Salvage radiotherapy in patients with recurrent or refractory primary or secondary central nervous system lymphoma after methotrexate-based chemotherapy

Prevention and management of secondary central nervous system lymphoma

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (SCNSL) is defined by the involvement of the CNS, either at the time of initial diagnosis of systemic lymphoma or in the setting of relapse, and can be either isolated or with synchronous systemic disease. The risk of CNS involvement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is approximately 5%; however, certain clinical and biological features have been associated with a risk of up to 15%. There has been growing interest in improving the definition of patients at increased risk of CNS relapse, as well as identifying effective prophylactic strategies to prevent it. SCNSL often occurs within months of the initial diagnosis of lymphoma, suggesting the presence of occult disease at diagnosis in many cases. The differing presentations of SCNSL create the therapeutic challenge of controlling both the systemic disease and the CNS disease, which uniquely requires agents that penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Outcomes are generally poor with a median overall survival of approximately 6 months in retrospective series, particularly in those patients presenting with SCNSL after prior therapy. Prospective studies of intensive chemotherapy regimens containing high-dose methotrexate, followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have shown the most favorable outcomes, especially for patients receiving thiotepa-based conditioning regimens. However, a proportion of patients will not respond to induction therapies or will subsequently relapse, indicating the need for more effective treatment strategies. In this review we focus on the identification of high-risk patients, prophylactic strategies and recent treatment approaches for SCNSL. The incorporation of novel agents in immunochemotherapy deserves further study in prospective trials.

Efficacy and toxicity with radiation field designs and concurrent temozolomide for CNS lymphoma

Background

There is no consensus on the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma refractory to first-line methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is sometimes used but may result in unacceptable neurocognitive dysfunction. We examined the efficacy and toxicities of WBRT with or without concurrent temozolomide in CNS lymphoma treatment.

Methods

This single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study included adults with CNS lymphoma who received WBRT, either consolidative low-dose WBRT alone or low-dose WBRT with a focal boost to residual disease and were previously treated with high-dose methotrexate. The relationships between the WBRT regimen, concurrent temozolomide, and clinical outcomes and toxicities were assessed using proportional hazards and logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 45 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 24–74) treated from 2004 to 2019 were included. In total, 20 patients received concurrent temozolomide. In the WBRT + Boost cohort (n = 32), concurrent temozolomide resulted in better 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) (73% OS and 66% PFS) compared to patients treated without concurrent temozolomide (44% OS and 24% PFS). On multivariate analysis, concurrent temozolomide was associated with significantly better PFS (HR 0.28, P = .02). There were no significant differences between the two radiation groups or between those treated with or without concurrent temozolomide, with respect to significant acute hematologic, non-hematologic, and long-term neurocognitive toxicities (P > .05).

Conclusions

In this study, concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy in CNS lymphoma was associated with better PFS and was well tolerated. Low-dose WBRT with a boost is a safe and reasonable treatment approach for focal refractory disease. Prospective research that includes rigorous neurocognitive assessments is now warranted.

Revisiting the concept of recurrence of primary CNS lymphomas after complete response to methotrexate-based therapy: Periventricular reseeding as the predominant mechanism of recurrence

Purpose

Understanding patterns of relapse for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) may inform mechanisms of recurrence and optimal consolidation strategies. In this study, we report patterns of relapse among patients with PCNSL who achieved a complete response to high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy with or without consolidation radiation therapy (RT).

Methods and Materials

We conducted an institutional retrospective analysis of patients with PCNSL who received HD-MTX-based chemotherapy between November 2001 and May 2019. Relapses were characterized as in-field (within original T1 contrasted lesion), marginal (within T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery but not T1), local (in-field or marginal), distant brain (no overlap), or distant (distant brain, cerebrospinal fluid, vitreous or extra-axial) and further characterized with respect to periventricular location (≤10 mm of ventricles).

Results

Seventy-eight patients with PCNSL met inclusion criteria, of whom 29 (37%) underwent consolidation RT. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 57.0 and 66.7 months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 38.9 months, a total of 32 patients (41%) experienced recurrence. Most patients (21 [65.6%]) had a periventricular failure. Surprisingly, local recurrences (n = 11) were exclusively observed within periventricular lesions, whereas distant recurrences (n = 21) were seen in both periventricular and nonperiventricular locations (P = .009). The median time to progression was shorter for locally recurrent lesions compared with distant recurrences (13.8 vs 26.1 months; P = .03).

