. Subsequent maintenance therapy comprised BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the best overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 assessed by central imaging review, until 18 weeks after the start of treatment.

Results

In total, 671 patients were randomized at one-to-one ratio to BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP, of whom 335 and 328, respectively, received treatment. Of these, 228 (68.1%) and 256 (78.0%), respectively, proceeded to maintenance monotherapy. A manufacturing issue led to a small number of patients treated with BI 695502 switching to bevacizumab RP late in the study. The primary end point, best ORR, was 54.0% in the BI 695502 group and 63.1% in the bevacizumab RP group. The 90% confidence interval for the between-group ratio of best ORR (0.770 to 0.951) was within the prespecified range for equivalence (0.736–1.359). Adverse events were class-related and similar between the two treatment arms.

Conclusions

This study revealed equivalent ORR after 18 weeks of treatment with BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP, with similar adverse event profiles.

Phase I study of lurbinectedin in combination with weekly paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Lurbinectedin and paclitaxel showed synergism in preclinical studies and have non-completely overlapping toxicity profiles. This phase I trial evaluated a combination of paclitaxel and lurbinectedin with/without bevacizumab in advanced tumors. This trial was divided into Group A, which evaluated weekly paclitaxel (60 or 80 mg) plus lurbinectedin (3.0-5.0 mg flat dose [FD] or 2.2 mg/m²) every 3 weeks in advanced solid tumors; and Group B, which evaluated bevacizumab (BEV, 15 mg/kg) added to the recommended dose (RD) defined in Group A in advanced epithelial ovarian or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 67 patients (A, n = 55; B, n = 12) were treated. The RD was paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on Day (D)1,D8 plus lurbinectedin 2.2 mg/m² on D1. At this RD, myelotoxicity was reversible and manageable, and most non-hematological toxicities were mild/moderate. Adding BEV did not notably change tolerability. Twenty-five confirmed responses were observed: 20/51 evaluable patients in Group A (overall response rate [ORR] = 39% at all dose levels and at the RD), and 5/10 evaluable patients in Group B (ORR = 50%). Most responders had breast (n = 7/12 patients), small cell lung (SCLC) (n = 5/7), epithelial ovarian (n = 3/9) and endometrial cancer (n = 3/11) in Group A, and epithelial ovarian (n = 3/4) and NSCLC (n = 2/6) in Group B. Clinical benefit rate was 61% in Group A (58% at the RD), and 90% in Group B. No major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions were observed. Paclitaxel/lurbinectedin and paclitaxel/lurbinectedin/BEV are feasible combinations. Further development is warranted of paclitaxel/lurbinectedin in SCLC, breast, and endometrial cancer, and of paclitaxel/lurbinectedin/BEV in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Angiogenesis inhibition in lung cancer: emerging novel strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the current review, we will explore the molecular bases that have determined the design of clinical trials exploring the efficacy of antivascular agents in combination with chemotherapy, immune check point inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the synergistic effect of antivascular agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and EGFR-TKIs, despite no molecular marker has been identified yet to select patients.

SUMMARY

Lung cancer remains one of the first causes of cancer-related death. However, thanks to the development of stratified molecular medicine and the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, patients' survival has significantly improved. Due to the critical role of pro-angiogenic factors in cancer progression, antivascular agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) have been developed. Their efficacy has been explored in combination with chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with promising but not definitive conclusions about their impact on prolonging patients' survival.

Safety and efficacy of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (DCVAC/LuCa) combined with carboplatin/pemetrexed for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer without oncogenic drivers

Background

Our prospective, open-label, single-arm phase II study investigated the safety and efficacy of DCVAC/LuCa (dendritic cell vaccines for lung cancer) combined with standard carboplatin/pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous (nsq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

Eligible patients had stage IV nsq NSCLC without oncogenic drivers and had not received prior systemic cancer therapy. Treatment consisted of carboplatin/pemetrexed for up to 6 cycles followed by 21 cycles of pemetrexed maintenance or until progression or intolerance. Non-progression patients after two cycles of chemotherapy started to receive DCVAC/LuCa subcutaneously (s.c.) on day 15 of cycle 3, and thereafter q3w (day 15 of chemotherapy cycles) for up to 15 doses. Dosing of DCVAC/LuCa s.c. varied among patients depending on the baseline number of leucocytes but remained constant for each single patient. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Efficacy was measured by overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Sixty-one patients were enrolled. In the safety population (n = 60), eight patients (13.33%) had grade 3 or greater TRAEs, and six patients (10.0%) showed SAEs which were not related to leukapheresis or DC vaccination. Six grade 1 AEs were considered to be related to leukapheresis. No AESIs or DCVAC/LuCa-induced AEs were observed. The 2-year survival rate in the modified intention-to-treat population (n = 44) was 52.57%. Median OS was not reached. Median PFS was 8.0 months, median TTP was 10.2 months, and the ORR was 31.82%.

Conclusion

In treatment-naïve stage IV nsq NSCLC patients without oncogenic drivers, the combination of carboplatin/pemetrexed and DCVAC/LuCa was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Therefore, a study to prove our immunotherapeutic concept in a randomized phase III trial is planned.

•

We investigated the safety and efficacy of DCVAC/LuCa combined with standard carboplatin/pemetrexed in nsq NSCLC.

•

The combination therapy showed a favorable tolerability profile in a selected Chinese population.

•

The 2-year survival rate in the modified intention-to-treat population (n = 44) was 52.57%.

Safety and activity of alectinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study

Background

Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is highly effective in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and represents a standard first-line therapy. New strategies are needed, however, to delay resistance. We conducted a phase I/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of combining alectinib with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor.

Patients and methods

Patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled. The phase I portion employed a dose de-escalation strategy with alectinib and bevacizumab starting at the individual standard doses. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In phase II, the primary objective was to evaluate the safety of the combination at the RP2D; the secondary objective was to determine extracranial and intracranial efficacy.

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled between September 2015 and February 2020. Most patients (82%) had baseline brain metastases. Six patients (55%) were treatment-naive; five (46%) had received prior ALK TKIs (crizotinib, n = 3; ceritinib, n = 1; crizotinib then brigatinib, n = 1). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. RP2D was determined as alectinib 600 mg orally twice daily plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Three patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events: pneumonitis related to alectinib, proteinuria related to bevacizumab, and hypertension related to bevacizumab. Treatment-related intracranial hemorrhage was not observed. Six (100%) of six treatment-naive patients and three (60%) of five ALK TKI-pretreated patients had objective responses; median progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval, 9.0 months-not reached) and 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3 months-not reached), respectively. Intracranial responses occurred in four (100%) of four treatment-naive and three (60%) of five TKI-pretreated patients with baseline brain metastases. The study was stopped prematurely because of slow accrual.

Conclusions

Alectinib plus bevacizumab was well tolerated without unanticipated toxicities or dose-limiting toxicities.

•

Alectinib plus bevacizumab is safe in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer.

•

Bevacizumab combined with alectinib does not increase risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with brain metastases.

•

Enrollment challenges with this trial highlight important considerations for future studies of ALK inhibitor combinations.

A Real-World Analysis of Patients with Untreated Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving First-Line Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Combination Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The clinical features of patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line therapy based on erlotinib combined with bevacizumab are unclear. Here, we sought to analyze the clinical features of this patient group.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for the period from January 2015 to August 2019 for 49 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line erlotinib-and-bevacizumab combination therapy from the Linkou and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals.

RESULTS

The combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab showed an 83.7% objective response rate and a 97.9% disease control rate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 22.0 [95% CI (19.7-22.33)] and 47.6 [95% CI (38.87-56.37)] months, respectively, for all patients. The secondary EGFR-T790M mutation rate in the patients with acquired resistance to the combination was 72.4%. No predictive factor associated with the appearance of secondary EGFR-T790M mutations was found. The most frequent adverse event (AE) caused by the combination therapy was dermatitis (100%), and most of the AEs were manageable and grades 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib combined with bevacizumab is an effective and safe therapy for untreated metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. The combination does not alter secondary EGFR-T790M mutations in patients with acquired resistance and is feasible in real-world clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of MIL60 compared with bevacizumab in advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

We compared the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of MIL60 with reference bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in this phase 3, randomized, double-blind study.