Conclusions

After complete response to HD-MTX, few failures occurred within initial T1 contrast-enhancing lesions and many of these may have been alternatively classified as periventricular failures. These observations argue against the use of purely focal RT consolidation for patients who achieve a complete response after HD-MTX-based chemotherapy and suggest that periventricular reseeding may have a central role in PCNSL recurrence.

Use of rituximab, temozolomide, and radiation in recurrent and refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma in the Philippines: a retrospective analysis

Background

Refractory disease in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) may occur despite adequate initial treatment. There is currently no standard of care for relapsed and recurrent PCSNL. No study to date documents using a combined regimen of radiotherapy, temozolomide, and rituximab. This study aimed to present the clinical course and outcomes of patients with recurrent or refractory disease who were given a combination of radiation, temozolomide, and rituximab.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was employed to evaluate data from recurrent or refractory PCNSL patients who were treated with radiation, temozolomide, and rituximab in two tertiary hospitals in the Philippines. Baseline demographics, treatment regimen, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Fifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included, 11 with refractory disease and 4 with recurrent disease. Patients with bulky disease received either whole brain radiotherapy or partial field radiotherapy with rituximab and temozolomide given during radiation and for 6 months after radiation. Overall response rate to salvage therapy was 93.3% (14/15). Median overall survival from initial diagnosis was not reached (median follow-up: 84 months). Mortality rate was 33.3% (5/15), but only 2 out of 5 mortalities were from disease progression. There were only two reported cases of mild allergic reactions to rituximab, which did not result in treatment interruption.

Conclusion

Rituximab, temozolomide, and radiotherapy can be considered as an effective and safe salvage therapy for relapsed and recurrent central nervous system lymphoma.

Selective salvage radiotherapy could provide favorable outcomes in patients with refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

To date, there is no relevant data supporting the role of salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in patients with refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Herein, we aimed to investigate the impact of sRT in patients with refractory or relapsed PCNSL following upfront HD-MTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 89 patients who had refractory (n = 16) or recurrent disease after an initial favorable response (n = 73); among them, 41 were treated with sRT and 48 were treated without sRT (nRT). Event-free survival (rEFS) and overall survival (rOS) after first recurrence were considered from the date of recurrence to date of each event.

RESULTS

Overall, the first failure was diagnosed at a median of 11.0 months [interquartile range (IQR), 5.6-26.4] after first treatment. More than half of the patients had recurrent disease involving initial tumor bed (n = 47), deep structure (n = 67), and multiple lesions (n = 58). Among 19 patients who were initially treated with 23.4 Gy of whole brain RT, 10 patients received sRT as a re-irradiation; other 31 patients in sRT group were RT naïve patients. There was no significant difference in tumor characteristics between sRT and nRT group. Overall and complete response after salvage treatment were 80% and 48%, respectively; sRT provided higher overall response rate than nRT (93% vs. 69%, p = 0.011). With a median follow-up of 14.3 months (IQR, 7.9-31.4), 2-year rEFS and rOS rates were 27% and 57%, respectively. There were no differences in rEFS and rOS according to sRT (sRT vs. nRT, 26% vs. 28%, p = 0.730; 63% vs. 50%, p = 0.690). Poor performance, recurrence interval < 8 months, and unfavorable response following salvage treatment were associated with inferior rEFS and rOS. Additionally, sRT and stem cell transplantation improved response rate independently after multivariate analysis for complete/partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

We found favorable response rate and comparable survival outcomes following sRT compared with non-local treatments for patients with refractory/relapsed PCNSL. Further studies of patient selection could stratify patients who can benefit from sRT.