METHODS

Patients with untreated advanced or recurrent NSCLC were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive either MIL60 or bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin. Patients with non-progressive disease continued maintenance single-agent MIL60 until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 12-week objective response rates (ORR12) by independent review committee (IRC) using RECIST 1.1. Bioequivalence was established if the ORR ratio located between 0.75 and 1/0.75. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03196986).

FINDINGS

Between Aug 23, 2017, and May 8, 2019, 517 patients were randomly assigned to MIL60 group (n=257) and bevacizumab group (n=260). In the full analysis set (FAS) population including all randomized and evaluable patients who received at least one dose of MIL60 or bevacizumab, the ORR12 in MIL60 group and bevacizumab group were 48.6% and 43.1%, respectively. The ORR ratio of these two groups were 1.14 (90% CI 0.97-1.33), which fell within the pre-specified equivalence boundaries (0.75-1/0.75). The median DOR was 5.7 months (95% CI 4.5-6.2) for MIL60 and 5.6 months (95% CI 4.3-6.4) for bevacizumab. No significant difference was noted in median PFS (7.2 vs. 8.1 months; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78-1.30, p=0.9606) and OS (19.3 vs. 16.3 months; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.02, p=0.0755). Safety and tolerability profiles were similar between the two groups. No patient detected positive for Anti-drug antibody (ADA).

INTERPRETATION

The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MIL60 were similar with bevacizumab, providing an alternative treatment option for advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC.

FUNDING

This study was sponsored by Betta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Pembrolizumab or Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Nonsquamous Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective: Pembrolizumab and bevacizumab both have antitumor activity. According to NCCN updated guideline the benefit of pembrolizumab or bevacizumab as a first line in management of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is documented in randomized controlled studies. The study aimed to evaluate the response and complications of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC who received cisplatin with pemetrexed combined with pembrolizumab (A group) or bevacizumab (B group) from 07/02/2018 to 07/03/2021 at Peking University Cancer Hospital. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: This study included 66 patients, 34 in A group and 32 in B group. There were no differences in median PFS (7.6 vs 9.9 months, P = .601). There were no differences in median OS (23.1 vs 24.2 months, P = .782). There were no differences in ORR (57.6% vs 41.9%, P = .211) and DCR (93.9% vs 100.0%, P = .164) between 2 groups. The occurrence of AEs was similar. No new safety signals were observed. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17 (50.0%) patients of A group and in 12 (37.5%) of B group (P > .05). Conclusion: The addition of pembrolizumab or bevacizumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin was well tolerated and resulted in a clinically meaningful treatment benefit in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. When pembrolizumab is not suitable, bevacizumab plus chemotherapy may be an option.

Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose:

This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O with reference bevacizumab (BEV), as first-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Patients and methods:

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MYL-1402O or bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel up to 18 weeks (6 cycles), followed by up to 24 weeks (8 cycles) of bevacizumab monotherapy. The primary objective was comparison of overall response rate (ORR), based on independently reviewed best tumor responses as assessed during the first 18 weeks. ORR was analyzed per US Food and Drug Administration (ratio of ORR) and European Medicines Agency (difference in ORRs) requirements for equivalence evaluation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, safety, and immunogenicity over a period of 42 weeks, and pharmacokinetics (up to 18 weeks).

Results:

A total of 671 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. The ratio of ORR was 0.96 [confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR was −1.6 (CI −9.0, 5.9) between treatment arms; CIs were within the predefined equivalence margins. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity was transient, with no notable differences between treatment arms (6.5% versus 4.8% ADA positivity rate in MYL-1402O versus BEV, respectively). The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower in the MYL-1402O arm (0.6%) compared to the bevacizumab arm (2.5%).

Conclusions:

MYL-1402O is therapeutically equivalent to bevacizumab, based on the ORR analyses, with comparable secondary endpoints.

Trial Registry Information

EU Clinical Trials Register, Registration # EudraCT no. 2015-005141-32https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-005141-32

Plain language summary

Previous studies established bioequivalence of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O to reference bevacizumab. In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, MYL-1402O (n = 337) demonstrated comparable efficacy to bevacizumab (n = 334) in treating advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer per Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency requirements for equivalence; the ratio of objective response rate (ORR) was 0.96 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 1.12] and the difference in ORR (MYL-1402O:bevacizumab) was −1.6 (95% CI −9.0, 5.9). Median progression-free survival at 42 weeks was comparable: 7.6 (7.0, 9.5) with MYL-1402O versus 9.0 (7.2, 9.7) months (p = 0.0906) with bevacizumab, by independent review. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death (2.4% vs 1.5%), serious adverse events (17.6% vs 16.7%), and antidrug antibodies (6.5% vs 4.8%), were comparable in the MYL-1402O vs bevacizumab arms, respectively. The incidence of neutralizing antibody post-baseline was lower with MYL-1402O (0.6%) than with bevacizumab (2.5%). These findings confirm therapeutic equivalence of MYL-1402O to bevacizumab, providing opportunities for improving access to bevacizumab.

Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapeutic Molecules as Single and Multiple Agents in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) Patients

Background and Objectives: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) makes up 85% of all lung cancer cases and the majority of patients are diagnosed when the cancer is advanced. Over the years, many anticancer drugs have been designed and introduced into the market to treat patients with advanced NSCLC. This review aims to discuss the comparative therapeutic benefits of conventional chemotherapeutics and other drugs available for treating advanced NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A literature search for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC was carried out on PubMed and Google Scholar. Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival were chosen as target endpoints. Results: Monotherapy showed lower treatment endpoints compared to combination therapy. Different combinations of platinum-based doublets demonstrated similar efficacies in treating NSCLC. However, pemetrexed-platinum doublets showed significantly better treatment endpoint in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Most studies showing the best complete response rate (CRR) utilized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), while most studies producing the best overall survival included programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in their treatment regimens. Conclusions: The findings of this review indicate that targeted therapy using specific inhibitors is now the most promising first-line anticancer treatment available in the market. However, chemotherapy is still effective in treating advanced NSCLC and is viable as a first-line treatment.

Non-small cell lung cancer: Emerging molecular targeted and immunotherapeutic agents

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the most common and fatal type of primary lung malignancies. NSCLC is often diagnosed at later stages and requires systemic therapies. Despite recent advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted molecular therapies the outcomes of NSCLC remain disproportionately poor. Immunotherapy is a rapidly developing area in NSCLC management and presents opportunities for potential improvements in clinical outcomes. Indeed, different immunotherapeutics have been approved for clinical use in various settings for NSCLC. Their promise is especially poignant in light of improved survival and quality of life outcomes. Herein, we comprehensively review emerging NSCLC therapeutics. We discuss the limitations of such strategies and summarize the present status of various immunotherapeutic agents in key patient populations. We also examine the data from ongoing studies in immunotherapy and consider future areas of study, including novel inhibition targets, therapeutic vaccination, tumor genome modification, and improvements to drug delivery systems.

VEGF and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Prevention of Brain Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in preventing the development of brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2020. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with systemic cancer that reported the incidence of BMs treated with and without VEGF inhibitors, as well as observational studies of adults with systemic cancer that reported the incidence of BMs treated with and without ICIs (no RCTs addressed the ICI question). Pooled relative risks (RR) were computed with a binary random-effects model.

RESULTS

A search for VEGF and incidence of new BMs revealed 7 studies (6,212 patients with breast, colon, and non-small-cell lung cancer). Meta-analysis showed a lower incidence of new BMs compared to control (RR 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.89, p = 0.003). A search for ICIs and incidence of new BMs yielded 8 studies (732 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer or metastatic melanoma) in which ICIs were used as an adjunct to radiosurgery. Meta-analysis showed a lower incidence of out-of-treatment-field BMs with ICIs compared to controls at 1 year (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, p = 0.005). The overall Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations score for the evidence evaluating the role of bevacizumab and ICIs was high and moderate, respectively.