Role of 23.4 Gy upfront whole-brain radiation therapy following high-dose methotrexate for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparative analysis of whole-brain radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the role of upfront whole-brain radiation therapy (RT), with a reduced dose of 23.4 Gy, following high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 185 patients with PCNSL treated with HD-MTX between January 2013 and January 2020; 145 patients underwent no RT and 40 patients underwent upfront RT. Using propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for clinical factors, 40 patients were selected from each treatment group. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between treatment groups.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients in the upfront RT group were younger, had higher LDH levels, received less frequent rituximab and stem cell transplantation than those in the no-RT group. Patients in the upfront RT group also showed a lower response rate after initial HD-MTX than those in the no-RT group (73% vs. 88%, p = 0.038). The median follow-up was 25.1 (interquartile range 13.7-43.0) months. Comparable 2-year EFS and OS rates were observed between the upfront RT and no-RT groups (56.6% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.170; and 81.7% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.097, respectively). Upfront RT was related to improved EFS and OS in patients with stable disease or progressive disease after HD-MTX, but not in patients with complete or partial response after HD-MTX. Upfront RT was also an independent predictor of EFS and OS in the PSM cohort. The cumulative incidences of treatment-related neurotoxicity at 3 years were 20.2% and 21.2% in the upfront RT and no-RT groups, respectively (p = 0.630).

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront RT with a reduced dose of 23.4 Gy, showed favorable outcomes in patients with stable disease or progressive disease after initial HD-MTX. In addition, upfront RT appears to be an effective treatment for PCNSL when rituximab or stem cell transplantation is not feasible.

Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib in Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A PRISMA-Compliant Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Background

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is an aggressive lymphoma. Studies investigating primary CNSL determined that the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) played an important role in pathogenesis. Ibrutinib, an oral BTK inhibitor, is a new treatment strategy for CNSL. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to clarify the effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in the treatment of CNSL.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted through to 31 October 2019. Studies involving patients with CNSL who received ibrutinib that reported the overall response (OR), complete remission (CR), and partial response (PR) were included. The random-effects or fixed-effects model with double arcsine transformation was used for the pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for all outcomes.

Results

Eight studies including 162 patients were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR rate after treatment with ibrutinib was 69% (95% CI, 61-79%, I² = 47.57%, p = 0.06), while the pooled CR and PR was 52% (95% CI, 35-68%, I² = 74.95%, p = 0.00) and 17% (95% CI, 7-30%, I² = 67.85%, p = 0.00), respectively. Among PCNSL patients, including new diagnoses PCNSL and R/R PCNSL, the pooled OR rate was 72% (95% CI, 63-80%, I² = 49.20%, p = 0.06) while the pooled CR and PR rates were 53% (95% CI, 33-73%, I² = 75.04%, p = 0.00) and 22% (95% CI, 14-30%, I² = 46.30%, p = 0.07), respectively. Common adverse events above grade 3 included cytopenia and infections.

Conclusions

The ibrutinib-containing therapy was well tolerated and offered incremental benefit to patients with CNSL. However, randomized-controlled studies that directly compare efficacy and adverse events of ibrutinib are still needed.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020218974.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Recent improvements in chemoimmunotherapies, targeted agents, hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and cellular therapies have revolutionized treatment paradigms for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Even in the relapsed or refractory setting, contemporary treatment options are delivered with curative intent and can lead to lasting remissions. Although such therapies have improved overall outcomes, they have increasingly led to a wide variety of presentations of recurrent tumors in need of palliation. Here, we review the use of radiotherapy (RT) in the palliation of DLBCL. We draw particular attention to the evolving role for hypofractionated RT and low-dose RT for DLBCL. We review the available literature on these topics and focus on commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

High-dose methotrexate monotherapy for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: 15-year multicenter experience

AIM

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is rare disease and shows poor prognosis although methotrexate-based chemotherapy is used. Here, we present our experiences with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) monotherapy for immunocompetent patients with PCNSL at three institutions and investigate factors related to survival.

METHODS

PCNSL patients, who were histologically confirmed with diffuse large B cells and treated with HD-MTX monotherapy from 2001 to 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent induction chemotherapy with 8 g/m² of MTX every 10 days (maximum three cycles). Maintenance chemotherapy of 3.5 g/m² of MTX (maximum six cycles) was selectively performed depending on the response to induction chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were included. Although seven patients discontinued induction chemotherapy because of MTX toxicity, 40 (59.7%) patients showed a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy. Twenty-six (38.8%) and three (4.5%) patients showed a CR and partial response, respectively, after maintenance chemotherapy. Forty-one patients with recurrence or progression following HD-MTX underwent second-line treatment. Progression-free survival rates were 43% and 24% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median overall survival was 40.3 months. In a multivariate analysis, a radiological CR to induction chemotherapy was a significant factor related to prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MTX-monotherapy is tolerable in terms of adverse effects and still considered as a treatment option in patients with PCNSL. However, an additional therapeutic option should be prepared for non-CR responders to induction chemotherapy.

Consolidative or palliative whole brain radiation for secondary CNS diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma

We analyzed 25 patients receiving whole brain radiation (WBRT) for secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL), grouped by consolidative intent (after complete/partial response, n = 13) vs. palliative intent (initial CNS treatment, primary refractory disease, or CNS progression, n = 12). Median WBRT dose for the consolidative and palliative cohorts were 24 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively. For 13 patients receiving consolidative WBRT, median OS was 24 months from WBRT and 2-year OS was 64%. Three patients had CNS relapse at 2, 9, and 24 months after consolidative WBRT. For 12 patients receiving palliative WBRT, median OS was 3 months from WBRT and two-year OS was 8%. All 10 patients with neurologic symptoms had documented improvement. In conclusion, consolidative WBRT after chemotherapy response led to reasonable long-term survival and may be an effective strategy for SCNSL, especially transplant-ineligible patients and/or isolated CNS recurrence. Palliative WBRT effectively improved neurologic symptoms, but survival was usually only months.

Pemetrexed in Recurrent or Progressive Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Phase I Multicenter Clinical Trial

LESSONS LEARNED

The findings from this study using monotherapy with pemetrexed in a pretreated patient population are, overall, encouraging. Unlike high-dose methotrexate, which requires several days of inpatient hospitalization, pemetrexed is relatively easy to administer in the outpatient setting and remains a viable treatment option in this patient population. The maximum tolerated dose of pemetrexed administered (900 mg/m² every 2 weeks) was generally well tolerated and showed activity in patients with relapsed or refractory CNSL.

BACKGROUND

There is currently no standard salvage treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (CNSL). We report the results of a phase I study of pemetrexed, an antifolate drug with broader activity than methotrexate (MTX). We provide the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed in patients with recurrent CNSL.

METHODS

Through October 2015, 17 patients with relapsed/refractory CNSL received pemetrexed every 2 weeks with the first cohort receiving 600 mg/m² and dose escalation in increments of 300 mg/m² to a maximum of 1,200 mg/m² . Three patients were to enroll at each dose level with expansion to six patients in the event of dose-limiting toxicity. Patients with both primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) could be enrolled.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were evaluable with a median age of 63.7 years. Main adverse events included fatigue (82.4%), anemia (82.4%), and neutropenia (70.6%). The MTD was established at 900 mg/m² . Dose-limiting toxicities were recorded in one patient in the 600 mg/m² cohort and in two patients in the 1,200 mg/m² cohort. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response assessment; 21.4% achieved a complete response, 35.7% had a partial response, 14.3% had stable disease, and 28.6% had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months. The median overall survival was 44.5 months. In the original study protocol, the plan was to add an expansion cohort of six patients at MTD level. However, the first phase of the study was characterized by slow recruitment. Therefore, after achieving the primary objective of the study and establishing the MTD, the investigators decided to amend the protocol and to close the study.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed administered at 900 mg/m² every 2 weeks exhibits single-agent activity in patients with recurrent CNSL; it is well tolerated, and side effects are manageable.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Guidelines from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group

Approximately 30% to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will have either primary refractory disease or relapse after chemotherapy. In transplant-eligible patients, those with disease sensitive to salvage chemotherapy will significantly benefit from high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. The rationale for considering radiation therapy (RT) for selected patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL as a part of the salvage program is based on data regarding the patterns of relapse and retrospective series showing improved local control and clinical outcomes for patients who received peritransplant RT. In transplant-ineligible patients, RT can provide effective palliation and, in selected cases, be administered with curative intent if the relapsed/refractory disease is localized. We have reviewed the indications for RT in the setting of relapsed/refractory DLBCL and provided recommendations regarding the optimal timing of RT, dose fractionation scheme, and treatment volume in the context of specific case scenarios.