DISCUSSION

VEGF and ICIs may have a role in prophylaxis against BM in patients with solid tumors.

Bevacizumab promotes active biological behaviors of human umbilical vein endothelial cells by activating TGFβ1 pathways off-VEGF signaling

Objective: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with clear clinical benefits. However, overall survival of some cancer types remains low owing to resistance to bevacizumab therapy. While resistance is commonly ascribed to tumor cell invasion induced by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), less attention has been paid to the potential involvement of endothelial cells (ECs) in vasculature activated by anti-angiogenic drugs.

Methods: Human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs), bEnd.3 cells, and mouse retinal microvascular ECs (MRMECs) were treated with bevacizumab under conditions of hypoxia and effects on biological behaviors, such as migration and tube formation, examined. Regulatory effects on TGFβ1 and CD105 (endoglin) were established via determination of protein and mRNA levels. We further investigated whether the effects of bevacizumab could be reversed using the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib.

Results: Bevacizumab upregulated TGFβ1 as well as CD105, a component of the TGFβ receptor complex and an angiogenesis promoter. Elevated CD105 induced activation of Smad1/5, the inflammatory pathway and endothelial–mesenchymal transition. The migration ability of HUVECs was enhanced by bevacizumab under hypoxia. Upregulation of CD105 was abrogated by anlotinib, which targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases including VEGFR2/3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRα/β, C-Kit, and RET.

Conclusions: Bevacizumab promotes migration and tube formation of HUVECs via activation of the TGFβ1 pathway and upregulation of CD105 expression. Anlotinib reverses the effects of bevacizumab by inhibiting the above signals.

Phase I Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Dilpacimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Dilpacimab (formerly ABT-165), a novel dual-variable domain immunoglobulin, targets both delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) and VEGF pathways. Here, we present safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and preliminary efficacy data from a phase I study (trial registration ID: NCT01946074) of dilpacimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients (≥18 years) received dilpacimab intravenously on days 1 and 15 in 28-day cycles at escalating dose levels (range, 1.25-7.5 mg/kg) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. As of August 2018, 55 patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the dilpacimab monotherapy dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) included hypertension (60.0%), headache (30.9%), and fatigue (21.8%). A TRAE of special interest was gastrointestinal perforation, occurring in 2 patients (3.6%; 1 with ovarian and 1 with prostate cancer) and resulting in 1 death. The PK of dilpacimab showed a half-life ranging from 4.9 to 9.5 days, and biomarker analysis demonstrated that the drug bound to both VEGF and DLL4 targets. The recommended phase II dose for dilpacimab monotherapy was established as 3.75 mg/kg, primarily on the basis of tolerability through multiple cycles. A partial response was achieved in 10.9% of patients (including 4 of 16 patients with ovarian cancer). The remaining patients had either stable disease (52.7%), progressive disease (23.6%), or were deemed unevaluable (12.7%). These results demonstrate that dilpacimab monotherapy has an acceptable safety profile, with clinical activity observed in patients with advanced solid tumors.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

Bevacizumab was currently available for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSqNSCLC) patients and has been studied in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for treatment of these patients. This meta-analysis summarizes the most up-to-date evidences regarding the effects and adverse reactions of bevacizumab in the treatment of NSqNSCLC patients.

Methods

The authors searched for RCTs from electronic database including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Experimental arm was defined as the bevacizumab-containing group and the control arm as the bevacizumab-free group. Data of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions were synthetically extracted. A protocol for this meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

Results

Ten RCTs that involved a total of 3134 patients were included. The experimental group was associated with significant superior ORR (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.14, P < 0.001), OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, P < 0.001), and prolonged PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.74, P < 0.001) compared to the control. No significant difference was observed regarding DCR (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.30, P = 0.08). The experimental group showed higher rate of hypertension (RR 6.91, 95% CI 4.62 to 10.35, P < 0.00001) and hemorrhagic events (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.78 to 5.30, P < 0.0001) than the control group. The experimental group showed lower rate of anemia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96, P = 0.02) than the control group. No significant difference was observed regarding treatment-related adverse event grade 3-5 (TRAE3-5) (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.53, P = 0.06), thrombocytopenia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.33, P = 0.29), and neutropenia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.40, P = 0.36).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that bevacizumab could increase ORR, OS, and prolonged PFS for treatment of NSqNSCLC patients. However, no significant improvement in DCR was observed and bevacizumab could increase the rate of hypertension and hemorrhagic events. Bevacizumab was an acceptable option for NSqNSCLC patients. This trial is registered with PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021226790.