Radiation Therapy as an Effective Salvage Strategy for Secondary CNS Lymphoma

PURPOSE

We assessed the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) in the management of secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The cohort comprised 44 patients with systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) secondarily involving the brain and/or leptomeninges at initial diagnosis or relapse that was treated with RT.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 29 (66%) were in systemic remission when CNS disease was diagnosed. The overall response rate to RT by magnetic resonance imaging was 88% (42% complete, 46% partial). The median overall survival (OS) after RT initiation was 7 months (95% confidence interval 4-10 months). The OS curve plateaued at 31% from 2 to 8 years. OS was superior in patients who achieved a complete or partial response to RT, underwent stem cell transplantation after RT, and had brain parenchymal (vs leptomeningeal) disease. Eight cases of CNS disease progression occurred after RT: 1 involved the brain parenchyma, and 7 involved the spine and/or cerebrospinal fluid and/or meninges.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that RT is associated with high response rates and may contribute to long-term OS. In addition, RT may provide CNS disease control that facilitates successful salvage with stem cell transplantation in patients with chemotherapy-refractory disease.

Primary CNS lymphoma at first relapse/progression: characteristics, management, and outcome of 256 patients from the French LOC network

BACKGROUND

Treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is poorly defined, because randomized trials and large studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics, management, and outcome of R/R PCNSL patients after first-line therapy in a nationwide cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed R/R PCNSL patients following first-line treatment who had been prospectively registered in the database of the French network for oculocerebral lymphoma (LOC) between 2011 and 2014.

RESULTS

Among 563 PCNSL patients treated with first-line therapy, we identified 256 with relapsed (n = 93, 16.5%) or refractory (n = 163, 29.0%) disease. Patients who were asymptomatic at relapse/progression (25.5%), mostly diagnosed on routine follow-up neuroimaging, tended to have a better outcome. Patients who received salvage therapy followed by consolidation (mostly intensive chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [ICT + AHSCT]) experienced prolonged survival compared with those who did not receive salvage or consolidation therapy. Independent prognostic factors at first relapse/progression were: KPS ≥ 70 vs KPS < 70), sensitivity to first-line therapy (relapsed vs refractory disease), duration of first remission (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥1 y vs <1 y), and management at relapse/progression (palliative care vs salvage therapy). Patients who relapsed early after first-line therapy (ie, PFS < 1 y) had a poor outcome, comparable to that of refractory patients. Conversely, patients experiencing late relapses (PFS ≥ 1 y) and/or undergoing consolidation with ICT + AHSCT experienced prolonged survival.

CONCLUSIONS

About a third of PCNSL patients are primary refractory to first line treatment. We identified several independent prognostic factors that can guide the management of R/R PCNSL patients.

Clinically important variants of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

It has become clear that diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is not a uniform antibody. Several recognizable variants have clinically distinct features and, frequently, require specific treatment approaches. Recognition of these variants and utilization of the appropriate treatments will improve the outcome for the patients.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapies for primary CNS lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) constitutes a rare group of extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) primarily of B cell origin. It occurs in both immuno-competent and immune-compromised patients. High dose m ethotrexate (HD-MTX) based chemotherapy is the standard therapy. Chemotherapy with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) improves response rates and survival compared with WBRT alone. However, due to the increased risk for neurotoxicity with WBRT, recent studies have focused on using chemotherapy alone. Methotrexate based multi-agent chemotherapy without WBRT is associated with similar t reatment rates and survival compared with regimens that include WBRT although controlled trials have not been performed. Because of the low incidence of this disease, it is difficult to conduct randomized controlled trials. In this article we have discussed about the past, present and emerging treatment options in patients with PCNSL.

My treatment approach to patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

My favored treatment approach for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma continues to evolve. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can now be cured in more than 50% of patients. This is a result of improved definitions of the disease, improved diagnostic capabilities, better staging and restaging techniques, a useful prognostic index to guide therapeutic decisions, and the development of increasingly effective therapies. Positron emission tomographic scans have improved the accuracy of both staging and restaging. Findings on a positron emission tomographic scan at the end of therapy are the best predictors of a good treatment outcome. Numerous subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma have been identified that require specific treatment approaches. For example, plasmablastic lymphoma typically lacks CD20 and does not benefit from treatment with rituximab. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma originating in specific extranodal sites such as the central nervous system, testes, and skin presents special problems and requires specific treatment approaches. A subgroup of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a very high proliferative rate seems to have a poor outcome when treated with CHOP-R and does better with regimens used for patients with Burkitt lymphoma. New insights into the biology of these disorders are likely to further change treatment approaches. Recognition that diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is not one disease, but a variety of clinicopathologic syndromes provides the opportunity to further improve our ability to benefit patients.