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib in Chinese patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC (ARTEMIS-CTONG1509): A multicenter phase 3 study

Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways may delay therapeutic resistance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 3 study investigated the efficacy and safety of an erlotinib plus bevacizumab regimen in untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. In total, 311 patients received bevacizumab plus erlotinib (n = 157) or erlotinib only (n = 154). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.2-19.9) for bevacizumab plus erlotinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.7-13.8) for erlotinib only (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73; p < 0.001). A brain metastases subgroup treated with bevacizumab plus erlotinib also showed improved PFS (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84; p = 0.008). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 86 (54.8%) and 40 (26.1%) patients, respectively. Bevacizumab plus erlotinib significantly improved PFS in patients with untreated metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, including those with brain metastases at baseline.

A Long-Term Extension Study of Bevacizumab in Patients With Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab has been studied in numerous clinical trials in multiple types of cancer; however, patients may receive bevacizumab over an extended period of time. This study assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of bevacizumab among patients with solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients enrolled in a Roche/Genentech-sponsored trial who had derived benefit from bevacizumab therapy as monotherapy or in combination with anticancer drugs were eligible for continuation of bevacizumab in this long-term extension (LTE) study. The primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) grade ≥3 related to bevacizumab treatment, serious AEs (SAEs), and deaths.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with the following cancer types were enrolled in the LTE: ovarian cancer or peritoneal carcinoma (n = 41), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 16), glioblastoma multiforme (n = 14), breast cancer (n = 11), colorectal cancer (n = 7), or renal cell carcinoma (n = 6). The median (range) duration of bevacizumab treatment was 15.6 (0.0-81.0) months during the LTE and 57.5 (16.4-134.9) months overall (parent trial + LTE), with three patients receiving bevacizumab for >10 years. Overall, 17 patients (17.9%) experienced SAEs, and 21 (22.1%) had a bevacizumab-related AE of CTCAE grade ≥3 (proteinuria and hypertension were the most common). Four patients died: three from disease progression and one from an AE considered unrelated to bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

The safety outcomes observed support the tolerability of long-term bevacizumab in patients with various solid tumors, with a median extended treatment duration of almost 5 years overall and >10 years in some individual patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01588184.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In this long-term extension study of patients with solid tumors, the median duration of bevacizumab treatment (including parent trials) was just under 5 years, with a long-term exposure in some patients of 7 to >10 years. Grade ≥3 adverse events related to bevacizumab were consistent with the established safety profile, with proteinuria and hypertension being the most common. Patients received bevacizumab over an extended period of time (beyond the length of most clinical trials), and the overall safety outcomes observed support the tolerability of long-term bevacizumab treatment in patients with solid tumors, with clinical benefit achieved over an extended period.

Rapidly Progressive Lung Sarcomatoid Carcinoma Managed with Doxorubicin Plus Ifosfamide and Pemetrexed

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It carries a poor prognosis, even among other subtypes of NSCLC. Currently, most treatment strategies for PSC are derived from regimens aimed at managing soft tissue sarcomas or NSCLC. The use of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide and pemetrexed has been well established in the management of soft tissue carcinoma and other nonsmall-cell lung cancers, respectively. We report the case of a 69-year-old male diagnosed with PSC who was managed with doxorubicin plus ifosfamide and pemetrexed therapy. Our patient initially responded to the therapy but had rapid progression and died 8 months after the initiation of treatment. Upon genetic analysis, it was revealed the patient had overexpression of the MDM2 protein, which has been associated with poor response to therapy. This case highlights the need for a personalized treatment approach, as well as the need for a standardized treatment regimen for managing PSC.